Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Nick reminds me a lot of Jerry Falwell Jr, the Liberty U President that had that big degenerate cuck scandal.

Nick mocked him on a show with Drexel.

Nick says he wished he’d known Marc was flying in because they could have gone out drinking together. How quickly that “107 fever” faded from memory!

This is pointing to some serious mental declindecline... Nick could not have been this dumb that whole time.

It would be fascinating to watch Rekieta actually practicing at the bench given his current state. He strikes me as one of those over the top nasally incompetent attorneys you'd find in the tutorial of a Phoenix Wright game.

I have no clue how this guy would function in any kind of professional job if he finally gave up on streaming.

He wouls not and from his recounting of his past work experiences he did not. He was the arse who stayed at entry-level and was salty to everyone.

About that.

Spoiler

Once upon a time I worked with a guy who was constantly relapsing on meth. He was a complete flamer but not a jolly one — he was always in a very dark mindset and I don’t think I ever saw him smile or laugh. Anyway after what was literally his 15th relapse, he told me that he was also a sex addict and that after years of increasingly extreme sexual acting out (meeting strangers for sex multiple times per week, always with meth), he found it impossible to engage in sexual activity without meth — pretty much guaranteeing he’d never stop using.

This shit sounds especially fanfic-esque to those of us with beautifully drama-free, drug-free lives. But the fact is it’s much more commonplace than one would think. Does Nick really seem at this point like he’s got any kind of moral compass or the super-power of self-control?

I see nothing in Nick’s recent behavior to suggest he has the inclination or ability to moderate his behavior in any way. The way Nick tells it, he REFUSES to take guidance given in a “faggy way.” I suspect the truth is he’s utterly incapable of reining it in and he knows it.

Which to Nick is any way at all.

I'll note that this singular trait in and of itself is not unusual or the sole reason Nick is disliked. Nor is it any other. We all have people we like that are flawed. This is something Nick cannot or will not understand.

He made himself unlikable in the aggregate. We only point to specific flaws by way of example. He thinks he can respond to a few criticisms ans make everything right again--as if it is a social debt that must remain below a certain theshhold.

This is why he seems baffled when he fixes one thing people are complaining about and that critique does not suddenly cease.

It's not my job to educate you, bigot.

With the quality of his audience, they will probably just take what he says and not bother looking for themselves. There were many too afraid to load up this website to see what was being said about the LOCALS chat back in ita heyday.

I popped into the stream briefly last night and caught this in chat
View attachment 5771860

This man is an idiot. This is going into the OP and getting posted in the lawsuit thread.

Well Randazza conceded that Monty gets discovery no matter what so eventually Nick is going to be in a deposition and have his actual comments played back to him.

If I were him I'd have a better tactic than pretending not to have said what he said and broadcasted to the Internet, but I hope he doesn't, that would be funny to watch.

My reas on that was that he was pleading ignorance to Minnesota procedure, but that CO law should apply within the framework of MN constitutionality. Not an admission, but more an 'this can work within your rules and we will follow them' to avoid having to fight about it now and jeopardise the application of CO law argument with more strife.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Neither can I. Metokur said a lot of things about Monty, but I don't think he ever called him a pedo.

Does anyone have vids or links for the original Metokur vids on Montagraph? I found this one on bitchute and will give it a listen, but are there more?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8FslqIXw_bs/

 

[Tubby Aardvark]

Does anyone have vids or links for the original Metokur vids on Montagraph? I found this one on bitchute and will give it a listen, but are there more?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8FslqIXw_bs/

View attachment 5772002

Just type in metokur and montagraph on the youtubes and it shows a bunch of them including one with Nick where he got trolled by being an Egg
Edit: Josh also called and talked to montagraph which can be found Here

 

[PikminCollector]

I had to watch this new "dweeb" clip back to back with the total skunk death video and now you can too

There is no saving what's left of this "man".

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

Potential lawyer people and law nerds chime in here:

I know that Monty has been called a pedo before by trolls (per the Monty op).

Theres also those photos of him kissing a doll of a little girl.

And the lawsuit with Morphonios didn’t go anywhere.

But would those be decent grounds for Nick’s defense that his statement couldn’t be defamatory?

Does Nick’s statement “He sucks little baby penises”, qualify as defamatory if these previous allegations and behaviors exist? Would his argument be that his statement is a reasonable extrapolation from previous events and comments?

 

[FedPostalService]

Potential lawyer people and law nerds chime in here:

I know that Monty has been called a pedo before by trolls (per the Monty op).

Theres also those photos of him kissing a doll of a little girl.

And the lawsuit with Morphonios didn’t go anywhere.

But would those be decent grounds for Nick’s defense that his statement couldn’t be defamatory?

Does Nick’s statement “He sucks little baby penises”, qualify as defamatory if these previous allegations and behaviors exist? Would his argument be that his statement is a reasonable extrapolation from previous events and comments?

Hi Nick! Pay for your own legal advice!

 

[polar bear]

*falsely accusing someone of committing one of the most horrific crimes there are*
"guys, could we call it a reasonable extrapolation?"

 

[Captain Manning]

This is pointing to some serious mental declindecline... Nick could not have been this dumb that whole time.

The thread moves fast, and I'm sure somebody here has already said this, but...

My theory is that his internal organs began to liquify in the days leading up to oral arguments, because he wasn't sure if they would go in his favor, and he wanted an excuse to not livestream it.

A miraculous recovery occurred the following day when it was clear Randazza pulled off a good showing. I think if he did a show on the night of the 28th it would have looked a little too contrived even for him.

Does anyone have vids or links for the original Metokur vids on Montagraph? I found this one on bitchute and will give it a listen, but are there more?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8FslqIXw_bs/

View attachment 5772002

Good luck. I think if somebody with any credibility (I am discounting randos and trolls) had called Monty a pedo before Nick, it would have been found by now. Nick seemed to lean pretty heavily on Metokur for Monty lore going by the text of his (now defunct) GiveSendGo.

If you are a glutton for punishing yourself more, I will note that drumr828 has a multi-part series on YouTube. Have fun. I can't find part 1 though. I gather there's supposed to be 5 parts.

Remember, Rekieta is being sued. Not Metokur. Nick tried to fob that off as Schneider hating him, but AFAIK only Nick said anything that might actually be actionable.

 

[Thugnificent]

This is why he seems baffled when he fixes one thing people are complaining about and that critique does not suddenly cease.

It's almost like he has trouble picking up on social cues...

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

The thread moves fast, and I'm sure somebody here has already said this, but...

My theory is that his internal organs began to liquify in the days leading up to oral arguments, because he wasn't sure if they would go in his favor, and he wanted an excuse to not livestream it.

A miraculous recovery occurred the following day when it was clear Randazza pulled off a good showing. I think if he did a show on the night of the 28th it would have looked a little too contrived even for him.


Good luck. I think if somebody with any credibility (I am discounting randos and trolls) had called Monty a pedo before Nick, it would have been found by now. Nick seemed to lean pretty heavily on Metokur for Monty lore going by the text of his (now defunct) GiveSendGo.

If you are a glutton for punishing yourself more, I will note that drumr828 has a multi-part series on YouTube. Have fun. I can't find part 1 though. I gather there's supposed to be 5 parts.

Remember, Rekieta is being sued. Not Metokur. Nick tried to fob that off as Schneider hating him, but AFAIK only Nick said anything that might actually be actionable.

I was more interested in Metokur's (historic) take on Monty. I don't think there's any connection to what drunkyNose called him. Mr Law and Social Cues seems to have made that up from whole cloth.

 

[AnOminous]

Well Randazza conceded that Monty gets discovery no matter what so eventually Nick is going to be in a deposition and have his actual comments played back to him.

I think that was a really bad concession to make because it basically admits the anti-SLAPP statute in question is at least in part procedural. Most federal appeals courts that have looked at whether to apply a state anti-SLAPP law in diversity jurisdiction cases under an Erie analysis have concluded that it is procedural, there is a substantive federal rule addressing the same issue (generally 12(b)(6)), and the federal rule applies.

While this isn't, strictly speaking, an Erie analysis, the court appears to be looking at it in an analogous way. If it's procedural, then Nick just loses.

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

About that.

Spoiler

Once upon a time I worked with a guy who was constantly relapsing on meth. He was a complete flamer but not a jolly one — he was always in a very dark mindset and I don’t think I ever saw him smile or laugh. Anyway after what was literally his 15th relapse, he told me that he was also a sex addict and that after years of increasingly extreme sexual acting out (meeting strangers for sex multiple times per week, always with meth), he found it impossible to engage in sexual activity without meth — pretty much guaranteeing he’d never stop using.

This shit sounds especially fanfic-esque to those of us with beautifully drama-free, drug-free lives. But the fact is it’s much more commonplace than one would think. Does Nick really seem at this point like he’s got any kind of moral compass or the super-power of self-control?

I see nothing in Nick’s recent behavior to suggest he has the inclination or ability to moderate his behavior in any way. The way Nick tells it, he REFUSES to take guidance given in a “faggy way.” I suspect the truth is he’s utterly incapable of reining it in and he knows it.

