Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
Rekieta doubles down:
That confirms to me that it was a snipe at Null.
2.png
He even spelled out on his original meaning that he absolutely did not actually mean to insinuate, where did people get that idea??
1 (2).png

He also doesn't read kiwifarms, but he tweets oblique and highly misleading references to things virtually nobody knows about and then has a screenshot of the response within 20 minutes of it being posted.
3.png

Who was the target audience? I think Null alone. Nobody in his audience would get the reference.
I think Null leaving Nick on read broke his brain and he is now in the spurned retard club desperately grasping for any attention from his e-daddy he can get.
 
I've seen this driving drunk with kids thrown around a lot lately. Do we have any evidence he's doing so? Of all the shit he's doing atm, that would be by far the lowest.
Slight powerlevel time, I lost a friend to a drunk driver some years back, and I have a special kind of loathing for people who do that shit.
I believe it's a reference to this incident:

I think the issue is less that he was complaining about having to leave to pick up one of the darn kids at 9am but more that he said that he had to leave to pick up one of the darn kids in 4 hours right after talking about being drunk.

Let's do some math. That clip (it's on page 2052) is three minutes long and starts at 05:49:00 in the VOD. His stream is scheduled to start at 11pm Central time, but If I'm reading the Rumble UI correctly, Rumble appears to have timed the stream as starting at 11:09pm Central time; adding 5 hours and 49 minutes to that time places that clip sometime around 4:58am Central time. That's just over 4 hours before 9:00am, which comports with Nick's statement. Even if he were to have started on time as scheduled at 11pm, that's only a difference of nine minutes.

The clip below comes from the end of that night's stream, at 06:24:35 in the VOD. That's over half an hour since Nick said he had to leave in four hours at 9am, and around 5:33am if the timing on Rumble is correct. It's well past five in the morning; Nick still has a drink in his hand.

Would you let this man drive your child around three and a half hours after this clip?

Not going to rewrite my take on it because I said it in that same post, but it seems likely that this is what people are referring to.
I don't think Nick does breathalyzer super chat goals like Ralph does, or at least not yet, so I don't know exactly how drunk he was. I haven't bothered to count how many drinks he's had. It's completely possible that by 9am his BAC actually wasn't above the legal limit. I'm not an expert on how fast alcohol is metabolized, especially for a heavy drinker such as Nick Rekieta. Maybe he's playing it up for the camera. I don't know. How could I know?

I'm just saying that between the drinking and apparent lack of sleep - if he went immediately to sleep after the stream ended and walked immediately from his bed to the car, that's still 3.5 hours or less of sleep - I personally would not agree to be a passenger in his car. Not a chance.

I'm sure he also has some of the many people who don't like Null in his DMs trying to feed him rumors and unsubstantiated bullshit. He can't post any proof cause he doesn't have any. That's why he has to do the whole "What if SOMEONE is doing these things hypothetically?" It's almost like he's doing everything he is accusing KF of doing to him to Null. 🙄 Drunken bald hypocrite that he is.
This hashing thing along with the "sneak references to Monty into every show so his lawyer has to watch all of it" makes literally no sense and it makes me think something has happened recently as the things that came out of his mouth were not that nonsensical not even that long ago.

Let's say you try to be "generous" to Rekieta and grant him that he's not being intentionally dishonest about the hashing thing and actually has been confused for a long time about how it works technically.

He didn't say anything about it until his thread turned on him and Null pointed out that the stories Drexel told on Nick's show were extremely concerning and is only criticizing him for it now? Talk about a self-own. He looks better as a moron who doesn't understand the difference between a file and a hash of a file.
 
He even spelled out on his original meaning that he absolutely did not actually mean to insinuate, where did people get that idea??
1 (2).png
claim's he does not read his thread but is able to get a screen snip of said thread. that is non practicing lawyer logic at work.

He mentions on stream that he has to drive his kids somewhere at 8am his time while plastered at 4am.
let me concern troll about the kids. hopefully, kalya will not let nick drive the kids drunk.
 
- Keffals and #DropKiwiFarms arc, Nick supports KF and gets mass flagged
- 3rd strike and "permanent" loss of YT channel
- switch to exclusive Rumble streaming, no longer beholden to YT moderation rules
- Nick starts shilling 24/7 Locals chat hard, drive for 5k memberships with "custom" gift
- debate with Duncan MacLeod, faggot former Pokémon streamer and Keffals defender over Nick's YT ban and his "on the wall" comments re: pedos (this is my personal watershed moment for the last appearance of "old Nick")
To the degree that you are cleaning this up for chronology or whatever...

It was the Duncan stream on August 30, 2022 that caused the 3rd strike. Nick doubled down with 'on the wall' rhetoric or whatever. While on air 2 days later, I believe, he recieved notice of the banning. (The clip of him finding out about his banning is around - I can't readily find it.) Anyway, there's a 19 day gap bw 8/31/22 and 9/19/22 on YT when he was banned for the mass flagging after Duncan.

