The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Might just be how jaded ive become due to twitter discourse but whenever someone brings up the "Victims of CSA find comfort in loli/shota content" defense they are almost never a victim themselves and just wanna use them as a meat shield so they can continue to goon off to loli.
We can clearly see they that they only use them becuase some ''agree'' with them. They don't sympathise with CSA because if a CSA have clearly a anti lolisho stance they will quickly bash them
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu
Screenshot_20230420_110407_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20230420_110423_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20230420_110625_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20230420_111111_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20230420_111247_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20230420_111124_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20230420_111311_Chrome.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230420_110407_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230420_110407_Chrome.jpg
    550 KB · Views: 37
  • Screenshot_20230420_110423_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230420_110423_Chrome.jpg
    522.2 KB · Views: 29
  • Screenshot_20230420_110625_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230420_110625_Chrome.jpg
    399.8 KB · Views: 27
  • Screenshot_20230420_111111_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230420_111111_Chrome.jpg
    553.2 KB · Views: 29
  • Screenshot_20230420_111124_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230420_111124_Chrome.jpg
    366.8 KB · Views: 25
  • Screenshot_20230420_111247_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230420_111247_Chrome.jpg
    420.3 KB · Views: 26
  • Screenshot_20230420_111311_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230420_111311_Chrome.jpg
    283.5 KB · Views: 54
They get really assmad and defensive about the whole "fictional" part since its not real and drawings cant consent but usually someones tastes in fictional characters reflect their tastes in real life.
Not true at all. Fact is artwork and animation =/= real life. Some people have no attraction to drawings at all, even if it otherwise depicts something they are into in real life, while someone may be attracted to an anime character that is Japanese but not be attracted to actual Japanese people, because the drawing doesn't resemble an actual Japanese person in the slightest. That's why there is a particular fetish for being attracted to drawings or cartoon characters separately from anything else.
 
I remember one time getting into a tiny argument with a lolicon and said "try to explain your fetish to someone who doesn't know internet lingo without them calling you a pedo afterwards" and they would not understand it. They just kept going down the route of "its not cp so im not a pedo" ignoring the point i was making.
 
Shit, in Romeo & Juliet Juliet was starting to be viewed as an old maid at 14! A few hundred years ago people didn’t live very long, hebephilia and ephebophilia were incredibly common. It was only up until the mid century that the concept of a teenager even existed. Old farts would marry young girls (perhaps after their first wife kicked the bucket in childbirth or whatever), he’d get reproductive capabilities and she’d get well cared for by an established man. It’s not PC, but it was life for the majority of human history.
That's actually a misconception. The average life expectancy was a lot lower bc of maternal and baby mortality during birth before modern medicine. If one survived childhood, they could easily live into their 60s.
Young girls were more likely to be betrothed which is not the same as being husband and wife. Muhammad was a degenerate for fucking prepubescents, even in his time.
 
That's actually a misconception. The average life expectancy was a lot lower bc of maternal and baby mortality during birth before modern medicine. If one survived childhood, they could easily live into their 60s.
Young girls were more likely to be betrothed which is not the same as being husband and wife. Muhammad was a degenerate for fucking prepubescents, even in his time.
To elaborate, people at the time Romeo and Juliet was written were fully aware of the danger of teenage pregnancies. The girl was engaged/promised in marriage pretty young, but the common understanding was that she'd retain her chastity until she was old enough to bear children safely. The guy, on his honor, was also supposed defend her purity. Romeo and Juliet was a tale of teenage love gone completely off the fucking rails, not the norm, and Shakespeare also made her a fair deal younger than she was in the original story he based his play on. On that one, they were about the same age, and both in their late teens.
 
Shakespeare also made her a fair deal younger than she was in the original story he based his play on. On that one, they were about the same age, and both in their late teens.
Yeah, he totally ripped off the Roman tale Pyramus and Thisbe by Ovid. Most of the so called accomplishments and discoveries of the Middle Ages were rediscoveries of things from Classical times. They literally forgot human anatomy and it was a big deal when they stopped scribbling abortions and started making decent looking statues again. Monotheism is degenerate, SMDH.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Wright
Yeah he will come back and sperg in no time
Mhm. That blackbuster critic wannabe is gonna eventually get his account suspended in a short time since he's the type to not give up easily. I see clay as that because i remember his commentary on one such individual, jsenpaix4's video called "top 10 hottest lolicon characters" that countdown video cringe on the level of guptill89's sonic video.

Clay however was being an alarmist about it going "How did this nigga get a free pass?"
He seems to forget this isn't 2009 where going after smaller channels were lucrative plus jsenpaix4 and most lolicons he beefs with struggles to break 100 views with their videos so i don't get why he bothers.
Here's the video in question:
 
Mhm. That blackbuster critic wannabe is gonna eventually get his account suspended in a short time since he's the type to not give up easily. I see clay as that because i remember his commentary on one such individual, jsenpaix4's video called "top 10 hottest lolicon characters" that countdown video cringe on the level of guptill89's sonic video.

Clay however was being an alarmist about it going "How did this nigga get a free pass?"
He seems to forget this isn't 2009 where going after smaller channels were lucrative plus jsenpaix4 and most lolicons he beefs with struggles to break 100 views with their videos so i don't get why he bothers.
Here's the video in question:
"Doesnt care about body type, cares about the age of the girl"

Good noticing there.
 
Drawing porn of an actual real child isn't "just a drawing" either. Anime children aren't representing actual real human beings. This argument falls flat on its face.
And they like to insist they're based on real children because they're stylized. Which is why they use the "if it looks like a child and acts like a child" card everytime
 
You can argue about the morality and creepiness of it until the end of time, but when it comes right down to it loli shit isn't technically child porn since no real children are represented in those images. If it's lewd art of a real kid then it's cp, at least in the United States.

Again, this is putting aside the morality and perversion of loli, no matter your personal stance on it. This is just the legal aspect that these Twitter losers flat-out ignore.
 
And they like to insist they're based on real children because they're stylized. Which is why they use the "if it looks like a child and acts like a child" card everytime
Lolicons think loli is a loophole to CP.

"Oh I dont like jerking it to little girls and boys, I jerk it to fictional characters who just happen to look, sound and act like little girls and boys."

It certainly shouldnt be illegal due to the endless ramifications it would cause and because its not actual cp, but people who happily and openly show their love for loli are disgusting and should always be reminded of that.
 
You can argue about the morality and creepiness of it until the end of time, but when it comes right down to it loli shit isn't technically child porn since no real children are represented in those images. If it's lewd art of a real kid then it's cp, at least in the United States.

Again, this is putting aside the morality and perversion of loli, no matter your personal stance on it. This is just the legal aspect that these Twitter losers flat-out ignore.

Whats maddening to me is that. While the loli artwork argument is going on all over Twitter. No one seems to give a fuck PornHub still has no legal age verification to become a creator. Despite the story coming out recently, that a missing underage girl was identified in videos on Pornhub by authorities.

So do these anti-lolicon artwork people really give a fuck about kids? I really don't think so.
 
Back