Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[prolapsed_cranium]

Rackets is just lighting money on fire. If Monty wins in the end Rekieta may be so broke that to cover the damages a portion of every superchat gets siphoned by the court to service it. Imagine if the court was able to order Rackets to give Monty the Balldomobile.

Remember when Rackets thought that having Randazza on retainer would prevent people from suing him over mean words? Well it turns out hiring the country's most hyped up "1st Amendment lawyer" doesn't do a whole lot when you say stuff that is defemation per se. Oh and having the judge and plaintiff's attorney hating your guts. I bet Monty's Lawyer is doing this at a massive discount.

Up to this point, it's been relatively cheap, but now is where the real billable hours begin, and Schneider's partner isn't going to be all "lmao" when it starts eating into his end of the take.

 

[feral cat #6385]

I decided to sacrifice sleep to do the archive from today when the news in LOCALS dropped about Nick's case:

Discussion of the case continues in LOCALS:

Thanks for your hard work providing us with amusement. Good Christ. I have a kitten that insists on nursing on me and even that is less painful than the stupid that is Nick's Locals.

 

[LanternsNSongs]

Jenna_c​

Yeah, but I’d be willing to bet he has some leeway built in. He was a lawyer and probably had a lawyer look over it and negotiate.

Nick had Ty Beard look over it yeah.

 

[Botchy Galoop]

Since it is pretty apparent that no matter what the legal outcome of Rekieta v Quest is; Nick loses. I think the only way for Nick to salvage his career and ego is to go all in on the freeze peach larp.
I can almost be convinced that he already thinks he is some kind of a digital Lenny Bruce or Larry Flynt. IT'S JUST JOKES, BRO! I'm sure that he can convince a fair number of his hangers-on that he'll take this case to the highest court in TEH LAND! *grift machine creaks into action*


However this goes, it will be interesting to see how Nick handles the outcome.

 

[feral cat #6385]

However this goes, it will be interesting to see how Nick handles the outcome.

By sucking dick for spare change at Gay 90's.

 

[Homer Simpson]

M O T I O N D E N I E D

Should've just stuck to lawsplaining instead of rolling in the shit with us nick.

 

[zimzam88]

Have you seen the status of his KickPayMe? He has systematically alienated his big paypigs. Winemoms aren't picking up the slack.

Even if he got another rittenhouse/depp-type trial dropped in his lap I find it unlikely he could capture much more growth and reverse his current trends. The lawtube sektor which was once revolutionary I think is now pretty saturated and most passionate viewers have moved onto different streamers with trial coverage that is more consistent.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Since it is pretty apparent that no matter what the legal outcome of Rekieta v Quest is; Nick loses. I think the only way for Nick to salvage his career and ego is to go all in on the freeze peach larp.
I can almost be convinced that he already thinks he is some kind of a digital Lenny Bruce or Larry Flynt. IT'S JUST JOKES, BRO! I'm sure that he can convince a fair number of his hangers-on that he'll take this case to the highest court in TEH LAND! *grift machine creaks into action*


However this goes, it will be interesting to see how Nick handles the outcome.

I think his 1A Absolutist role really is flawed. He has banned people for 'harming his business' and has told people to stop giving him criticisms. There are enough people he has burned that are (at least currently) motivated to troll him.

If Nick succeeds at anything now it will be DESPITE the haters, where previously he thrived BECAUSE of the haters. It will be a long road to recovery, if he makes it.

Nick was supposed to laugh at the cows; not become one. He is forever touched by that taint of lolcow for those who remember.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Final drop before I do because of sleep deprivation:

Comments on Nick's LOCALS announcement of the case update:

Spoiler: LOCALS comment on Nick's announcment

What is interesting to me is that Nick has built up his audience of idiots that know nothing of the law. The comments tell me that they think this is a slam-dunk for Nick, and if that negatively affects his fundraising, it will be divine comedy.

Nick will have to whinge more to pump those numbers up...

 

[Diamond Homonculus]

The lose condition has pretty much already been met for Rekieta. All Monty really had to do was keep this going until it cost enough that Rekieta would be too mad to chalk it up as a win outright.

Now any victory rant no matter how triumphant will come with an asterisk, a but.

 

[Shush]

I think the more interesting question is: 'Who will cover his case filings first?'

 

[Star Platinum]

One nice thing about the standard formatting for judicial opinions is that you occasionally get pretty good comedic timing in the writing. I could hear the Always Sunny title card music in my head.

Spoiler: peanut gallery musings

My personal take on the opinion is that it's pretty bad for Nick. Looks like Judge is signalling that Nick is probably liable for defamation per se (which is not a hard claim to prove). NIED/IIED may get dismissed. Quick glance at a law review article tells me that Minnesota law for defamation, presumed damages, and how they interplay with emotional distress claims is kinda wonky.

 

[Pomniman]

The wages of sheer balldo boofing gay 90s gargling hedo II hubris. It's almost impressive that he's somehow managed to make himself less sympathetic than someone like monty. It takes true dedication to being a complete faggot to burn up that much good will in so little time. Take a nice long sip out of your cuck chalice Nicky, you've earned it.

 

[Clipuoka]

Clip that just came down from Hey Clip This... Along with some of the latest Elissa Clips. Expecting major coom cilps once Nick discusses the motion denied.

