- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
There's no such thing as an insanity defense for civil torts (*). If you are a fat retard like Pat and you rack up fines for your retardation, it is still the obligation of you or your tard wrangler to come up with the dough.Again I shouldn't be shocked from this but it's just so insane how delusional he is. Maybe he's trying to go for some legal strat of not being mentally fit enough? Kind of like how if you're found legally insane you can't be sentenced to death in the US. Is there something like that for avoiding paying Quasi or am I giving Fatrick too much credit for actually having a plan with these insane ramblings?
(*) As with most things there are a couple exceptions like specific intent torts.
There's also no reason any person needs to give any explanation whatsoever for why they are attending a public proceeding.There is no reason to give Fat an argument that he actually has “stalkers” in a court room.
You have an absolute right to do that. Obviously don't tard up the place but if you aren't a tard you won't do that anyway.
Last edited: