Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Tubby Aardvark]

Spicy Sean is the best Sean

 

[Neetorino]

I don't really think that's a big "own" lmao. It's just as cringe when Sean does it as when Nick does it. Even if Sean is much less flamboyant when he does it.

I mean, you could make that argument, but CGoody has a bad case of finger diarrhea and is lying in a manner designed to turn Rekieta's braindead audience against Sean (for the dumbest reason too), so I'm inclined to give Sean a pass here.

Don't forget that this isn't just some random chat-fag, this is one of Nick's longest running Youtube/Locals(?) mods and biggest nose-guard, he's practically an employee just without the paycheck.

Edit: just thought of how fucking funny it would be for him to get de-modded for causing Nick more gay drama. It'd be just devistating to him, not that it'd happen.

 

[Strix454]

• Given that Nick claims that most of his shit concerning Montagraph came from Metokur, how is cancerman gonna take it if Nick loses?

I dont think he will remember or care unless someone sits down and reminds him of who Monty is.

• If Nick copes by claiming Jim gave him bad info, how much of that excuse should we believe?

None. The interactions between Jim and Nick over Monty were in maybe 2018? Years ago. Monty had no interactions with Nick after until he showed up in that stream chat dunking on Nick for his Youtube ban. What Nick knew at that point was that Monty had tried to sue someone over being called a pedo and his attempt failed. Nick going out of his way to make the most direct pedo statement about Monty possible and then daring him to sue suggests that Nick was driven by anger and what he knew legally about Monty failing in the earlier case.

• Is that even really a good excuse? (Legally, it's my understanding, one is still on the hook even if they just repeat defamatory info).

Its not a good excuse. Nick also didn't say that people were talking about Monty being a pedo or that there was information out there that suggested it. Nick said directly that Monty was engaging in specific illegal acts and dared him to sue. There were lots of better and safer ways legally to insult monty. But Nick, knowing the law, did just about everything a person is not supposed to do.
I think a more realistic excuse for Nick is that he assumed that Monty couldn't sue him based on the outcome of that old case where Monty tried to represent himself. Nick likely thought that Monty could never afford a lawyer and would never be able to file the case in Minnesota where he lives and where the case would be harder to get dismissed.

• Or, is it more likely Jim just told him some funny stuff, but Nick got angry and stupid and came up with the child molestation accusation on his own?

They were on streams on the subject back then. Jim was focused on ridiculing Monty for the various public things he has done. Nick was aware of all the details of the case and all the paperwork in the case. Monty looked like a total weirdo given the various stupid things he has done and alot of people had said things about Monty. But I can't remember anything where actual crimes were discussed or police investigations were said to be going on or anything that would lead someone to believe Monty was an incontrovertable pedophile.

I agree that Nick got angry. But I think Nick also arrogantly underestimated Monty's ability to sue him. I think Nick very deliberately baited Monty with the most absolute pedo accusation he could think of and dared him to sue thinking Monty couldn't do anything about it.

 

[2lolis1cup]

Plus it's fun... though now I'm concerned I may actually be a poet of sorts.

In the depths of shadows, where darkness thrives,
Lies a bored troll, with sinister vibes.
With cunning eyes and a heart full of glee,
He seeks amusement in cruel artistry.

Through cyberspace, he silently creeps,
A digital phantom, where secrets seep.
A wicked game he plays, devoid of care,
For it's doxxing that excites this troll's snare.

Names and faces, he unveils with delight,
Lurking in shadows, hidden from sight.
He brazenly uncovers personal trails,
Unmasking lives, while his laughter prevails.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

The origins of Kayla's infertility/misscarriages was her lack of a particular hormone. (Google tells me that would be progesterone.)

I believe there's likely a logical fallacy here on Nick's part.

Obstetricians often put women with a history of recurrent miscarriages on 1st trimester progesterone supplementation for pathophysiology reasons I can't remember and am too lazy to look up (stabilizing the endometrium?).

There really isn't much that can be done for women with recurrent miscarriages medically and the search for cause typically comes up empty.

I suppose early pregnancy progesterone supplementation has some evidence to help prevent some miscarriages, but I believe it's mostly doing something for the sake of doing something.

But just because a specialist prescribes you hormones, doesn't mean that you suffer from a "hormone deficiency".

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

• Given that Nick claims that most of his shit concerning Montagraph came from Metokur, how is cancerman gonna take it if Nick loses?

Jim won't give a shit, he doesn't have internet friends, assuming he lives long enough to see it come to its conclusion. The Sweetie Squad will just laugh at a shyster lawyer being taken down.

 

[Captain Manning]

I'm not sure what Nate is up to (or his editor) but this YT short made me smile and also a little sad.

