2023 Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict

Why do some journalist keep bringing that up? I am not aware of a single law of war that forces you to feed and supply enemy civilians in (!) enemy territory. I also can't really think of any examples in history (police actions pseudo wars don't count). I think in late WW2 the Americans provided food for the Netherlands but that were allied civilians in German occupied territory.
It's only after you occupy the territory that it becomes your responsibility again.

I think it's just that following the Ukraine debacle, where a small nation attacked a nuclear equipped nation with near unlimited manufacturing potential, no one considered that a suicide mission. But now these guys are morons. You can see how people can get a little confused considering the previous narrative laid out.
 
Gaza is doomed. The Western leaders are talking about a "proportional" response whereas in the past they stressed 10x that IDF should avoid civilian casualties. The German defence minister didn't even bother to ask Israel to show restraint. The Chancellor didn't either. He was basically like they get all the ammo and guns they want and the rest we don't care. Both a proportional response and acting according to the rules of war doesn't stop Israel from solving the issue once and for all.

The only hope would be bleeding heart Europe, the problem here is that a lot of countries including Germany are drifting to the right and let's put it politely Muslims aren't that well regarded anymore outside the academic left. The riots that will 100% happen across Europe will not improve the opinion of Muslims either.

Hamas-supporting Muslims have the same issue that troons do: they yell and scream and threaten violence about every tiny little thing anyway, so what's the point in showing restraint?

From Israel's perspective, they are going to scream and riot and commit jihad if you flatten one building or if you flatten all of them and then piss on the rubble, so why not just skip to the latter if you can get away with it? I'm not saying that's a moral way of thinking, but it's logical.

Why do some journalist keep bringing that up? I am not aware of a single law of war that forces you to feed and supply enemy civilians in (!) enemy territory. I also can't really think of any examples in history (police actions pseudo wars don't count). I think in late WW2 the Americans provided food for the Netherlands but that were allied civilians in German occupied territory.
It's only after you occupy the territory that it becomes your responsibility again.

I still cannot believe that they are complaining that the country whose civilians they just massacred cut off their power. It's like a Reddit moderator seething because his mom wouldn't bring his dinner up to his room anymore because he called her a bitch.
 
View attachment 5409828

A security company my friend works for is certainly taking this potential jihad seriously.
He and everyone in the company received an E-mail regarding Friday the 13th.
THE FULL PDF

Downtown in my large city had teams of SWAT officers with long guns patrolling up and down the bar streets tonight in carts.

So is anyone going to talk about the elephant in the room about the staggering amount of voices in academia that excused the murder and rape of innocent civilians in Israel at the concert (even blamed them)? And how one could easily see that translating to us having a massive problem on our own soil if America were ever to get attacked again? Like these same people would not only cheer on another 9/11, but at this point they'd sell out their own countrymen to virtue signal and would trip over themselves to unlock the barricaded door to the proverbial Christian school for the Hamas to shoot up. And then berate the surviving parents that they brought this upon themselves.

How the fuck did it get so bad?

They've always been like this. They've just finally been emboldened to the point where they feel comfortable saying the quiet part out loud.
 
Holy shit I hope this is true. Absolute dumb motherfuckers. Niggos in Africa are smarter than this and have more of a survival instinct than these morons. Also, them hostages be dead n' shieet.
View attachment 5409795
View attachment 5409796

It's real. Hostages also really dead.
View attachment 5409804 View attachment 5409805
You know, I recall them promising executing a hostage each time an airstrike happens and livestreaming it. What happened? They bitched out? Or they already killed all the hostages by that point, just for shits and giggles?
 
Small quibble:
Kuwait didn't steal Iraqi oil.
Kuwait (and Saudi Arabia) loaned Saddam huge sums of money to bankroll his war with Iran. Saddam wanted to become a Arab Charlemange/Bolivar, a person who united various tribes of a people into one, and he wanted to do that by beating the Persians. The war ended in a stalemate, but Kuwait and SA wanted to be paid back, becasue they never asked to be united with the other Arabs, and interest on the loans was ruinous, especially with sanctions. So it was "siezed because loan payments not being made" not "stolen".
But Saddam still had all the soldiers and weapons those loans had bought, so he decided to use them to try to fix his problem.

The Iraqi Invasion was intended to take Kuwait wholesale (thus eliminating their debt obligations there) and then intimidate Saudi Arabia into a level Debt Forgiveness. Saudi Arabia however had been trading oil for American Goodwill for nearly two decades at that point and decided to cash in one of their chits with the US instead of bartering with Saddam.

The rest of your post is completely accurate (well, except Iraq had WMDs, they chemical weaponed the kurds remember. Just all their store were gay and worthless by 2003) but Iraq wasn't some good boy dindu nuffin.

But Iraq refused to negotiate with Kuwait on such an agreement. So Ku wait produced oil from Rumaila with out any agreement, and then adopted a policy of producing far more oil than it was allowed under the quota system of the Organization of Petroleum Export ing Countries. That policy became an other sticking point in relations with Iraq, which contended that the over production depressed oil prices and revenues for all OPEC members.

