'I'm so upset': This Gen Z worker went absolutely viral for slamming the 9-to-5 work day - Complains it leaves no time for friends, dating, working out. But does she have a point?

Link | Archive
Sabina Wex
Thu, October 26, 2023 at 5:00 PM EDT

Gen Z have officially entered the working world — and they aren’t too excited about it.
New grad Brielle posted a viral TikTok last week that has divided the internet. She explained through tears that her first 9-to-5 role leaves her no time to do anything but eat, sleep and shower. Brielle has to leave the house at 7:30 each morning to commute into New York for her in-office marketing job and doesn’t arrive back until at least 6:15 p.m.

“I’m so upset,” she says in the video, explaining that it’s not her job, just the 9-to-5 schedule itself. “How do you have time for friends? How do you have time to meet a guy?”
Her video blew up online, drawing some sharp responses initially. But many other replies were sympathetic, recalling the difficult first days of settling into a new lifestyle: “I had a crisis when I got my first 9-to-5 job. Literally I couldn’t believe this was life.”
So is Brielle complaining? Or is the 9-to-5 lifestyle really that bad?

40-hour work week​

In a follow-up to her viral video, Brielle explains how she feels about work: “That’s the whole 9-to-5 system: pushing the same rock up the hill.”
Brielle’s not wrong: the 40-hour work week was designed to be Sisyphean. It began in the Industrial Revolution to create schedules for assembly line workers, but in the late 1800s, 70 hours would have been common, says Benjamin Hunnicutt, a historian who studies the history of leisure and work, told NPR.
That was slowly whittled down until the 40-hour week became the norm during the Great Depression until it was enshrined in law in the 1940s. Economists and analysts expected the week would continue to shrink — John Maynard Keynes actually predicted that technological advances could see the workweek shrink to just 15 hours by 2030.
But that never happened. In fact, now, all workers are expected to fit into this assembly line mold — even if they’re working in marketing office jobs, like Brielle.
There has been a push for the four-day work week, which advocates like 4 Day Week Global argue increases worker efficiency. It hasn’t quite caught on in the U.S., but the recent “summer of strikes” has shown that workers of all ages do want to see drastic changes from their employers.

Poor equity​

In another follow-up video, Brielle explains that she wants to see a structural change to the 9-to-5 work schedule because it imposes inflexibility on workers that don’t always make it up the chain of command.
“It’s not fair that the only people that are benefiting [from 9-to-5] are the people that either run the corporations and can make their own schedules, so they just pile on the work to people that are less fortunate,” she says.
And while many would argue those workers are fairly compensated for their time, growing wages simply haven’t kept up with inflation. If you look at the minimum wage, you can see this is true: 1980’s minimum hourly wage was $3.10; today, it’s $7.25. This may sound like a big jump, but inflation means that a dollar in the 1980 is worth $3.68 in today’s purchasing power. If minimum wage accurately reflected inflation and cost of living, it would now be $11.40.
We’ve already seen trends responding to this, including Gen Z’s penchant for what they call “lazy girl jobs,” which require minimal effort while taking in a decent salary. When their paychecks aren’t covering both rent and groceries, it’s not hard to understand why employees are resisting the system.

Work-life balance​

Considering work and her commute take up nearly 11 hours of her day, Brielle has a point when she says she has limited time — and energy — for a social life after work. She adds that it’s even worse if you have kids or any other dependents.
But this lack of life is starting to see pushback from people like Brielle. A recent ResumeLab survey discovered that 73% of Gen Z will pick a job with a better work-life balance over a higher salary.
Brielle’s TikTok sums up the general feelings toward work culture right now. And it appears it’s not just Gen Z who feels this way, with many older workers agreeing with her in their comments. And perhaps these older workers would have said something earlier, but they didn’t have TikTok to share their message far and wide.
 
We will be old too one day. The social contract is that you work when you’re young and you pay in, then when you’re old we look after you. In the uk that generation has paid in - national insurances and taxes, and they deserve their pensions. They rebuilt the country after the war. I am ok with them having what they have. I think here is very different to America in that sense
I pay in and will receive nothing, because it will collapse well before I can collect. I just want to stop paying. The elderly can starve to death. The state cheated on the agreement, that's not my fault, and I won't be left holding the bag.
 
