I think it's worth noting that Pat's not going to be the only side presenting their case. Quasi's lawyer's going to be there, too. If Pat sullenly caves and says, 'Fine, fine, I'll pay it,' then Quasi's lawyer's going to be able to point to the Pretender's podcast and point out how he's publicly stated that he will never pay, he considers the judgment illegitimate, etc., and how Pat has already promised once, and brazenly changed his mind as soon as he had some time to himself. I think Quasi's got a very strong case here for requiring more than just Pat's word that he'll pay. Pat going out there and stating, 'We decided not to pay,' as a public excuse for not following through with the amortization plans is really harmful to his case. He didn't even try to pretend there was some mitigating circumstance.