Artcow WogglebugLoveProductions / Cynthia Hanson / Cherie Anne Hapney - One Womanchild's Fruitless Quest to Make Her Cockroach Husbando a Household Name

What is the Wogglebug's sexual orientation?


  • Total voters
    434
As someone who is an Oz fan, I never had an issue with the Wogglebug. I actually thought he was fairly endearing, with his tendencies to appear intelligent and educated, but it becomes apparent that he is not all that intelligent. A bit dopey, but nice, and harmless.

And I like the way Skottie Young drew him in his Marvel Adaptation of the Oz books.
latest


...Why anyone would obsess over such a auxiliary character from a children's book series though, is beyond me

I personally found the Scarecrow to be a much more engaging "brainy" character, to be frank.
The Scarecrow is too mainstream for Cynthia. She believes that it's her duty to show Woggle to the world as everyone in the Oz fandom apparently hates him. -- Except to learn and be a fan you also have to take a lame loyalty test and be Cynthia approved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HickoryDickory
I stayed away for this long because Cynthia was upset that I posted something here that I recorded specifically for her and didn't ask her permission to do so. In a way, she had a valid point. It's kind of rude to record something and send to someone saying "I recorded this for you" then post it in a public place without getting permission. Now I have returned because I need to set a few things straight. I apologize in advance for all of the quotes but please bear with me.

Updates from me:

I've finally and ultimately decided I shall not release my movies to Amazon. Instead I will sell them through my own website only.

I have talked this over with @voiceguy and he has fully agreed with me on it.
Hmm. I wouldn't say "fully agreed" necessarily. One of my managers at my old job always used to tell me "You have to learn to pick your battles, and don't pick one you can't win." I tried really hard to convince her to sell the movies on Amazon, almost succeeded, then some of you people started posting plans to try to get bad reviews from various websites. After that, Amazon was out of the question for her and I knew I was never going to convince her otherwise. It was a battle I wouldn't win, so I stopped trying. But "fully agreed" is too strong a term for what happened, it would be more precise to say I "acquiesced".
And actually @voiceguy has been quite an encouragement and inspiration in why I should be alienating toward the Oz fans and to how much of an extent (a great one). His ideas of subjects for new books forced me to remember why I wanted the Wogglebug to be in movies in a non-Oz environment as if his origins were always there and never in Oz. It's because I love the Wogglebug and hate Oz because Oz hates him. .
Huh? Wha? I never encouraged her to alienate the Oz fandom, quite the opposite in fact. I kept pointing out to her that the Oz fandom was a good built-in fanbase because they actually know who the Wogglebug is. But her hatred of them runs so deep because 99% of them think of him as a villain. Battle can't be won, another acquiescence.
It sounds to me like @voiceguy , if he's supporting you alienating a fanbase, has no idea of how to handle franchises or fandoms for the purpose of creating a success. Every person you alienate is not just one less fan but many, as they'll likely tell their friends and family not to bother either.
You know, @ActualKiwi , You strike me as a fairly intelligent person but you obviously don't know me well. I understand fully well how franchises work and that you don't want to alienate any conceivable fan. Like some others have already mentioned, I think it's wrong for Cynthia to lump you all together as despicable trolls -- but will you at least grant me the kindness of admitting that there have been a number of rather vicious-minded people in this thread who have insulted and demeaned her? Granted, she made a bad impression when she first posted here, but she did manage to win over a number of people who have legitimately tried to help her.
@ActualKiwi All I'm saying is @voiceguy understands me and knows I am the one who's in charge of my decisions, actions, and scripts and movies, franchise and fandom. And he is only the voice behind the icon of my fandom and that is as it should be. I just mean he is helping me just as he only wants to do. And so he knows if he wants to help me at all he can only support and help me to alienate the Oz fans and make their favorite characters look bad. He never argues against me at all as he knows my mind is made up and he wants no bad energy between and so he does not question my decisions and scripts he just does his lines and honors my wishes.
Not 100% true, but I do try to respect her decisions and gently try to ameliorate some of them. I don't argue, but I do make suggestions. If she chooses not to take them then so be it. In the end, she's da boss.
So voiceguy is fully supporting Cynthia ostracising the Oz community and this business model? Interesting.

