Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 129 37.7%

  • Total voters
    342
So what happens when Vito gets arrested for CP or some related sex offense? What defense will these fools give then? "Oh but his jokes we're funny. They were cheeky" ???

His jokes don't even qualify as jokes. They're worded like confessions without an even semi-literate punchline. These are literal fools who like to play pretend experts on things such as "social cues", "social media" (and apparently now comedy), but spend too much time online in echochambers to see how irresponsible they are to acknowledge even reasonably modest social boundaries.

Read any of these tweets outloud in public. Hell, read them to yourself in a mirror. Only idiots would take such posts as comedy. No one else in their right fucking minds but fools would entertain it as anything such.

There is no such thing as a social media expert outside of the technical definition of an SEO expert. There is no such thing as a universal mastery in social cues. There are not even "people experts". Human nature is too prone to blindspots. These are weasel terms for being a bullshit artist. And apparently "social cues" are just a way to cover for other people's suspicious commentary. It's absurd.
 
He is now doing research for materials to defend vito with against jeremy from geeks and gamers.
Screenshot_20230903-040549_X.jpg
 
I think Nicks recent pro-pedo-humor or whatever is to help his lawsuit. It's so the judge/jury see him making fun of pedo-stuff and thus the 'harm' of calling Monty a pedo is lightened because its muh comedy. It's so his lawyer can go "Look, ya hona. My client jokes about cheese pizza all the time." If he took it more seriously (like Null) then calling someone a pedo would be far more damaging in court since he means it. It just so happens that nick is related to several people (Vito, Drexel) that have sus reputations. He is defending their retarded opinions so he can play the freeze peach card and build a history of doing edgy pedoshit-humour to try and lessen the damage of his accusations.

I've watched him for a long time and he's always been about putting pedos on the wall. I think hes even talked about disliking Vito in the past for this very content. But now that he's in a lawsuit for calling someone a pedo? The timing is too convenient. I think the nose is trying to alter his behavior to look more like a shock-jock in court to get away with his defamation since his words wouldn't able to be taken as seriously.

It reminds me of when he used to constantly call himself a journalist as if it were a get out of jail free card when being a douche.

That's my two cents. I don't know much about law stuff but I hope I got the gist of my theory across.
It's a good theory. I think he's too coom-brained to think beyond his immediate self-gratification; but if he's not, it's a plausible speculation.
 
Even if they might be attractive they are kids, they act like kids, they talk like kids
That's exactly what I meant. I didn't say it was right, or that I personally feel that way, I said it's a common thing that needs to be acknowledged. "Teen" is always one of the top porn categories in those surveys and grown men start to harass girls the second they develop secondary sex characteristics. Saying "it doesn't exist and in fact you are a pedo for noticing it" is performative virtue signalling.
You're also dealing with people in their teens and early twenties for whom the retardation of 16 year olds may not be as obvious, or intuitively off-putting as for someone more seasoned.
I've seen numerous clips of IQ 80 "influencers" standing their ground against people who have the heart in the right place but no clue how to properly argue their point. It's very frustrating to me to see them be able to walk away from discussions with a W in the eyes of their audience and further normalize bad behaviour. I feel like the sexualisation of teenagers has skyrocketed in the last couple years and it's gotten far more socially acceptable in certain online circles. Drex' disgusting views of women are just one example of what I think is a broader trend.
I think a bad argument getting dismissed is worse than no argument being made, because it gives the audience an illusion of the harmful position being right when in reality the person with the correct view was just poorly equipped.

Edit: Sorry, this is something I'm passionate about, I got carried away.
 
Last edited:
He is now doing research for materials to defend vito with against jeremy from geeks and gamers.
View attachment 5310759
"Vito's [jokes] weren't funny, but they didn't seem serious at all given the context of defending Cuties and wanting to normalize pedophilia as simple mental illness".
FTFY, you phenotypical snake.
 
He is now doing research for materials to defend vito with against jeremy from geeks and gamers.
View attachment 5310759
What fucking "context"?!?!

Somebody asked Vito about virtuous pedophilia, and Vito gave the boilerplate propaganda response and said he's one of them. Where's the joke, dipshit?

God damn, nobody can be this stupid, can they? If he'd get both the bottle and Dick's dick out of his mouth long enough, he'd see this.

EDIT TO ADD:
Can you imagine how inconsolable Nick and Dick would be if child sex crime related charges were laid against Vito? I almost pray that happens here just for that alone. And it's only almost because I don't want to see kids hurt. Holy shit.
 
I think it’s time someone checks Nicks hard drive, I wouldn’t be shocked if he and Vito/Dick all have a lot more in common then we think.
 
