- Joined
- Feb 2, 2023
I agree, though they're still wrong because fuck you so many of the counterparts to gen 1 are literally just better in gen 5. Who would honestly choose Golem- a stunted lizard stuck in a boulder- over Gigalith- a literal moving mountain that shoots laser beamsMost of the people that burnt out with the series in BW wasn't just because the starters but the fact that Unova just had a fucton of bootleg Gen 1 pokemon. They weren't awful but it was more that it just felt like trying to catch lightning in a bottle twice and with people that grew up with the series, it was just the "nothing is new and shiny enough anymore" to draw those people back. The number of new pokemon was actually good. It's just that a lot felt uninspired like a new Parasect or Machamp. They're not all 1:1 but it just felt like it was retreading ground and that's pretty much all the complaints I really remember. Number: good. Rehashing: meh.
Primeape- "it just gets bigger and angrier"- over Darmanitan- Daruma doll meant solely to set shit on fire? Raticate over Stoutland? Fearow over Braviary?
Subjective taste aside, I've always thought the "it's just the same thing again" argument was dumb because it's really grasping for straws. Even the examples I gave here are stretching it for similarities. Even the most blatant copies- for example, Hypno vs Musharna- differ greatly in execution, to the point where it's a disservice to the newer designs to even compare them. Musharna's body type is completely different, its premise is executed in the exact opposite way, it plays extremely differently (with a different evolution method to boot), it's much rarer...
Not to mention- the "dumb filler" repeats at the beginning are outright retarded to claim as solely a Unova thing. I still remember seeing genuine arguments that Watchog was shit because it was just Raticate again- a normal-typed rodent. Keep in mind that this was during gen 5, when the regional bird/rat/etc trope was already relatively well-established. The two aren't even remotely similar in execution.
I understand why that argument cropped up, but I think that the people pushing for it would've burnt out on the series anyways (since no matter what went differently I highly doubt the series would've broken from the formula to any greater extent five generations in) and that it's more an expression of exasperation than it is an actual argument. If they wanted to shit on the dex for anything, they could've started with asking why half the designs look like they're wearing clothes.
Samurott's alright but the other two are mediocre. The trio definitely isn't bad, but I think it's the beginning of the end for all-around good starter designs and I dislike how strongly anthropomorphized Emboar especially is when looking back on it. The point is that they falter in comparison to the last two generations' choices, where I still had at least one genuine favorite (Swampert/Blaziken, Torterra) instead of one "I don't dislike this design".I agree with the rest of your post, but the starters are not doodoo, stalker child. Those are your delusions again. Samurott is my bro 4 lyfe and I will defend him to my last breath. Prison awaits
That's not what I meant, anyways. The starters are actually some of the best designs in the early dex imo, because the rest of it is bloated with dog shit like
- the same two monkeys with slightly different clothes and color schemes 9 separate times
- a realistic pigeon with gender differences where one gender looks less interesting than watching paint dry
- stretched-out rat on acid that is constantly giving you death glares (this description is infinitely more interesting than the design)
- literally just doronjo but as a cat with gross colors and one of those wrestling suits that Pignite's already wearing