Maybe Rekieta literally doesn't understand the concept of grooming.
On the subject of grooming and pre/post-pubescent classification, noticed a lot of people going with Drexel's story that he knew T since she was 13 as if that were consistently presented. This is simply not the case. I don't expect people to go back to the megapost to verify all the stories, so here's a quick look.
For your convenience: a look at T's timeline
If T was 13 in 2006 (when Drexel first knew the mother, 13 years since 2019), T would have been sexually dominated around 2018 at age 25.
This would mean that the mother quickly introduced Drexel to her daughter. T being 13 is unlikely though as it conflicts with other accounts.
If T was 10-12 in 2010 (Drexel said he went with her to Eclipse, which was in theatres in 2010,
when Drexel said she was a tween), T would have been sexually dominated around 2018 at age 18-20. Also,
if T knew Drexel for as long as her mother (assuming she didn't hide T away from him for 4 years before abandoning all caution)
Drexel could have known T as young as six years old.
Meanwhile, Drexel has been trying to split the difference by saying she was 22 in his misguided "get the facts straight" rant.
So, taking all of the stories into account;
the age when Drexel could have known T actually ranges from 6-13 years old.
View attachment 5353377
Getting very malevolent vibes from this gaze. She's glaring like she's about to watch me be executed for spilling her breakfast wine.
There as a discussion earlier in the thread about Kayla's eyes, even when smiling. Focusing on the eyes can make a world of difference.
Seems like a good time to repost this:
