Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
He hasn't done that in a while though...right? If he already got rid of all the old viewers but his rumble is growing...that means he has a portion of new set of audience that should be willing to give him money. Unless...they are not real? 😱

He has spoken quite recently and frequently about how he wants to take corporate money; not his audience's. He wants to add value to LOCALS and the show and doesn't want to raise the price from 5 dollars per month.

My overall impression is he doesn't want to work hard anymore. He doesn't want to dance or sing for his supper by reading EVERY superchat (recall the 1.5 hour readings?) or pretend to care about all the people in his audience.

He is an entertainer who does not want to cater to his audience any longer. He just wants the applause without the effort of performance.

Perhaps this is too harsh, and he suffered some burn-out, but this is the impression he left with myself.
 
Perhaps this is too harsh, and he suffered some burn-out, but this is the impression he left with myself.

His streaming business decisions and performance is probably the least harsh category you could judge Nick on these days.

It’s downstream from the other mountain of issues, sure, but if Nick’s only problem was him phoning it in, he wouldn’t have almost 3000 pages in his thread.
 
Nick did a short hot tub stream: -SNIP-
This all reads as:

[Onlooker approaches a hungover Nick Rekieta lying in his front yard -- his house is engulfed in flames in the background]

Onlooker: Yo, your house is burning down.
Nick: [Eyes closed with a whiskey bottle cap stuck to his forehead] You are wrong! My house has never been better, Balldo child!
Onlooker: Riiiight. [Walks off]
Nick: [Yelling into the ether] By the way, I'd like to talk about how into fire safety I am and all the things I'm doing to prevent my house from burning down...
------------

All I a can surmise from Nick's latest nightly cope streams is that whatever recent negotiations with Rumble were happening didn't go so well for the Social Media Expert™.

Looking back at those photos of Nick and his wife from that movie premiere in Florida, they dress like they think they're actual celebrities, instead of the Z-list wannabes any sane person sees them as. Sad!
 
He has spoken quite recently and frequently about how he wants to take corporate money; not his audience's. He wants to add value to LOCALS and the show and doesn't want to raise the price from 5 dollars per month.

My overall impression is he doesn't want to work hard anymore. He doesn't want to dance or sing for his supper by reading EVERY superchat (recall the 1.5 hour readings?) or pretend to care about all the people in his audience.

He is an entertainer who does not want to cater to his audience any longer. He just wants the applause without the effort of performance.

Perhaps this is too harsh, and he suffered some burn-out, but this is the impression he left with myself.
I’m a factory worker. I first encountered “burnout” 20 years ago.

I don’t think your assessment is too harsh, it sounds accurate to me.
 
Why is Rekieta's audience so poor? I never understood why people send superchats so much...parasocial etc etc but holy fuck for a 2k live viewer, his superchat intake is fucking abyssmal compared to people a quarter his size.
I don't think it's that people are poor, I think it's just that a growing number of people just don't like him anymore.

I also think the newer people here might not appreciate how well he used to do. That 5K MANdy gave him over several years? That ain't shit.

The cope on the Discord end is that a bunch of people weren't paying to be in there, and so they were tossed, but that wouldn't explain his abysmal superchat performance or his much lower view count.

EDIT: Or his ghost town of a Locals.

He has to get guests for Matsuri 2024. The people he gets will be ones that people do not expect.
Oh boy, more not anime people at the anime con!

Aside from Critical Drinker, that sure worked out good last year.
 
Last edited:
Mobile fagging.

The idea that "Nick and lawyers speak bluntly do people don't understand." is such a fucking Midwest take.

He has clearly never been to, nor understands the east coast.

He and lawyers don't speak bluntly. They may try to give the appearance of it; but they twist their words and try to weasel their own meanings into things.

Nicky, you're not blunt, you're Midwest at best, west coast at worst. Everything you say has double meanings or is said for show.
 
he wants to have Cory Chirafisi on as well

Nick trying to grift off his success of over two years ago.
Btw, the last time Nick had Kyle on, Nick told Kyle that he would buy ten of Kyle’s books as to have as a giveaways. Last week Nick admitted that he has not done that yet. But he is going to! For sure, he will be doing that soon.
 
he wants to have Cory Chirafisi on as well.
Oh good.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I've been lying awake at night wondering whether Kyle's attorney knows about the Balldo, or has seen Redo of Healer.

Rekieta asks the hard hitting questions.
 
Why is any lawyer, non-practicing or not, stupid enough drunkenly ranting about an ongoing case he’s a part of?

Even I know if you are a part of any legal action the only person you speak to is your lawyer and not to breath a word about it on the internet.

He’s utterly retarded.

Also, calling another lawyer a liar is declaring a blood feud with them. You do not do that. He’s fucking himself over.

This is pretty serious and if he had any friends left in the legal profession they’d tell him to shut the fuck up.
 
Mobile fagging.

The idea that "Nick and lawyers speak bluntly do people don't understand." is such a fucking Midwest take.

He has clearly never been to, nor understands the east coast.

He and lawyers don't speak bluntly. They may try to give the appearance of it; but they twist their words and try to weasel their own meanings into things.

Nicky, you're not blunt, you're Midwest at best, west coast at worst. Everything you say has double meanings or is said for show.
Ha, yep.

My wife is from Utah and somehow, for some reason, I convinced her to move to North East.

It’s not all bad; she finds the de-emphasized, reflexive profanity fascinating.

Like, when people try to write dialogue for characters from New York or Boston, they always over-emphasize the “fuck,” “fucking,” etc.

They’re rarely the natural inflection point of a sentence.. they’re hesitation sounds that fill up the off-beat spaces before or after we said the important part.
 
Also, calling another lawyer a liar is declaring a blood feud with them. You do not do that. He’s fucking himself over.
It's entirely possible that the reason Schneider took Monty's case against Nick to begin with is that Nick instigated a blood feud already through his characteristic behavior.
 
Why is any lawyer, non-practicing or not, stupid enough drunkenly ranting about an ongoing case he’s a part of?

Even I know if you are a part of any legal action the only person you speak to is your lawyer and not to breath a word about it on the internet.
The whole point of that was it was going to be a massive payday for Rekieta in terms of superchats and donos. Like Vic 2.0. There's a clip of him basically saying as much.

In reality, Monty actually surpassed him in terms of money raised (while talking far less about the case), and Rekieta recently shut down the GSG. Nobody knows why, but I suspect it has to do with how embarassing it was doing. Last I checked, the last donation was some 3-4 months ago, and it had slowed to a crawl long before then.

Not only did he not shut the fuck up, but he's simultaneously doubled down on the things he's said about Monty while trying to obfuscate what he actually said.

As to why: He's a fucking idiot. He's barely a lawyer.
 
His streaming business decisions and performance is probably the least harsh category you could judge Nick on these days.

It’s downstream from the other mountain of issues, sure, but if Nick’s only problem was him phoning it in, he wouldn’t have almost 3000 pages in his thread.
I’m a factory worker. I first encountered “burnout” 20 years ago.

I don’t think your assessment is too harsh, it sounds accurate to me.

The fear of being too harsh came from a more holistic viewpoint. I am sure Nick (as have millions of others) has personal stressors in his life that push him strongly to act how he does--some of it is out of his control. He probably has (or believes he does) good subjective reasons for what he does. This is where my personal sense of empathy tells me to back off.

However, because I really do not KNOW Nick, the only real help that I (and most of us) or his audeince can offer is objective critique. Most of the good points ITT are of this kind. We laugh and point out the silly things he does and should STOP doing, in the main.

There are things Nick is doing that are unquestionably stupid (e.g. Flirting with MAN-dy.) Nick has done these kinds of things for years despire criticisms and when he has taken the advice he does it with poor grace (e.g Toning down degeneracy, diversifying to Rumble/Oddysee, and drinking less) but with great personal benefit once he adopt them.

I believe Nick takes objective critiques (even well intentioned ones) as personal attacks. His protestations that 'You donot understand my life!' are very much like young teenaged artists. He cannot separate the objective from subjective critique, thus his misunderstanding of this thread and its objectives.
 
THE GREAT WHITE COPE IS IN . cgoody, weren't you guy's e-dating? lets see those DM's
Even if all info posted on farms is wrong and Mandy is most true and honest woman that ever lived. And "she" never lied to Nick .
Then he is still man with wife and kids who is thirsting for another "woman" and broadcasts it on internet for whole world to see. He is still pathetic coomer.
Fact that object of his desires is almost definitely man is just cherry on top .
 
"Are traps gay?"

Yes, he literally asked Kyle that in the first interview.
He was so off the mark.

I assume he saw “17 year old anti-riot kid with an AR” and assumed something about 4chan culture. I genuinely wonder if he even read an article to see that Kyle was a literal Boy Scout and police explorer.

If he did, he didn’t give a fuck about having him on just to make shit too awkward to talk about anything anyone cared to hear.

I’ve ranted about this before. The important part is everyone who cared about the rittenhouse case cared about it deeply and substantively, not as some jerkoff meme shit.

