Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
It would be exactly like him to overlook a little fraud for the sake of superchats.
He "overlooked" a lot of shit concerning John Leigh of Anime Matsuri, so it would be on par for him, yeah.

It would be funnier if O’Keefe someday defrauded Nick the way he has so many others.
Well, he better hurry the fuck up, because Randazza is practically doing that right now.

Maybe "defraud" is too strong a term, since I think Randazza actually is putting in a good faith effort, but god damn if Nick isn't hemorrhaging a lot of money on a long shot chance.

To be fair, it was Legal Mindset (Andrew Clifford d'Adesky) that let it slip that he went to Jamaica.
I thought it was Nick who let that slip. Didn't he say that he went to Jamaica, but that he's not supposed to talk about it because his wife didn't want it known? One of you even found the clip I thought.
 

I watched the show out of morbid curiosity and to see if there was any information in it. It was terrible and mostly unfunny. Drexel kind of runs things for the first hour which is somewhat organized. The second hour is just a mess. Nick is low effort throughout the whole thing. Dick seems uninterested or is struggling to do his type of thing with the people on the stage. Camelot and Cecil are not really funny. Branca does his law thing on self-defense to mostly indifference.

NIck tells two old stories which I suspect are going to be his stand-up routine. He talks about the fat chick in cheerleader tryouts that he had to lift and "tore his shoulder". He bitches about the teacher from his school days and the Jello. He didn't seem to do any work to prepare for the show at all. He also didn't bring any new material.

I did a summary:

0:00 Introductions of Drexel, Nick and Masterson by Camelot

6:40 Drexel bitching about black women, black people and his mom. Drexel doesn’t seem to like his mom (surprise)

14:00 Drexel talking about Waffle House

17:00 Camelot complains about thots and he & Drexel talks about party buses

19:00 They introduce Branca and he replaces Dick who seems bored.

21:25 – Camelot talks about women in Vegas. Branca talks about Lizzo and fat women. Drexel talks about New York women and Branca goes back to fat jokes. Drexel talks about how fat chicks were better in the old days.

28:50 Camelot tells a bullshit story about how he had two chicks lined up. Both cancelled on him and he had to do a fat chick who randomly called him out of “charity”.

30:00 Nick tells his old story about having to lift a fat girl in cheerleading and “tearing his shoulder”.

34:00 Camelot does some gross self-depricating sexual stuff.

35:30 Drexel switches the conversation to Branca about sex.

37:00 Since Branca is old, Drexel asked Branca about how whores have changed over time. Branca wants his daughters not to be whores.

40:00 Drexel talks about how Tiffany changed his mind on the “short girl thing”

43:00 Drexel talks about doing whiteface or something. Bad race jokes. Then Drexel talking about self-defense and gets Branca to talk the legal issues about it.

47:00 Dick comes back so Nick can get a drink. Drexel makes a Fleece Johnson joke. I don’t think anyone knows what he is talking about.

51:00 Camelot breaks out his ass jokes and then talks about his twitter ban. Drexel immediately switches back to Branca

53:00 Drexel mentions Fleece Johnson again and then takes a break when Nick goes back. Then Nick gets rid of Camelot for Cecil. Cecil is dressed like a clown and they keep talking about self-defense. Then they talk about police officers. Dick tries a couple things but he doesn’t seem to have anyone to work with here.

1:01:00 They start talking about Cecil’s comic book.

1:03:00 Nick starts talking about Nashville.

1:07:00 Branca taps out and Camelot comes back. Random unfunny stuff.

1:14:00 Japanese comfort women talk with Cecil but it goes nowhere

1:16:00 Pronoun talk with Camelot. Its all kind of incoherent.

1:20:00 Church jokes about retards singing with Camelot. Nobody else is much interested.

1:24:00 Dick leaves again and Drex comes back. Nick does his bitching about his teacher stories.

1:27:00 Drexel tries to tell a gym story about working out late at night with Nick. Goes nowhere.

1:31:00 Drexel and Cecil about Cecil’s divorce. Cecil is not doing that.

1:33:00 Drex tries to talk about kids. Goes nowhere.

1:37:00 Cecil tags out for Dick.

1:39:00 Camelot tries to tell a story and Dick keeps cutting him off.

1:41:00 Camelot does a stepmom/stepsister joke.

1:43:00 They all talk about their online porn searches

1:44:00 Lactation humor. Camelot talks about sex with a pregnant woman.

1:54:00 Stories about Drexel moving furniture then the show concludes.
 
Maybe "defraud" is too strong a term, since I think Randazza actually is putting in a good faith effort, but god damn if Nick isn't hemorrhaging a lot of money on a long shot chance.
Fraud has a very specific meaning. Despite being a smooth-brained alcoholic, Nick knows exactly what he’s doing. No one is defrauding him.
 
Maybe "defraud" is too strong a term, since I think Randazza actually is putting in a good faith effort, but god damn if Nick isn't hemorrhaging a lot of money on a long shot chance.
Randazza is not defrauding him. He is definitely taking a lot of his money without any expectation of victory, but Nick is the moron insisting on this catastrophic course.

Nick is a lawyer himself, although not a very good one. He is presumed to have the competence to manage his own legal affairs, even if he is choosing to do it in the most retarded, self-destructive and stupid manner imaginable.

Randazza is just doing what he's being paid to do by an absolute idiot with the education and knowledge to know exactly what he's paying for, even if what he's paying for is retarded beyond belief.
 
Does any one know how those photos of hedo got out?
He posted them himself plus streamed from the hotel room.
Right. He posted them on LOCALS. Maybe even in the main show. But it was NOT a big secret!!! I promise... Hedonism was actively being discussed in his chats when he was in Jamaica, and prior.

I'm perplexed by this discussion saying he denied going to Hedonism. Initially, in their stream from Hedonism II on Aug. 11, 2022 , they obviously tried to hide their hotel but not very hard, They said on stream they were in Jamaica.

Some "reciepts".... The stream (link above) is the gift that keeps on giving.

HIGHLIGHTS:
- At 1:50:34 they're directly asked about being at Hedonism. Kayla played dumb.
- They're directly asked about swinging. It's at 1:15:00.
- I will refrain from comment on her outfit:
1695841158192.png
- Direct mentions of a "foam party". Here's what google found:
Screen Shot 2023-09-27 at 12.18.28 PM.png
- Nick won the costume party but only wrote "GET THIS DICK" on his chest, Kayla was a "naughty school girl" - she re-enacted on stream:
1695832540870.png
- Kayla called Nick "a woman" for liking Titos vodka
- They'd been playing 'We've Never But We Would' card game and they'd never had sex in a raft, so they did that. For another card, they play acted being strangers and Nick picking her up at the bar.
- They both danced on a stripper pole,
- They denied a shotgun wedding and said they were engaged for 11 months.
- Nick implied that she has a strangulation kink (it was playful but seemed true)
- Admitted that his then 8 yo daughter (the violent one) is his favorite.
- Wedding date is July 24, 2004

ANYWAY,
I'm fairly sure it was Kiwi that specifically doxxed the location.. This is the earliest post I can find, posted Dec 1, 2022. That's almost four months after the vacation when he'd started getting push-back about debauchary and posted the pics, I believe. If I were to guess, that's why Kiwi dug deeper. LOCALS was starting to go sideways and nudes were regularly being posted. Farmers farmed.

So now that the autism has died down a bit I can post this. The "Caribbean" resort Nick is super secretive about is called Hedonism 2.

You can see he is wearing the Jamaican flag swimwear and the Graffiti matches. That and the poses match as well.
1669833192716.pngGirls-Just-Wanna-Have-Fun-23-1200x750.jpg

Don't say you want something to be a secret, then post details from it.
(There are earlier Kiwi posts in which someone noted that Nick mentioned on stream that he was researching Hedonism prior to going. Again, my point is that he didn't try that hard to hide it.)

