hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

Jush is a free speech advocate, which lands him in the very retarded yet admirable position of “I don’t agree with all of your ideas or what you say but I will say you have the right to say it”. Fucked if you do, fucked if you don’t.
If you fundamentally do not believe in the concept of freedom of speech no one has the obligation to give it to you or if you only believe in freedom of speech is cynical political maneuvering no one has an obligation to give it to you IE all the Communists from the 60s
 
Todd in the Shadows has to put his own two cents in about this Somerton dude oops
This video is way more entertaining than the Hbomb video, and I felt like it gave me a reason to care about this James Somerton guy other than "look, here's all the times he plagiarized someone else". It's a shame a lot of this wasn't touched on because some of this guy's takes (the ones we know he came up with himself, at least) are utterly batshit.

Skip to the fifty minute mark and you'll hear him claim that American men in WWII hated Germans because they were... jealous of their muscles and toned physiques? What? Since TITS couldn't find any other reference for this (and the claim itself is so fucking weird), I have a strong feeling that this is James accidentally revealing he has some kind of Nazi uniform fetish. I really struggle to come up for any other explanation as to why he would frame WWII in this way otherwise.

Which begs the question. What did this James Somerton guy do to receive the ire of his contemporaries? It's not like Breadtubers to pull the rug they swept another's dirt under for the sake of "integrity." I guess we will find out soon enough when the pieces start to come together. My bet is that this is their form of the harvest.
This is alluded to in the video somewhat, but I get the sense that Somerton is a misogynist in that really bitchy way that gay men are. And as some of Hbomb's fans have put it, "cis white gay men are the straight white men of the LGBT community". Somerton doesn't have the social capital to punch down in the way that he does, so for a certain subset of people he's been a very juicy target for a while.
 
I agree. That would have been an easy solution. Give the article writer 5-10% of ad revenue and I think that would be fair.
Should IH have paid Lucas Reilly (the writer of that article) directly or through the mediator of Mentalfloss?

Speaking of Mr. Reilly, has anyone actually asked his side of the story? That could have clarified a lot of things about this whole situation.
 
This is alluded to in the video somewhat, but I get the sense that Somerton is a misogynist in that really bitchy way that gay men are. And as some of Hbomb's fans have put it, "cis white gay men are the straight white men of the LGBT community". Somerton doesn't have the social capital to punch down in the way that he does, so for a certain subset of people he's been a very juicy target for a while.

By this logic Hbomber being "Bisexual" cis white male who has shown no evidence that he sucks dick because he's not actually gay and even if he was no one would want to fuck his shaved coconut looking ass how long until he troons out to delay the inevitable expose about his SA apologia and metokur fuckery?
 
Why there are so many retards in this thread talking about IH? Okay, he might have plagiarized or not... whatever.
50% of the video is dedicated to James Somerton and he is a away bigger lowcow. The guy was plagiarizing scripts for movies.
Because they hate the person who made the video, they want to defend the person in the video and shit on hbomberguy because he is a loser. However, James Somerton is indefensible. That means that they need to defend IH regardless of how relevant he actually is or if they even genuinely believe what he did was kosher or not.
Hbomberguy is partly to blame for making his internet content so politically charged, but that's just how it is.
 
Why there are so many retards in this thread talking about IH? Okay, he might have plagiarized or not... whatever.
50% of the video is dedicated to James Somerton and he is a away bigger lowcow. The guy was plagiarizing scripts for movies.
I think its garnering such attention as its mostly segment to snipe on IH for some reason and its mostly political stuff when it comes to IH segment for some reason.
 
I think you’ve been drinking too much of the Soylent koolaid my dear retard. Regurgitating what HB said is not grounds for a good argument. Consider topping yourself ye daft cunt.
Yeah, I suppose saying that he only copied a couple of words when many sentences were shown being copied is a good argument. The article is still up, we can see he copied a lot, but randomly saying it was "some words" really is a good defense.

I wonder why IH didn't just come out and say it was only "some words". Why did he rephrase things, "some words" cannot be copyrighted.
 
IH has lost 30k subs as of this writing. Harris has gained 60k. You are allowed to settle things in private, but Harris wants a struggle session and got it.
I genuinely wonder how much of Harris content fails his plagiarism smell check, people have said he plagiarized several posts from a fallout forum for his fallout 3 video,, but I haven't seen anything definitive.

I expect for at least a month every semi popular youtuber to be hunted down for "plagiarism" by terminally online people until this drama dies down.
Oh yes, that would be lovely to see. Maybe EFAP or someone more autistic could find those crumbs. But it wouldn't make a dent.
Null better be careful about reading articles word for word on MATI now or Harris the bald perv might come after him next
Count Dankula goes that too. But because he offers commentary, that's considered transformative.
It's ok for dark souls to plagiarize berserk though because I hecking love bideo james t. hbummersoy
even doe berserk just plagiarized evil dead in the first place thoughbeit
A homage is a nod of sorts; your audience will recognize the reference. Game of Thrones is filled with real world references and Dead Space and Halo and Mass Effect all have mind controlling world destroyers. The lore alone separates Berserk from Dark Souls.

At least Gwyndolin didn't rape anybody.
Generally difference between homage and plagiarism is the fact that people who make homages are blatant about it. Homages in art generally are done with the in hopes that the audience recognises the source while plagiarism is done in hopes that the audience cannot recognise the source. Sampling
Miyazaki is a huge Miura fan; all of his works have nods to Berserk. And Berserk has nods to other sources, etc etc. If you go into the Razorfist thread you'll see him say The Witcher plagiarized Michael Moorcock. I doubt you'll see Hbomberguy defend him.
Plagiarism on Youtube is interesting. It feels a lot more personal if one Youtuber plagiarized or copied a smaller creator or vice versa but ripping off articles and frankensteining them together to be a more coherent summary is par for the course if you are covering things like caving incidents. Some lines IH spoke are word for word from the article, with some very minute addition of words and breaking out the thesaurus or changing words around is still plagiarism, but exceptions are made when something being presented cannot be simplified verbally or distilled any further than the original idea you're referencing.
Bernadette Banner, a Jewish sewing YouTuber who pretends to be an 1880s gentile, was discovered to have ripped off smaller sewing blogs with no credit. She will not get a mention or lose subscribers from plagiarism because if you do it to smaller creators they get drowned out by your defenders.

The Hasan excuse is inexcusable. That boy steals content and doesn't even commit to the effort of transformative work. Even xQc and Asmongold reference the original video and offer personal commentary, as shallow as it is.
 
Also, you'd think hiring and coordinating "voice actors" as well as editing their likeness into the story it would be considered transformative
I just want to point out that the SpongeBob SquarePants Rehydrated fan film got DMCA'd by Viacom and they fought and won. It's literally a 1:1 recreation of the first movie. Same script. Same stuff happens in the same order. It's just been completely reanimated by different animators that switch every few minutes. They also redid all the VA and music (although the music sounds very similar to the original). I'm just saying. If that's fair use I fail to see how IH's video isn't.
 
Last edited:
Okay if this thread has revealed something is that with Metokur dying a lot of tards have taken IH as their new Internet daddy.

But I'm interested to see how the situation with the leaf queer develops.
I never cared about Metokur and I don't "follow" IH beyond watching many of his videos. I suspect the reason everyone's focusing on him is because he's the only person in the video that anyone actually gives a fuck about. To me, this video is just a generic commie sex pest sneeding about a bunch of irrelevant nobodies and also IH. Therefore if I wanted to discuss it, I'd hyper focus on the IH section.
 
Yeah, I suppose saying that he only copied a couple of words when many sentences were shown being copied is a good argument. The article is still up, we can see he copied a lot, but randomly saying it was "some words" really is a good defense.

I wonder why IH didn't just come out and say it was only "some words". Why did he rephrase things, "some words" cannot be copyrighted.
You’re so stuck on this that it makes me think you’re seething and screaming “SOME WORDS SOME WORDS”. This will be my last reply to you regarding IH and HB.

Go back and read the original post you called a dishonest crack needing retard or whatever.

Plagiarism is much more than “some words” and “he told the story witterawey the same way!”. Plagiarism is beat by fucking beat copying someone’s words and ideas. Not only does HB, your apparent lord and savior, admit that IH changed the wording, he doesn’t even solidify his argument against IH besides saying “he’s cringe and his fans are icky!”.

Harry had full reign to go over how exactly he thought IH plagiarized, but instead he says “If I did that we’d be here all day”. He said that in a fucking nearly four hour video. Harry had the time, but just like every video essay he pushes out, he spends too much time trying to be smug and funny rather than making a good argument. It’s half assed, and you shouldn’t be wasting this much time polishing his they/them knob.
 
IH has lost 30k subs as of this writing. Harris has gained 60k. You are allowed to settle things in private, but Harris wants a struggle session and got it.

Like I said before, this is Null's Grift Wars in action. Harris and his fellow breadtubers don't want to share space with these people. It's bad enough YouTube is trying to do shady shit with its adblock blocking, but they're not going to be hosting very many people if regular folks realize they're one hitpiece away from losing a chunk of their audience. It also goes to show just how shallow the average YouTuber is. It's all reactionary unsubbing.
 
You’re so stuck on this that it makes me think you’re seething and screaming “SOME WORDS SOME WORDS”. This will be my last reply to you regarding IH and HB.

Go back and read the original post you called a dishonest crack needing retard or whatever.

Plagiarism is much more than “some words” and “he told the story witterawey the same way!”. Plagiarism is beat by fucking beat copying someone’s words and ideas. Not only does HB, your apparent lord and savior, admit that IH changed the wording, he doesn’t even solidify his argument against IH besides saying “he’s cringe and his fans are icky!”.

Harry had full reign to go over how exactly he thought IH plagiarized, but instead he says “If I did that we’d be here all day”. He said that in a fucking nearly four hour video. Harry had the time, but just like every video essay he pushes out, he spends too much time trying to be smug and funny rather than making a good argument. It’s half assed, and you shouldn’t be wasting this much time polishing his they/them knob.

>Go back and read the original post you called a dishonest crack needing retard or whatever.

Your mother is a crackwhore I raped 20 years ago

>Not only does HB, your apparent lord and savior, admit that IH changed the wording, he doesn’t even solidify his argument against IH besides saying “he’s cringe and his fans are icky!”.

I fucked her so hard you came out retarded. I asked you a very simple question:

Why did IH need to change the wording after he was struck with a copyright claim? If he didn't really plagiarize it, only copied "some words" and he changed it up enough, he could have countered it, which is a whole lot less work than reuploading an edited version.
 
If he didn't really plagiarize it, only copied "some words" and he changed it up enough, he could have countered it, which is a whole lot less work than reuploading an edited version.
Perhaps to make sure it doesn’t happen again. And Counter Claims, even if right, might not always be simple. Sometimes it’s easier not to bother fighting it even if you’d win.

It can take awhile to actually just resolve normally, taking a video down, editing and reuploading might straight up be a quicker sometimes if you just care about wanting the video up.
 
Last edited:
>Go back and read the original post you called a dishonest crack needing retard or whatever.

Your mother is a crackwhore I raped 20 years ago

>Not only does HB, your apparent lord and savior, admit that IH changed the wording, he doesn’t even solidify his argument against IH besides saying “he’s cringe and his fans are icky!”.

I fucked her so hard you came out retarded. I asked you a very simple question:

Why did IH need to change the wording after he was struck with a copyright claim? If he didn't really plagiarize it, only copied "some words" and he changed it up enough, he could have countered it, which is a whole lot less work than reuploading an edited version.
You’re actually retarded. Ignoring your shite skill at banter, you should practice more, the reason why is because quite fucking frankly it’s EASIER to reupload a version with changed wording than to counter claim. I imagine you don’t know the process of counter claiming, so let me tell you YouTube’s retarded process.

It’s almost as stupid as you. YouTube notifies user that they have a copyright claim against them, if user chooses to counter, you still with me? If user chooses to counter, YouTube returns to whoever filed the copyright claim and says “Are you SUUUURE that they infringed on your copyright”? To which whoever filed can just fucking click yes and be done with it. What happens then if both sides are not willing to compromise is one of two things.

1) Legal battle, which nobody has the time nor fucking money for.
2) whoever filed copyright claim gets all the revenue from the video.

Now look deep into your tiny nonce head and tell me why a full time YouTuber wouldn’t want to go through that and chose instead to just reword the bitch and reupload it.
 
Back