Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[Peaches the Wonder Cat]

Would have agreed with this before she went after autists. Now I'm thinking she just doesn't like retards generally. And I'm OK with that.

How has she "gone after autists"?

If she's going after genderblobs who claim to be autistic so they can chimp out, good for her.

 

[Mourning_Cloak]

I pretty much only ever see autistic people (especially children) get worshipped and put on some kind of special pedestal, where they are better than us and somehow more worthy because they have the 'tisms.

 

[The Magnificence]

How has she "gone after autists"?

If she's going after genderblobs who claim to be autistic so they can chimp out, good for her.

You're new, so I will do this one time, but you need to try to keep up on your own: https://twitter.com/forestvanslyke/status/1708190955214712904?s=46&t=TMUOZCqGbx3Pv9MjeQqrig

 

[Peaches the Wonder Cat]

You're new, so I will do this one time, but you need to try to keep up on your own: https://twitter.com/forestvanslyke/status/1708190955214712904?s=46&t=TMUOZCqGbx3Pv9MjeQqrig

If JK is pissing off women like Forest, good.

 

[Der weiße Teufel]

Since these people are always exaggerating and so on, the main guy from their case is called autistic, but not in the "a bit simple" sense, more the Asperger's type who will quote books word-by-word at you.

She uses "retarded" twice and it's both times said by old people, referring to the same guy, who I think is this one "neurodivergent" character this tranny is talking about, and he only comes up during the investigation of what happened some years ago.
No other retards in the book as far as I can tell, though there is another mentally ill (manic depressive) guy who committed suicide.

Oh, and Mumsnet gets mentioned once, the hive of british terfery. I'm sure this is some sort of dogwhistle.

 

[stupid frog]

I didn't even know she was writing under another name, until they freaked out after the last book. So they are on my backlog now haha.

 

[The Magnificence]

View attachment 5377546
If JK is pissing off women like Forest, good.

Pretty bold to call someone else dumb when you can't research for yourself, kiddo. Try not being too much of an uppity prick on the Farms, it won't end well for you.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You're new, so I will do this one time, but you need to try to keep up on your own: https://twitter.com/forestvanslyke/status/1708190955214712904?s=46&t=TMUOZCqGbx3Pv9MjeQqrig

You're new, so I will do this one time, but you need to try to keep up on your own:

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/pv9DF?wr=true

 

['Ole Dente]

"Fong," said Null, after a slight pause. "Everyone called him Brick Face. He clearly wasn't normal, the name speaks for itself. He had a brick for a face. Whether that's because someone threw bricks at his face and caused the disfigurment or because his face had the unique texture of fireblasted clay, nobody quite knew."

"Do you know where he is now?"

Null laughed "Likely trying to rape teenagers, but if time has ever been any teacher, in his mind, prepubscient pussy sits carefully next to how much he hates me."

 

[Prince Vegeta]

How has she "gone after autists"?

If she's going after genderblobs who claim to be autistic so they can chimp out, good for her.

She's going after them the same way she's 'gone after' trannies, that is, not at all. They're just screeching because they're unable to understand basic concepts of fiction where not every sentence in said fiction represents the author's beliefs and politics. They live on a terminally online diet of 'representation', which taught them that a text shows the author's values and beliefs. The literal text, the words characters speak and how they look, not the overarching concepts and worldviews that the whole narrative shows, or genre conventions or cultural and historical factors. Take with that a chronic lack of knowledge about society, history and culture, add some access to the Internet, and voila, you have these people. Their reading comprehension is around the level of a child. A 'learning disabilities' child.

 

[Ammyterasu]

I don’t remember, what scene was that?

There isn't. iirc (I last read it more than 10 years ago) the only "problematic" scene in Salem's Lot is about the adult guy who works in a landfill (?) and resents a pretty high school girl who always makes fun of him for being a loser. Once he becomes a vampire he goes to bite her and it's more or less implied they spend the nights having undead sex. It's a very small scene, a couples of lines at most.

 

[Richard Cheese]

She's going after them the same way she's 'gone after' trannies, that is, not at all. They're just screeching because they're unable to understand basic concepts of fiction where not every sentence in said fiction represents the author's beliefs and politics. They live on a terminally online diet of 'representation', which taught them that a text shows the author's values and beliefs. The literal text, the words characters speak and how they look, not the overarching concepts and worldviews that the whole narrative shows, or genre conventions or cultural and historical factors. Take with that a chronic lack of knowledge about society, history and culture, add some access to the Internet, and voila, you have these people. Their reading comprehension is around the level of a child. A 'learning disabilities' child.

Autists tend to struggle with theory of mind. Some of them legit might not comprehend that an author could create a character with different views than the author's own.

But mostly it's just because they hate her and therefore everything she does is evil.

