- Joined
- Dec 21, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hard to say, could be HSLD contract, something purpose built, or something adapted from something else. it's not the AAC MG-SD i've used a couple times, and i've also seen some adapted Sionics or MAC (and rarely a Ciener suppressors) from 9mm SMGs that were from old inventory shortened and run wet for 7.62 purposes. they didn't last more than a belt, but sometimes that's all you needed. GSL did some really innovative stuff with small suppressors so maybe it's related to a project of his? since the gear in the pic is fairly modern it could be something from B&T or SIG or any number of recent IDIQ solicitors.Can anyone ID the belt fed suppressor in this photo?
View attachment 5621866
Do you own anything he can get some trigger time on to help him make the decision?I have a younger friend who's interested in getting his first gun. He's torn on what he wants right now, and I don't think the advice of myself, one person alone (and I'm not an expert by any stretch of the imagination either) is good enough to help him.
We talked a bit and right now he's boiled down his choices to: Handgun, a 12 or 20 gauge shotgun, or some kind of PCC. He doesn't want a rifle like an AR or anything. I asked him why and he said because he's worried about penetration. I told him that handgun bullets can actually penetrate more than a Rifle depending on what kind of rifle/what kind of handgun. But he didn't really believe me.
Thoughts?
felt recoil, bullet velocity, which can greatly affect bullet effectiveness on a target, trajectory over a distance, ability to participate in some competitions, some pistols might not like heavy 9mm loads due to OAL issues with feed ramp geometry, magazine geometry, et c. POI at farther ranges can also be unexpected if you don't calibrate sights, as most factory 9mm pistols will be sighted at 50 meters with 115gr (this varies from manufacturer to manufacturer and chambering to chambering).what difference does it make in pistols
Does bullet weight matter all the much when it comes to pistols? Say, the difference between 115gr and 147gr 9mm. I know with precision rifle shooting it sometimes can, but what difference does it make in pistols?
You can now print a version of that "totally not a stock" thing for handguns that requires you to actively hold it in place
View attachment 5623026
The Dev behind the MAC Super Safety trip has reported that testing looks promising but he has concerns regarding durability as the trip is only 0.76mm thick
View attachment 5623033
Yeah, not so concerned with accuracy, more with penetration/lethality/reliability. I don't own any PCCs at the moment, although I do want a CZ Scorpion someday.Regarding accuracy, I don't think you will ever notice the difference in accuracy if you are shooting 9mm from a standard 5" barrel with iron sights between 147 and 115. I buy cheap reloads or just 115 Winchester white box, nothing wrong with %99 of factory loaded 9mm ammo. Are you shooting an actual pistol or a PCC? I could understand wanting a more accurate load from a PCC at 100 yards.
I thought we all collectively moved past the piston AR fad at this point? I know there are a few high end AR's that use piston but, I think this came out of the now dead and thank god it's dead "M16 VS AK" debate from like 20 years ago. I have heard "oh yeah if you are running a slower projectile like 300BLK you're gonna want that piston" and also heard "oh yeah if you are running suppressed you're gonna want that piston" and exactly the opposite from other sources. I don't think I have seen evidence supporting which one is correct at this point. The only thing I recommend based on personal experience is an adjustable 300BLK gas port especially if you have a short 300BLK. Is anyone actually using a longer than 16" 300BLK barrel?so does 300 black like pistons or no?
Does bullet weight matter all the much when it comes to pistols? Say, the difference between 115gr and 147gr 9mm. I know with precision rifle shooting it sometimes can, but what difference does it make in pistols?
felt recoil, bullet velocity, which can greatly affect bullet effectiveness on a target, trajectory over a distance, ability to participate in some competitions, some pistols might not like heavy 9mm loads due to OAL issues with feed ramp geometry, magazine geometry, et c. POI at farther ranges can also be unexpected if you don't calibrate sights, as most factory 9mm pistols will be sighted at 50 meters with 115gr (this varies from manufacturer to manufacturer and chambering to chambering).
9mm 124gr is known to have lower penetration then 147gr. In addition in order to be effective most 124gr require +p pressures to get the required velocity. This can be an issue if you are using a gun not rated for +p. Most new handguns on the market in 9mm are +p rated however check with the manufacturer before choosing an ammo. That being said, in a handgun you will likely have less felt recoil from a 124gr vs 147. Some people want that for faster follow up shots. I personally prefer 147 but your best bet is to get some a try both.Yeah, not so concerned with accuracy, more with penetration/lethality/reliability. I don't own any PCCs at the moment, although I do want a CZ Scorpion someday.
If you're worried about pen, something in 380 auto or 38 special is solid. There's pretty decent ammo for both any more. A hand gun is also just more versatile, you can CCW it, not just keep it at home like a shot gunI have a younger friend who's interested in getting his first gun. He's torn on what he wants right now, and I don't think the advice of myself, one person alone (and I'm not an expert by any stretch of the imagination either) is good enough to help him.
We talked a bit and right now he's boiled down his choices to: Handgun, a 12 or 20 gauge shotgun, or some kind of PCC. He doesn't want a rifle like an AR or anything. I asked him why and he said because he's worried about penetration. I told him that handgun bullets can actually penetrate more than a Rifle depending on what kind of rifle/what kind of handgun. But he didn't really believe me.