Since the doxxing I don't recall him denying that they went there. In fact, he leaned in and justified it, talked about the nude beach, the organized parties with the excellent Jamaican dancers, a pole dance, etc. Am I missing something?
Edit: Clarity
 

Attachments

  • 1695832067120.png
    1695832067120.png
    948.9 KB · Views: 99
Last edited:
Fraud has a very specific meaning. Despite being a smooth-brained alcoholic, Nick knows exactly what he’s doing. No one is defrauding him.
Randazza is not defrauding him. He is definitely taking a lot of his money without any expectation of victory, but Nick is the moron insisting on this catastrophic course.
Like I said, defraud is perhaps too strong a term.

But it's about as close as you can get without it actually being it. Randazza is benefitting handsomely from the impulsive nature of an idiot, and I'm sure he knows it too.

I disagree Nick knows what he's doing though, because I don't think there's any chance in hell he came up with this Colorado plan on his own. He's not that smart, and he's definitely not that good a lawyer. That has Randazza's fingerprints all over it. Randazza gets a pass though because Randazza is presumably trying his very best, with the limited tools available to him, to pull off a long-shot win. It's within ethical boundaries, probably.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was Nick who let that slip. Didn't he say that he went to Jamaica, but that he's not supposed to talk about it because his wife didn't want it known? One of you even found the clip I thought.

(There are earlier Kiwi posts in which someone noted that Nick mentioned on stream that he was researching Hedonism prior to going. Again, my point is that he didn't try that hard to hide it.)

The June 13th drunk stream is also where Hedonism is first brought up. (About a minute into this clip) He tells chat they are going to vacation in Jamaica but haven’t chosen which resort yet & asks for suggestions. Hedonism is brought up & Nick seems keenly interested despite feigning that that he is unfamiliar with what exactly Hedonism is. Although he also seems to be well aware of what it is, immediately asking if it is that “swinger resort” & even calling it by the nickname of “Hedo”. He asks someone to send him more details. I put this clip on 1.5x speed because he’s talking annoyingly slow while mauling a large piece of bread.
View attachment 4866540
 
Since the doxxing I don't recall him denying that they went there. In fact, he leaned in and justified it, talked about the nude beach, the organized parties with the excellent Jamaican dancers, a pole dance, etc. Am I missing something?
Yes. You are missing where he called up texted Null from the shower at 12am and was emphatic that he did not attend Hedonism II at all. The belief is that he was passive-aggressively trying to convince Null to scrub all mention of it from the site. He went on to bizarrely tell Null that EVEN IF he went to Hedonism II, it definitely wasn't during the black bull extravaganza (per... IIRC... @Balldo's Gate's research, it was definitely during the black bull extravaganza).

Also, @Kalea was famously de-wrenched from his Youtube for bringing up the subject.

Like I said, I don't think HE really cares if people know about it, but Kayla gave him an rash of shit for him talking about it, and certain details getting out, and he's had to resort to flat out denial ever since then.

EDIT: Correction.
 
Last edited:
But it's about as close as you can get without it actually being it. Randazza is benefitting handsomely from the impulsive nature of an idiot, and I'm sure he knows it too.
Nick called his business partner a faggot with absolutely no provocation. Randazza even mentioned that in oral argument.

If you hire a guy you dissed that hard you kind of get what you have coming.
Yes. You are missing where he called up Null from the shower at 12am and was emphatic that he did not attend Hedonism II at all.
Yet another example of this gaslighting cocksucker pretending he isn't a flaggot while obviously being a flaggot.

And so absolutely astoundingly dumb as dog shit that he tried this on Null of all people.
 
I will refrain from comment on her outfit:
Has Nick ever talked in depth about how he copes with being married to someone who doesn’t match his ideal female shape of a human string bean? Kayla has a nice body but it’s definitely not the ultra-thin “borderline unhealthy” ideal Nick has made known is what he really wants.

Like I said, defraud is perhaps too strong a term. But it's about as close as you can get without it actually being it.
Being “almost defrauded” is like being “almost pregnant.” It’s not a thing. Nick may be very impressionable, but fraud is an intentional use of deceit to separate someone from their property. Unless there’s proof that Randazza told Nick that his strategies are all slam dunks, this isn’t even close. (In fact we have footage of Randazza discussing publicly just how thorny this case is.) Even if he had, that’s a statement of opinion. Not fraud, not close to fraud.

