Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 21.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 106 34.8%

  • Total voters
    305
All Nick seems to cite that allegedly "proves" Montagraph is a child molester are those Umbrella Man short films (which contain no minors nor molestation), the 2 Girls 1 Cup parody (he eats chocolate pudding with a Barbie doll), and "fucking" the melon (he was fully clothed and didn't even actually kiss it in the clip featured in Montagraph's thread). If he has proof that Montagraph is a child molester or a pedophile then it'd be pretty awesome if he could publicize that evidence rather than trying to end the lawsuit before discovery.

Not just calling him a child molester, Nick accused him of specific acts which even given the most generous reading of Monty’s history I don’t think have ever been accused. It’s actually wild Nick made that claim. Booze and Molly is a hell of a combo I guess.
 
All Nick seems to cite that allegedly "proves" Montagraph is a child molester are those Umbrella Man short films (which contain no minors nor molestation), the 2 Girls 1 Cup parody (he eats chocolate pudding with a Barbie doll), and "fucking" the melon (he was fully clothed and didn't even kiss it in the clip featured in Montagraph's thread). If he has proof that Montagraph is a child molester or a pedophile then it'd be pretty awesome if he could publicize that evidence rather than trying to end the lawsuit before discovery.
I'm not sure at the time of his last motion he had the actual films. From what I remember, his motion depended on a 2016(?) review of one of the films by a tinfoil hat crazy guy. The actual films (now all on the farms) disprove everything said about them who claimed they were pedo snuff films.
 
Ask and you shall receive. My favorite part personally is when he says calling someone a pedophile and accusing them of sexual acts with children "can't" be defamatory.

Second favorite part: "Thanks for not killing yourself" *immediately picks up a glass of alcohol*


View attachment 5408846
The amount of butthurt is hilarious from Balldo. Null has never called anyone a pedophile without some sort of evidence and the videos Monty made have been found which have nothing to do with pedophilia from what it appears.

I also like how Nick doesn't differentiate between speculation and statement of fact, considering when he talked to Null he made it out as if he speculated but every other time he treated it as fact.
 
He also says he hasn’t seen proof that what he believes is wrong.

I actually believe him when he says this. But only because I can 100% believe he would actively avoid any and all potential evidence that could prove him wrong solely so he can keep saying this same line rather than having to admit he was wrong in the midst of a lawsuit. It's the equivalent of him plugging his ears and going "Lalala I can't hear you".
 
Now this might be my ESL flaring up, but is he attempting to imply that the reason he called monty a pedophile was because the farms OP did so at the time? is he trying to pin the blame of his retardation on Null?
It sure sounds like it. I thought he was gonna try and pin this on Jim somehow, but maybe I missed the mark and he'll go after Null.

Going after Null is even dumber though. The ONLY thing Null had in that OP that was wrong was mention of him having a photography business involving kids. Null presumably has full edit logs in which he can show what the OP used to say. If he wants to go down that route, I think Nick is gonna get burned. It never ever EVER said that Monty "sucks little boy cock."

Also, Monty asked Null nicely to remove the part about the photography business, and Null agreed. Monty presumably didn't even mind the rest of the OP, so it wasn't the usual B.S. of a cow objecting to a thread in general.

Maybe... JUST MAYBE... Null is actually the smarter, more rational, and more fair minded person here. All that in spite of the fact Null RARELY removes stuff on request of cows.

Just sayin'.
 
The snacks part is what confuses me. Having watched a solid 70% of his streams I've never seen her provide snacks. His son provides snacks - he told that story on Monday.

Maybe she’s the one who stocks the snack drawer. When Nick is on camera in the vault he’s stranded there, starving to death unless he’s able to get someone to bring him sustenance. He could eat before streaming or bring a snack down with him but that’s too much pre-planning for Nick.

Tbh, having heard the contents of the snack drawer (pop tart, mini cookies, cheese/ cracker sets, applesauce or yogurt pouches etc) plus the cost of the snack drawer ($2k per month) it seems like the type of thing for parents who are sleeping or otherwise indisposed at breakfast or dinner & its use to to stave off the whining of small children who are wanting whatever meal it is supposed to be.
 
Be Nick. Get lovely wife who blesses you with a bunch of lovely kids. Start internet shekel stream. Becomes popular enough this is all you have to do. It’s easy work you just talk to a camera. Instead of being grateful to God at being blessed you turn to drink. Streams start to rank because of drink. Degeneracy slow sets in. This is fine I’m still friends with Dick Masterson he’s cool guy. Hey I think I’ll switch to drugs to perk up.

Remember Nick. All becomes gunt. I hope you’re still exercising to keep those booze calories off.
all of these guys are on some kind of amphetamine/stimulant along with medical testosterone replacement, too. it's the only way to explain their abhorrent horniness. everyone on the internet does adderall but a lot of these guys got into it half way through their internet career to show the transformation.

and definitely ignore racket's 15 minute prepared story about how he has a prescription for stimulants for some ACKSHUAL medical reason but he never takes it because that wouldn't be smart. straight up fucking addict tier story.
 
The ONLY thing Null had in that OP that was wrong was mention of him having a photography business involving kids.
Here is an archive of the page from February, so before the edit of the OP.
I'm in the middle of an irritated writeup on this but I figured I'd jump in quickly with the old OP while I had it up.
 
Social media expert doesn't know how to mute and trim off his social media timeline of all the eric july drama that he keeps saying he wants to get away from...and his ODD keeps going dormant when people demand answers from him so he keeps interacting with them even though by rights his ODD would just make him ignore them.
"No stalker child, it is you who has the ODD, enjoy the Balldo stalker."
 
"For all of Josh's handwringing kvetching, it's on his fucking website. [pause] and in any other circumstance than his own fucking butthurt... '[Mocking Josh] The farms is really good at getting facts' . Are they, Josh? Seems like it on Montegraph. You understand humans though, right? Tell me more about my life. You're nailing it. You've got it SO right, Josh. You've got it fuckin' right."
So I first read this before a half-hour drive home, and decided that I was gonna do it. I was gonna cum going to read through every page of Monty's thread, watch every stream talking about him, even watch his gay home movies that are so damning to prove once and for all that Monty was not a pedophile. But first, I wanted to do a cursory look at the OP and search up "Pedophile" and "likes sucking little boys penises" or other variations of the phrases, i.e. "pedo" or "sucks on/little boys" just to make sure I'm not missing anything. After all, as a member of the hivemind named "Joshua Conner 'Null' Moon", p.k.a. The Kiwi Farms, I should make sure all the facts are gotten and in one place, for Nick's viewing pleasure whenever he catches up on the Thread.

To start: the OP (a) and whatever claims it may make.


chrome_reu4MMcvvE.png
chrome_fFpDUf3kyn.png
It has a lovely little note added into it from when Monty messaged Null to remove the claim. Not enough in the thread or elsewhere for Null to even keep the claim intact in the OP, not a good look on that front. Null clearly understood a person well enough to know being called a pedo constantly, without evidence, sucks and rectified it the same day. That's what I'd call good service right there from our Janny-In-Chief. Before this the old OP had some less critical takes on Monty's history and behavior.

Search 1: "pedo" - 22 results, "pedophile" - 17 results.

chrome_KFKtjEgaMk.png

Those results were pretty interesting, mostly in the "Oh he's super not a pedophile" way. We've got posts discussing Monty's appreciation for loli art on DeviantArt, something that regardless of your opinion of is not illegal to view no does it automatically make you a pedophile. Now if he'd maybe put out a glowing review of Cuties talking about how the little girls got him horny, I could understand thinking he's a pedophile, but viewing/liking the art on its own is not enough to call him a pedophile. In fact, immediately underneath that claim is someone saying exactly that back at the time. Surprisingly, with how much those words come up, with some posts repeating of course, you would think there'd be more claims of actual shit he'd done. But no, outside of one specific guy (same as loli post) who really seemed to hate Monty, everything else is either people saying Monty has a history of being called a pedo, or that some of the people he tried to sue never actually called him one to begin with. He also apparently hung out with a pedo named Von Helton, but again just because you hung out with a pedo doesn't make you one. Other than that, or vague references to his movies that have all proven to have adult actors who lived after the filming finished, there wasn't a lot of facts in the thread to prove Monty is a pedo. Maybe I'm crazy and missed something, but I don't think so. Maybe that other search will come up with something?

Search 2: "likes sucking little boys penises" "little boys" "sucks on" "sucking"

chrome_ecKKn9jUc3.png
chrome_mZF42HuvBB.png

How embarrassing!
That's right, we can all go home now, the search came up with fuck all for me to work with on that one. Technically, "sucks on" and "sucking" had results, but they were completely irrelevant to any desire Monty might have to do it to little boys. Regardless, wherever it is that Nick got this claim from it certainly wasn't on the Farms. Might be a good idea to go back to that source and see if they will have any facts to back it up. This does leave me dangling though, I was ready to knuckle down and watch a few hours of streams and home movies, maybe even search through the "Montagraphy" archives, but I don't think I have to. As far as I can tell, the claim that Monty is a pedophile, or likes to suck the dicks of little boys for that matter, is completely and unequivocally false. Although, I wasn't able to "prove" he's not one, so maybe I'm just a retard too.