In the summer of 2020, Americans were the most oppressed by their own governments that we’ve ever been. You could get arrested for walking alone on a beach, but these mobs could burn a city center with no arrests. At issue with Kyle was whether you could even poke your nose out of your house and pretend to guard something, or if you had to let a convicted child rapist commit violence against you
 
Last edited:
Why is any lawyer, non-practicing or not, stupid enough drunkenly ranting about an ongoing case he’s a part of?

When it started, he was literally wringing his hands about how much audience and money he was going to get because of the case. Nick got has start with Maddox vs. Dax. He was deluded enough to think that he could leverage the case against Monty in the same way Dax used the Maddox case.

And at every step along the way where Nick's expectations about the case turned out to be wrong, Nick doubled down with his "Fuck you Mom and Dad I'm doing it my way" child-like mentality.

Talking about the case is really no more foolish than how the case came about originally. Nick very deliberately and with full knowledge did per se defamation against Monty as well as asking to be sued. Not something a sane person would do.

I think part of why he is talking about the case is his ignorance of how civil litigation works. He just doesn't understand how the comments he is making will create immense problems for him both in a deposition and in trial testimony. Or else he sees himself as such a verbal super-genius that he will be able to out-argue the attorneys in his own deposition and during trial testimony.

The other part of it is that since the start his actions have been driven by false assumptions that the case can either be easily dismissed or that he can will a SLAPP judgement. I think he has a poor understanding of SLAPP based on Vic losing to SLAPP in Texas.

He never expected:

1) That Monty would be able to hire an attorney
2) That the case would be filed in Minnesota making dismissal far more difficult
3) That the per se defamation was likely to create questions in the case only a jury could answer that would make getting the case dismissed very difficult.
4) That the case would be boring and that he would get no sympathy (money) from his own audience when he pretended to be a victim.
5) That Nick couldn't just go talk to Monty's lawyer and convince him to cease representing Monty.
6) That showing that Monty was a "retard" wouldn't convince the judge to end the case.
7) That as a "rich guy", just hiring an expensive attorney wouldn't have solved all his problems in the case. That Nick, as a rich guy, couldn't buy his way out of his legal problems.
 
The most insane part is that this person who is completely enslaved by his alcohol cravings, sex drive and need for attention thinks he’s some free man living the dream of liberation — or would be without a wife and kids harshing his buzz. He really thinks they’re what’s holding him back.

He deserves to lose them.
A grown fucking person who clearly is not a man and clearly not an adult acts like he's in the position to make whatever the hell decision he wants because they only affect him, but without realizing he gave that excuse up the moment he married Kayla. And he gave it up even more after his first child. His decisions aren't his anymore and he needs to get over himself or become a deadbeat, because at least he'd be honest with what he really wants out of life. And anyone who chooses to associate with him after the fact could be avoided like the plague because they're the worst people to even know.

How does he look at the faces of his wife and children and explain that his inability to not be an asshole for a millisecond is taking away money that could be used to support them is instead being wasted on a lawsuit and not want to immediately kill himself out of shame is beyond me.

Every goddamned excuse he gives for not doing what he needs to do because it's the expectation of every man in every goddamned society in the history of time is deplorable.

He doesn't deserve to lose his family, he deserves to lose everything, because he's the worst aspects of humanity in one shitty package. He unfortunately has the legal education to try to worm his way out of just being a fucking man who does what he needs to do and does what he says he's going to do, because any other option is fucking embarrassing...and yet he chooses the most embarrassing fucking option every time he can.

Watching Crigler tell Nick he just needs to shut the fuck up and do what he said he was doing was hilarious because that's the standard fucking response, and Nick looks like he wants to kill himself when he talks with someone who decides that they don't accept his worthless ass excuses.

Here's a post from a while back that I remember seeing:

Somewhere in the last 50 pages, he had a cope clip where he seriously made the proposition that (paraphrased) was 'What if my definitions are different than yours?'
Anyone who sees this sentence or anything resembling this sentence and thinks anything other than, "This person is not even worth talking to," deserves to have their time wasted. Because speaking with someone who decides to change definitions to suit their narcissism (and always conveniently decides to leave that out until it's the most convenient for them) is exactly what that is, a waste of time.

Look back at every sentence Nick has ever said in the past 2 years and decide honestly, "Do I actually believe what he says?" Because I don't, and I have no reason to anymore without triple checking every stupidass word that comes out of his mouth. At least KF has the tism to record everything he says, so we know exactly when he's lying, so I can back up my reasoning with literal fucking arithmetic. I don't even need trigonometry to do it, as hilarious as that sentence would be to say for the first time in human history.
 
Back