Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.1%

  • Total voters
    404
There is a section of Faith that denies the divinity of Christ (Gnostic adjacents mostly), but it is considered heresy by most others and they were... purged...
There are different forms in the early church which are sometimes called "denying the divinity" which are not quite the same as just saying that Christ was just a "good man". There is Arianism for example which accepts Christ as son of God but not as equal to God. Most of those early arguments were over the relationship of the entities within the Trinity to each other.

The Unitarians are probably the best modern example of Nick's particular version of the denial of divinity of Christ (IMO). Though some Unitarians do accept the divinity of Christ.
 
This clip looks like it was from a locals the evening after iHypocrites stream
That was posted yesterday, before it would have been dark, so I'm guessing it's probably from Monday night.

A sub $100 stream on youtube. I dare say the Depp well is truly dry at this point. It does make sense as a big part of that was Heard being a crazy BPD woman and a warning to men. He is trying to shift the narrative now and that makes his locals thots look bad.
firefox_lBGYnQVv9D.png

I forgot to do rumble as Fishtank was on fire last night and i recommend people watch that instead.
Yeah I noticed that last night. I checked out the beginning of his show to see if he addressed the daytime stream. He was 15 minutes late and by the time I tapped out, which was not that long to be fair, he had ~1,500 live viewers on YT and ~2,500-3,000 on Rumble. Maybe he gained more viewers later.

It seems like not too long ago he'd be getting double that on YT and double to triple those numbers on Rumble.
 
I think looking at the sponsors is more interesting than the view count, as in just view counts don't bring in money. Ridge hasn't renewed with him and neither has Birch Gold, they must have gotten really shitty conversion rates. He's not even selling the shitty Chinesium chain saws he promised a review for that never came anymore. It's just that dumbass supplement company and that shady as fuck Covid relief shit that sets off alarm bells left and right. He went past the dumb shit that's common on Youtube and right down into the shady bottom shelf things. I mean I'm assuming Manscaped shit is way overpriced but essentially it's razors and soaps and those do what razors and soaps do, who even knows what's up with the supplements.
 
I mean I'm assuming Manscaped shit is way overprized but essentially it's razors and soaps and those do what razors and soaps do, who even knows what's up with the supplements.
They're not going to pay someone who just takes their money and doesn't even shill their product, or just drunkenly mumbles his way through some bullshit once every month or so.
 
I think looking at the sponsors is more interesting than the view count, as in just view counts don't bring in money. Ridge hasn't renewed with him and neither has Birch Gold, they must have gotten really shitty conversion rates. He's not even selling the shitty Chinesium chain saws he promised a review for that never came anymore. It's just that dumbass supplement company and that shady as fuck Covid relief shit that sets off alarm bells left and right. He went past the dumb shit that's common on Youtube and right down into the shady bottom shelf things. I mean I'm assuming Manscaped shit is way overpriced but essentially it's razors and soaps and those do what razors and soaps do, who even knows what's up with the supplements.

There was also that air purification unit Nick was trialing last year claiming it took some of the smells out of his nasty kitchen.
 
He isn't even making any actual concrete claims against the thread, just pissing and moaning like a little bitch.
Exactly.

Also, because my name was invoked by Nick in his hot tub stream and in at least 7 posts here in the last few days, I thought I'd ring in.

All the Kiwi recent commenters referencing me have been accurate but to reiterate, here's my comment on Elissa's channel:

1684365177713.png

Tbh, I'm not entirely sure what "touching the cow" means. Is there an objective definition? We know Null and Nick's definition differ bc Null defended @Himedall All-seeing Waifu s logging, and Nick regards that as cow-touching.

Regardless, to be clear, I have never reported anything anywhere re Nick's Locals. Despite knowing lots of information (from their public comments), I'm not interested in destroying someone's livelihood or otherwise messing with their lives.

In other matters, Kiwi isn't a particularly "prescriptive" or corrective place but it's worth noting that Nick himself created this problem. It wasn't the fucking block function that was the issue. Anyone could have seen this issue from a mile away (or since Nov. 2022).