I pay in and will receive nothing, because it will collapse well before I can collect.
I often wonder if even my generation are going to get pensions. I’m kind of counting on it all collapsing before that point and trying to save. I suspect anyone younger than mid thirties isn’t going to see a state pension at all.
I wonder if our government were conned into importing all these people to stave off the ponzi crisis a bit longer. But surely they’d realise that Somalis aren’t going to be a net contributor to the system…
There may well be a point where young people realise they’re working themselves half to death for nothing - no chance of good housing, freedom, land or family. At that point I wonder if they will indeed burn it all down or just be passive and useless as they are so far. Covid didn’t give me much hope about the masses waking up and going for a brisk pitchfork n torches walk
 
There may well be a point where young people realise they’re working themselves half to death for nothing - no chance of good housing, freedom, land or family.
We've realized that for years. It's why the birth rate is so low everywhere except nigger lands.
At that point I wonder if they will indeed burn it all down or just be passive and useless as they are so far.
Who knows. There's nothing we can do. It'll be nice when G-d decides to let us out of this torture chamber existence, but until then we have to love him for torturing us or he'll send us to Hell.
Covid didn’t give me much hope about the masses waking up and going for a brisk pitchfork n torches walk
Boomers violating the Nuremberg Code took my hope away. Traitors deserve summary execution.
 
There may well be a point where young people realise they’re working themselves half to death for nothing - no chance of good housing, freedom, land or family. At that point I wonder if they will indeed burn it all down or just be passive and useless as they are so far. Covid didn’t give me much hope about the masses waking up and going for a brisk pitchfork n torches walk
That's literally what's happening in this article, even if the girl in it comes off as an entitled brat. Some people in the big cities are literally working for the sake of working: gas prices, car insurance, and clothes will add up to more than their paycheck. My zoomer little cousins realized the same thing. Experience? All anyone hires is based on recommendation/"networking" these days. Glorified nepotism.
 
Great Britain, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Tranada. Yes, I know you were memeing that only the US is a first-world country. Don't ask questions if you don't want the real answer.
The claim was that 40 hour weeks are less than what people in these countries work consider normal. You answered the first part of the question (the countries that this applies to).

I realize you're not the person who made the original retarded statement but i'll ask you just in case you have an opinion on these things - do you think people in Great Britain or Australia work significantly more than 40 hours a week and consider it normal?

Also @Iron Jaguar you giant niggerfaggot bitch you're welcome at any time to chime back into the discussion unless you're a massive coward who realized his statement was stupid as fuck
 
I realize you're not the person who made the original retarded statement but i'll ask you just in case you have an opinion on these things - do you think people in Great Britain or Australia work significantly more than 40 hours a week and consider it normal?
Right, I get you now. I cannot speak for anywhere else, but in the UK, the legal working week is 48 hours. It can vary a lot outside of that, though. In my field, it's not unusual to pull 60 hour weeks when shit is going down, for instance. There are also a bunch of exceptions for particular types of work, like agriculture, healthcare, or transport, where longer hours are the norm.

I suppose the difference is that we have more legal guarantees for things like overtime or time in lieu. If you work more than 48 hours in a week, your employer must pay overtime. No exceptions.
 
Being self employed, feels more like the 9-9-6 lifestyle
I'm sure I'm in the minority, but it's still better than being a corpo slave in my opinion. There are some jobs out there that are worth the grind if they give you freedom and personal fulfillment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Free the Pedos
I initially mocked this as a case of zoomer being zoomer, but now I actually do kind of agree with her on some minute level. I still think she's probably just a self centered retard who didn't think to have any ambition and now just wants to be paid to exist like the other braindead thots of her generation. But like others ITT have said, the social contracts that motivated our high work lifestyles have long since been broken.

Up to the fairly recent past, it actually was the case that people had a wide variety of job options and the primary limiter of your upward mobility was your willingness to invest time in work. If you were academically inclined you could go to college get a degree and get a high paying job in the world reflective of your higher level of qualification. If you weren't academic you could still get a job in a trade and ride through the ranks, or even get a job in a business and start climbing the structure that way.