It could be a thinly veiled dig.

Branca and Nate had a fight just a little while back over the Brand situation, although I dunno if Nick weighed in or if it affected Nate's relationship with Nick any.

Certainly a number people in the comments have noticed how shit Nick looks in 2023, so I don't think you could call this a very flattering video. If it's not a dig, it was bad idea.

I dont think he will remember or care unless someone sits down and reminds him of who Monty is.

Oh, he knows! There's no way in hell he won't remember Montagraph. Voice clips of Montagraph were played in the "You Got That" intro when he did a stream last month (granted, that might have been made a while back). I think Montagraph had enough of an impact on Jim for him not to forget.

The interactions between Jim and Nick over Monty were in maybe 2018? Years ago. Monty had no interactions with Nick after until he showed up in that stream chat dunking on Nick for his Youtube ban. What Nick knew at that point was that Monty had tried to sue someone over being called a pedo and his attempt failed. Nick going out of his way to make the most direct pedo statement about Monty possible and then daring him to sue suggests that Nick was driven by anger and what he knew legally about Monty failing in the earlier case.

I agree, but it also does seem like he's leaning on Jim a bit going by his GSG narrative.

You see it, don't you?

He doesn't establish a clean break between what he and Jim went over concerning Monty's "storied internet history" (LOWER CASE I! Alert Null!), and then him talking about Monty's "well documented past" years later. Whereupon, in the later case, he accused Monty of being a child molester.

I think that might be an intentional omission to garner support. As if to conflate in people's minds what he talked about with Jim, and what Nick talked about years later which has now led to the lawsuit.

I'm just wondering if he's gonna try and make Jim a scapegoat. I think that would be complete bullshit, but it doesn't mean he wouldn't try. This is the same guy who is now crying about "being drawn in" to the Eric July thing. As if he had a gun pointed at the back of his head. I mean, hell, Nick is STILL being dishonest as all hell over what led to him being sued.

 

[Bowl of Ramen]

Jim won't give a shit, he doesn't have internet friends, assuming he lives long enough to see it come to its conclusion. The Sweetie Squad will just laugh at a shyster lawyer being taken down.

Came here to say this. I would imagine Jim, or what’s left of him, will just laugh at Nick as yet another upgrade to his exoskeleton is added on while Jade puts up more and more extravagant lawn ornaments.

 

[keke]

Anyone mind explaining how Sean became liked here, or at least mentioned semi-often. I like his streams from what I remember but no one ever brought him up here until recently. Do something based or just appearing on Nicks streams more? I did back read but only saw the recent CGoody stuff

 

[Captain Manning]

Anyone mind explaining how Sean became liked here, or at least mentioned semi-often. I like his streams from what I remember but no one ever brought him up here until recently. Do something based or just appearing on Nicks streams more? I did back read but only saw the recent CGoody stuff

You might have missed it, but he had Null on two weeks ago to discuss the legal and infrastructure challenges the Farms is facing. Normally, in the past, Null would discuss such issues with Rekieta, but things are a bit... "strained"... between the two of them. Sean stepped up.

There's other reasons some people like him, but I think that's when he started being discussed here more often.

 

[Puff]

or just appearing on Nicks streams more? I did back read but only saw the recent CGoody stuff

Opposite. He had Josh on and Rackets was mentioned. He remained mostly cordial, but it was clear he didn't like what Rackets was doing.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Said "many" of his fans have started OF. Claims to have never visited their accounts. (Someone needs to do a Sally search.)

I doxxed her in this thread. I took a look under here real name and the nickname her curretn husband uses. No joy, but I did not look too hard.

I know this has been hammered on repeatedly in this thread, but it's incredibly bizarre for a proud Christian to be okay with OF to the point he's basically encouraging it. He doesn't have to shame them, but what kind of Christian encourages ladies to be whores, especially moms?

I'm not particularly religious, nor do I really care if people whore themselves out by choice. But I do know no matter how much society likes to pretend now, NO ONE actually respects a hoe and they will always be shunned and shamed, so encouraging/justifying them to actually go on that road seems kinda messed up

He is not a Christian. As a deeply devout one, I can say that I am 95% sure Nicholas is only paying lip service and is Agnostic in all but name.

I'm not sure what Nate is up to (or his editor) but this YT short made me smile and also a little sad.

It could be a thinly veiled dig.

Nate has a bunch of these for multiple YT lawyers. It is not a dig. It is only shorts clcikbait.

These used to come up on my recommendations feed when I watched more of these people regularly.

 

[Sam Losco]

I'm not sure what Nate is up to (or his editor) but this YT short made me smile and also a little sad.