Nick could have EASILY kept Locals decline in check by doing some combination of the following:
  • Not done 24/7 unmodderated chatting in which literally anything was posted including, for a period, daily violations of Locals TOS. Even genitalia would stay up for hours.
  • Using Locals TOS as his excuse to time-out/warn/ban. Nick could have blamed Locals TOS which is actually pretty strict, and kept his freeze peach values in tact.
  • Getting CGoody (and a couple others) to moderate. Whatever you wanna say about Cory he is brilliant (and often hilarious) at steering the conversation away from an utter shitshow without banning people. He's done it for years on YT for Nick.
  • Been a better leader. His simps love him SO much, if he had given any heartfelt speeches about civility and the risk to him (reputation, financial, whatever), people would have listened.
This is entirely a self-created problem by Nick. He simply doesn't want to see it.... and didn't want to do the work to preserve his little paying hugbox.
 
Not done 24/7 unmodderated chatting in which literally anything was posted including, for a period, daily violations of Locals TOS. Even genitalia would stay up for hours.
He could have done that if he had a hands-off approach about it, but since he bans anything that makes him butthurt, like a giant pussy, while letting fedposters like Still-Life make explicit felony, actionable terrorist threats against federal officials, he apparently is okay with that. Note, § 230, even if it does protect him, applies only to civil liability. Never mind bar discipline if some scamp decides to take it into their head to fuck with him that way again.
 
I think looking at the sponsors is more interesting than the view count, as in just view counts don't bring in money. Ridge hasn't renewed with him and neither has Birch Gold, they must have gotten really shitty conversion rates. He's not even selling the shitty Chinesium chain saws he promised a review for that never came anymore. It's just that dumbass supplement company and that shady as fuck Covid relief shit that sets off alarm bells left and right. He went past the dumb shit that's common on Youtube and right down into the shady bottom shelf things. I mean I'm assuming Manscaped shit is way overpriced but essentially it's razors and soaps and those do what razors and soaps do, who even knows what's up with the supplements.
I mean all the metrics are down. YT subs are down. Live viewers are down. With less live viewers there's a smaller pool of people to convert to donating super chats or Locals subscriptions. Super chats are in fact down. Making less than $100 on YT is terrible for someone who used to pull in $1.5-2k a night.

The numbers of people in the Locals live chat at a given time is down. While we don't know whether the number of paying members on Locals is down, the fact that he was blaming Locals for not adding a block feature soon enough suggests that that probably is too.

Last night's sponsors (listed in the YT description) were the vegetarian powder company and a site for CBD gummies. IDK, seems like crunchy wine mom stuff to me. Might just reflect how his audience has changed. Though at this point the changes are coming from subtraction, not addition.

Using Locals TOS as his excuse to time-out/warn/ban. Nick could have blamed Locals TOS which is actually pretty strict, and kept his freeze peach values in tact.
For Nick, it's about accusing Null of making the Farms hard to defend (by letting people "provoke and provocate" Nick on this thread by archiving things and mocking him) while simultaneously allowing Still-Life to post detailed and graphic threats about specific individuals.
 
One thing I know is kiwi farms has always enjoyed getting retards and hysterical cunts that are fighting with the cows to come in and comment in the cow's threads for their perspective and to maybe find out why they do what they do. I would exactly consider those people regular kiwi farms posters. More like guest appearances. Maybe we are sussing those individuals out for their own cow potential. But those autists were fucking with the our cows long before they found the farms. Nothing we do or say here typically convinces these people to stop making public spectacles of themselves.

Take Mathew Vicker as an example. He loves to comment on Ralph's threads. But Mathew screwing with Ralph has nothing to do with the farms. For him, it is personal.
 
Here's an archive of that drunk Faran and Nick stream if anyone wants it —

Also Clip This Bitch on YouTube is Faran Balanced channel. She runs it even though she said she sold it. Yes all the shit she had to say about clip channels then turns around and becomes one. Elissa will always be my favorite clipper. What are the odds of her selling her channel and that person stays within the same lawtube space? Also no one gives a fuck about her channel and clips. It's losing hundreds of subs a day. https://socialblade.com/youtube/c/faranbalanced

Here's where she said she sold her channel —
View attachment 5125266
View attachment 5125284

If she really sold it then how come the other day on Good Lawgic's channel the Clip This Bitch channel banned someone pretending to be "Faran On TV" (that's her new channel. It should be Faran Not On TV) ? What are the odds the "new" owners of the channel would be in the chat banning them within seconds?

