Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[nym]

I'm just going to guess these are fairly conservative churches. If they cared to look into what Nick was doing, he'd be gone in an instant.

I don't know the truth of it, but I'm thinking the way he's talked of teaching his Constitution courses to them makes me think you're looking at predominantly libertarians.
Your right-to-far-right Christian nationalists are in their teens and 20s, your 65+ Christians who tried to get rid of Harry Potter have waned and are forgotten, and you've got the 40 year old libertarians in the middle -- again, all I can say is I figure that's what you're looking at. But I have no secret knowledge.

 

[Spaded Dave]

But the ministry could get into the comics business and that would cause more confusion in the future.

IANAL but this doesn't sound like how it works. Maybe it does, but if you extend the idea out then "ISOM could eventually get into prosthetic medical devices so a biomedical engineering organization can't use that acronym either. They also might get into farm equipment so no tractors with the acronym ISOM. They also made a joke once about opening a bank so nobody can call themselves the International Safe Of Money."

A lawyer can tell me I'm retarded, but until then that idea sounds retarded.

People lying about his drinking

My man, I brought the receipts. You're caught on video. If I didn't have a job I'd do an "Alcohol Count" for every stream he does and send it to Himedall for inclusion in her overviews.

 

[Peace Through Power]

- Nick still had the broken robot going off in the background that annoyed him and he never turned it off. It is his daughter's, and she is obsessed with robots. He mentioned her name.

He is just trying to make his surroundings like they were when he was a kid in da hood

 

[Geared Chris]

I caught up on the thread using highlights and didn't really see anything about the ISOM ministry going ahead with their lawsuit. Kiwi law nerds, is there any merit to it?

Sounds like it does have merit based on the following:

- Same name, obviously, and Good Shephard (GS) owns the ISOM trademark. They applied for it in 1999 and have owned it since 2006.
- Similar spaces. GS publishes illustrated books and had plans to enter the comics world with their God stuff.
- July's hero apparently has a cross on his belt.
- The SEO issue. GS has spent over 25 years building the brand. As July's ISOM gets more popular it's bumping down GS's ISOM.
- The "consumer confusion" issue is obviously a subjective call that the courts/Trademark Office would have to make but GS's CEO has said it's already happening.

Nick mentioned the World Wildlife Fund as a comparable non-profit that won. The courts compelled the World Wrestling Federation to change its name.

When Kurt and Nick first covered it, I don't think they were aware of how established GS is within its space. Both seemed to think it was just some tiny charity that no one cared about. (Some homework would have been helfpful but, alas, YT lawyers...)

Is it because he's actually a self-hating gay, who romps with Romaine and Ricardo while holidaying in Jamaica, but then comes back to his evangelical Christian home school and is deeply and profoundly ashamed of his behaviour (in those few fleeting moments when he's sober enough to feel shame.)

I think it's that simple, tbh, minus the shame.

Edit: Punctuation

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

- Nick still had the broken robot going off in the background that annoyed him and he never turned it off. It is his daughter's, and she is obsessed with robots.

*chirp*

 

[Potatoherder]

Nick wants to talk to the right guest about how men listen too much to other men amd ignore women's opinions on what I'd attractive. He couched this in a joke that men are 'all turning gay'. He knows he is right because men hate 'short-shorts' and a lady in a hot tub stared at his crotch for minutes and he later got catcalled by a homeless Black woman. He has to talk down women who flirt with him beciase he compliments them for things other men do not.

I think we've crossed from him being bi to him being outright closeted homosexual. The constant need boast in public about how desirable women find him while at the same time trying to get approve from women by showing how he is an ally. We totally believe women are sliding off chairs when he enters the room in his gay pride t-shirt and short shorts.

AI render of Nick while trying to fight off women. You have been warned.

Spoiler

 

[Irrational Exuberance]

Also, that song is now sad. It has lines like:

"Oh his lady is fair and she handles herself with the grace of one who'se born many children as the wife of a law man she makes sure that he has the time and place to provide for them there"

It's a song about a Nick and Kayla that is wholly unrecognizable now.

"And the woman he's tied to has borne him much bounty,
but is the man grateful? Why, in a pig's arse.
His kin'll fear what their own lives are amounting,
when they see their Da in those underwear bars."

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

He cooked a canned chicken, rice, soy sauce, and salsa dish.

Canned chicken? Who is he? Big Mastodon?

 

[jspit2.0]

- Same name, obviously, and Good Shephard (GS) owns the ISOM trademark. They applied for it in 1999 and have owned it since 2006.
- Similar spaces. GS publishes illustrated books and had plans to enter the comics world with their God stuff.
- July's hero apparently has a cross on his belt.
- The SEO issue. GS has spent over 25 years building the brand. As July's ISOM gets more popular it's bumping down GS's ISOM.
- The "consumer confusion" issue is obviously a subjective call that the courts/Trademark Office would have to make but GS's CEO has said it's already happening.

Nick mentioned the World Wildlife Fund as a comparable non-profit that won. The courts compelled the World Wrestling Federation to change its name.

When Kurt and Nick first covered it, I don't think they were aware of how established GS is within its space. Both seemed to think it was just some tiny charity that no one cared about. (Some homework would have been helfpful but, alas, YT lawyers...)


I think it's that simple, tbh, minus the shame.

Edit: Punctuation

They have a duty to defend the trademark or risk losing it. A simple google search combined with a search of trademarks, which a businessman should have done, black rapper, would have shown this.

 

[ReverendVerse]

It could be a product of adderall/ritalin/some other ADHD/narcolepsy med use. Or it could be that he just had a cheeky little line about an hour before he went on stage and the main effects have worn off. Alternatively, he could just be getting really shitty cocaine -- more cut than coke.

Even OTC allergy drugs can cause dry mouth.

Cant reply to the "Loli" guy directly for some reason, but:
-degeneracy is pretty common among libertarians
-homeschool is predominantly libertarian
-drunken shenanigans isn't weird Midwestern behavior

odds are, imo, that his group thinks that while his behavior may be aberrant, perhaps abhorrent, it's not that big a deal

Also, they're conservative Christians... they're probably just normies that have no idea about the internet subculture that we and Nick engage in. Absolutely no one in my circles have any idea what KiwiFarms is, who the big streamers are, and the drama they're involved in.

EDIT: I used to lead a Christian men's group through my church and one of our goals was how modern Christian men are supposed to navigate the current culture in America to help bring younger men into the faith. I was speaking about how the idols of our younger generations have changed compared to what ours where when we were younger. I bring up streamers and the impact they're having on the youth and many of these streamers actively advocate to hate Christians and to hate what we believe in. None of these men (of various ages) had any idea who people like Hasan Piker, Vaush, Destiny, etc even are and were amazed by how influential they are. I told them that these are the types of people we're competing against and we're losing hard, because we simply don't engage in this culture, don't know it exists, and powerless to combat it unless we learn about it.

 

[No Scope]

Maybe he thought the same thing would happen with Monty, however he underestimated that the local law community doesn't like him and he has everything to lose while Monty has everything to gain.

Not just the local law community, the ones in YouTube as well. There are several types in the Lawtube community . . .
* The smart ones who quietly distance themselves from Nick and focus on their own content. (Dani Ahn, Emily D. Baker)
* Clout chasers who repeatedly return as guests on Nick's stream and ignore his degeneracy. (Joe, Legal Vices, Kurt, Aussie Overlaw'd, Branca, Law & Lumber)
* The ones with integrity that take a neutral position and point out his bullshit. (Potentially Criminal)
* Blind devotees that acknowledge Nick's degeneracy. (Gosney)

I really liked Gosney at first but after watching his streams where he emulates Nick's grifting and praising of him. I completely stopped following his content. Having a p3do defender write the foreword in one of your published books doesn't look too good. Even worse if he loses the case with Monty. I expect that one book to get a reprint or severely discounted in the future.

Spoiler

Happy St. FatNick's Day Stream with Camelot, Dani, Aussie Overlawd, LegalVices and MAYBE More!