Leftists and "progressives" want people to believe that what changed that and created the current shitty structure where you work till the day you die and keep paying into the system for no reward, is le ebil boomercons held onto all their money and never want to spend any. And certainly the boomers fucked a lot up. But the problem is more that due to various progressive ideologies forcing bullshit into the business world it is simply untenable to climb your way up these days. We tax the everliving shit out of people as soon as they start getting past the poverty line, that makes it difficult for anyone in the middle class to advance, which is the intended purpose. They want the middle class to work themselves to death so the upper class can jet around and the lower classes can be entirely subsidized by the blood and sweat of the middle. So instead of working an honest days work and getting an honest days pay that stays in our bank account, we go work shit jobs where we have to cowtow to ideological fanatics and avoid offending anyone while paying between 20-40% of what we earn into a system specifically catering to the worst elements of society that hates us and wants us dead. It's one thing to pay taxes and those taxes be used to actually improve the state of your living. It's an entirely different matter to pay high taxes while earning less because you're a white man and know you will never advance in your career because your skin tone isn't dark enough and all those taxes will be spent to teach gender studies to Pakistanis or fund wars in third world shitholes. And the whole time, Jamal can skip taxes and skip child support and anything else and rob a fucking Target in broad daylight and be fine, while Jose hopped the border illegally and got set up with free insurance and welfare subsidies.

Our founding fathers would have hanged every one of these bastards and then probably hanged us for allowing it.
 
This is a touchy subject, because no matter how we look at it, most people always had to work to survive, so whining about this reality of life is extremely childish. Besides, the 40 hour workweek, for office drones, is honestly not that terrible, try doing 10-12 hour shifts on the shop floor, doing some monotone shit.
On the other hand, I bet there is absolutely no need to employ every single adult, for society to function. But if we ever admit this, there is an uncomfortable question that needs to be asked.
Even if not all people have to work, some still need to, to keep essential systems running. Who decides who is allowed to live as freeloaders and who needs to continue to toil away?
I think people undersell how much the industrial revolution altered working dynamics. Look at how people worked as literal serfs in the medieval ages, or in colonial america. There were periods of a lot of hard work and there were periods of relaxation.

The 9-5 doesn't have those very hard work-from-dawn-to-dawn days like they had back then, but they also don't really have the mellow days. And what's more, since most 'work' is just pointless busywork these days people never get the satisfaction of the labour.

Working all night to raise a barn may suck at the moment, but by the end you get to see the barn, y'know?
 
I pay in and will receive nothing, because it will collapse well before I can collect. I just want to stop paying. The elderly can starve to death. The state cheated on the agreement, that's not my fault, and I won't be left holding the bag.
That's the biggest issue hitting a lot of working people nowadays. If you were born after the seventies in the West you most assuredly will not be able to pull from any of those programs your parents had and they absolutely resent it. It's also why I don't support union pensions as the worker:pensioner ratio is absolutely fucked.
I often wonder if even my generation are going to get pensions.
If you have to ask yourself that question you know deep down what the answer is.
 
How in the hell do you get 48 hours divided into 5 days?

That's 9.6 hours per day. You're telling me in the UK most people are working 9 hours and uhhhh 35 minutes a day?

And none of that time is lunch breaks?

It's 8 hours over 6 days, though obviously most people only work 5. Lunch breaks are required if you work more than 6 hours in a day, but there's no guarantee they'll be paid (though they generally are). It's also meant to be a maximum (unless you opt out), which is averaged over several weeks. If you work more than 48 hours a week over a given period, you either have to get back-dated overtime or get time in lieu, which means extra paid holiday.
 
And this is coming from a guy who hangs out in the "Woman hate thread."
Fuck. I didn't know. I must go search for this thread.
It's genuinely one of the biggest problems I have with boomers: they live as if the world today was the exact same as the world when they were young adults and are intent on not changing anything until it's too late or affects them negatively. Employers actively try to exploit their workers more than ever nowadays, from trying to get them to work longer hours, not giving them the proper training and just throwing them straight into the production line, human resources forcing a fake and gay culture onto the workers, etc. From the software side of things, it often doesn't take 8 hours to do work and unless you are doing something related to manufacturing or where you are creating physical goods (with the exception of hospitality, sales and restaurants), it really takes away from other aspects of life that are just as important (socialization, dating, hobbies, rest, learning, etc.). There was a study that determined that medieval peasants had a shit load more free time than we do now.
Opinion discounted.

