AWizard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2023
Do you think they did it out of the kindness of their heart? I, at least very least, expect a working game when I pay for it. They had to fix it both for their reputation and so they didn't get hit with a lawsuit on a non-functioning product.No. That doesn't mean plenty of devs wouldn't have.
Again, I expect a working game on release. I don't know if the zoomer generation has acclimatised to broken games on release, but it is a psychotic expectation. The only grade A retards were the ones who paid full price instead of using a russian/ukrainian vpn to get a massive discount. I knew this game was going to be a janky game but I did not expect the level of incompetency that I saw on release.I was smart enough to wait until the game got the 1.5 update and thoroughly enjoyed it. Anyone who fell for the day one release was a grade A retard.
And that makes it okay? Don't you remember the 45-minute gameplay demo of the rescue mission which incredibly different to the actual mission in the game? Either that video was entirely scripted to the point where it was a literal FMV sequence parading as gameplay or they removed things from the game before release. All the things they promised would've differentiated it from other games.The only thing 'fundamentally' wrong with it is that it isn't the gigantic choose your own adventure cyberpunk RPG they said it would be back before the actual game entered development.
It's an average, mostly linear, looter shooter with a somewhat of an interesting storyline and voice acting, with a completely dead open world akin to Mafia 2.It's an above average open world action RPG now.
Daikatana nearly ruined John Romero but a little chinese girl cartoon somehow breathed life back into an epic mess of a release and broken promises.
Last edited: