Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 47 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 104 34.3%

  • Total voters
    303
LAW LICENSE UPDATE

Over the past few weeks I've seen a number of people in Elissa's comments opine that Nick doesn't have, or soon will not have, a valid law license in Minnesota. This was based off the fact that his license fee was due on the 1st, but records showed it hadn't been received yet (notwithstanding that, he was always listed as Authorized, and I checked multiple days after the 1st).

Well, now he's good to go for another year. The payment was received on the 10th. Barring anything else, he can continue to be a non-practiciing attorney instead of being further downgraded to a non-practicing non-attorney.

View attachment 5407947

ETA: I am not sure of the Minnesota rules exactly, but I presume there is like a 30 day grace period or so before they formally declare you View attachment 5407976. That's not exactly uncommon when it comes to due dates.
When I saw "Date Admitted: 5/8/15" I figured there's no way he's only been a lawyer for only ~8 years and talks the big game that he does. Since it isn't addressed in the OP, I searched the thread and came across this post:

Nick graduated Law School in 2015. He practiced law in a real sense from 2015-2017. When his streaming about law took off in 2018, law become a very occasional hobby and not something he does seriously.
So not only is Nick a non-practicing lawyer now, he was barely a practicing lawyer to begin with. Do the people who watch his shit even care about that?
 
When I saw "Date Admitted: 5/8/15" I figured there's no way he's only been a lawyer for only ~8 years and talks the big game that he does. Since it isn't addressed in the OP, I searched the thread and came across this post:


So not only is Nick a non-practicing lawyer now, he was barely a practicing lawyer to begin with. Do the people who watch his shit even care about that?
"Its not illegal the LARP"
 
For all of Josh's handwringing kvetching, it's on his fucking website. [pause] and in any other circumstance than his own fucking butthurt... '[Mocking Josh] The farms is really good at getting facts' . Are they, Josh? Seems like it on Montegraph. You understand humans though, right? Tell me more about my life. You're nailing it. You've got it SO right, Josh. You've got it fuckin' right."
Now this might be my ESL flaring up, but is he attempting to imply that the reason he called monty a pedophile was because the farms OP did so at the time? is he trying to pin the blame of his retardation on Null?

In any case, I can feel how not-mad he is even through your transcript, that's amazing.
 
Now this might be my ESL flaring up, but is he attempting to imply that the reason he called monty a pedophile was because the farms OP did so at the time? is he trying to pin the blame of his retardation on Null?
My read? He's likely directed Rendazza to Kiwi for "evidence" that Monty is a pedo and that it was "common belief" or some such legal excuse that's considered valid in court.

Most of the cases Nick has covered have been about people defaming people and screwing with their buissnesses.
What? That's objectively not true. You know you can fact-check these things pretty easily.

3 cases re defamation/business livelihood: Depp, Vic, Masterson

8 are criminal: Rittenhouse, Kim Potter, Theodore Edgecomb, Murdaugh, Chandler Halderson, Curtis Reeves, Taylor Schabusiness, Daryll Brooks

1 is other: Greer - does he have a category?

This specific line in the song has confused me for years now. It’s praising her because she… let’s him do his job?
Doesn’t every housewife let their husband work? It’s just always been such a weird verse to me
The snacks part is what confuses me. Having watched a solid 70% of his streams I've never seen her provide snacks. His son provides snacks - he told that story on Monday.

I recall some of the lingerie pics released to Locals (and then leaked here) were thought to be of her.
I remember seeing that. The sourcing seemed tenuous to me.
 
But that would be gay.

If you recognize that the lunatics on locals are completely fucking gay, you might want to rethink how posting exactly the same arguments that those gaylords have been posting looks to us.

The problem with that theory would be coming up with a reason why it seems so much worse in that live show where he's sitting next to Dick Masterson.

Nick's dry mouth definitely looks like the consequence of stimulants but he lacks the signature drug-induced bruxism that you see with recent cocaine use. (That stiff jaw thing that generally accompanies the dry mouth.)

It could be a product of adderall/ritalin/some other ADHD/narcolepsy med use. Or it could be that he just had a cheeky little line about an hour before he went on stage and the main effects have worn off. Alternatively, he could just be getting really shitty cocaine -- more cut than coke.
 
My read? He's likely directed Rendazza to Kiwi for "evidence" that Monty is a pedo and that it was "common belief" or some such legal excuse that's considered valid in court.
That would be an idiotic move considering he doubled down afterwards, plus I'm not sure the thread had the wording he specifically used when he got not-mad at monty ribbing on his ban.

It's so dumb that in fact I think you might be right, it's exactly what he'd try.
 
>thread suddenly jumps a few pages in an hour
>get excited for more Balldoman lunacy
>get retarded spergy Kiwis instead
Nick’s homeschool set up sounds like absolute chaos.

Nobody seems to know who is doing what on a day to day basis (this could be a Rekieta problem though) & a bazillion trips to & from activities hardly seems worth it when it means the sole breadwinner can’t even manage a work schedule (again, probably a Rekieta problem but still)

Then to add to it, they have to unindoctrinate the kids from whatever religious stuff they are being taught because Nick has his own ideas about that?

What are even the benefits of this “homeschool” which is hardly done at home? At this rate, why not send them to a regular pubic or private school, advise them to ignore any troonary & it would make their family life easier? Could hardly be worse for the kids than the degen weirdness they see from their dysfunctional parents on the daily.
I'm most concerned by the fact that Nick is allowed to teach other children in his homeschool co-op. Unless this homeschool co-op was actually a bunch of freaky nudist hippies or other degens the entire time, I can't imagine the average parent would want an alcoholic pervert who boasts about his poly drug usage teaching their children. Not even Nick's fellow degenerate leftists, since leftists convince themselves that the drag queens teaching their kids are keeping their perverted sexuality and drug/alcohol use at the gay bar.

