Balldo Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Internet shock jock" not-allowed-to-practice abortionist "lawyer", swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a felonious, copyright cuck. End-stage career failure: normies know.

[Chibitzen]

Nick really should be introspecting over this. It wasn't even that long ago that his own influence meant he could help someone like Vic garner enough help and funding to fight a lawsuit. Now?

He burnt up what was left of any good will during his YT ban victim tour after he funneled everyone into the crappy Locals livechat scheme. The 5K grift and bragging everyone could unsub and he'd be unimpacted probably didn't help. He thinks he can order his audience around when they say or do things he doesn't like. He tells them to get lost. They are there to foot his bills and keep his chat and comments sections above room temperature. Oh and to asspat him with lewd chats.

 

[RotPockets]

aka The Watermelon Patch

The Porch: Fiery but Mostly Peaceful

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Nick himself on stream pointed out how his videos don't get a lot of views and how he runs his mouth at just let him yell at clouds and make fun of his yelling. He joked on his stream he did that he's a nobody. Nick could have just ignored him, or even thrown the occasional barb at him and this wouldn't have happened.

Brother, I have no fucking clue what you are trying to say.

 

[200MB]

His cultivated reputation as the patron saint of free speech and knowledgeable law talkin' guy would take a hit surely?

What's one more dent on a totaled Mustang?

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Funny you should mention that. I saw this in the comments section of Monty's initial video the other day:

View attachment 5335692

I dunno if it can be traced to anybody in particular though. Assuming this person isn't full of shit, Legalbytes would fit the bill. Also, Faran.

There was also two $1,000 donations, a $2,000 donation, and a $2,099 one.

Faran is not a lawyer, but I do agree that the large chats could be a-logs and not Monty whales. Do we even know if Monty has any whales?

Nick has had a 6 year career of making enemies on the internet. He has largely been I slated until now by the goodwill of his audience and the Farms to support him when 'cancelled' and not look to deeply into his flaws.

Nick is just seeing the effect of being a retard on the tinternet without an insulating cushion. Welcome to the real world, Nick, you entitled prick.

Holy shit, for real? I’d love to hear him say that or even see quotes. The delusion is real.

It was actually worse than that. Nick really believed a few months ago that he was going to get a huge anti-SLAPP verdict against Monty, bankrupt him with that debt and then be able to literally supervise everything Monty did afterward on the internet or elsewhere through having an unpaid legal judgement against him. He openly bragged about stuff like that.

He did gloat about this. If I remember, his more wild claims came on Friday degenerate shows.

I would be interested to see what kind of time Schneider sinks into research into those streams as case prep if Nick's desperate gamble fails.

Brother, I have no fucking clue what you are trying to say.

Monty is a nobody, so if Nick didn't hand him a club, he could have laughed at him forever and Monty would be harmless to Nick.

 

[AlSharptonPogrom]

I don't know how it's even possible for me to do that, but I have an idea for how to organize this.

It's just a suggestion, but you 100% absolutely have to make a Drexel thread THEN rename this thread "... Rekieta (a Drexel orbiter)."

Watch Rekieta turn on the sadist groomer.

 

[Kheapathic]

Was Drexel around when Tonka was doing his tough guy shit? Probably the only intelligent thing Tonka ever said was he's not "Internet People," and doesn't get them, the same applies to Drexel; he's obviously not Internet People and fails to understand how to go about this. You'd think his good friend, the Internet Law Pope, would explain this to him.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

For those who don't follow the Weeb Wars board or the Community Happenings thread: the Weeb Wars subforum may be closed or repurposed. An ignominious end. At least there were some nice shirts that came out of it.



The thread:

This board was made for the immense drama spewing forth from the Vic lawsuit. The lawsuit is now dead and the people involved in it have mostly gone away.

So we can go about this one of two ways:
1. Close the board and move live threads to other boards.
2. Repurpose the board.

#1 is the most straight forward.
#2 is possible if someone has a good idea.