Thoughts?
It depends on what you're going for. A lighter bullet pretty well always goes faster, which means less drop. 115 grain 9mm is great at that. But it also sheds energy faster. Heavier bullets hold onto energy longer. With +p you can usually get around the same speeds as lighter loads, but you'll have more recoil and wear on the gun, even if it's built for it.Yeah, not so concerned with accuracy, more with penetration/lethality/reliability. I don't own any PCCs at the moment, although I do want a CZ Scorpion someday.
so does 300 black like pistons or no?
yes, plenty of people jumped on the "rattler" train with a 9" (or so) .300 BLK carbine with attached suppressor for an OAL of at or under 13". add a folding stock on some piston-based designs and it's very handy for DSS and some other special duties. hog hunters also like and use .300 BLK as a bush gun owing to an easy conversion kit from an AR and much less costly then .450 BM or using 1 oz slugs.Is anyone actually using a sub 16" 300BLK barrel?
you can just buy Ranger Bonded like any other ammo. Winchester sell direct only to LE and Fed, but they don't care if the distributors sell to non LE. Ranger-T is also often marked LE only on packaging (much like how 50 round "Duty" ammunition of Gold Dots are marked LE only and it's just a packaging thing. Ranger Bonded has overpenetration issues in the MP5 and similar and isn't used in those weapons typically because of that. in a pistol it's probably "okay" but if someone was concerned about overpenetration going with a bonded projectile probably isn't a good idea.Winchester Ranger Bonded (LE only, fuckers)
fabric clogging was an issue with early wide-nosed hollowpoints and is one reason why Golden Sabers fell out of favor (along with the jacket separation issue). a polymer ballistic tip helped a lot but the ideal fix was with the HST offering a narrower nose geometry and letting it "paper punch" through fabric then open suddenly once the cavity was filled, overcoming reliable expansion. the HST was developed with some lessons learned from the previous attempt to overcome the issue with the center post of the Hydra-Shok ammunition. other companies twigged on to the geometry change and clogging isn't as much of a problem any more unless you're shooting larger calibers like .45.I know the fabric clogging hollowpoint was an issue LE ran into 10-20 years ago however I have no idea how well these 2 systems work or if they are just gimmicks.
147gr HST might have problems expanding consistently out of a 16" barrel. these pistols rounds are generally designed for 3-5" barrels and hollow points, being velocity dependent, can encounter performance problems if they are too fast or too slow. 124gr 9mm Gold Dots or HST (both normal pressure and overpressure) seems to work pretty good from a Colt 6951 (10 inch barrel i think). Golden Saber 147gr was the old school load used in the Colt SMG and Ruger PC-9 with suppressors in the 90's and earlier and functioned reliably and with great authority. also consider Cor-Bon DPX 9mm as i know a good number of people with cheap 9mm carbines that get good performance doing mule deer hunting and personal protection, the Ruger M77/357 comes to mind.Speaking of HSTs, would 147gr HSTs be a good option from a 16"+ PCC barrel? Goal is to have some stopping power within 50-100 yards at the most.
Initially thought about going for 124gr +P HSTs but that velocity could get in the way of proper expansion, so leaning towards the slower 147gr now.
Interesting, thanks. The reason why I thought 147gr would make a good option was based on these charts which indicated only a 70~ fps difference between an 16" barrel and a 5" barrel for 147gr HST. Sounds like I should get some gel blocks...147gr HST might have problems expanding consistently out of a 16" barrel. these pistols rounds are generally designed for 3-5" barrels and hollow points, being velocity dependent, can encounter performance problems if they are too fast or too slow. 124gr 9mm Gold Dots or HST (both normal pressure and overpressure) seems to work pretty good from a Colt 6951 (10 inch barrel i think). Golden Saber 147gr was the old school load used in the Colt SMG and Ruger PC-9 with suppressors in the 90's and earlier and functioned reliably and with great authority. also consider Cor-Bon DPX 9mm as i know a good number of people with cheap 9mm carbines that get good performance doing mule deer hunting and personal protection, the Ruger M77 comes to mind.
i mean, 147gr HST aren't spitballs even if they're not performing as intended. try buying a small box and trying it out - worst outcome is some trigger time and knowledge gained.Interesting, thanks. The reason why I thought 147gr would make a good option was based on these charts which indicated only a 70~ fps difference between an 16" barrel and a 5" barrel for 147gr HST. Sounds like I should get some gel blocks...
Assuming that the Trigger slap was caused by the MAC's FCG then the problem wouldn't exist because the Super Safety is designed to work with an AR FCG. So the guy is working on a trip that will interact with the Super Safety in an AR FCG equipped printed lower.What am I missing here?
Reminder that the SBR and SBS tax in the NFA was done to close a loophole that existed in the original draft of the NFA that taxed handguns as well (most of the public in the 1930’s was in favor of a total handgun ban btw). Obviously they didn’t want the plebs to just bubba up their shotgun or rifle and get the concealability benefit of a handgun. It was last minute lobbying that got the handgun ban taken out of the NFA, but the SBR and SBS retardation still exists as a legal appendix.IMHO the whole SBR regulation thing was stupid, even for the NFA it was a dumb idea. Even in countries where firearms are regulated to death the SBR thing is much more reasonable and realistic.