- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
It was an accurate real world comparison, so if you feel personally attacked then i don't know what to tell you besides touch grass. The only difference is one has real animals and the other is playing animal breeder simulator for over 9000 hours just to get a 1% stat increase compared to another one you can find in the wild. People even release or put them in storage just like pokemon and try to get irl "shinys" with good "stats", meaning they don't have defects from inbreeding. The other guy saying pokemon eugenics was also incredibly accurate. No one cares what you do with your pokemon because they aren't real, but telling kids they need to act like a digital pug breeder or they are playing competitive wrong is ridiculous and out of touch.
Sanctioned events being inclusive means troons kicking kids out for nervous laughing after they demand their pronouns. Competitive pokemon is cringe just like competitive game tournaments in general. Bragging about being good at a game is bragging about who wasted the most time and the average person wouldn't be impressed. That was kind of my entire point. It's not limited to competitive pokemon. You can still be competitive without acting that way.
My point wasn't defending competitive players, I agree that it's autistic to hatch 10000 eggs for marginally better stats. But if some people think it's fun, who am I to tell them no? I've been guilty of resetting the games for weeks until a model was a different color.
My point was that if you seriously believe that breeding fake pixel monsters is comparable to breeding actual deformed animals in the real world, then you're the one who needs to touch some grass.