Imagine your in legal trouble and you decide to go with Nick because of the good reviews on Google. As you pray this sexual deviant is busting his ass, justifying his expensive costs, you have little to no idea he's defending pedophiles on the Internet and calling the owner of a gossip forum while in the shower, crying.

As you sit in your cell, Nick is getting pegged by the balldo.
 
The real value would be that it would 1) put something out there that will almost certainly look horrible for Drex and Nick that Nick will almost defiantly be unable to resist fucking up worse by trying to get the last word on and 2) probably be pretty damning for anyone who's on the fence.
Why bother? They do it for free.
I've always tended to think of Drexel as a guy who was raised far away from black people and doesn't quite understand how to relate to them. Especially black women. An overly strong mother and an absent father (if that is true) could multiply his problems.
Like Amy from Congo.
In fact, I find it EXTREMELY interesting he's really hammering Null on the Drex thing, but not the other thing Null and Nick supposedly discussed: Hedonism II. Why? Could it be that as we talk more and more about Drexel, and Dick, and Vito, we're focusing less on him?
Probably. Or maybe stirring up shit to make it look like he is still relevant for contract negotiations. Since he burnt through his old audience, he could be trying to cultivate a new pedophile audience.
A grown ass man obsessing over moles in his discord is so fucking funny to me. Especially one who fancies himself as some suave lady killer.
Stupid muh dik nigger things. Good luck buddy. Half of your discord is moles.
He is now doing research for materials to defend vito with against jeremy from geeks and gamers.
So is he going to put any family time in his family getaway or just slap fight on twitter all weekend?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 5310783
I don't know who should get the platinum medal for mental gymnastics. Nick or me trying to make sense of this.

Oh wait, I probably don't get the medal cause I failed.
You missed the worst tweet. Nick is defending Vito by making Vito style jokes while he's supposed to be engaging with an annual family event. This is going great.

Also I have a feeling Nick won't be on Flashcast ever again based on the below screenshot.

View attachment 5310463
(Twitter | Archive)
His brain is marinated in whiskey.
 
I think Nicks recent pro-pedo-humor or whatever is to help his lawsuit. It's so the judge/jury see him making fun of pedo-stuff and thus the 'harm' of calling Monty a pedo is lightened because its muh comedy. It's so his lawyer can go "Look, ya hona. My client jokes about cheese pizza all the time."
Do you know who makes pedo jokes all the time?

Pedophiles.

"My client is a pedophile" is rarely a winning strategy.
 
So what happens when Vito gets arrested for CP or some related sex offense? What defense will these fools give then? "Oh but his jokes we're funny. They were cheeky" ???
Dude, at the rate Nick is freefalling, he'd go full retard lolbertarian and sputter out some barely decipherable diatribe about how the fascist government is persecuting Vito for "looking at pictures.

That's the problem with lolbertarianism. Follow that path too long and one day you're unironically asking "Okay, but what if the child consents?" Null has mentioned this on MATI, and plenty of other people have made that observation over the years too.

Nick was way more tolerable when he was pretending to be conservative. He should have kept that grift going.
 
All of this using “comedy” as a defense to say disturbing and disgusting things about sexually abusing children is completely missing one of the biggest points of comedy. Comedy is a way to state an opinion or truth in a way that would normally be rejected or frowned upon by the cultural zeitgeist. So when pedo vito tells a a “joke” about wanting to molest children, in his mind, it is a “truth”that every dude would totally molest children if given the ideal circumstances, and because this is also taboo we should all by laughing hysterically!!! Why aren’t you laughing guys!!! :story:
 
He is now doing research for materials to defend vito with against jeremy from geeks and gamers.
View attachment 5310759
Yeah and Louis CK was canceled for being a weird sex pest. Is this his best example? Really scraping the bottom of the barrel here.

View attachment 5310783
I don't know who should get the platinum medal for mental gymnastics. Nick or me trying to make sense of this.

Oh wait, I probably don't get the medal cause I failed.
That has to be the best reply to him so far. "If the joke is okay you make one" He's almost completely staggered.
 
So what happens when Vito gets arrested for CP or some related sex offense? What defense will these fools give then? "Oh but his jokes we're funny. They were cheeky" ???
I suspect Vito is entirely disposable as far as Dick Masterson is concerned. If he got arrested, Dick would just laugh at him and say that he was a dummy. Which he is. And then Dick would move on to find a new sleazy co-host.
Nick would just follow whatever line Dick was doing. Nick is still at heart a fanboy looking for approval. Nick isn't making some sort of principled stand for CP, cuties or Vito. Nick is just mindlessly supporting Dick regardless of the personal cost to Nick.
 
Back