Here's showing it happened —
View attachment 5125292
Here's showing the account that was banned for a single comment — (It's the top one in grey)
View attachment 5125296

I just thought some context on this shitty clip channel would be good. Oh and she's rebranded like 5+ times and her last channel name was The Clipping Room Floor for about 5 minutes. Faran On TV commented on the first clip trying to pretend she sold it. Here's that screenshot-
View attachment 5125310
I know... it's not shocking she's lied.
Dracula... this thread is about Nick Rekieta. Not your issues with some random youtube channel.
 
Been a better leader. His simps love him SO much, if he had given any heartfelt speeches about civility and the risk to him (reputation, financial, whatever), people would have listened.
Exactly he coulda have scolded the lewds with "oh my thats a very nice 40 year old ass" then go to say "hey we need to not do that, I have a professional license, local deal etc, I mean if I owned the platform it would be another thing....anyway its please dont post undwear photo in the chat" and then do some double speak about sliding into DM's
 
We know that Rumble severely inflates the viewership of their videos. I was curious about other indicators of viewership though and realized that both YouTube and Rumble have a "like" button.

So taking a look at streams recently and comparing their likes/views ratio. Here is YouTube (via Playboard)

He gets roughly 9% of his viewers to click "Like" on his videos. That's not bad, and Playboard ranks his overall like % (at 7.51) as Very High.

Let's take a look at his Rumble numbers:
Ooooof. So of his 100k+ viewers, he can only get 1300 of them to click the like button? I averaged out over the same period as the YouTube screenshot, and he averages 1.27% of his viewers clicking like on his Rumble videos.

I can think of a few reasons for this. 1) His viewers might not watch him on YouTube, but they head over to YouTube and click like to help him there. 2) Rumble seriously fucks with view numbers by as much as 10x. 3) Rumble viewers just don't care to press the like button ever.

Oddly though, it appears that only the livestreams count extra views. His last short form content (basically 30 min clips of his livestream) on Rumble got only 5.8k views, with 238 likes (4%).
To compare, I went to Steven Crowder's Rumble channel and compared his views and likes. On YouTube recently, Crowder gets roughly 4% likes. On Rumble, Crowder gets around 1.5% likes, but they claim he gets millions of views per video.

I highly doubt that YouTube's audience is more likely to press the like button than Rumble's, but that's possible. My guess is that something to do with their underlying tech causes it to log extra views when livestreaming. I'm not in the video player web dev space, so someone else will likely have a better explanation.
I am pretty much always signed in to YouTube, but I haven't bothered to create a Rumble account to sign in to.

Because I don't have a Rumble account, after watching a video on Rumble, I can't give it a LIKE.

That is probably why the disparity in LIKES is so large.
 
Dracula... this thread is about Nick Rekieta. Not your issues with some random youtube channel.
Your first post on the farms is lecturing someone about what's appropriate to post while simultaneously failing to understand the historically incestuous connection between Rekieta and other Lawtube adjacents that have been discussed previously on the thread.

Fail. Lurk more.
 
Truth be told. Josh paid me in silver utensils to go to Hedonism II and act as some sorta crazed paparazzi, getting all of the salacious deetz on camera with a telephoto lense.
What I saw on that fateful day I will take with me to the grave since I cannot bear to dig into my subconscious and remember it.
Having touched the cow in such a blatant way and violated the trust of everyone on here has been tearing at me for months, however.
I just needed to get it off my chest.
I'm deeply sorry :/
I wish you hadn't DM'ed me those pictures of Mrs Rackets performing cock and ball torture on both you and Nick at the same time. I don't know if it counts as touching the cow tho since yours and Rackets balls never touched during the entire thing as far as I can tell.
 
Your first post on the farms is lecturing someone about what's appropriate to post while simultaneously failing to understand the historically incestuous connection between Rekieta and other Lawtube adjacents that have been discussed previously on the thread.

Also, maybe don't quote the whole of a multiple paragraph post just to respond with a single line.

I thought kiwifarms had stopped letting you do that now, but even if you managed to squeak in under the threshold, you can just highlight the section you want to respond to and either quote (if you're replying to multiple posts) or reply (if you just want to respond to a single point.

Fail. Lurk more.

What he said.
 