You have absolutely no idea the level of exploitation we endured. Shit, bosses and managers in blue collar jobs would punch the shit out of people, ruin their lives, swindle them out of wages. And oh noes! Working longer hours? Try doing 16-18 hours a day with no rest for months on end in some fucking mining camp and not seeing your daughters first steps or words. I've done that. Not giving them the proper training? Nobody got any training. You figured it out and worked like a bastard for it or you were out the door. No safety or training or anything. Any suggestion of that would have been laughed at or gotten you fired. You got me on the human resources bullshit. We didn't have that, and that does suck.
Agreed, more flexibility would be appreciated.
In my experience, most office jobs, even at manufacturing companies, require about 5 hours of actual work per day. In some cases even less. I fucking hate sitting at the office 3-4 hours a day just to clock in 8 hours total, wasting both my and the company's time. I really wish I could just leave when I'm done with my work, because my continued presence adds no extra value whatsoever. I just read books these days, after I'm done with everything
So shouldn't those jobs only be paid for 5 hours? And yours for 3-4? After all, that's the work you're doing. If it's due to being a better worker, then the wage should compensate, but it seems to me it's more of a case that this is an issue of corpos needing to vent money just to keep a bare minimum of employees needed who have very little work ethic.
Feels like a lot of the jobs I had didn't need to be eight hours long, they could pay double for half as much time and get the same labor. Four twelve hour shifts might have worked in some cases too. Takes vision and courage to break paradigms.
Quite the courage to say you are being paid twice as much as you're worth.
Boomers violated Nuremberg and voted for covid lockdowns and jab mandates. They're not saving anyone or anything. It's good when the elderly die.
Weird. There was a bit of that from older boomers, but most younger boomers and Gen X I know gave less than zero fucks about Covid. It was the millenials and zoomers panicking and unable to emotionally regulate their drama over it.
The West has already decided that the dark skinned people get to freeload and the white people will work away for breadcrumbs.
WEhich in a way, has a very strange place in human history. The weathy and affluent are working as slaves for a freeloading underclass. Reparations complete! Quiet niggers, and stop enslaving us!
I think people undersell how much the industrial revolution altered working dynamics. Look at how people worked as literal serfs in the medieval ages, or in colonial america. There were periods of a lot of hard work and there were periods of relaxation.
One thing my dad said that always stuck with me, something like: "having tractors made us work longer. Horses had to rest, so we could rest. With tractors, there was no rest."
 
Send it to the mines. It'll learn to worship a 9 to 5 office job and realize that things aren't just made out of thin air but require basic elements and raw materials.

growing wages simply haven’t kept up with inflation
Hold it right there nigger, the president of the United States and his administration have stated there is no inflation. Stop lying.

Maybe don't work in a place that requires a 90 minutes commute?
Or get a car and put in a bitchin' sound system.
The 30 minutes of travel time to-and-from work driving on the highway and blasting some music on some Focal speakers and subs were some of the best therapy I ever purchased.
 
Last edited:
Blame feminism, cutie.
See, this is what this girl's crying fit has made me reflect on: while women and feminism do take some of the blame, I think they're just puppets of the real globalist plan to massively inflate the labor pool. By cramming women, and now foreigners, into the workforce, they massively reduced wages and now they can get multiple times the labor for the same price.

As a result, men can no longer find women, can no longer afford to support those women on just their own job, so women are forced to work themselves, raising their own standards to ridiculous heights. They then gravitate to the few men that do meet those standards, who have no interest in settling down with them. Meanwhile the few that do manage to pair off are both working themselves to death just to get by, and state raises their children if they can even afford them. You can't afford a house now, you can barely afford a car, if that, and the older generations act like it's just laziness when they had a massively different economy that their politicians who they voted for stripped all the value out of, and now we're stuck dealing with the mess they left behind, taxed to all hell to pay for their healthcare and retirement, knowing we'll never see a penny of it.

If someone managed to show this girl the connection between the WEF and modern economics and the situation she's crying about, she might even start acting all based because she's right now feeling its effect directly. We're colossally fucked in the ass, fighting between men and women, Zoomers and Boomers, niggers and crackers, all while the globalists turn us all into wage slaves. We are living in the most boring combination of practically every major dystopian story.

You WILL eat the bugs.
You WILL live in the pod.
You WILL own nothing.
And you WILL be happy.
Or else.
 
Last edited:
I don't approve of communism on the basis that it doesn't work, but I understand why people support it. Even slaves never had to pay for their own food and housing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anustart76
Back