Notice how Nick tries to play it off that what he said didn't have anything to do with Dani leaving.

Kurt and Branca, for example, seem to be exasperated with how he's handling the Montagraph thing. Branca's thinly veiled lecture to him over falsely calling people pedophiles was quite the shock. I don't think Sean has commented on it, but it's my understanding he's trying not too because he might be called as a witness.

This was also brought up by Andrea Burkhart who was a guest on Kurt's stream on July 14, 2023. Live stream titled - "Law Fun with @aburkhartlaw". Originally posted by @Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/steve-...eta-rekieta-law-llc-2023.143950/post-16502559

Spoiler: Video Clip

@Strix454 gave a good explanation of what likely happened with Jim. There's currently no evidence that Jim himself accused Monty of being a pedo either. I brought Jim up earlier because I think there is a non-zero chance that Nick might at some point claim he did, just like he's (falsely) claiming that the Farms has information that Monty is. It's also possible the Sweety Squad, which I presume Jim has little to no actual control over, might be running troll ops. Monty has lots of trolls. A fact which Null makes very clear in Monty's OP, and throughout the thread. In fact, it has been revealed there is so much stupid fake bullshit out there about Montagraph that it's caused even some otherwise relatively stone hearted farmers to express sympathy for him.

It would not surprise me if Nick were to put the blame entirely on Jim when he is dead from cancer AIDS should he lose the case against Monty. I remember him saying once in a stream that you cannot defame the dead.

 

[SargonF00t]

This was also brought up by Andrea Burkhart who was a guest on Kurt's stream on July 14, 2023. Live stream titled - "Law Fun with @aburkhartlaw". Originally posted by @Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/steve...eta-rekieta-law-llc-2023.143950/post-16502559

Someone should tell Andrea that Kurt wants to inseminate her, with immediate effect.

 

[jspit2.0]

So....we have Baldo man, sober. We have black rapper attacking christians for defending a trademark he should have known about and not infringed. Is Racket's trying to pivot here?

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

So....we have Baldo man, sober. We have black rapper attacking christians for defending a trademark he should have known about and not infringed. Is Racket's trying to pivot here?

No, Nick's life is a downward spiral. He's circling the drain of his career desperately grabbing at anything that used to work, being unable to hold onto it long enough to right himself before trying the next thing again.

His old weeb audience hates his guts and don't have a cause to rally behind anymore, the law audience has better options now, his wine-mom audience gave into entropy and is collapsing in on itself because he can't keep up the true-crime trial streams, and his Coomer audience doesn't actually exist.

 

[Strix454]

I caught up on the thread using highlights and didn't really see anything about the ISOM ministry going ahead with their lawsuit. Kiwi law nerds, is there any merit to it?

It could go either way. Isom is an actual name which complicates things. The religious Isom & the comics Isom are both fairly obscure things and its hard to see a comic creating confusion in the marketplace. There might be an argument to be made about search engine confusions.

The World Wildlife Fund vs. World Wrestling Federation case is being somewhat misrepresented. The WWF (and previously WWWF) had been using that brand in the US for many years. When a couple of scandals happened with the wrestling organization in the 1990s, the World Wildlife Fund got upset. There was eventually a deal between the two organizations about how the wrestling organization would use the term "WWF".

The Wrestling WWF basically ignored the deal that they had signed with the wildlife fund. Then it went into the British courts which have their own system of law and WWF wrestling lost.

 

[Ice Gun Ninja]

Is he trying to fool me, his audience, or himself?

All of the above.

Or maybe the holes in his brain are getting larger.

Those holes are the reason he thinks its a good idea to gaslight everyone.

One additional thing: Nick might be looking to start a fight between Montagraph and Null

What makes you think that?

The Pull up clip:

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

It's also just a bizarre statement to make that per se defamation doesn't exist or that calling someone a child molester doesn't qualify as per se defamation. Rekieta didn't just repeatedly call him a pedophile, he made the accusation that Monty had performed specific sex acts on boys.

I'm kind of at a loss for why he just keeps lying about what he said. Is he trying to fool me, his audience, or himself?

