- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It was unprofitable, or at least not profitable by much, when it was run by someone other than a thieving gook fugitive tax cheat who sold user information and outright malicious ads. Moot was only able to make enough to become actually somewhat rich by selling it to said gook.People who parrot this "4chan was unprofitable" thing get all their info from YouTube videos by nasally essayists.
3) you're fucking retardedTwo possibilities exist:
1) Moot was a lying faggot
2) Famously shrewd and jewish Japanese executives bought 4chan out of pure charity, with no regard for financials, knowing they were taking on dead weight
Last edited: