Science SPACEX "Starship" explodes shortly after launch

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

SPACEX​

"Starship" explodes shortly after launch​

The unmanned "Starship" giant rocket of the US space company SpaceX has exploded during its first test flight. The largest and most powerful rocket ever built took off on Thursday from the SpaceX spaceport Starbase in Boca Chica in the US state of Texas. However, just over three minutes after launch, the rocket detonated, live footage showed.​
Online since today, 3:41 p.m. (Update: 3:57 p.m.)

At that point, the first booster stage called "Super Heavy" should have separated from the "Starship" space shuttle. SpaceX spoke on Twitter of a "rapid unplanned breakup prior to stage separation." "Teams will continue to evaluate data and work toward our next flight test," tech billionaire Elon Musk's company added. The launch was delayed by a few minutes: the countdown had been briefly interrupted to check some more details. Afterwards, the launch was released after all. Actually, the "Starship" of the private space company SpaceX of tech billionaire Elon Musk should have already taken off on Monday for a first short test flight. But that was postponed shortly before the planned launch because of a problem with a valve.

Enormous setback
The "Starship" rocket system - consisting of the roughly 70-meter-long "Super Heavy" booster and the roughly 50-meter-long upper stage, also called "Starship" - is intended to enable manned missions to the moon and Mars in the future. The "Starship" system is in itself designed so that the spacecraft and rocket can be reused after returning to Earth. The explosion, however, is an enormous setback for the initiative. The U.S. space agency NASA has selected "Starship" to fly humans to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years in the Artemis 3 mission at the end of 2025. Even flights to Mars should be possible with the rocket.

First attempt briefly halted
The launch of the 120-meter-high rocket from SpaceX's Starbase spaceport in Boca Chica was stopped on Monday less than ten minutes before the planned ignition. As a kind of dress rehearsal, however, the countdown continued until ten seconds before the originally planned launch time. The reason given for the abort was a technical problem with the pressure equalization on the most powerful space rocket ever built. Musk wrote on Twitter, apparently a valve had frozen. However, he said SpaceX had "learned a lot" from the launch attempt. It was only in February that almost all of the rocket's first stage engines had successfully ignited for the first time during a test in Boca Chica. Musk then declared that the 31 engines ignited in the test were "enough to reach orbit".

Explosion after first landing
Apart from the size and the associated possibility of transporting large loads, the reusability of all rocket components pursued by SpaceX is another central element of the "Starship" program. The declared goal is to significantly reduce the cost of operating spacecraft. SpaceX reported the first successful landing of a prototype in May 2021. Shortly thereafter, the explosion of the rocket made headlines. It was the third explosion within a few months - yet Musk remained convinced that the "Starship" rocket would soon be "safe enough" to transport people.

Youtube Video

Private moon orbit with billionaire and artists
Since last year, SpaceX has been trying to launch its spacecraft into orbit for the first time. At the beginning of the year, Musk had initially set a launch date of February or March - but at the same time made this dependent on the further course of testing. The schedule will be missed by at least a few weeks. A first private space mission is also planned for this year. The Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa recently announced his intention to circumnavigate the moon in a "starship" together with eight artists. The moon will then also be the destination of a mission pursued jointly with NASA.

Central role for NASA moon program

NASA is currently planning to use "Starship" as a landing module in its Artemis program in 2025 at the earliest. The rocket is significantly larger and more powerful than NASA's SLS rocket, which the space agency plans to use to put astronauts into orbit around the moon from 2024.​
1681999822370.png
After several weeks in space, the unmanned "Orion" capsule of NASA's Artemis 1 lunar mission returned to Earth in December

According to NASA plans, the "Starship" mission is dependent on the progress of the Artemis-2 mission. After the Artemis-1 mission, which ended in December with the return of an unmanned Orion space capsule to Earth, a manned orbit of the moon is now on the agenda. The next step will be to bring astronauts to the moon again with the "Starship". NASA put the last humans on the moon in 1972 with the Apollo 17 mission. The USA was the only country to put twelve astronauts on the moon with the Apollo missions between 1969 and 1972.

Space suits ready
Artemis 3 will be much more complex, according to NASA, combining the SLS "Orion" system with spacecraft built and flown by SpaceX. The NASA plan calls for a four-person "Orion" crew to dock in space with a SpaceX lander that will carry two astronauts to the lunar surface for nearly a week.

