- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
Russell is too powerful, if I was Taylor Swift RN, I would be running in fear
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fair enough. I'm more annoyed that the defamation should have been challenged before it got to this point and the situation is sticky. There are no good options if we are being brutally honest. But novel legal arguments are not "dumb" and would certainly not get someone "disbarred". If that was the case nobody would ever argue anything.Please stop talking about legal shit like this aaa, the only have to accept relevant facts as true, things like 'Jersh made a troon commit suicide' are not relevant facts to the lawsuit and should be disregarded.
How are we responsible? Last time I checked, we can't control the actions of others. American courts are a total joke.They state a bit higher their reasoning:
View attachment 5419558
They also state in there we caused a school shooting now too?
"Mr. Moon and Kiwi Farms users have been implicated in three suicides, a school shooting in New Mexico, and a clash with New Zealand authorities over information about terrorist attacks at mosques in Christchurch."
Good to see some pushback to the idiots in the thread. Courts liberally construing a pro se Plaintiff's complaint to state a claim happens thousands of times a day in this country, and the only thing that makes it newsworthy is that KiwiFarms is involved. Any practicing lawyer will be able to tell you that Courts are pretty damn generous when it comes to allowing pro se complaints to avoid a motion to dismiss.Many posts with cogent, grounded analysis
The fan fiction persecution complex conspiracy theories written here, while entertaining, are mighty embarrassing. Some people might need a reality check that the world does not revolve around KiwiFarms.I feel for @Useful_Mistake right now, it must be annoying dealing with retards who see a feature and immediately post without reading anything.
Is it too late to add a "Damn it, Null. We lost the case." To the line up?Oh... I don't know about you... but I think Josh is gonna need to sell a few more T-shirts to pay back 300k. Holy fuck.
Anyway, here's where the Appeals court disagreed with the district court,
They specifically were gearing up to charge every NZ resident who viewed the christchurch footage with child porn possession and had mouthpieces brag about this on their behalf. The fact that they're deliberately citing the wrong charge just to have some excuse to throw the book at people for watching a video is the main reason Jersh cited for insulting them.They also wanted all user data.
It’s strange to me that they highlight Null’s persistent mockery of Greer, because as far as I understand, that’s the reason for the fair use of his content. Null and other users are offering critique of something they think sucks.
Their rationale is that Josh reposting Greer's takedown requests and making fun of them in public encouraged other people to infringe on his copyright and therefore the case is remanded.Am I interpreting this correctly: Because Null more or less said "lol get fuckt retard" that somehow impacts the legality of the situation?
Welcome to Current Year + 8!"We find Kiwi Farms to be a bunch of meanypants, therefore we reverse our ruling not based on merit or legalities, but because we are unable to operate as professionals and instead are purely driven by emotional manipulation and baseless conjecture while incessantly needing to feel morally superior."
This is not good, but it's not the end either. I remember @AnOminous was not very optimistic about Null's chances if this exact thing happened, though.Is it so over or are we so fucking back?
Not a single judge dissented.because one judge felt differently than another
They have to fill in the background section of the parties and what led to the case in action. To do so they must rely on the operating complaint. Aside from that, nothing.What does judging the character of the website have to do with copyright infringement?
You mentioned appeal and now I'm wondering that if this keeps going, Josh will end up before the Supreme Court. Because this isn't even really the end, not yetlol. I don't see how this case being reopened could be anything for Greer but yet another embarassment in a long career of cringe. every other case of his has ended in total loss due to his own comical incompetence but I'm sure this one will be different. I know we're all doompilled about the integrity of the court system and our societal justice framework and all that but no judge is going to instantly torpedo their legal career by firing the shot that turns the internet censorship cold war hot. even if a judge was retarded enough to flout every reasonable course of action in favor of blind political activism, the chances of it surviving appeal are even lower. realistically he's just doing what he does best: being a noxious but ultimately harmless scourge in the lives of every unfortunate soul that has to deal with him and his flaming dumpster of a personality.