Not sure if that's her putting words in his mouth (ie she made suggestions and he said 'sure, sounds good') or if he's really behind it.

Possibly an "I'll agree with you if it keeps you paying me" situation.
Again, the fact that I get paid for doing the voice work comes up. Let's run through it again, shall we? I get paid for doing the Wogglebug's voice ONLY for movies that she plans to make money off of. I do not charge her for studio work or audio adjustment. I do not charge for recording re-takes or rewrites. I do not charge her for promotional materials. I did not charge her for writing the lyrics for the songs in the movie. I did not charge her for rewriting pretty much the entire screenplay, a rewrite that vastly improved her scores with the script-reading services. I will not be charging her for the two short film tie-ins to this movie. Since she paid me for recording the lines for the New York Adventure, the script has undergone a major overhaul. I am currently working on a free re-write of that script and will record those lines for no charge. I even convinced her that the girl who voices Sylvie (which means half the weight of the movie is on her shoulders) should be paid as well. Now, is everybody clear on the money situation?
Woggle, if you're still around, I have a few quick questions: do you watch/read or keep up with any modern children's media or have an opinion on it? Any current sources of inspiration or disdain? Also, have you had any success testing out your Wogglebug stuff with kids and parents?
I think I can answer those for her. She keeps her finger on the pulse of children's programming to see what's new and what's successful. There is an "Alice in Wonderland" series that inspired her to do the short film tie-ins to the features. They will involve Sylvie returning to Genoma for a short adventure (or being told a story about one) which will teach a valuable moral to children. The children doing voices and their parents all love the script and can't wait to see the movie.
@voiceguy is taking you for a hell of a ride.
Not quite sure what you mean by that, sir, but if it's a reference to money then please see my comments above.

Say what you want about Cynthia Hanson, she has a clear focus on what she hopes to accomplish. If not everything she does seems to make sense to some of you, it's because I don't think she's ever tried to tackle anything this big before. I am trying to help her get through this project as much as I can, because I want it to be a success. I know what failure is like -- my first movie "The Man from Schenectady" was made by a director who thought she was a paragon of film-making. She took my script (which everyone who read it said was a brilliant piece of comedy) and ruined it. I don't want to go through that again. So my first order of business is to help Cynthia to make the best movie she can (she films scenes, I tell her what needs to be fixed, and she fixes it). We'll work out the distribution later.
 
...Why anyone would obsess over such a auxiliary character from a children's book series though, is beyond me.
I personally found the Scarecrow to be a much more engaging "brainy" character, to be frank.
Oh, you! :tomgirl:
The answer is second-tier/auxillary character are even more of a blank than the main characters are; the reader could project any number of traits onto the character.
More stuff on the whole "poor Wogglebug is abused ablublublooo," Baum started to use the Wogglebug as a way of poking fun at the arrogance of over-educated individuals with a higher opinion of themselves than they should have. While the given description of him is kinda harsh, he doesn't really become a rat-bastard until another author takes over continuing the OZ series after Baum's death.
-Maybe Cynthia takes it as an attack on her beloved Wogglebug because she's projected some of herself onto the character? Who knows.

Yeah, scarecrow's better because he's been there from the start and he doesn't get as arrogant as the bug does. My favorite will always be the Tin Man, though. Gentle most of the time, but puns will drive him to contemplating murder.

The Marvel Wogglebug isn't too shabby (look at his fucking adorable horse-bug feet!) but I'm a fan of the Ike Morgan version due to how terrifying his bug hands and feet are compared to the amicable humanoid face. Also his taste in fabric prints just fucks me up.
In both of these versions he looks more like an educated dandy.

The Productions version tried to be in keeping with the original depiction of him in the first edition but failed when they tried to make the design more human to the point of uncanny valley. If they had stuck with original or Ike's, they would have been better off. Also that fucking voice needs to be changed, he sounds like a mosquito and nothing good comes from those fuckers.
 
Last edited:
Heyyyy! Cynthia likes my voice. :(
You two clearly do not live in a state partially made from mosquitos, do not hear them in your sleep, and should count yourselves lucky.


Edit: try for a longhorn beetle voice? it's likely that's what the wogglebug's based on.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
Say what you want about Cynthia Hanson, she has a clear focus on what she hopes to accomplish. If not everything she does seems to make sense to some of you, it's because I don't think she's ever tried to tackle anything this big before. I am trying to help her get through this project as much as I can, because I want it to be a success. I know what failure is like -- my first movie "The Man from Schenectady" was made by a director who thought she was a paragon of film-making. She took my script (which everyone who read it said was a brilliant piece of comedy) and ruined it. I don't want to go through that again. So my first order of business is to help Cynthia to make the best movie she can (she films scenes, I tell her what needs to be fixed, and she fixes it). We'll work out the distribution later.

sure, good for her for being focused on her goal. We're just pointing out that her ambition is at best, misguided, and at worst, outright asinine

The Wogglebug is not an engaging character, and the animation in her films are on par with those Brazilian animation studios that make rip-off Pixar and Disney films every year to try to scrape a few crumbs off the Walt Disney popularity pie.

At best, her movies are the kind of thing you'd find in the bargain bin at a grocery store. If that's all she wants, is "The Wogglebug's story to be told", then sure, she could accomplish that. But if she thinks she is going to introduce the character to a whole new generation and make him as popular as the Princesses from "Frozen" I can guarantee you that won't happen. Not even close.

Kids will be turned off by the animation alone. When they can see movies like Zootopia and Finding Dory, something like the Wogglebug has nothing to offer them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@voiceguy
I'm a bit confused, my comment had nothing to do with your financial agreement with Cynthia, and my suspicion that you didn't actually agree with her ostracising the Oz community and selling exclusively from her website was apparently correct by your own admission. @ActualKiwi wasn't accusing you of anything untoward either. They were just wondering if you were agreeing with her because she's your employer.

Sylvie is an extremely important character and needs to be voiced by a competent actor. I hope you really have made Cynthia understand that.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
Say what you want about Cynthia Hanson, she has a clear focus on what she hopes to accomplish. If not everything she does seems to make sense to some of you, it's because I don't think she's ever tried to tackle anything this big before. I am trying to help her get through this project as much as I can, because I want it to be a success.

Helping someone with severe mental problems attempt to complete a goal that is at the center of their obsession does them no favors.
 
sure, good for her for being focused on her goal. We're just pointing out that her ambition is at best, misguided, and at worst, outright asinine

The Wogglebug is not an engaging character, and the animation in her films are on par with those Brazilian animation studios that make rip-off Pixar and Disney films every year to try to scrape a few crumbs off the Walt Disney popularity pie.

At best, her movies are the kind of thing you'd find in the bargain bin at a grocery store. If that's all she wants, is "The Wogglebug's story to be told", then sure, she could accomplish that. But if she thinks she is going to introduce the character to a whole new generation and make him as popular as the Princesses from "Frozen" I can guarantee you that won't happen. Not even close.

