Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

I really want to beat the point to death that all of these feminists that a large chunk of this forum think are "based" are literally just the same SJWs from 2014 that everyone was mocking back then. Trigger warnings, wage gap, male gaze, manspreading, believe all women, you name the ridiculous fucking concept and there's a non-zero chance they believe in it.
This 100%. But at least in my view all that would be forgivable if they actually took responsibility for their fuck up that allowed the troon wave, but no somehow it is also men's fault and the patriarchy at work. That shows that they will never get it and are a lost cause. Troons are basically the 21st century version of a bronze age plague punishing decadent societies for their sins.
They're also too retarded to realize that troon supremacy is their fault. They opened the floodgates, they began the oppression Olympics, they're the ones who felt victimized enough to turn all of society upside down.
If they would have not ignored the obvious warnings, they wouldn't have that issue now. The (feminist) left controls the discourse, if they actually wanted to get rid of troons they could have. They made their bed ...
She's pro refugee, she was vehemently against Brexit and Scottish independence but when it comes to trannies (Who let's be real here aren't even a major issue outside the internet) OH NO IT'S TOO FAR!! It's only when it personally inconveniences them that it becomes an issue.
The worst thing about her pro refugee posture was that, at the time, she had an empty property and didn't even take in any refugees there. I am not even asking lefties to take in refugees in their personal home because most of them aren't that retarded, but if you have empty properties and are pro open borders, you have to be willing to take them in there. In many countries you would even get monetary compensation from the state. It's dead evident that it was always just posturing for clout and having the "right opinion".
 
they pulled all the gender shit out of their ass
Gender is a made up term coined by pedophile "Dr." John Money by making a young David Reimer undergo srs (at 22 months old btw) when he got a botched circumcision and then in his teenage years forced David and his brother Brian to perform sexual act together. Both of the boys ended up killing themselves, Brian due to pills while David did an homage to Cobain. So every time you see the word gender used know that 2 men underwent man made horrors to make it possible.
 
Gender is a made up term coined by pedophile "Dr." John Money by making a young David Reimer undergo srs (at 22 months old btw) when he got a botched circumcision and then in his teenage years forced David and his brother Brian to perform sexual act together. Both of the boys ended up killing themselves, Brian due to pills while David did an homage to Cobain. So every time you see the word gender used know that 2 men underwent man made horrors to make it possible.
The only reason why people use the word gender is because they don't wanna say sex.
 
Typical cunts. All whining, no responsibility. Let's just hand them the keys to the forum, surely nothing will go wrong
the end goal of 90% of women's politics is to absolve women of responsibility for their actions and allow them to do whatever they want all the time without consequences or blame. They could vote for mass migration from shitfuckistan tomorrow and then when all the low IQ brownoids start raping them they'll blame it on evil white men and the patriarchy for not teaching those heckin poor downtrodden brownerinos not to heckin rape.
Troons are basically the 21st century version of a bronze age plague punishing decadent societies for their sins.
well they are the harbinger of death for civilizations after all
I bet if history had taken a different turn, the same "based radfems" we have here on the farms would be part of the effort to cancel the forum because it lets you make fun of women, or is toxic masculinity or something.
I've already seen on ovarit these same people complain about the website because people are allowed to say "nigger". As someone else said, they were the establishment's cultural battering ram of yesteryear and they're only mad that they got replaced by a much more convenient tool that maximizes decadence by feminizing men and dispossessing women.
If they actually want to work towards equality then I’ll be interested
I wouldn't, I want them all back in the kitchen and in burqas immediately, equality is a false god. I firmly believe that every social problem we have is due to a lack of patriarchy, not in spite of it.
 
If they actually want to work towards equality then I’ll be interested but all they want is more favorable treatment and privileges.

What does equality even mean? Men are not physically capable of giving birth, nursing an infant, or emanating the pheromones necessary for proper formation of an infant's limbic system. Women are not physically capable of doing high-risk, dangerous jobs. They are not as strong or large as men, and they injure far more easily. Men need to consume more calories to survive; women need to spend more time and resources on hygiene to stay healthy. And this is ignoring all the different psychological differences we have, which lead to different preferences and socialization patterns.

The point is, our different bodies mean we, on the whole, are simply incapable of allocating our time on this planet equally and therefore cannot possibly, over the course of that life, act in equal way to achieve, produce, and consume equal things.

Nobody can articulate what equality means on a practical level that makes any sense. What it ultimately means is, "any time a woman whines that something is unfair, we give her what she wants."
 
I wouldn't, I want them all back in the kitchen and in burqas immediately, equality is a false god. I firmly believe that every social problem we have is due to a lack of patriarchy, not in spite of it.
I don't think women should have zero control or agency over their own lives whatsoever. That's how you end up with dumb shit like child marriages and pajeets burning their wives to death when the husband dies.

Women clearly have no business being able to vote, however. They are socially poisonous to the function of government and most of their rights need to be significantly stripped back.
 
let's get back to hating w*men
1641271095001.jpg
IMG_1991.jpg
FDS is a funny and sad place
 
The only reason why people use the word gender is because they don't wanna say sex.
Exactly, when I was a kid, that's all it meant. It was how you discussed the concept of biological sex with a room full of children without them all giggling.