I've seen this driving drunk with kids thrown around a lot lately. Do we have any evidence he's doing so? Of all the shit he's doing atm, that would be by far the lowest.
Slight powerlevel time, I lost a friend to a drunk driver some years back, and I have a special kind of loathing for people who do that shit.
In addition to what @Balldo's Gate has referenced:

- As Nick was picking up his Mustang from the dealership, the roads were icy and he immediately ran the car into a ditch. One of his daughters was in the back.

- The inciednt Balldo's Gate referenced was Nick being issued a ticket for going 80 mph in a 65. I can't recall if a kid was with him.

- He's recently said that he will be driving a kid to a 7 a.m. activity. This amused/horrified many of us because it's not at all unsual for him to be 10 drinks in at 5 a.m. Central time.

Edit to Add: It just occured to me that the 7 a.m. event is likely his eldest's soccer practice. That son is getting his Learners Permit. The son could possibly be the one who is supposed to drive while his drunk dad rides shotgun.
 
Last edited:
He mentions on stream that he has to drive his kids somewhere at 8am his time while plastered at 4am.

You’re not going to sober up in time is the thing people have realized.
Especially not if he's mixing alcohol and modafinil, which drastically slows the metabolization of alcohol. He's even got a story about the first time he did it without realizing that was a bad combo where he claims he had two drinks after taking one beforehand and nearly falling over when he went to leave

With his constant lying/gaslighting now that kinda throws the 'two drinks' into doubt for me and I'm wondering if 'two drinks' means that he was expecting to have about two drinks worth of alcohol in his system, like if he'd had five drinks over the course of a three hour dinner or something like that, but none of it had metabolized so he had practically all of the five drinks in his system when it was time to leave
 
- The inciednt Balldo's Gate referenced was Nick being issued a ticket for going 80 mph in a 65. I can't recall if a kid was with him.
@Balldo's Gate looked into this in June. In the stream a few hours before the ticket, Nick mentioned having to take one of his kids somewhere
At the end of Nick's stream that night, he apologized for not being able to do a post-stream Locals stream, because he has to "get the three hours of sleep that I can muster" before he has to "drive this kid to, to his uh, he's in, sections for speech, I guess".
 
While these people are at on X, can they ask him why he thought the need to continue to try and message Null while he was in the shower? No sane straight man would do that once told.
 
Rekieta is melting down on Twitter now over people being concerned with his drinking.

Seething in the replies:
rekieta3.pngrekieta4.png
(Archive)

Rekieta moves to a quote tweet and insists that his on-stream drinking and seething on Twitter about people criticizing him for drinking is merely "extremely limited, curated material":

rekieta5.png

Rekieta describes it "amazing" that someone does not understand how a "5 hour binge drinking livestream" counts as "curated".

rekieta6.png
(Archive)

Rekieta insists "it's a performance" and insinuates that people are only pretending to be concerned about his drinking because they are annoyed with him cancelling shows.

rekieta7.png
(Archive)
 
Rekieta is melting down on Twitter now over people being concerned with his drinking.

Seething in the replies:
View attachment 5451025View attachment 5451024
(Archive)

Rekieta moves to a quote tweet and insists that his on-stream drinking and seething on Twitter about people criticizing him for drinking is merely "extremely limited, curated material":

View attachment 5451023

Rekieta describes it "amazing" that someone does not understand how a "5 hour binge drinking livestream" counts as "curated".

View attachment 5451022
(Archive)

Rekieta insists "it's a performance" and insinuates that people are only pretending to be concerned about his drinking because they are annoyed with him cancelling shows.

View attachment 5451059
(Archive)
He is tweeting at the speed of 30 tweets per hour right now
1698610077117.png
Slightly delayed Nitter archive

*Edit. He just can't stop
1698610482480.png
Archive
 
Last edited:
He claims he cannot do things he promises or used to do regularly because he is shuttling kids around. All this despite having an extra vehicle, having hired a driver, and making more money.

To be fair, his schedule COULD have gotten more busy with children's activities, but at some point you cut them back. Also, there is speculation in the thread that a family Yzerman rift cut off transportation help they were getting from in-laws, but the factors above should be offset by the other improvements.
With so many mechanisms in place to ensure that Nick's family has transportation, the most likely reason Nick would keep going out himself is if he also has something he wants to do. Maybe not every time, but it's a good cover for other activities. Before there were claims that it was to get beef jerky.

Businesses can have issues with their own delivery drivers. Management who don't know/care how long a delivery takes are none the wiser as the driver leverages this and runs personal errands (even going home at times if it's on the route) resulting in lower productivity at the customer's expense in addition to time theft from the company. If a problem employee does this consistently enough, the behavior is normalized and management can start to assume that it really does take all afternoon/day to do deliveries.

Professional drivers on the other hand know how long it takes to get to where they're going after a short while and will rarely miss appointments. Since Nick is essentially a non-practicing lawyer turned chauffer who has to drive his kids everywhere, this is an apt comparison and any excuses are just that.

Nick is likely still occasionally going out to get "beef jerky" after dropping the kids off wherever he goes, and Kayla doesn't have to know every detail. In fact, Nick could easily go off on her (or anyone else) having to know "every detail" of what he does. One can very easily imagine Nick assuming regular driving responsibilities as a means to getting his "beef jerky" privately.
 
Back