I mean isn't his homeschool co-op supposed to be conservative Christians? I've been around those types of people and I'm amazed that spending hours a week on stream openly getting drunk, using profanity, and talking about futanari, porn stars, balldos, and his disbelief in basic Christian tenets hasn't somehow made these people want to disassociate with him. We know his homeschool class watches his streams and I'm sure TwitterIsCancer or that local sovcit who hates Nick has complained to the church/homeschool group, but how the hell has nobody done anything about it? That's pretty disturbing, since if they can't even vet Nick, who else aren't they vetting?
 
My read? He's likely directed Rendazza to Kiwi for "evidence" that Monty is a pedo and that it was "common belief" or some such legal excuse that's considered valid in court.
If anything, the observation of this idea that has been caused by this case has convinced most people it probably actually isn't true and Monty has been unfairly maligned.

There was absolutely nothing in any thread here that would lead to the conclusion that he "sucks little boys' dicks."

That is just defamatory bullshit Nick made up out of his own sick drunken head, based on absolutely nothing.
 
"For all of Josh's handwringing kvetching, it's on his fucking website. [pause] and in any other circumstance than his own fucking butthurt... '[Mocking Josh] The farms is really good at getting facts' . Are they, Josh? Seems like it on Montegraph. You understand humans though, right? Tell me more about my life. You're nailing it. You've got it SO right, Josh. You've got it fuckin' right."
Is Nick using random kiwifarms users calling people pedos as his justification to specifically state someone enjoys sucking little boy dick as a fact? He also seems a little mad that people are armchair analyzing him now as if Josh controls that
 
- Nick Rekieta (It was nasty. Rumble 3:38:30-3:39:20... obviously re Monty. Should be clipped and tagged to Null if it hasn't already been.)

Ask and you shall receive. My favorite part personally is when he says calling someone a pedophile and accusing them of sexual acts with children "can't" be defamatory.

Second favorite part: "Thanks for not killing yourself" *immediately picks up a glass of alcohol*


 
When you take into account the $8 a month it takes to have a checkmark, Nick rakes in a whopping $1 a month for all his hard work.

Screenshot_20231012_205454_Brave.jpg
 
Cant reply to the "Loli" guy directly for some reason, but:
-degeneracy is pretty common among libertarians
-homeschool is predominantly libertarian
-drunken shenanigans isn't weird Midwestern behavior

odds are, imo, that his group thinks that while his behavior may be aberrant, perhaps abhorrent, it's not that big a deal
 
"Oh his lady is fair and she handles herself with the grace of one who'se born many children as the wife of a law man she makes sure that he has the time and place to provide for them there"

Needs an update

"Oh his lady is foul,
And her body is ruined,
Too many children
Have taken their toll,
As the wife of a cuckold
She lines up the niggers,
He brings them the snacks
As they fill up her hole."
 
Now this might be my ESL flaring up, but is he attempting to imply that the reason he called monty a pedophile was because the farms OP did so at the time? is he trying to pin the blame of his retardation on Null?

In any case, I can feel how not-mad he is even through your transcript, that's amazing.
My read? He's likely directed Rendazza to Kiwi for "evidence" that Monty is a pedo and that it was "common belief" or some such legal excuse that's considered valid in court.
If anything, the observation of this idea that has been caused by this case has convinced most people it probably actually isn't true and Monty has been unfairly maligned.

There was absolutely nothing in any thread here that would lead to the conclusion that he "sucks little boys' dicks."

That is just defamatory bullshit Nick made up out of his own sick drunken head, based on absolutely nothing.
Is Nick using random kiwifarms users calling people pedos as his justification to specifically state someone enjoys sucking little boy dick as a fact? He also seems a little mad that people are armchair analyzing him now as if Josh controls that

EDIT: Sniped by @Spaded Dave




Judge the clip for yourself.

Also a bonus:

1697158871439.png
 
Is Nick using random kiwifarms users calling people pedos as his justification to specifically state someone enjoys sucking little boy dick as a fact? He also seems a little mad that people are armchair analyzing him now as if Josh controls that
That would be really something because if I recall correctly, part of the evidence that led to the kick vic tweet was a thread on Pretty Little Liars. Of course that thread was actually about Illich Guardiola, an actual pedophile who was actually charged for his crimes against the minor at the time. I believe he also dated Monica Rial. Weird how Monica Rial didn't out her pedo ex-boyfriend.
 
Ask and you shall receive. My favorite part personally is when he says calling someone a pedophile and accusing them of sexual acts with children "can't" be defamatory.

He also says he hasn’t seen proof that what he believes is wrong. So now Nick wants a negative proven. I’m sure he’s argued in the past that that’s a logical fallacy.
 
All Nick seems to cite that allegedly "proves" Montagraph is a child molester are those Umbrella Man short films (which contain no minors nor molestation), the 2 Girls 1 Cup parody (he eats chocolate pudding with a Barbie doll), and "fucking" the melon (he was fully clothed and didn't even actually kiss it in the clip featured in Montagraph's thread). If he has proof that Montagraph is a child molester or a pedophile then it'd be pretty awesome if he could publicize that evidence rather than trying to end the lawsuit before discovery.

There's also the lawsuit that Montagraph lost previously over another person calling him a pedophile, and while I'm not going to pretend to be educated in the law, it doesn't seem that Montagraph lost that lawsuit because he actually molests children or is a pedophile.
 
Back