@Montagraph V. @RekietaLaw : Nick's Motion DENIED, Judge Wants 'Discovery NOW!'

https://youtu.be/z00ZpSHc9h8

Twitter Slap Fights: @RekietaLaw v @AnimeOutsidersTheWebsite re: Pipkin Pippa

Someone has reuploaded HeyClipThis's vid with more bleeps on Nick's words. Appears to be a channel from the same clipperfocused on Rendazza? It's called Scamdazza.

HeyClipThis! has been banned for a week.

Elissa has posted the docs on her Community tab.

For a laugh, random funny clip with some voice manipulation at the end by Bernie Gacon:

 

[JackoVerde]

Even if he got another rittenhouse/depp-type trial dropped in his lap I find it unlikely he could capture much more growth and reverse his current trends. The lawtube sektor which was once revolutionary I think is now pretty saturated and most passionate viewers have moved onto different streamers with trial coverage that is more consistent.

i think uncivil law is the main lawtuber of them, in that he actually reads out and explains big court procedings including the supreme court stuff.
so what are the odds montegraph wins, also how much can he actually claim in damages anyway. i dont think nick was conspiring to drag this guys reputation and lose him money, however little he could have made.

 

[AnOminous]

While it's easy to blame the lawyer, I think this is Nick thinking he's smart, and Randazza just cashin' checks!

Why blame Randazza? He's just doing what he's being paid to do. Literally, his client is a lawyer himself. He is not being taken for a ride. He is taking HIMSELF for a ride.

 

[Cyberpunk Panatela]

while he sits there passively listening that makes him a cuck.

How sure are you about the "passively listening" part? Were both his hands in plain view during that entire segment?

Also, people in the thread are really overthinking cuckoldry. A cuckold is a man married to an adultress. No more, no less.

He doesn't have to know about it.
He doesn't need to watch.
Niggers don't have to be involved(Sorry, Mr. Fuentes and fans, but that's the way it is)

Back on topic:

Anyone who knows anything about Minnesota law in the thread, there's some stuff in the denial of summary judgement that I don't quite get:

1. The statement that Minnesota had anti-SLAPP legislation but it was deemed unconstitutional. Was the whole concept of such legislation found to be unconstitutional or only parts of the statute? (It seems a bit weird that the law wasn't sent back to the legislature with instructions to fix it but just declared void - is that just the US way of doing things?)
2. Regarding the fact that calling someone a pædophile is considered defamation per se: Can this be countered by showing the statement to be true (I'm thinking of cases like the "MAP community" and convicted child molesters here), or is this absolute?

 

[Procrastinhater]

I need to put Balldos thread back on watch it goes too fast, I forgot all about this faggot.
Balldo is such a goddamn retard.
He could have given Monty 10K at the start to fuck off, its pocket change compared to what he was making during Depp, and Monty is a fucking pauper, he would have jumped at the chance to get a 10K under the table to just go away.
Instead this fucking stubborn asshole has thrown away tens of thousands for nothing, and he's gonna end up tens of thousands more in the hole by the end of it no matter how it goes.
Good fucking job Nick.

 

[Swole McPole]

What is interesting to me is that Nick has built up his audience of idiots that know nothing of the law. The comments tell me that they think this is a slam-dunk for Nick, and if that negatively affects his fundraising, it will be divine comedy.

These comments were really illustrative. Actual practicing lawyers know that the law is complicated and difficult and that's true of those areas in which you actually practice and have expertise.

Nick doesn't know this because he's never *really* practiced law. He just fucked about, pretending to do so for a few months. Nevertheless, he's managed to persuade this shower of dullards that he knows what the fuck he's talking about, that the law is easy and that he's right about everything.

It's all a bit like those apocalyptic doomsday cults. The cult leader tells his flock, "The End of the World is Coming! It's this Friday! I have a direct line to God and he has told me this directly."

Come Saturday when the rapture still hasn't happened, the flock remain committed. "OK, according to Pastor Nick, God's calculations must have been off by a few months. Pastor Nick needs our tithes all the more now, because it's critical that all us True Believers make it to the Promised Land of Hedonism II where we can coom to our heart's content for all eternity."

 

[Manimal House]

Rackets come have made this whole thing disappear right at the very start with a retraction and an apology. He refused to do that, despite obviously knowing that what he'd said would be defamatory per se and could result in his losing a very expensive action for defamation.

I think there were a couple of reasons for this.

To add onto this: hasn't Nick always had this opinion that you should never apologize for things that upset others? I know that's a popular thing to say in regards to outrage over mean tweets and whatnot, but I remember hearing him go on rants about always saying what you mean and never backing down. Even before all of his big trial coverage he was saying that, it may as well be the only thing he's been consistent on despite his habit of doing the whole 'well, I know I said that but what I meant was this' double talk. I haven't watched his streams in a while, but I doubt that's changed.

Personally, I don't think he should apologize, but for a different reason. The only time anyone should ever apologize for anything is when they are ACTUALLY SINCERELY sorry about something they said or did. If you apologize just to appease those you upset, they're not going to accept it because it's obvious when someone does that to get out of trouble. Forced apologies only make things worse because the people that were on your side will think you bitched out and everyone else will see it as an opportunity to rip you a new one or take a piece of you. That being said, the attitude of 'never apologize for any reason' is mostly just a stubborn justification method used by people who think they're never wrong about anything, ever.