Tbh, I'm not entirely sure what "touching the cow" means. Is there an objective definition? We know Null and Nick's definition differ bc Null defended @Himedall All-seeing Waifu s logging, and Nick regards that as cow-touching.
Logging isn't cow touching. However, let's say an autist doxxes a wine mom and then swat shows up at their door or the nudes/lewds they posted show up in printed form at their kids school, something physical happens, etc. That's touching the cow.

I don't know if there is a set of guidelines, but generally, taking any affirmative actions towards harming the person or reputation is off-limits. If someone from the farms starts flagging (flaggotry) Nicks videos or reporting Nick for TOS violations that's considered touching the cow. Sharing clips of Nicks retarded degeneracy, commenting on it, making fun of him -- none of these things are cow touching, even if off-platform.

TLDR; Nick is just a whiny bitch. I'm willing to bet he's trying to negotiate another exclusive contract with Rumble, he's getting the runaround, and it's dawned on him that he's going to lose his Locals/Rumble contract. He has no one to blame but himself.
 
Rekieta has put himself in a danger zone where he now HAS to address to a larger audience. He was trying to just use the locals whine streams to let off some steam but you cant do entire streams bitching about someone and expect it no to get back to them.

He's counting on his fan's ignorance of what actually goes on here but that cuts both ways and some of them are no doubt wondering why Rackets is now being a dick to Josh who has always been cordial and informative on rackets' streams. Josh who many times has been on to talk about stuff like section 230 and has always admitted that some people take things too far. It's like you couldn't pick a worse target for this line and on a third party channel with large viewership no less.
 
Tbh, I'm not entirely sure what "touching the cow" means. Is there an objective definition? We know Null and Nick's definition differ bc Null defended @Himedall All-seeing Waifu s logging, and Nick regards that as cow-touching.
If I remember correctly, the "touching the cow" rule was started when a number of users on Kiwi Farms would run operations on Chris Chan and fabricate things to instigate him doing crazy things. Basically don't cause cowness, just observe and enjoy the crazy.

Nick thinks that @Himedall All-seeing Waifu logging Locals is preventing people from posting in chat, and he's probably not wrong for a few people. The wine moms probably don't want the fact that they posted their lewds to a hundreds (maybe thousands) of people getting out. What he doesn't say is that a large portion of his audience stopped hanging out in locals long before the logging started due to how he ran it.

But since he's Nick, and he's never really had to work for anything, he'll just blame everyone else but himself as he crashes into the sea after the wax on his wings melted.
 
Tbh, I'm not entirely sure what "touching the cow" means. Is there an objective definition?
Anything beyond the bounds of documentation could be considered touching the cow, but it's more a spectrum 🧩 so I'll provide some examples.

- Just documenting/recording content and posting it to the farms while providing color commentary like @Himedall All-seeing Waifu will never be considered touching the cow regardless of if the cow reacts to the documentation. It's the point of the website.
- Meeting a cow and recording the interaction (assuming the cow is friendly) may be okay depending on how the farms view the cow and how you're interacting with the cow. Telling a Schizophrenic cow you're with the CIA and stalking him would be terrible. Buying him a burger in exchange for the privilege to record him talk might be fine since it might be the only way a popular schizo cow gets documented.
- Showing up at a cow's place of residence to leave diapers and corn cobs like people did for Ralph is ultimately benign and hilarious, but still discouraged because you're submitting yourself to the risks of being near a cow. This is straddling the line of what would be acceptable.
- Calling up companies or people that associate with a cow to fuck with the cow's income, gofundme, relationships, etc. is always way across the fucking line. It's not funny, it's always done out of spite, and can only lessen how much milk we get from any given cow.
- Showing up to Portugal to punch the cow in the face so hard they go cross eyed is illegal. Don't do this regardless of how the farms feel about it. If you hate a cow this much you need help and there's likely some Britbong that hates him just as much that will do it anyways.
Dracula... this thread is about Nick Rekieta. Not your issues with some random youtube channel.
It's not "some random youtube channel". Faran Balanced was introduced to the farms via her association and collaborations with Nick and was/is a Lawtube orbiter. Her most infamous moment, the drunk stream where she flashed her panties at the camera, took place while streaming with Nick. Faran is also the source of the most credible evidence to date regarding whether or not Nick and Kayla are swinging.

If someone goes through the trouble to write up an op she might get her own thread, but until then here and the Lawtube thread are fine for Faran related info. Your first post in a forum should never be to tell the forum they're doing it wrong, retard.
 
Back