Please: Don’t indulge Nick’s dindu complex by feeding the narrative that he’s under Randazza’s control and doesn’t know any better. I’m sure he’ll be peddling that line himself soon enough when he’s forced to make a humiliating climb-down, loses in court, needs to raise more money or all of the above. He doesn’t need our help co-signing his bullshit.
 
Nick is such a fucking retard. Has he read literally anything about the case? A 501(c)(3) can’t opt to let it slide when someone — even the founder — gets busted stealing money from their registered charity. Saying “I left them millions in the bank!” doesn’t address falsifying expense reports and swindling donors.

Is there credible evidence for this, aside from the allegations from the board members that were seeking to have him ousted? I've followed the case fairly closely and have never seen any.

And of course, the timing was really fucking convenient as well, wasn't it?

Don't get me wrong -- I think O'Keefe is a moron who regularly overstates the claims that he makes. I'd be happy to see him get nailed for some wrongdoing or other. But when your board wants shut of you, bitching about your expenses is one of the easiest ways to do it.

The very first thing anyone would read about O’Keefe even 10+ years ago was that literally no one — not even his collaborators — trusted him. This isn’t news.

He's an abrasive ego-driven cunt who rides rough-shod over his collaborators, for sure. But if they didn't trust him, why would they collaborate with him at all?
 
I thought it was Nick who let that slip. Didn't he say that he went to Jamaica, but that he's not supposed to talk about it because his wife didn't want it known? One of you even found the clip I thought.
I never seen him say that until maybe after he was outed as going there
Hedonism was actively being discussed in his chats when he was in Jamaica, and prior.
I don't remember that. I do not remember any real talk of hedonism 2 in his chat. There may have been spit ball countries that people threw out. I don't remember any body speaking with any authority and Nick confirming anything.
he didn't try that hard to hide it.
He was bad at it, but he did try. He kept saying how he wouldn't name the hotel and how he was going back there. He only referred to it as a "Caribbean Country" for quite some time.
 
I'm so fucking back @Useful_Mistake and all other mods are trannies who can suck my profile picture so can @Norbert the Tiger for doubting my power.
That is no way to win friends and influence people.
If Monty wins, does that make any difference legally to anyone else that Rekieta has dropped a bucket of shit on, if they were inspired by a Monty victory to sue him for defamation?
No.
The case should be fought on two grounds. The question of actual malice by Nick in making the comments and on the amount of damages that should be awarded.
Good thing there aren't hours and hours of Rackets drunkenly, maliciously defaming Monte.
We're hoping that the case goes all the way to a full trial and that the NEXT Nick Rekieta steps forward and livestreams it while providing commentary.

The new guy shouldn't have a balldo or a groomer for a best friend though
I would very much like the case to go to the Supreme Court. I want it to get as ridiculous as possible. Imagine the Quest vs. Rekieta ruling being cited for the next 100 years.
just cropped out the text.
If you looked below Racket's but crack, you could see the top of one of the letters.
Speaking of Branca...I always thought they look kinda similar.
There is no difference.
i love how all of you shit on Rekieta,
but at least half of you would totally bang lady Rackets
Ewww... Are you high? Why would anyone want a busted up nutbag like Lady Rackets? Me personally. I only have eyes for @Himedall All-seeing Waifu. Because she is smart and has done an excellent job cataloging Nick's collection of Locals nutbags. Not for coomer reasons. Cooming is boring.
 
But if they didn't trust him, why would they collaborate with him at all?
Because we live in a world of trade-offs, a world of “keep your friends close and your enemies closer.” I didn’t claim that O’Keefe hasn’t made exceptionally valuable contributions to the pursuit of truth. But the fact is the man’s been living in a glass house for well over a decade. It was only a matter of time before it caught up with him. He’s had his uses and I hope he continues to bust those who deserve to be busted. But falsifying expenses for a 501(c)(3) is an almost guaranteed ticket to deserved shame. My sympathy has many more deserving recipients than this shyster.

