Science SPACEX "Starship" explodes shortly after launch

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

SPACEX​

"Starship" explodes shortly after launch​

The unmanned "Starship" giant rocket of the US space company SpaceX has exploded during its first test flight. The largest and most powerful rocket ever built took off on Thursday from the SpaceX spaceport Starbase in Boca Chica in the US state of Texas. However, just over three minutes after launch, the rocket detonated, live footage showed.​
Online since today, 3:41 p.m. (Update: 3:57 p.m.)

At that point, the first booster stage called "Super Heavy" should have separated from the "Starship" space shuttle. SpaceX spoke on Twitter of a "rapid unplanned breakup prior to stage separation." "Teams will continue to evaluate data and work toward our next flight test," tech billionaire Elon Musk's company added. The launch was delayed by a few minutes: the countdown had been briefly interrupted to check some more details. Afterwards, the launch was released after all. Actually, the "Starship" of the private space company SpaceX of tech billionaire Elon Musk should have already taken off on Monday for a first short test flight. But that was postponed shortly before the planned launch because of a problem with a valve.

Enormous setback
The "Starship" rocket system - consisting of the roughly 70-meter-long "Super Heavy" booster and the roughly 50-meter-long upper stage, also called "Starship" - is intended to enable manned missions to the moon and Mars in the future. The "Starship" system is in itself designed so that the spacecraft and rocket can be reused after returning to Earth. The explosion, however, is an enormous setback for the initiative. The U.S. space agency NASA has selected "Starship" to fly humans to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years in the Artemis 3 mission at the end of 2025. Even flights to Mars should be possible with the rocket.

First attempt briefly halted
The launch of the 120-meter-high rocket from SpaceX's Starbase spaceport in Boca Chica was stopped on Monday less than ten minutes before the planned ignition. As a kind of dress rehearsal, however, the countdown continued until ten seconds before the originally planned launch time. The reason given for the abort was a technical problem with the pressure equalization on the most powerful space rocket ever built. Musk wrote on Twitter, apparently a valve had frozen. However, he said SpaceX had "learned a lot" from the launch attempt. It was only in February that almost all of the rocket's first stage engines had successfully ignited for the first time during a test in Boca Chica. Musk then declared that the 31 engines ignited in the test were "enough to reach orbit".

Explosion after first landing
Apart from the size and the associated possibility of transporting large loads, the reusability of all rocket components pursued by SpaceX is another central element of the "Starship" program. The declared goal is to significantly reduce the cost of operating spacecraft. SpaceX reported the first successful landing of a prototype in May 2021. Shortly thereafter, the explosion of the rocket made headlines. It was the third explosion within a few months - yet Musk remained convinced that the "Starship" rocket would soon be "safe enough" to transport people.

Youtube Video

Private moon orbit with billionaire and artists
Since last year, SpaceX has been trying to launch its spacecraft into orbit for the first time. At the beginning of the year, Musk had initially set a launch date of February or March - but at the same time made this dependent on the further course of testing. The schedule will be missed by at least a few weeks. A first private space mission is also planned for this year. The Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa recently announced his intention to circumnavigate the moon in a "starship" together with eight artists. The moon will then also be the destination of a mission pursued jointly with NASA.

Central role for NASA moon program

NASA is currently planning to use "Starship" as a landing module in its Artemis program in 2025 at the earliest. The rocket is significantly larger and more powerful than NASA's SLS rocket, which the space agency plans to use to put astronauts into orbit around the moon from 2024.​
1681999822370.png
After several weeks in space, the unmanned "Orion" capsule of NASA's Artemis 1 lunar mission returned to Earth in December

According to NASA plans, the "Starship" mission is dependent on the progress of the Artemis-2 mission. After the Artemis-1 mission, which ended in December with the return of an unmanned Orion space capsule to Earth, a manned orbit of the moon is now on the agenda. The next step will be to bring astronauts to the moon again with the "Starship". NASA put the last humans on the moon in 1972 with the Apollo 17 mission. The USA was the only country to put twelve astronauts on the moon with the Apollo missions between 1969 and 1972.