.st | .onion

 

[John Andrews Stan]

he's obviously not Internet People and fails to understand

He’s hardly even offline people. Nigger is not terribly bright. He’s lucky so many white people care about being invited to the cookout. Whenever he encounters anyone indifferent to his bix n00d bona fides, he has a complete system failure and defaults to “My life is amazing, yours sucks — MUH DICK!”

They say water finds its own level, but I would not have predicted Nick was this fucking blinded by BBC.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

If only we can be so lucky as to live in a world where Monty gets to dictate what cuck resorts Nick is allowed to go to and which bulls he is allowed to buy for his wife because of an unpaid judgment against HIM.

Makes one wonder how Nick would react in the scenario of a financial judgment against him.

Nick did show disdain for the law with letting his traffic ticket go into penalty this spring, though that was a much lesser scale.

I recall lots of discussion post-Depp how it was in many ways only a moral victory for Johnny given how hard it is to collect awards from a defendant like Heard with non-wagie income.

Nick would be in a similar camp with his superchat monies and Rumble contract. Could be hard to garnish if Nick really wanted to drag his feet.

Would non-payment of a judicial judgment affect his standing with the Minnesota Ethics Board or similar officer?

He burnt up what was left of any good will during his YT ban victim tour after he funneled everyone into the crappy Locals livechat scheme. The 5K grift and bragging everyone could unsub and he'd be unimpacted probably didn't help

Then he bragged about buying a Mustang AFTER it had been been documented that he was informed about Monty's defamation suit.

Then crashed said Mustang.

Then used Monty's lolsuit to cry poor that he could no longer afford 5000 super-duper unique and custom 5k Locals gifts indefinitely.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Guys, we made Drexel very sad.



This tard is ripe for a Chudbuds-esque incident, no Harry Potter bait necessary. Nick surrounds himself with so many tards that I’ll be shocked if we don’t soon get a Hunter’s laptop-type event where we get to see some hilarious emails and DMs:



ETA: Something about Drexel announcing on Twitter that he’s going to click a link is so funny. Based on his tweets you’d think he’s in his 70s.

Drexel doesn’t think much of kids like his own daughter:

 

[Big moth tiddies]

Successful people do not behave this way. I am fairly certain this guy has maxxed out a lot of credit cards or taken out some loans or borrowed money from family or something. Most people don’t just have $17,000 lying around for a rainy day in case they want to fight a subpoena. It’s not something that happens.

I think you're being over optimistic and that you want Nick to be broke.
I'd love for Nick to be broke. I'd love for him to have to start at the bottom again knowing his downfall was his own doing. Given the amount of money he made though, I don't think he's even close to broke. I think he's still sitting on money from the Depp v Heard trial, not counting the shit that came after.

I truly believe this is Nick doing the standard legal meme of "I have more money than you, I'm gonna bury you."
You might ask, "if he's got so much money, why is he doing a gofundme?"
The answer to that is simple. You can never have too much money, and if you can wring money out of your audience, most of which Nick probably actively hates by now, why not do it?

However, I don't think that's a good enough excuse for Nick to say what he said. I think a person should exercise enough self control to avoid falsely accusing somebody of being a child molester

I always go back to what Jersh says. I would not call someone a pedophile unless I would be comfortable putting a gun to their head and pulling the trigger.
Simple as.

 

[Captain Manning]

A proper OP would require his basic details (his age, lives in his mamas house), brief personal history (smash bros. etc), beginnings online as Rekieta's shield and establishing Migtown, an overview of his degenerate interests (gangbang liaison, 2.5-somes with a midget, transsexual encounters and impotence, grooming allegations, etc.), culminating in him gaining more exposure than he bargained for courtesy of KF.

Would you be willing to write it? I think you'd make an excellent candidate.

If we're experiencing one of those all-too-common situations where everybody is clamoring for a thread, but nobody wants to write the damn OP, I guess I can volunteer. I have tomorrow off, so I can start putting puzzle pieces together tonight and through much of tomorrow in Proving Grounds if needed. I don't think it would involve so much writing as it would involve mostly editing.

