Retard uprising in the "Mad at the Internet" thread over being told women should be considered in far-right politics

everyone knows nature would assert itself and the stronger sex would reassume control in the event of a real societal collapse, so it doesn't even bear mentioning. if you're a man seething about this then its because you want it to happen. if you're a woman seething about this its because you don't want it to happen. simple as, and pointless to discuss.
unless you enjoy it. in which case, carry on.

I don't think there will be a societal collapse, we'll just gradually fall into controlled demolition Brazil/South Africa tier countries. Infrastructure will be become unreliable. And there will be an army of security guards at Martha's Vineyard and the like, ready if you ever get uppity about it. Certain neighborhoods will become no-go zones because of gang wars or Mexican cartel activity. Similar to the no-go zones in Sweden.

I mean we already see it with the tent cities of homeless popping up all over the US. Then afterward we'll have the Favelas of Brazil.
 
chronically single old crone
PowerLite_982W_06_Right_Angle_690x460.jpg
 
I don't think there will be a societal collapse, we'll just gradually fall into controlled demolition Brazil/South Africa tier countries. Infrastructure will be become unreliable. And there will be an army of security guards at Martha's Vineyard and the like, ready if you ever get uppity about it. Certain neighborhoods will become no-go zones because of gang wars or Mexican cartel activity. Similar to the no-go zones in Sweden.

I mean we already see it with the tent cities of homeless popping up all over the US. Then afterward we'll have the Favelas of Brazil.
how is that not a societal collapse?
do you think south africa or brazil are by any means stable?
for fuck's sake, brazil has a bunch of gangs running around doing whatever they want with impunity, like mexico

We already see that now in first world countries during situations of high civil unrest: they just decriminalize it or ignore that it's happening. I'm not sure how you can point at the decline and say it's not happening because it's not complete shit yet.
 
We already see that now in first world countries during situations of high civil unrest: they just decriminalize it or ignore that it's happening. I'm not sure how you can point at the decline and say it's not happening because it's not complete shit yet.

By collapse I meant a sudden jump, like yesterday bread was $2, now it's $200.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: im5!XxhO and Lake
Because all of you are retarded. You're all complaining about whamens on the Internet instead of going outside and talking to them but instead saying that oppressing them would be good for society

If there are guys wanting to oppress Women for the good of society, why would they value talking to Women? If they are so feebleminded, then talking to them would be a waste of time? That's the thing I don't get. It's like a paradox.
 
Why are we arguing of the definition of collapse?

View attachment 5242987
Yes, and the definition of "literally" also includes "metaphorically", collapse in modern vernacular is used as a colloquial term used to refer to the general decline of society into it eventually actually crumbling or rather collapsing with the original definition, don't be so anal about it.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: WebLurker and Lake
Yes, and the definition of "literally" also includes "metaphorically", collapse in modern vernacular is used as a colloquial term used to refer to the general decline of society into it eventually actually crumbling or rather collapsing with the original definition, don't be so anal about it.

I just had two people randomly call out my usage of 'collapse' and then told I'm being anal. lol
 
If there are guys wanting to oppress Women for the good of society, why would they value talking to Women?
A lot of women and men who put pussy on a pedestal don't realize this about the people they preach to. Also, it's ridiculous that just talking to women will get you laid. I just don't see sex as worth the effort of having to interact with a woman, never mind all that can come afterward. She can claim I raped her without any fear of repercussion, get far too attached, or get pregnant if protection fails.
This is the part where one of you comes in saying I shouldn't be having sex in the first place if I don't want to be in a relationship or insists that women have something else to offer men aside from sex.
 
This nigger is literally GAY. Thread should've been over after that.
His doomsaying was bad enough, but after outting himself as a faggot and someone that gave up on women after one woman hurt him I don't know why people even tried to argue with him about men and women's relationships. He should change his username to "please tread on me" to reflect his weak pessimistic thinking.
 
Back