SCOTUS OVERTURNED RACE BASED COLLEGE ADMISSIONS

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Harvard's response to the ruling:

View attachment 5184627
Heaven is High and the Emperor is far away. For certain the loyal mandarins of America's most prestigious institution will STUDIOUSLY and with SPECIFIC vigor implement heavens decree. While also praying earnestly and with the most HUMBLE of hearts that heaven may change its mind. or be made too.
 
Harvard's response to the ruling:

View attachment 5184627
Sounds like doublespeak.

"we will certainly comply with the court's decision."
download.jpg
 
Its funny because its not funny.

" 'Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man's mind,' " Paul quoted.
"Right out of the Butlerian Jihad and the Orange Catholic Bible," she said. "But what the O.C. Bible should've said is: 'Thou shalt not make a machine to counterfeit a human mind.'



Fuck my job. I'm going to take the pay cut and go work for the convenience store full time. They were a nice stop gap for extra spending money, but, and I am being deadly serious here. Those few shifts I worked at that convenience store each week have been more fulfilling for my soul then the fucking soulless corporate fucking bullshit of fucking no face fucking mother fuckers I have had to deal with for the last fucking god damn fucking decade. I've met real people. I've worked with real people. I've become involved in real life human dramas that have involved everything from the Sherriff showing up to formalize no contact orders to old farts finally dying of cancer.

When AI ultimately replaces my peers, I have know doubt they will be begging ME for a job.
 
Adding onto my former post here:
Sure do wish this passed before I was in the small minority of whites at a historically black college. I almost certainly got denied entry to actual good schools because I wasn't brown or gay enough.
How will this ruling work with historically black universities? They've never really been able to just turn non-blacks away (as evidenced by the 2 year degree I got there) but it's very, very obvious by the term "historically black college" and by the fact that the majority of faculty and students are black that there's an obvious push to get a specific demographic going to these schools.
 
If you wanted to know who sided with who:
View attachment 5184183
Serious question, do the spic and the jew EVER break rank with the popular progressive consensus? I know Jackson will sometimes at least pretend to have a tiny bit of respect for the constitution, but I swear I've never seen Sotomayor in particular not blatantly toe the party line.
 
I thought injuns were praire niggers. The more you learn!
They where. They also have ones that lived in the forests. Or along the shore fishing.
Timberniggers is not very inclusive because not all of them lived in the woods. . Lets just stick with the classic Savages.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Ghostse and Mankirk
I was actually surprised to see it happen in the States cause it has been happening in Asian countries for a while. If youre part of a religious minority or tribal lineage or bureaucratic family, shit like that you get ton of benefits for university admissions, from easy admissions to reduced fees. That shit has been going on for 50 years, long enough that the communists are opposing it cause it disproportionately advantages rich people with that kinda background. Nice to see Murican stumble into the stupidity though.
Hoo boy, let me tell you about Ron Unz's 'Myth of Meritocracy' (essential reading for anyone in this thread). You see, that already happened, but with Jews instead of Asians. During the 1930s-1950s, Jews were kept under 25% for all elite Ivy League universities. They sued, and eventually they came to dominate all aspects of Ivy League life (even when artificially kept down, they still overperformed). WASPy America lost, and licked its wounds for eternity. now, Jews had to contend with another group in a similar IQ Bell Curve as them: Han Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese (mostly Chinese), and they didn't like having the switcheroo put on them.

America always had this: first with WASPs, then Jews, now Han Chinese. The Jews now are in the same place where they were 60 years ago, and they fucking hate it.
I don't get angle of the SCOTUS here, how exactly is this going to help increase white admissions to college? Clearly, this paves the way for schools like Harvard, Yale, Georgetown, etc. to now be pay-to-win in terms of entry but how does it help the everyday American? I think you all are celebrating a win for the ultra-wealthy disguised as a win for all of us, I don't think there is any real benefit to anyone here that wasn't born with a silver spoon firmly rammed up their ass.
The Ivy League, as Ron Unz points out, is usually a pay-to-play for Jews, and a hereditary 'kick that ball' scholarship if you want to play football as a white guy. Even high scoring whites, who participate in every extra curricular there is, are still denied entry to the Ivy League. They have always been pay-to-win, and the expensive tuition should be abolished as they already thrive off of government and private stipends (as Unz demonstrates).
This is what they wanted. Now all Ivy-league bullshit schools will be filled only with applicants they pick out and there will no longer be the exceptional nigger that gets in, that is one more spot for the ultra-wealthy to buy into.
See point above. They're only mad because another group noticed, and didn't take it lying down.
 