Main issue with this is I don't want to step on anybody's toes here. The reason we're even at this point in thanks to the stellar work of people such as yourself, @Balldo's Gate, @Pippa's Greasy KB, etc.. You all have done much of the heavy lifting. I have little doubt any one of you would do a better OP than I. In fact, I'd prefer if somebody like you would write it.

Let me know what you think, or if one of you is willing to do it. Either way, I agree he needs his own thread. If only because it'll make this thread a lot easier to read. This is basically becoming the Drexel and Rekieta thread.

 

[AnOminous]

His cultivated reputation as the patron saint of free speech and knowledgeable law talkin' guy would take a hit surely?

Nobody sensible seeking counsel expects the impossible.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I think you're being over optimistic and that you want Nick to be broke.

@bile demon is clowning on Pat Tomlinson with that $17,000 quote. Inside pigball.

 

[Troonos]

Funny you should mention that. I saw this in the comments section of Monty's initial video the other day:

View attachment 5335692

I dunno if it can be traced to anybody in particular though. Assuming this person isn't full of shit, Legalbytes would fit the bill. Also, Faran.

There was also two $1,000 donations, a $2,000 donation, and a $2,099 one.

Faran isn't an attorney, just a journalist.

 

[Pedophobe]

Nobody sensible seeking counsel expects the impossible.

Okay but wouldn't that discourage you from hiring a lawyer with a history of attempting the impossible?

And now every time he tried to blog about some hypothetical point of free speech law aren't people just going to say "lol this is coming from the guy who tried to convince a court to apply an unconstitutional out-of-state standard twice"?

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Would you be willing to write it? I think you'd make an excellent candidate.

If we're experiencing one of those all-too-common situations where everybody is clamoring for a thread, but nobody wants to write the damn OP, I guess I can volunteer. I have tomorrow off, so I can start putting puzzle pieces together tonight and through much of tomorrow in Proving Grounds if needed. I don't think it would involve so much writing as it would involve mostly editing.

Main issue with this is I don't want to step on anybody's toes here. The reason we're even at this point in thanks to the stellar work of people such as yourself, @Balldo's Gate, @Pippa's Greasy KB, etc.. You all have done much of the heavy lifting. I have little doubt any one of you would do a better OP than I. In fact, I'd prefer if somebody like you would write it.

Let me know what you think, or if one of you is willing to do it. Either way, I agree he needs his own thread. If only because it'll make this thread a lot easier to read. This is basically becoming the Drexel and Rekieta thread.

I'll volunteer some time to contribute in either writing, editing, research, or some combination of it. I cannot take on the whole effort, but I should have a bit of a long weekend starting Friday afternoon American Eastern.

 

[Merton J. Dingle]

I'm glad that we found out that Drexel is a homo so that I can forever associate his black retardation with a classic:

 

[Captain Manning]

Okay but wouldn't that discourage you from hiring a lawyer with a history of attempting the impossible?

Well, in Nick's case, that would have been a good thing. It could have saved him a lot of money.

Because if Randazza can't get this shit dismissed, Nick might be kinda fucked. Randazza isn't a fucking wizard. No lawyer is.

What you're seeing here is the old maxim of "if you're facts are bad, argue the law" in practice. I don't see a plan B for arguing the facts if the court doesn't agree with Randazza's legal theory. The facts are atrocious. They're not the type of facts you'd want in front of a jury. Nick said Monty is a child molester. He said it as a fact statement. He then repeated it several times thereafter.

And now every time he tried to blog about some hypothetical point of free speech law aren't people just going to say "lol this is coming from the guy who tried to convince a court to apply an unconstitutional out-of-state standard twice"?

I think he'll be fine. If only because a lot of people support some sort of anti-SLAPP, and think Minnesota is gay for not having one.

I mean, look at Dunford. He hates Nick, and yet he doesn't seem particularly happy with the fact Minnesota is devoid of an anti-SLAPP.