Kids will be turned off by the animation alone. When they can see movies like Zootopia and Finding Dory, something like the Wogglebug has nothing to offer them.
Different tastes. I read The Marvelous Land of Oz and The Wogglebug Book, both by Baum, and found his character to be delightful and amusing. Will he ever be as popular as any Disney Princess? Of course not. But I think there is an audience out there who will enjoy his story as it unfolds. As for comparing the quality of our animation to Disney/Pixar -- well, let's see. Zootopia had a budget of $150,000,000; Finding Dory had a budget of $200,000,000. We are making our movie for 0.001% of a Disney budget. If we had their budget, our animation would kick ass too. And you may be right, the animation provided by Iclone may not engage the sophisticated youth of today. On the other hand, when I look at some of the cheap crap that passes for animation on Cartoon Network, Iclone doesn't look that bad. Plus, we have an engaging story that I think families are going to enjoy. Yes, that's right, I really believe in this project -- otherwise I wouldn't be in here -- and those of you who know me know that I am an intelligent and rationally sound person.

One more thought: America was built on the foundation that people who work hard can make their dreams come true. Cynthia is working hard to make her dream come true -- why should she be attacked and insulted for it just because you don't believe in her dream?
@voiceguy
I'm a bit confused, my comment had nothing to do with your financial agreement with Cynthia, and my suspicion that you didn't actually agree with her ostracising the Oz community and selling exclusively from her website was apparently correct by your own admission. @ActualKiwi wasn't accusing you of anything untoward either. They were just wondering if you were agreeing with her because she's your employer.

Sylvie is an extremely important character and needs to be voiced by a competent actor. I hope you really have made Cynthia understand that.
Sorry about that. The tirade about money wasn't addressed at you because you were right. And though I appreciate @ActualKiwi as an intelligent and well-meaning person, his use of the phrase "if it keeps you paying me" just rubbed me the wrong way. I get touchy whenever anyone mentions the money she pays me because when I first came on this site, it was to answer accusations that I was a con artist ripping off Cynthia. Truthfully, if you compare the number of hours I'm putting into this project against what I'm getting paid, it's less than minimum wage. I'll make more money playing Santa Claus for five weeks, ho ho ho. As I said above I believe in this project.

In answer to your second comment: Yes. Sylvie is as important as the Wogglebug in this movie. The ten year old actress supplying her voice is just wonderful. This is her first acting job, but I think her performance is going to make a good first credit on her resume.
Helping someone with severe mental problems attempt to complete a goal that is at the center of their obsession does them no favors.
Severe mental problems? Not hardly. Some mental problems? I wouldn't try to argue with that since so many people have some mental problems. I suffer from depression and anxiety disorders; does that make me inadequate? And I prefer to think of myself as helping someone to fulfill their dream, which imho is one of the nicest things you can do for a person in this crazy shitpot we call Life.
 
Last edited:
Cynthia is working hard to make her dream come true -- why should she be attacked and insulted for it just because you don't believe in her dream?

Cynthia has bullied and attacked people for daring to write Wogglebug fanfiction that doesn't adhere to her vision.

Severe mental problems? Not hardly

Schizophrenia is a mental illness that would probably be classed as "severe".
 
Cynthia has bullied and attacked people for daring to write Wogglebug fanfiction that doesn't adhere to her vision.
Do you have a link for that? I would be genuinely interested in seeing it.
Schizophrenia is a mental illness that would probably be classed as "severe".
Really? Where did you get your Ph.D. from? And how many private sessions have you had with her to reach that diagnosis? You know who else had schizophrenia? Math genius John Nash.
 
Do you have a link for that? I would be genuinely interested in seeing it.

Really? Where did you get your Ph.D. from? And how many private sessions have you had with her to reach that diagnosis? You know who else had schizophrenia? Math genius John Nash.
The link is this thread. There are a few instances sprinkled throughout, even where she stalked a former "friend" for daring to write her a gift fanfic that apparently has religious connotations. (I don't think it was posted and only via Cynthia's word)

Do not challenge people here on mental illnesses. You are also not qualified.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
Do not challenge people here on mental illnesses. You are also not qualified.
I don't claim to be. But it seems to me that anyone who is going to state something as fact ought to have the educational background and have the one on one experience with the person to back up what they say. Otherwise, they're just trolling.
 
Back