 

[Prince Vegeta]

Autists tend to struggle with theory of mind. Some of them legit might not comprehend that an author could create a character with different views than the author's own.

But mostly it's just because they hate her and therefore everything she does is evil.

Good point, I agree, but I refuse to believe that suddenly an entire generation of predominantly American and English people all suffer from 'autism', and not just from social and cultural rot found in wealthy societies. Just like I refuse to believe the 6gorillion% rise in 'trans' identities is not social contamination, borne from said cultural rot.

 

[Ghostse]

I didn't even know she was writing under another name, until they freaked out after the last book. So they are on my backlog now haha.

I've forgotten some of the finer details but:
She wrote under another name to "own the MRAs" because at the time Mens were the worst and saying she'd never get published as a man because she was saying how easy men had it publishing, etc. So she made a whole stink about how she was published and didn't use her name, etc. Except she did; she used her editor to put her pennamed novel to the front attention of another editor thereby getting it above the muck and irony was seemingly completely lost on her.

I wouldn't just add them willy-nilly to the back log just to "own the groomers" or w/e.
Reviews, so I guess mild spoilers.
Anyway, the first novel is average/above average if you like modern British Detective Fiction. If you don't know what I mean by that, read about 5 dective novels set in the UK by UK authors written post 1990 and you'll understand.
The focus is still mainly on the main title character, the resolution/reasoning for the crime is a big heaving sigh but the SJW points aren't belabored. The second novel is acceptable but her projection onto the Secretary character starts in earnest in that novel; she takes a defensive driving course in the break and is of course a complete natural at stunt driving. Where the first novel had her realistically pressed into service and doing about as well at PI work as you could expect a newbie to be, this is where she starts having author projected super powers and of course the sexual tension with the gruff, emotionally distant male lead.
The third novel is nearly unreadable. The detecting part of the novel isn't half bad, but it is like 1/2 to 2/3s bullshit soap opera relationship & family drama.
It was so bad I tapped out after that one.

 

[Ewan McGregor]

Now you're just fucking lying.

I don’t remember, what scene was that?

It's towards the end, the school bus driver turned vampire infects the children and turns them into his personal harem. It was short and bluntly written and disturbed me quite a lot.

However, in and on itself, I don't think this is telling at all of King's character nor represent or implies in any way that he is a pedophile living of his stuff through his writing - Unlike much troon produced media. It was well written and added to the horror of the whole 'horror story'.

The scene on It was much more WTF than this one and more prone of raising eyebrows.

My point was that if we were to subject King's work to the sort of revisionism the woke tend to subject "fallen" creators such as J.K. Rowling they'd find a much fertile ground to do so given the subject matter of most of his stories.

For instance, The Shining alone would be more than enough to cancel him.

 

[Morethanabitfoolish]

She uses "retarded" twice and it's both times said by old people, referring to the same guy, who I think is this one "neurodivergent" character this tranny is talking about

I had a sneaking suspicion that was the case. Being such overly simplistic sorts they think if any character in a work says it that means the author must want everyone with mental disabilities rounded up in camps.

 

[Slantern]

It's towards the end, the school bus driver turned vampire infects the children and turns them into his personal harem. It was short and bluntly written and disturbed me quite a lot.

However, in and on itself, I don't think this is telling at all of King's character nor represent or implies in any way that he is a pedophile living of his stuff through his writing - Unlike much troon produced media. It was well written and added to the horror of the whole 'horror story'.

The scene on It was much more WTF than this one and more prone of raising eyebrows.

My point was that if we were to subject King's work to the sort of revisionism the woke tend to subject "fallen" creators such as J.K. Rowling they'd find a much fertile ground to do so given the subject matter of most of his stories.

For instance, The Shining alone would be more than enough to cancel him.

Re: Salem’s Lot, it was the other way around.

The bus driver treats the kids cruelly, so after they become vampires they kill him.

 

[teriyakiburns]

For instance, The Shining alone would be more than enough to cancel him

They were working themselves up to this exact thing. It's why he went so hard on socjus bullshit, to fend off the attack he saw coming.

 

[Slantern]

They were working themselves up to this exact thing. It's why he went so hard on socjus bullshit, to fend off the attack he saw coming.

Though he still follows Rowling and got backlash from them when he retweeted a review of one of her books.

And while he said he disagreed with her, he called out an article that made it sound like he said her views were “shitty and hateful.”

 

[fishercat]

Re: Salem’s Lot, it was the other way around.

The bus driver treats the kids cruelly, so after they become vampires they kill him.

I just reread it the other day, and I was super confused by the first post because I thought I'd completely misread it. Nope, some undead kids corner him in his bus and kill him. Not sure where the "personal harem" thing came from.