- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Dear Judge Sosnay,Independent Journalist Daniel Mullen has his work cut out for him with all these new filings:
View attachment 5290812
It merely says "correspondence", as opposed to, "Affidavit in support of Motion for Continuance", but I wonder if this isn't the start of a deluge of documents intended to try and derail what should be a completely straightforward process.
Granted, these attorneys and this specific lawl firm don't appear to be the sort that you'd seek out if you were looking to spend a bunch of money to delay a process or engage in behavior that would otherwise piss off a judge that already has good reason to dislike you, but who knows what Pig Sandwich actually told them about the real facts and circumstances? Who says they're not looking to make a name for themselves in the internet "defamation" area or that they don't view this as some sort of "social 'justice'" type action? And who says they don't know that they SFWA dropped over $100,000.00 in legal fees on this buffoon's behalf only to never actually get past the pleading stage [and think he may be able to weasel them out of a bit more]?
It's farfetched, sure, but this is L.O.Law-world.
No child, I didn't. Yes child, I am. No child, I am not. No child, we aren't. Yes child, I will.
Disrespectfully yours,
Richard S Johnson