That depends on how far back you want to go. A lot of that had to do with infant mortality driving down the average, at least in historical time periods. If you made it past four years old in the Bronze Age, you stood a decent chance of making it past 60. But a lot of people didn't hit four.
Not exactly where I was going with that but ok. Honestly I think last year was kind of a bad one. I can't really remember too many degenerate scandals this year but that might be because I haven't had my ear on the ground as much anymore.
Well okay there is also this actually, although this is also blatant coomerism in general too. Still furry coomerism nonetheless. This has also been going on for a while too, I'd like to know how this just slipped by everyone. What pisses me off is a few of these that are outright porn are only age restricted. No, it should be removed.
So you're telling me if I play a few seconds of copyrighted music Youtube is on my ass IMMEDIATELY, but actual porn can stay up for years AND it's not even age rated?
This new youtube algorithm is pretty cool.
And the also happen to be very loud as well as piss and shit everywhere with extra stinky urine and there's no irony with any of those aspects and furries.
Vocalizzation is used for mating call and allarm, while the urine thing is for territory marking and shared by way too many animals to list.
Adding to this, male foxes are known to mate for life. When a vixen dies, he often won’t pursue another one. Another profound irony when contrasted with the furry fandom.
This just unlocked a core memory, and not for the better, dear God…
That's something I heavily doubt. I studied forest zoology at university and my teacher called that bullshit, sadly.
This applies only to gray foxes (which isn't a true Vulpes fox) and a few other species (NOT red foxes which are the majority of fox furfags' fursonas). They do find another mate after death, though. Every other species has high levels of polyamory (>50%).
One of the funny things to me is furries (especially the younger ones) not realizing that gray foxes aren't just a red fox reskin option.
It's the same as a black 'panther' being a melanistic version of a leopard/jaguar or a golden lab turning out black. Gray foxes aren't actual foxes. A tanuki (tribe Vulpini) is closer to a fox than a gray fox.
Furries have been having this argument for decades and it's going to go on forever.
I completely disagree. A character that has a human body, speaks and acts like a human, walks on two legs like a human and only has superficial animal features(head, tail, fur, feet) is closer to a human than animal.
Why not just exclude those features and leave the human as it is? Certainly zoophilic tendencies going on there if you find the need to incorporate such details in what you wanna fuck.