Kuwait was horizontal drilling the Iraqi fields for years, Iraq did nothing about it because they were fighting a life or death war against the Persians.

When the war was over Saddam offered to right off the stolen oil in return for debt forgiveness, the Kuwaitis, being money grubbing jumped up Bedouin goat fuckers (only a step above Jews) told him to get fucked. Remember as well that the Gulf Arabs were fucking terrified of Iran post revolution fearing a mass uprising from their Shia population. Iraq did them an enormous favor and his reward was getting screwed over.

For some light relief


If this had been Aussies being murdered this cunt would be calling for calm and understanding.

My own position is to reverently hope that the Arabs and Jews Shoa each other into oblivion and spare the rest of us from their bullshit.
 
It’s not that it’s goreporn. The last thing I want to see is dead babies. It’s that every western government has lied to us 24/7 for the past 5/10/20/50/100??? years. So if the government is going to say that there are dead babies, I want to see the fucking dead babies.
It's like verifying that you have shit on your shoe. No one is thrilled at the thought, but you have to do it.

If the escalation continues and this "war" (TPD) turns into something larger (TKandMD), the propaganda is going to be insane!

With the western leftists and a bunch of unemployed hack writers thanks to their strike resolution . . .

everyone that identifies as a Jew on the planet out for blood and blood-money . . .

The cringe memey shitpost-ey right that emerged (was astroturfed) into existence along the Trump train . . .

There's a reason why I come to the Farms to keep up with big events like this.
 
You know, I recall them promising executing a hostage each time an airstrike happens and livestreaming it. What happened? They bitched out? Or they already killed all the hostages by that point, just for shits and giggles?

I imagine that they executed a bunch and stuck their bodies in some ammo caches so they can claim that the airstrikes killed them.
 
israeli airforce dropping warning leaflets?
Naamloos.jpg

Naamloos.jpg

Naamloos.jpg


it says : "It says, go south immediately. A ground offensive will happen, you have 24 hours to leave."" ?

You must evacuate your homes immediately and head to the south of Wadi Gaza. the Israeli Defense
 
Last edited:
You know, I recall them promising executing a hostage each time an airstrike happens and livestreaming it. What happened? They bitched out? Or they already killed all the hostages by that point, just for shits and giggles?
Hamas is underground. Witness accounts talk about massive warrens and chambers, nothing important is above ground. So the Israelis bombing Gaza apartment buildings is purely being done as an act of collective mass punishment. No doubt the hostages, which have value, were taken underground, so claims they were killed in the bombings is bullshit.

I think it's just that following the Ukraine debacle, where a small nation attacked a nuclear equipped nation with near unlimited manufacturing potential, no one considered that a suicide mission. But now these guys are morons. You can see how people can get a little confused considering the previous narrative laid out.
Israel isn't Russia. They're a small country with limited industrial capacity and no natural resources apart from some offshore natural gas. They can't sustain a long war on their own.
 
Why do some journalist keep bringing that up? I am not aware of a single law of war that forces you to feed and supply enemy civilians in (!) enemy territory. I also can't really think of any examples in history (police actions pseudo wars don't count). I think in late WW2 the Americans provided food for the Netherlands but that were allied civilians in German occupied territory.
It's only after you occupy the territory that it becomes your responsibility again.
1. I'd like to point out that the Israeli was lying. The world tried to bring supplies and Israel said no.


2. Israel did not recognize Hamas as the government of Gaza when it won the 2006 election. That has consequences now.
 
Idk, why is everybody so univocably defending Israel.
Hamas killed 10 baibes, israel in returen killed 500.
Intention matters.
You don't have to take sides. This could be exactly what the middle east region is needed. IDF utterly destroys Hamas which is holding a significant number of Palestinians hostage and then after, an inquiry discovers that King Jew Bibi was incompetent and complacent, so he's gone as well. Egypt warned them, I have no reason to doubt this claim.

Probably a retarded or optimistic take. I'm fans of neither but Hamas is fundamentally worse.

israeli airforce dropping warning leaflets?
View attachment 5409876
View attachment 5409879
I was told the IDF will send out mass messages, drop leaflets, and toss empty bombs onto buildings to warn civilians before turning the area into rubble.
Hope Steve sees tomorrow's sunrise.
 
I hope all those stanning for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza are paid actors, because if not then they are even more retarded than the paragliders who gave Israel an excuse to purge.
are you referring to me with this and are you just too retarded to read the post I quoted?

Your partial quote confuses me, because nothing I said has anything to do with ethnically cleansing gaza and partially quoting it changes the context. Quit acting like journoscum.

But I'm all for total mudslime death. Feel free to quote that.
 
Last edited:
Israel isn't Russia. They're a small country with limited industrial capacity and no natural resources apart from some offshore natural gas. They can't sustain a long war on their own.

Since when has Israel done anything on it's own? If everyone pulled funding it would probably collapse in months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diamond Homonculus
Back