Kind of anticlimactic really, but I'm sure as shit glad that I never falsely called this highly-litigious spastic a pedophile!

(Edit to fix the gay broken attachments, just like Rekieta has to do with his marriage! ZING)
 
Last edited:
Here is an archive of the page from February, so before the edit of the OP.
I'm in the middle of an irritated writeup on this but I figured I'd jump in quickly with the old OP while I had it up.
Right... so just so we're all on the same page here, the deleted part is this:

1697164914781.png


It now reads this:

1697165036583.png


How the FUCK do you get "Monty sucks little boy cock" from even the original?

Answer: You don't. If Nick tries to pin this on the Kiwi Farms, he's a lying faggot looking to dodge the consequences of his own drunken ramblings. Fuck him.
 
Cant reply to the "Loli" guy directly for some reason, but:
-degeneracy is pretty common among libertarians
-homeschool is predominantly libertarian
-drunken shenanigans isn't weird Midwestern behavior

odds are, imo, that his group thinks that while his behavior may be aberrant, perhaps abhorrent, it's not that big a deal
I'm sure there are libertarian homeschools, but the main current of homeschooling has always been conservative Christians. Fundie schools like Bob Jones University and Pensacola Christian College sell a bunch of textbooks for that market and that's ultraconservative stuff. And IIRC this thread (or Nick himself?) said the homeschool coop is related to his church/local churches.

While maybe there are liberal Christian homeschools (i.e. hippie shit), I'm just going to guess these are fairly conservative churches. If they cared to look into what Nick was doing, he'd be gone in an instant. Probably Our Wife too, since women who post naked pictures at the beach and lingerie shots online are not the sort of women these Christian groups want teaching their kids. Nor would they want women married to losers like Nick. I wasn't homeschooled, but I spent a few years growing up around these sorts of people and the online behavior of the Rekietas is the polar opposite of what is expected in that community.
 
Oh no! Did KAYLA take his Transformer? I hope it wasn't Starscream again!
I might actually take her side on that one, if she did.

If I were in her position, I'd be concerned he'd get so drunk or drugged out he'd confuse it for a Balldo, and ram it up his ASS.

Then she'd have to rush him to the hospital for rectal surgery.

Starscream has a lot of sharp edges.

1697166693369.png
 
I might actually take her side on that one, if she did.

If I were in her position, I'd be concerned he'd get so drunk or drugged out he'd confuse it for a Balldo, and ram it up his ASS.

Then she'd have to rush him to the hospital for rectal surgery.

Starscream has a lot of sharp edges.

View attachment 5409273
No with all the time he spends at Gay 90's he wouldn't even feel Starscream. The nigga could take this Transformer up his ass no problem.
11e1dc98-57f2-42c1-bf81-ac61c06b96eb.jpg

Fortress Maximus - largest G1 Transformer.
 
Absolutely nothing on the Monty thread would indicate that Monty is a pedophile. If he's claiming he can believe that Monty is a pedophile based on the thread or anything I've written, I would be happy to sign an affidavit stating the contrary.

The only thing to be said about Monty is that a bunch of trolls called his movies snuff films. I've seen all three and none of them are sexual, none feature children. They were very weird home movies that are on par with any home made horror movie.

The reason I don't call Monty a pedophile is I have absolutely no reason to and I never have had reason to. The reason I call Vito a pedophile is because he is one and has said he is. The reason I call Max Carson a pedophile is because he is one and says he is one.

It's also just a bizarre statement to make that per se defamation doesn't exist or that calling someone a child molester doesn't qualify as per se defamation. Rekieta didn't just repeatedly call him a pedophile, he made the accusation that Monty had performed specific sex acts on boys.

I'm kind of at a loss for why he just keeps lying about what he said. Is he trying to fool me, his audience, or himself?

Or maybe the holes in his brain are getting larger.

Those results were pretty interesting, mostly in the "Oh he's super not a pedophile" way. We've got posts discussing Monty's appreciation for loli art on DeviantArt, something that regardless of your opinion of is not illegal to view no does it automatically make you a pedophile.
There is no evidence that's his account.
 
Weird how people only seem to ask him to do things when it's stuff he already wants to do.
Like a confirmation bias or some shit.

I'm kind of at a loss for why he just keeps lying about what he said. Is he trying to fool me, his audience, or himself?
He's drank and drugged his brain into believing his lies. It's bad.
 
Back