I'm not going to say Nick doesn't look worse now, but I will say part of the problem is the camera setup he has now. It's some combination of the camera and the lighting or maybe a filter he uses, but it looks horrible. It's kinda dark and has a weird almost fuzziness to the image. Like an retro filter or something.

 

[Swole McPole]

Is he gonna burst through the wall of CGoody's hovel with his balls hanging out and exclaim "OH YEAH!"?

Shouldn't that be CGoody's father's hovel? Like Drexel, none of these niggers have ever earned enough money to get their own place. They're all in their late 30's/early 40's and still living in their parents houses.

Presumably, this is why Drexel goes on about never taking women home, always doing them in hotels, and CGoody tours the old leathery single wine moms when he wants his sack emptied.

It's all a bit fucking grim.

 

[Gorton Colu]

Nick always came across as only nominally Christian, imo. Even in the early days when he would present himself as "trad," his views and positions were pretty unorthodox for traditional Christian denominations. For example his infamous (and sophomoric at that) critical theory interpretation of the Bible.

I believe this comes from a shallow or limited understanding of Christianity. Even with disagreements on doctrine or practices, most Christian denominations have an internal logic that is very noticeable to other practicing Christians and is more enduring. This is why when people are only broadly or culturally Christian, they will often hold malleable opinions as there is no underlying philosophy as a foundation for when circumstance and life challenge held beliefs.

This is evidenced by Nick's shift on drugs and sexual expression from traditional disdain to libertine exultation. He was never opposed to these things foundationally or morally, but rather in a shallow cultural manner. For example "I oppose sexual impropriety because Christians oppose it and I consider myself a Christian." With the coinciding social independence from his local congregation probably due to COVID restrictions and his financial independence from relatives with he has shifted his beliefs and behavior. Add in drugs, alcoholism, and E-fame on top of that.

TLDR: I believe that Nick at one point was not a phony Christian, but a shallow one and when his values and faith were tested, they were found wanting. So far since then, he has elected to indulge in debauchery. His huge ego makes me unsympathetic towards him, but I feel sorry for his children.

 

[Pizdec]

I agree that Nick got angry. But I think Nick also arrogantly underestimated Monty's ability to sue him. I think Nick very deliberately baited Monty with the most absolute pedo accusation he could think of and dared him to sue thinking Monty couldn't do anything about it.

Again, he did the same thing LowTax did with Uwe Bowl, and went in thinking oh it'll be an ez clap victory. Never underestimate someone who has nothing to lose. Monty had nothing to lose suing Nick other then time and money. Nick has mouths to feed, doubly so if he has Child Support to worry about. Montagraph probably does not beyond his own.

I'm not going to say Nick doesn't look worse now, but I will say part of the problem is the camera setup he has now. It's some combination of the camera and the lighting or maybe a filter he uses, but it looks horrible. It's kinda dark and has a weird almost fuzziness to the image. Like an retro filter or something.

Nick does look worse, but that's only because the old camera set up was not HD. The new camera set up he has did the same thing to Chantal: it's highlighting his bad features, and if anything shown how he's gone from being pasty white to blood pressured rosy from chronic alcoholism.

 

[Mr.Bucket]

Anyone mind explaining how Sean became liked here, or at least mentioned semi-often. I like his streams from what I remember but no one ever brought him up here until recently. Do something based or just appearing on Nicks streams more? I did back read but only saw the recent CGoody stuff

He's a kiwifarmer. His account isn't widely known but if you spent time in his discord you'd recognize how he types and could figure it out fairly easily. They also had the same PFP/avatar/whateverthefuckyouwanttocallit for ages.
Also, being a typical Ohio guy, he's mildly unhinged and has little to no filter. Which is funny.

 

[AnOminous]

You might have missed it, but he had Null on two weeks ago to discuss the legal and infrastructure challenges the Farms is facing. Normally, in the past, Null would discuss such issues with Rekieta, but things are a bit... "strained"... between the two of them. Sean stepped up.

Too bad Nick started gargling down humongous cocks on the daily because those streams used to be cozy.

 

[AltisticRight]

I don't think Balldo changed, he just went mask off.
I refuse to believe someone would go from larpy TradCath Christian papa lawyer to libertine coomer Hedonism II multicultural orgies in the matter of a year.

Also, he's always been a lolbertarian. The signs were there.

 

[200MB]

Would it have been more acceptable if he were more polite about it? Should he not be permitted to confront Cory on his lying?

I'm referring to the clip from Nick's stream where no lies were confronted.

He's free to do whatever he wants of course. But I think if this were Nick trying to dunk on TiC no one would be going "slay queen", because trying to own the haters is cowish behavior.

I like Sean too, but that clip had me cringing.