Or maybe the holes in his brain are getting larger.

While it might somewhat counterintuitive and foolhardy to support another defamation case in light of how Vic ended, I am eager to test the theory that the "Rekieta curse" is real. Nick was on the other side in Vic.

I am sure many remember Nick saying that Anime Man's accusers were per se defamation becuase they were accusing him of ACTUAL FELONIES. 'Predator' implies sexual assault and 'child predator' implies touching actual kids. That was enough for him to sue over, Nick said.

This take mixes like oil and water with his MORE SPECIFIC claims against Monty.

I may be autistic (like everyone else here) but I'm pretty sure this is just him making a silly little joke

Don triple-post. Use the QUOTE feature or edit your posts.

I'll be much more interested to hear how discovery handles the issue of Nick's black best friend grooming the children of his girlfriends before turning them out on the BDSM scene as they come of age.

Why is it acceptable to groom female children, but not suck the dicks of male children? Is Nick actually a homophobe? Were all those trips to Gay90's for naught? Is it because he's actually a self-hating gay, who romps with Romaine and Ricardo while holidaying in Jamaica, but then comes back to his evangelical Christian home school and is deeply and profoundly ashamed of his behaviour (in those few fleeting moments when he's sober enough to feel shame.)

Sadly, I never believed we'd ever get to this point because I always believed Rekieta would settle if the case doesn't get thrown out at summary judgement. He appears to be preparing his supporters for such an outcome now. He had hoped he could pay Randazza the equivalent of one of his shitty paintings and the whole thing goes away, but if that (as seems likely) turns out to not be the case, he's going to have to be paying Randazza some serious money. Money that he'll never recover.

Nick might be drunk and stupid, but I don't think he's THAT drunk and stupid. Sadly.

I think @Geared Chris mentioned in a summary that Nick said he would be open to settling.

He kind of fucked that one up by repeatedly saying "Everything I said is true" and doubling/tripling down on his statements. He eliminated his best argument from basically the outset. Not that I think it would have been convincing to begin with. This case is Monty's to lose.

The only hope I see for Nick is Monty running out of money and having to drop the case.

Question for lawyers out there. If Schneider took the case on contingency, and it starts dragging on longer and pricier than expected, can he withdraw his representation or is he locked in?

It was discussed in the actual lawsuit thread that the GFM Monty setup for the appeal costs was at least partially driven by Schneider's exasperation.

Even OTC allergy drugs can cause dry mouth.


Also, they're conservative Christians... they're probably just normies that have no idea about the internet subculture that we and Nick engage in. Absolutely no one in my circles have any idea what KiwiFarms is, who the big streamers are, and the drama they're involved in.

EDIT: I used to lead a Christian men's group through my church and one of our goals was how modern Christian men are supposed to navigate the current culture in America to help bring younger men into the faith. I was speaking about how the idols of our younger generations have changed compared to what ours where when we were younger. I bring up streamers and the impact they're having on the youth and many of these streamers actively advocate to hate Christians and to hate what we believe in. None of these men (of various ages) had any idea who people like Hasan Piker, Vaush, Destiny, etc even are and were amazed by how influential they are. I told them that these are the types of people we're competing against and we're losing hard, because we simply don't engage in this culture, don't know it exists, and powerless to combat it unless we learn about it.

Correct RE: the streamer influence. There are no wholesome Religious streamers. The closest you get is a Crowder or Jordan Peterson unless you want to go to Mormon Beck or Jewish Shapiro or Prager.

In a day when even the Pope has horrible takes, I am not sure 'influencer' models of engagement are right for the faith. However, the reactionary position of trying to counter the indoctrination after it happens is not right either.

 

[Strix454]

Nick wants to talk to the right guest about how men listen too much to other men amd ignore women's opinions on what I'd attractive.

This seems like Kayla inserting her ideas into the show. If he wants to talk men's fashion, I would have thought he would have brought in Andrew or Fish-eyed Mr. Drexel. Both would have opinions (not good ones of course) at least.

 

[Maraschino]

Fuck I get those eggs sometimes. Brb killing myself.

Honestly the most fitting response to finding out you're a non-practicing egg hard boiler.

I think we've crossed from him being bi to him being outright closeted homosexual. The constant need boast in public about how desirable women find him while at the same time trying to get approve from women by showing how he is an ally. We totally believe women are sliding off chairs when he enters the room in his gay pride t-shirt and short shorts.

I think the simplest answer is that he doesn't care what hole he puts his dick into. Or he's just lying, OR he's just omitting some important details that could significantly change how the scenario could be interpreted, all for his own benefit.

Makes me wonder if the reason he's so bent on letting people know that other women find him attractive is because his wife doesn't find him attractive. I'm not married, but I feel like the opinions of literally any woman who isn't my wife and whether or not they find me attractive should basically be thrown in the garbage, but maybe I'm just "too autistic" and "don't get social cues."

If you're married, why the actual fuck would you care what another woman thinks about your attractiveness unless you're trying to fuck her, or you're compensating because someone you DO want to want to fuck you doesn't?

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

I watched/listened to Jim's stream with Nick where they talked about Montagraph threatening to sue Jim. I believe I have collected every claim Jim made about Monty no matter how joking or petty it was, for completeness. I didn't timestamp them because that was too much. I did however timestamp some parts that I found interesting or funny. I'll also include the stream I used for reference.

Tldr: at no point does Jim ever come close to saying anything Nick could have twisted into the claims he made.

Spoiler: Jim's Claims

• Claims that Monty doxxed, swatted and flagged people. Also that he got them fired from their jobs and sued them.
• Goes along with a melonfucking joke
• Calls Monty “pretty unhinged”
• Says playing a call will show “how insane this guy is” in reference to Monty
• Says Monty is “the kind of gift you rarely get in the world”. I doubt he would say this about someone he considers a chomo, compared to how he talks about Ross and Nick Bate
• Says Monty will threaten people by saying his family is “mainstream media royalty”
• Compares Monty to a mixture of Hank Hill with dentures and Boomhauer from King of the Hill
• Repeats his claim that Monty doxxes people, takes pride in it. But has archived Monty saying these things
• Monty is a “meme master”
• Says Monty has made the claim that he sues not because he wants to win in court but just to get info so he can go after people and embarrass them
• Says Monty has “remote viewing powers”, clearly joking
• Claims Monty likes to call people during streams
• Says Monty tries too hard to be intimidating and it goes so far it’s funny
• Jim recounts a story where someone Montagraph knew got catfished by someone pretending to be an underage girl. Claims Monty has flagged down any video mentioning it
• Jim says he found a video where Monty said Steve Quest was a DBA and filed a lawsuit using his address as a TJ Maxx
• Says Monty claims to have worked for the deep state but also destroyed deep state, so he doesn’t know which story to go with
• Calls Monty a “special case”
• Says that if you laugh at Monty he’ll put you on a “special list”
• Says Monty likes “putting people in bondage gear and having them suck toes on twitter”
• Jokingly claims Monty treats Spokeo as a “dowsing rod”
• Says when Monty doxxed Drumr he used an old address so he got the wrong guy
• Says Monty threatened him by saying “he would make me famous” Jim’s response “do it”
• Says Monty has a weird thing for toes
• Monty is “absolutely a Q boomer”
• Refers to Monty as a “Q larper” and says “as I understand he’s 100% in favor of Q, he is the super Q boomer, and he loves Q. Don’t listen to what he’s saying, it’s all deep cover bullshit. He is the Q boomer supreme.”
• “The only things I’ve accused him of are the things I’ve seen him actually do in that other archive. Which is admitting to doxxing people, admitting to flagging people, admitting to suing people, and claiming in audio, on stream, admitting to calling the police on people. I have not accused him of doing anything which he has not explicitly himself stated he has done. With regards to the 222 thing I made no declarative statements with that. I merely said ‘boy this rabbit hole is getting dark.’ So I guess he’s imagining I’m saying things that I’m not saying even though I’m not the one deleting tweets, he is.”
• Jim says jokingly “he is a romantic. I can’t deny he is a sweetheart. Maybe he should be in charge of the sweetie squad.”
• Jim says Monty isn’t making empty threats given his past history of filing motions.
• Monty “likes to remind people he lives in a stand your ground state”
• Montagraph “took offense” to being told “try to be nice to people whose kids got killed and was like ‘fuck them’”
• “Steve Quest is Paul Blart? Yeah, I mean, potentially”
• Jim says about Morphonius “Jake looked into who he was and came across the same stuff I did, right? Which is all this weird sex shit”
• Jim says “This guy is unhinged. He makes threats against people and tries to follow through on them.” “I’ve seen him call the cops on people and brag about it. I’ve seen him attempt to doxx people, flag people, do anything he can to get petty revenge.”
• “I ran into multiple accounts, and it’s not just shitposters. He’ll just target like old woman and shit.”
• Once again calls him a Q boomer
• Says Monty “not only worked for the CIA but destroyed it too”
• Calls him a “try hard”
• Says Monty was “fuming” that Jim made superchat money from streams about him
• "This guy is something else"
• Again calls him a "Q larper" who is "running around on the internet threatening to sue everybody"
• Says he's going to be homeless because "this psychopath decides he's gonna drag me to court for hurting his feelings cause I laughed at him"
• "I watched him being weird with drumr and I was fascinated by it really. Said somethings laughing about it and got put on the 'you're gonna get sued list' with a bunch of other people"
• "I want a nice reserve of hat money for when our boy here Montagraph rapes me in court"
• Jim says in reference to Monty "this man is nowhere near the league of Terry Davis"
• "Chalk it up to nervousness over getting sued by a CIA badass that worked at Raytheon was it? Who knows all the phone laws in this country. Gotta be careful with that shit"
• "I think he's gonna sue me given how unhinged he seems to be"
• Addresses Monty directly, "Montagraph if you're listening, which I'm fairly sure you are, your memes are shit and you really aren't scary. Stop being an idiot on the Internet, it's embarrassing.