Of course THIS is Nick’s hero, along with Vito and Dax.
 
Since the doxxing I don't recall him denying that they went there. In fact, he leaned in and justified it, talked about the nude beach, the organized parties with the excellent Jamaican dancers, a pole dance, etc. Am I missing something?
Yes. That's contrary to what has happened.

The only time I can recall when he justified going to Hedonism II was when he was really drunk on one of the panel streams and was asked by a chat, and even then he did deny going to Hedonism II himself, though arguably it was a sarcastic denial.

The reason you don't recall him denying that they went there is because he has tried to totally sweep up any mention of it and run from the accusation. When the VTuber turkey very lightly pressed him on his vacation destinations, he simply said he wasn't hiding his vacation destination, he just didn't disclose it....

Yes. You are missing where he called up texted Null from the shower at 12am and was emphatic that he did not attend Hedonism II at all. The belief is that he was passive-aggressively trying to convince Null to scrub all mention of it from the site. He went on to bizarrely tell Null that EVEN IF he went to Hedonism II, it definitely wasn't during the black bull extravaganza (per... IIRC... @Balldo's Gate's research, it was definitely during the black bull extravaganza).

Also, @Kalea was famously de-wrenched from his Youtube for bringing up the subject.

Like I said, I don't think HE really cares if people know about it, but Kayla gave him an rash of shit for him talking about it, and certain details getting out, and he's had to resort to flat out denial ever since then.
Basically, Rekieta got caught cold regarding his August 2022 trip. The rooms and beach were matched. He went to Hedonism II. In terms of whether Rekieta went to Hedo this past June, there was a bunch of circumstantial evidence that piled up, most prominently the Ricardo and Romaine Instagram situation, but nothing 100% definitive like the clear-as-day room match photos.

On the other hand, Rekieta went to minimal effort in August 2022 to prevent where he stayed leaking out beyond not saying what it was, whereas in June 2023 he made great efforts. Which I think is why he was pissed enough to rip @Kalea's wrench away.

I thought it was Nick who let that slip. Didn't he say that he went to Jamaica, but that he's not supposed to talk about it because his wife didn't want it known? One of you even found the clip I thought.
I never seen him say that until maybe after he was outed as going there
He disclosed that he was going to Jamaica sometime around June 2022 which I think was at the tail end of or shortly after the conclusion of the Depp trial. He blurted out that they were going to Jamaica before saying he wasn't supposed to say that. There was discussion of Hedonism II in the chat in that stream and Rekieta pretended that he wasn't super familiar with it.

My recollection was that he didn't explicitly say why he wasn't supposed to say that or who told him not to say they were headed to Jamaica, but it would seem that the only person who would impose such a restriction was his wife.

The clip has been posted here by someone and if you're interested enough it is probably findable through the search function.
 
But falsifying expenses for a 501(c)(3) is an almost guaranteed ticket to deserved shame. My sympathy has many more deserving recipients than this shyster.

I'm guessing you've never worked for a charity. I have. A charity where they got shut of the chair of our board for being too liberal wth the use of the company credit card. If I recall, one of his crimes was flying himself and three of his friends off to Africa on some 'fact finding' mission or other.

The truth is, he'd been using company coffers as his own personal bank account for years. It wasn't until he had a falling out wth the CEO that they went to war in the boardroom. Of course, the CEO was smart and had been fairly cautious when it came to spending on his expenses. He could afford to be -- because he was on a humungous salary.

The chair wasn't actually a paid position, so there was a tacit agreement (as far as I could tell) that he could milk his expenses, until the two butted heads in a power struggle. He ended up resigning quietly, only to end up in much greater disgrace some years later for buying drugs for rent boys on the company dollar.

I always quite liked the guy, myself. He was hugely entertaining. A few years later, the CEO mismanaged the charity -- which had millions of pounds worth of government contracts -- into bankruptcy.

In short, they're all fucking wrong 'uns.
 
Back