Nobody can articulate what equality means on a practical level that makes any sense. What it ultimately means is, "any time a woman whines that something is unfair, we give her what she wants."
Sure we can. The easy definition is "everyone gets access to the same opportunities." What's really going on is they want more. That definition isn't enough. They've redefined it as "women get everything they want and men have to pay for it and take all the blame."

let's get back to hating w*men
I never stopped.
 
The TERFs' hatred of trannies rarely deviates from their deep-seated misandry
TERFs aren’t our friends and most of them make it clear that camaraderie only goes one way.
My view on the TERF issue is pragmatic.
Temporary alliance to deal with the trans thing. Including men accepting some misandry and insulting behavior.
The trans thing seems to pale in comparison with other afflictions plaguing the Europeans, but it is actually very important, as reality itself is at stake. So it should be highly prioritized, BUT! never forget that if/once a victory is scored, there's a lot more to deal with - faggotry, mass migration, general progressive lunacy.
If the gender crits want to be the tip of the spear, they should be pushed to the frontlines. It's a "war" they are well suited to fight.
But, we will never forget who they truly are.
 
My view on the TERF issue is pragmatic.
Why? TERFs currently have a success rate of zero percent. If you really want to fight back against trannies, the school board moms hate radfems as much if not more than trannies and they seem to actually get victories here and there. Seems like it would be more worth your while to help them out versus the TERFs.
Why? They have the relationship they deserve.
Exactly. r/FDS assumes there’s going to be a tall, dark, handsome and rich guy waiting for them whenever they feel like getting them. These guys exist but maybe tens of thousands worldwide if even that. So when they inevitably fail, they just get more and more bitter. All those rings they give to themselves just exists as a reminder that they’re not good enough for the top 0.01% of men. Which makes sense just due to sheer numbers but their delusions of grandeur will never allow them to look at the bottom 99.99% of the scrotes. Meanwhile guys get told that wanting a woman who treats them nicely is an incel fantasy.
 
Sure we can. The easy definition is "everyone gets access to the same opportunities."

The inequality of physical bodies means the inequality of opportunity. So you can make a rule that women may now try to join the combat infantry, but they must pass the same physical test as men. Of course, virtually no women will pass this test, and if you were consistent, the few that do would soon be expelled for having sex with their comrades. The opportunity exists on paper, but not in physical reality. That's why, even when we gave women legal equality with men decades ago, it didn't achieve social or economic equality.
 
Last edited:
Temporary alliance to deal with the trans thing. Including men accepting some misandry and insulting behavior.
The trans thing seems to pale in comparison with other afflictions plaguing the Europeans, but it is actually very important, as reality itself is at stake.
I disagree with that. Overall the trans issue is rather minor in impact on the life of the average person. It's not that they are not annoying or harmful, but compared to other threats like uncontrolled mass migration, the complete and reckless redesign of the economy, the family law system (if you want to be a family man) and the threat of further global conflict/war, it shouldn't be high on the list. And especially not high enough to justfiy working with a group openly hostile towards you.
Even in 2024 a feminist is more likely to fuck up your life than a troon and to be clear both are still very unlikely unless you do something really retarded or live in a communist commune.

I also don't really understand your point of reality being at stake. Sure, it is fueled by delusion, but isn't that true for most issues we are facing today? "Diversity is our strength" is also ignoring reality. So is the redesign of the economy.
 
a woman who married a ghost but later divorced him
29a.jpg

Never, you see, whammen operate on theoretical quantum accountability hyperposition, which is entirely different from the mechanical responsibility described by conventional physics, which men operate on. Does that sound complicated? In as simple terms as quantum physics can be put, the level of responsibility a wimmon can be expected to have over her actions exists in a state of hyperposition, she both has, and does not have, responsibility for her actions, all at the same time! That is, until it is observed. Let me explain:

If a whamen does something stupid, and it works out for her, then the wave form of the responsibility matrice collapses into a single possible state, turns out, she was a badass independent woman all along and is in full control of her actions! But, if she goes off the rails and ends up fucking up, then the responsibility wave collapses into a different state, and the responsibility falls on the nearest moid who can be blamed.

Women are truly amazing creatures! Going off your understanding of moid physics, you might ask questions such as "You have 10 exes and they were all abusing you? What are the odds?" or "Why did you get with him when you knew he'd put 3 other women in the hospital before you?". But now, if we apply quantum physics, the answers are obvious!
Schrödinger's cunt.
 
Overall the trans issue is rather minor in impact on the life of the average person.

Despite being a tiny portion of the population, there are now speech codes in effect at most employers, plus a broad chilling effect on social media. This is a constant source of stress and unpleasantness. Far more people are aware of trannies than they were ten years ago because you will be punished for saying anything out of line, resulting in constantly having to be mindful of how crossdressers are near the top of the power pyramid right now.
 
I disagree with that. Overall the trans issue is rather minor in impact on the life of the average person.
I understand. I said it's temporary.
Maybe you can understand my perspective. I'm a medic. The transgender issue threatens my entire profession. It also threatens objective reality. If we cannot share a reality which we can all observe, i.e. binary sex, than all is lost.
school board moms
I don't mind those either. Whatever is needed.
Including men accepting some misandry and insulting behavior.
It's possible I didn't convey my opinion too well with this.
What I mean is that we will clench our buttcheeks for a bit, but in full knowledge that after the T, well, let's just say we will remember who were the most ardent man haters.
 
Back