Twitter | Archive

According to NASA, an orbital fuel depot and a space tanker are required in addition to the Starship. The new space suits developed for the mission in collaboration with Axiom Space were unveiled by NASA in mid-March. In the "Starship" program, the moon is only the first stopover on the first manned mission to Mars, which Musk has already announced for 2029.
red, ORF.at/Agencies

Source (German)
 
You guys do know that this only had a 50/50 chance of not exploding, was fully expected, and that the mission parameter was literally just being able to get off the pad, right? This is the first launch of an experimental rocket, there's no massive setback because this was expected to happen.
Journos do this all the time. They said the same thing when the Starship landing tests resulted in hard landings and explosions. Those were expected to happen, but "Test Rocket Explodes as Expected" doesn't get clicks or attention like "Enormous setback" does.
 
Oh yeah? If it's so powerful then why did it explode.

Checkmate, science.
Is math related to science?
Journos do this all the time. They said the same thing when the Starship landing tests resulted in hard landings and explosions. Those were expected to happen, but "Test Rocket Explodes as Expected" doesn't get clicks or attention like "Enormous setback" does.
Also worth noting that journoscum has a hate boner for Musk, for a multitude of reasons.
 
:story: KABOOM!

Remember in the 60s when you totally went to the moon to own the Russians? Remember how easy it was? Like 2 tin cans connected by a string. What happened?
What happened was Apollo I started on fire on the ground, killing a crew of very brave and crazy astronauts. NASA then fixed the causes and Saturn rockets became very safe.
 
Was pretty exciting to see. Very weird seeing it kind of just spinning in place. Sure wouldn't want to get on one, probably ever, since there's really no abort method possible with it.

Saw this thing bitching, really hates Elon..

View attachment 5072919
You cannot bullshit people forever. We all see that you are a fraud and a liar

Says the gamergate obsessed man in a dress pretending to be a woman. The lack of self awareness is palpable
 
Their biggest "fingers crossed" item today was not destroying their launch pad.

The second rocket is already mostly built. It can launch on schedule now because they don't have to rebuild everything.

Main engine separation appears to have got them, and the first stage is supposed to spin out of the way, which seems to have worked, but it took the rest of the rocket with when it did.

SpaceX has a neat pic from below showing 6 main engines didn't fire and it still got up.

View attachment 5073048


6 didn't ignite? You got to be careful when you tie the fuses together, or you can rub all the gunpowder off of them.
 
You cannot bullshit people forever. We all see that you are a fraud and a liar

Says the gamergate obsessed man in a dress pretending to be a woman. The lack of self awareness is palpable
The articles about the launch are full of drivel, like bird nerds complaining that launching from Texas inconveniences some sea birds.
 
Was pretty exciting to see. Very weird seeing it kind of just spinning in place. Sure wouldn't want to get on one, probably ever, since there's really no abort method possible with it.

Saw this thing bitching, really hates Elon..

View attachment 5072919
Screenshots_2023-04-20-10-27-19.png


This was a successful test. The first cartwheel was actually intentional, they were going to spin the stages to get them to separate. The fact that it passed Max-Q (highest aerodynamic stress on the vehicle) first try and got to stage sep was very encouraging.

The only real downside I've seen is that they damaged the ground infrastructure pretty badly.
 
I watched it live on the spacex yt channel, they had a lisping homo as their main commentator, like why for real? This is high profile stuff. Or did I seriously just answer my question there?

I don't even have a problem with gay people, if you have a job you that want a male with some acting or theatre experience I mean, it's gonna happen, but the ones with that voice are doing it on purpose to signal that they are available for buttdarts and other nastiness. Are there newscasters with hobbies like surfing getting stoned or being rap-fan? Are they allowed to do a affected voice on air? (mebbe dat last one)
 
Was pretty exciting to see. Very weird seeing it kind of just spinning in place. Sure wouldn't want to get on one, probably ever, since there's really no abort method possible with it.

Saw this thing bitching, really hates Elon..

View attachment 5072919
Johns just mad that people can start calling him by his real name on twitter now without getting in trouble.
 
6 didn't ignite? You got to be careful when you tie the fuses together, or you can rub all the gunpowder off of them.
They could have been blown out by too much pressure, or something could be wrong with fuel delivery. Not sure what their ignition system is, though.

Russia uses giant wooden matches to light the Soyuz rockets because their technology is kind of primitive, but it works well enough. It's worked since the 1950s, why change?
 
Screenshots_2023-04-20-10-37-34.png
A

Some photos of the damage caused by the takeoff. The self-destruct happened at 30km in altitude so none of this is from that.
FuKl3PcWwAIjAt5-1.jpg
The pad now has a huge gouge dug into the earth from the engine exhaust.

image-8.png
The fuel tanks have dents. I would not trust them.


image0-31.jpg
Hopper got a chunk taken from it



FuKa7nXagAAnNHS.gif
NASA Spaceflight's car got hit by a high-speed chunk of concrete.

image-10.png
A lot of remote cameras damaged or destroyed.
 
Last edited:
Back