Spoiler: Interesting Parts

Nick says at 26:06 that “I can assume that this guy is probably broadcasting from whatever Knights Inn he’s sucked someone off to borrow their key card at 10:45am before checkout so he can slip in there and record a video or two before going back to whatever bridge he lives under.”

Making a dick sucking joke is interesting in retrospect given his claim about Monty sucking boys.


At 31:45 Jim says to Nick “he’s gonna destroy you bro” could make a good clip now given the lolsuit.


Nick says at 37:50: “What’s funny is I haven’t seen anything degenerate about this guy created by anybody other than him. That’s the weird part of it. Like all of the nasty, weirdo degeneracy I’ve seen was his own videos.”

Would like to have Nick defend his claims about Monty now given this statement. I know it’s old but can he show where Monty made a video sucking boys? (He can’t)


Nick says at 51:22 that he’s “inclined to doubt whatever he says just out of principle” when talking about Montagraph. Lawyer brain or self-diagnosed ODD?


At 55:29 Nick says next time Monty calls him he’s “gonna pull up a bunch of yaoi titles I think he’s definitely watching and reading and ask him who his husbando is or whatever”. He was joking but again it’s interesting.


At 59:47 Jim says “It’s done. You might as well drink yourself to death right now.” Also could make for a great clip


At 1:01:51 Monty says “You will never forget my name as long as you live, Nicky!” Another good line for clipping


At 1:48:02 they’re reading Monty’s filing against Morphonius and it says Morphonius made pedo allegations against Monty to a live stream of over 4k. This is the first time (I think) that any pedo stuff has come up in the stream


At 1:53:22 Nick says “Let me give Montagraph a little lesson. Laughing at someone on the Internet is like standing across a highway and pointing at someone and laughing and it is not illegal to stand across a highway and laugh. It is not illegal if 7 billion people on the Earth are standing on one side of the highway, pointing their finger at you and laughing and you’re the only guy. And that’s probably what’s happening here. Not 7 billion, but anyone that sees this is laughing at you Montagraph, no one is laughing with you.”

This will be good for reference as well.