Space suits ready
Artemis 3 will be much more complex, according to NASA, combining the SLS "Orion" system with spacecraft built and flown by SpaceX. The NASA plan calls for a four-person "Orion" crew to dock in space with a SpaceX lander that will carry two astronauts to the lunar surface for nearly a week.

Twitter | Archive

According to NASA, an orbital fuel depot and a space tanker are required in addition to the Starship. The new space suits developed for the mission in collaboration with Axiom Space were unveiled by NASA in mid-March. In the "Starship" program, the moon is only the first stopover on the first manned mission to Mars, which Musk has already announced for 2029.
red, ORF.at/Agencies

Source (German)
 
According to NASA plans, the "Starship" mission is dependent on the progress of the Artemis-2 mission. After the Artemis-1 mission, which ended in December with the return of an unmanned Orion space capsule to Earth, a manned orbit of the moon is now on the agenda.
The whole Artemis program is a laugh riot. Spend billions and billions of dollars and nearly 20 years of development making a rocket that will be dependent on multiple Space-X launches. I guess Elon has a really good coke connection.
artemis 3.png
 
It did pretty well all things considered. This is one area where I can be pretty tismy but from those that I've talked to this was expected, and general consensus seemed to be that it wouldn't pass the tower. The most direct comparison to Superheavy comes to that of the N1 rocket, and if you know anything about that rocket Starship has managed to beat it with its first launch. - Though, not a fair comparison.

It's also pretty common for new rockets to fail. SpaceX's first rocket, the Falcon 1 failed its first (if I recall) 4 launches. Astra another company has a very bad launch record. This is also new hardware, Methane rockets are only really starting to fly and none have made it to orbit.
 
Was pretty exciting to see. Very weird seeing it kind of just spinning in place. Sure wouldn't want to get on one, probably ever, since there's really no abort method possible with it.

Saw this thing bitching, really hates Elon..

View attachment 5072919
I am surprised that this STEM girl doesn't know that any scientific advance we see now functioning and working is the result of about 100 failures beforehand...
 
Was pretty exciting to see. Very weird seeing it kind of just spinning in place. Sure wouldn't want to get on one, probably ever, since there's really no abort method possible with it.

Saw this thing bitching, really hates Elon..

View attachment 5072919

OT but, "you are a fraud and a liar" -

> Throws above as an insult
> Insists that an inverted dick is indeed, a pussy

Lmao even.
 
You guys do know that this only had a 50/50 chance of not exploding, was fully expected, and that the mission parameter was literally just being able to get off the pad, right? This is the first launch of an experimental rocket, there's no massive setback because this was expected to happen.
 
I am surprised that this STEM girl doesn't know that any scientific advance we see now functioning and working is the result of about 100 failures beforehand...
Engineers love to blow shit up and destroy things. They got pretty much everything they needed from this launch, enough engines fired that even though the takeoff was slower than ideal they learned a lot about their rocket's safety margins, AND they got to hit the big red self destruct button.

They had a great day.
 
I think I'd manage to come to terms with being a fraud and a liar if it made me the wealthiest man on the planet.
SpaceX's rockets still make it to orbit on a consistent basis, to the point that space launches became a trivial matter, that's just undeniable. No one else compares, even Bezos' Blue[ball] Origin despite all that money.
Wu doesn't even have a working dick, he's one to talk.
 
SpaceX's rockets still make it to orbit on a consistent basis, to the point that space launches became a trivial matter, that's just undeniable. No one else compares, even Bezos' Blue[ball] Origin despite all that money.
Wu doesn't even have a working dick, he's one to talk.
Their biggest "fingers crossed" item today was not destroying their launch pad.

The second rocket is already mostly built. It can launch on schedule now because they don't have to rebuild everything.

Main engine separation appears to have got them, and the first stage is supposed to spin out of the way, which seems to have worked, but it took the rest of the rocket with when it did.

SpaceX has a neat pic from below showing 6 main engines didn't fire and it still got up.

619dadad-c76e-4070-ae96-20430cf1d542.jpg
 
Back