@Android Raptor Hate Thread

Isn't there a fuckton of loli for that show?
Nigga what the fuck are you goin on about?
TBF, I do remember seeing it mentioned on websites such as /a/ board on 4chan about how Mugi (the blonde haired girl with funny eyebrows) tends to be drawn by Japs having sex with niggers (both consensually and non-consensually) and even one of the panels from a doujin depicting that, becoming a meme briefly on /a/.

There was a reason why people that liked K-ON! Back in the day were compared to bronies in 2011-2012 (along with Madoka people),and it's because of shit like this. :suffering:
1705623079543.png
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Android raptor
Idk, I though K-on was one of the big popular shows with gross weirdoes who like loli (who are also frequently wignats)
K-on was the proto moe show so yeah the cunnyseurs are going to know of it and also linking loli to wignats is a stretch and a half unless you are talking about terminally online larping faggots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Inside your walls
K-on was the proto moe show so yeah the cunnyseurs are going to know of it and also linking loli to wignats is a stretch and a half unless you are talking about terminally online larping faggots.
A lot of wignats are just straight up open pedophiles, like Andrew Anglin.
 
It's an attempt to distract from all the fucked up shit they're doing, like the aforementioned pedos going on about how much they want to diddle little girls.
Both sides do it and I'm pretty sure most people really believe they are doing something good.

There's scientific reasoning behind considering abortion murder though. It's indisputably a human life, but her and other pro-aborts instead use unscientific dehumanization tactics, like incorrectly referring to said life as a "parasite" (doesn't meet the scientific definition) or "clump of cells" (technically accurate, but that's all humans ever are from day 1, even after death).

So, it's more an issue of the opposition being ignorant/disingenuous than a flaw with the claim, best I can tell.
I'm somewhere in the middle on it (I wouldn't do it or encourage it, treating it as contraception is retarded because there are safer and less invasive methods, treating it as some kind of badge of honor is even more retarded but generally I don't care what other people do as long as it doesn't involve me) so I can comprehend your reasoning. She's on the opposite extreme so she can't connect with you on any level and neither of you is making a good faith attempt to make this connection, it's just sitting in your respective camps and taking shots at each other.
Just for the sake of illustrating what I mean, if I wanted to explain my indifference to you, just I would follow the "clump of cells" argument. What makes this clump of cells a person is consciousness. Consciousness resides in the brain, the rest is just aperture that keeps the brain alive and moves it around. Therefore I wouldn't fully equate a person to a fetus that hasn't developed something we could call a functioning (that is, being able to process stimuli) brain.
Then you can respond with your arguments against my statement. Best case scenario someone will reconsider their position and maybe even move an inch, worst case scenario we leave with better understanding of the subject and other side's reasoning.
Throwing "baby murderers", "fundies" and "pedos" at each other will only lead to 70 pages of rather boring spergout, as evidenced in this thread.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Lake
I'm somewhere in the middle on it (I wouldn't do it or encourage it, treating it as contraception is retarded because there are safer and less invasive methods, treating it as some kind of badge of honor is even more retarded but generally I don't care what other people do as long as it doesn't involve me) so I can comprehend your reasoning. She's on the opposite extreme so she can't connect with you on any level and neither of you is making a good faith attempt to make this connection, it's just sitting in your respective camps and taking shots at each other.
Just for the sake of illustrating what I mean, if I wanted to explain my indifference to you, just I would follow the "clump of cells" argument. What makes this clump of cells a person is consciousness. Consciousness resides in the brain, the rest is just aperture that keeps the brain alive and moves it around. Therefore I wouldn't fully equate a person to a fetus that hasn't developed something we could call a functioning (that is, being able to process stimuli) brain.
Then you can respond with your arguments against my statement. Best case scenario someone will reconsider their position and maybe even move an inch, worst case scenario we leave with better understanding of the subject and other side's reasoning.
Throwing "baby murderers", "fundies" and "pedos" at each other will only lead to 70 pages of rather boring spergout, as evidenced in this thread.
11 words: Abortion should be legal but women shouldn’t be allowed to choose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BULLY HUNTER_78
The@Android raptor I know you like insects, but do you like dung beetles? I can be your cute widdle dung beetle.
They're pretty cute I guess, and perform an important ecological function.
What would you do if I impregnated all of your roaches? Would you buy tiny little coat hangers and try to perform little roach-bortions UwU?
Roaches like hissers can actually give themselves abortions if conditions aren't right. They basically yeet their ootheca (egg cases) instead of it developing fully.

Many mammals can also yeet their own fetuses (or at least absorb them back into their bodies) if conditions aren't right, like cats and dogs.
Yeah what sort of white nationalist listens to a faggot mexican?
Wait til you find out where most of the worst Nazis fled after the war
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BULLY HUNTER_78
Not to derail this already autistic thread but, I kind of noticed that lots of self-proclaimed ""right leaning/conservative/trad people"" here, but also outside this website have this weird obsession with being self-righteous to the point of being incredibly unbearable and get very personal over other people's (retarded) choices.
I should write a deep thots thread about normalization and social norms.
I have no idea how to format my thoughts so not to sound smug, but almost everyone argues with severe levels of bad faith when it comes to social norms and "censorship", as well as personal freedoms and responsibilities.
It is true that conservatards are often self-righteous and retarded when it comes to this shit, and they rarely, if ever, put in practice what they preach. There are reasons I never said I am trad. Or religious. I'm basically devoutly anti-conservative, but also right wing and reactionary.
This should not be an extraordinary position, it should be common sense.
All societies have rules. There is NO LIBERTY BASED SOCIETY - but the US leans the most towards individual freedom, and it has been rather disastrous lately. Does that mean China or Russia have a better alternative? Or Saudi? NOPE, you nerds, it does not.
It simply means that people need to argue more honestly so we can find better compromises with less hostility, and take whatever works best from the US, from China, from Russia, from Muslims, from everyone, and create a synthesis of their best attributes.
Will it work flawlessly? Hell no, it will likely be a disaster too, but we will learn from mistakes, and further hone our approach.
Why can't you people be honest? I just can't understand why you think that something as serious as social norms is about you and your petty ideology "winning".
Winning what, more exactly?
 
Back