Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%

  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%

  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%

  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%

  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%

  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%

  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%
  • Total voters
    2,240
Heckler1 said:
Honestly he's probably more mold than human at this point.
Click to expand...
I can't unsee him as a fat molded from RE7.

1694809389600.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: REGENDarySumanai, Sundae, Mourning_Cloak and 5 others
Featured on Sep 17, 2023 by 0 0: Defying court orders to delete an unauthorized recording of his legal meeting, Acerthorn either invented time travel or falsified evidence of him deleting the footage by setting his computer's clock back while forgetting to edit his files' dates.
Stebbins v. Google LLC
000119.png

GOOGLE POINTS OUT THAT ACERTHORN LIED
000120.png

It cost Google nearly 2 grand to file the earlier notice of non compliance:
000121.png
 

Attachments

  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, REGENDarySumanai, biozeminadae1 and 150 others
Useful_Mistake said:
GOOGLE POINTS OUT THAT ACERTHORN LIED
Click to expand...
There was no reason for him to submit that video. The court did not request video evidence.
He tried to be slick and it blew up in his face thanks to his own stupidity. If I was Acerthorn I think I'd literally break down and cry.
That 26(f) recording is the gift that keeps on giving.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Kookin, Broken Cuddles, REGENDarySumanai and 66 others
Useful_Mistake said:
GOOGLE POINTS OUT THAT ACERTHORN LIED
Click to expand...
IT'S HAPPENING!
yes-no.gif
Useful_Mistake said:
Up to the judge, but I think he will be. @AnOminous , thoughts?
Click to expand...
I'm not Nostradamus. However, a party named "Google" tends to be taken more seriously. I really hope they take this turkey gobbling piece of shit retard to the woodshed on this one.
DiggieSmalls said:
so does he get slapped down or what?
Click to expand...
Filing dumb legal arguments as a pro se repeatedly may get you vexatious litigant status but committing outright fraud on the court, requiring a company like Google shell out real money to point it out, gets you sanctioned financially, even if it's meaningless to this judgment proof faggot.

In theory he could be actually criminally prosecuted, but don't expect it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, REGENDarySumanai, koos koets and 62 others
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, REGENDarySumanai, Sundae and 11 others
Contra Pozz said:
Yeah why do they order something that can't even be verified? Demanding the retard's pinky promise is not a good look for the court.
Click to expand...
There is an inherent assumption that you are a law-abiding citizen, and there is an inherent power of the court to punish you if you are not. If the court had any suspicions that he had not complied (as they do now), they could always seize his hard drives and check, and bill him the cost.

The punishment, including potential prison time, should cause enough fear to give you a reason to comply, same as with laws in general. Very few laws can verify that you aren't doing something, unless the state starts to have suspicions.

Bringing this to the original question, this also does serve as a ban on publication.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, REGENDarySumanai, cheersbigears and 53 others

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: REGENDarySumanai, Drowningman, Caesare and 18 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back