How will this ruling work with historically black universities? They've never really been able to just turn non-blacks away (as evidenced by the 2 year degree I got there) but it's very, very obvious by the term "historically black college" and by the fact that the majority of faculty and students are black that there's an obvious push to get a specific demographic going to these schools.
I'm not sure how that will play out.

IIRC, as privately funded institutions that were chartered to serve blacks, they have historically had a bypass. Sort of like religious schools are allowed to consider religion to maintain the founding principals of the school, a lot of them are grandfathered in (i.e. you'd never be able to open the Obama School for Niggerdom to offer degrees in Typical Negro Behavior Studies, but Howard has always operated this way so I guess they get to keep doing so)

Example, I interviewed at a company that provided religious materials to Churchs. This was a 100% back office job, but due to the fact one of the services offered was, effectively, a biblical helpline for pastors they were not just allowed to consider religion of applicants, but denomination, while still complying with the EOA. Their application portal was littered with "Holy hell you fedora-wearing apostates, stop trying to submit complaints to the State/Federal EO office. They already know, we're already cleared, this is an EOA carve out because we are religious support organization. We are allowed to ask your religion, your church, and call your pastor to confirm you are a member."

I remember reading a break down on it around the time the valedictorian of one of the HBS graduating classes was white and some Coastal Liberals and grifting niggers took offense. As I recall, as an end run around getting nailed to the wall as Harvard & UNC are having done, they opened a minority of slots as open enrollment so whites couldn't sue on the grounds of total discrimination - if they really want to indulge that jungle fever, they have a chance no matter how small. Also because ivory tower academics are fart huffing faggots and they needed someone other than all niggers on campus so thye could indoctrinate some more whites.

Serious question, do the spic and the jew EVER break rank with the popular progressive consensus? I know Jackson will sometimes at least pretend to have a tiny bit of respect for the constitution, but I swear I've never seen Sotomayor in particular not blatantly toe the party line.
Sotomayor is a fucking retard who hates the constitution. Her opinions are all literal garbage and type II diabetes cannot take her soon enough. Kagan is also a fucking dumb bitch but at least acknowledges the constitution exists from time to time.

They where. They also have ones that lived in the forests. Or along the shore fishing.
Timberniggers is not very inclusive because not all of them lived in the woods. . Lets just stick with the classic Savages.
Timberniggers for eastern and coastal tribes, Praireniggers for the plains tribes. You should have some pride in your slur usage.

Except for Koreans and Chinese. Make sure to use the Chinese slurs for Koreans and vice versa. Nothing, NOTHING pisses off a chinese more than being called Korean.
 
Last edited:
>point out that a discriminatory action is discrimination and thus unconstitutional
>REEEEEEEEEEE HOW DARE YOU

what i find funny is the few people trying to say it's not a sound thing to approve.
like nigger if you followed the fucking constitution 80% of laws would be extinct because they go against the constitution no matter the retarded tier-lawyer-reality-bending thinking.
 
I like how this response assumes that a nigger can write a literate essay

"BOYEE WE WUZ KANGS N SHEEIT N NOW WE ON THA WELFAIR SELLIN' ROX, LEMME GO TA HARVAD"
Stanford let in some sandnigger because he wrote "Black Lives Matter" on his application 100 times. A nigger could wipe his monkey ass and drool on the application and they'd still probably let the wankstain in.
 
So this is all well and good. Hopefully it’s a legal stepping stone to someone bringing a lawsuit to attack AA in employment.

Lets outlaw racism for real.
 
Back