The sex addiction thanks to abusing meth fits perfectly with Nick’s increasing fixation with cooming in recent times. The speed he took for his “streaming” also fueled his fixation on sexual degenerate behavior.

I’m sure his wife did struggle to satisfy Nick once he had fired up a dual sex and speed addiction. It was a lot easier when he was just a common drunk with whiskey dick.

Speed addicts, like your coworker, rely porn and random hook-up sites to feed their unnatural stimulant fueled needs. No one monogamous partner can keep up with a Methy McMasturbator degenerate sex drive.

If a man has any degen proclivities, and develops an amphetamine habit, they are definitely going to dive into the gay shit. It’s like expecting a starving man with $10 to not eat at the McDonald’s next door, but instead wait for a table at an expensive restaurant across town. It’s quantity over quality every time.

 

[Captain Manning]

I was more interested in Metokur's (historic) take on Monty. I don't think there's any connection to what drunkyNose called him. Mr Law and Social Cues seems to have made that up from whole cloth.

He almost assuredly did.

But boy does he want people to believe there's lore on Monty sucking little baby cock going back centuries. That and the "probably" he never said.

It's utterly disgusting.

 

[Anticipointment]

Can’t find a specifically good example but it can be seen in this video, Nick is doing this thing where he sucks in on his lips. Right before the clip ends he does it but also several times throughout. Right before he sways back & forth is another time. It is a peculiar mouth movement that addicts commonly do.

Rekieta gets on stage just before 1 hour 45 mins, and is on until the end of the show at the 3 hour mark. His mouth/jaw is moving continually for basically the whole time, except when he's actively talking. Here is a short compilation of clips, but I'll embed the whole stream so you can check for yourself. The last clip is a longer one where he speaks repeatedly, so you can see how quickly he goes from talking back to the mouth movements.

What's going on with Nick's jaw?

We both noticed strange mouth / jaw movements back in Oct. 23, but it has definitely become more accelerated in rate & more pronounced. Looks like classic coke or meth jaw.

Most likely that the official statement from Kayla was a joint effort between her and Nick, but the principles are still present in Kayla's actions and words elsewhere, and having her lolyer/social media expert husband draft the document for her demonstrates collusion more than anything.

Agree that is most likely. The locals message from Kayla in your post showing her getting overly defensive when called on her bs is pure cuntiness. Doesn’t bode well for the state of the marriage either, same cope as Egal & Art.

Theres also those photos of him kissing a doll of a little girl.

Where? Don’t recall this.

And the lawsuit with Morphonios didn’t go anywhere.

Monty was pro se then, wasn’t to do with the basis & was because of improper or late paperwork.

I was more interested in Metokur's (historic) take on Monty. I don't think there's any connection to what drunkyNose called him. Mr Law and Social Cues seems to have made that up from whole cloth

Not sure who but someone in this thread already went through the Metokur stuff ( @Neetorino ?) & found that Metokur didn’t ever say outright that Monty was a pedophile or anything else that would be considered actionable defamation.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Not sure who but someone in this thread already went through the Metokur stuff ( @Neetorino ?) & found that Metokur didn’t ever say outright that Monty was a pedophile or anything else that would be considered actionable defamation.

I vaguely remember Monty was considering suing Metokur at one point and backed down, but I don't remember the context of that. I couldn't find stuff on a search in the affected threads, but I may just be failing in my searchfu.

 

[DaleMcGuy]

I had to watch this new "dweeb" clip back to back with the total skunk death video and now you can too
View attachment 5772034
There is no saving what's left of this "man".

The skunk clip going viral would be the next great arc.

 

[Truly Rural]

Nick has a long way to go. He has much to lose still. Clearly everything he has to lose is damaged and broken in different ways but it's still something to lose. Broken wife, broken online rep, professional stagnation, health that can and will get worse, money ... My point is this is far from his worst behavior. Used up wife is still a wife that does his laundry from time to time even if she hates him.

He made me honestly sick doubling down on pedo bullshit in last Elissa clip. I am genuinely disgusted by his character from that clip even more than I was with his John rant.

 

[footballteam]

When exactly did the “worst day” happen? (I recall it and even checked the OP to see if it was mentioned there, but it’s not. I’m just trying to place it in the overall time line.)

Here is my post about it - was a few days before memorial day 2022.... Im convinced he clipped it out of whatever stream it was in.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-15664649

 

[Space Pope]

Does Nick’s statement “He sucks little baby penises”, qualify as defamatory if these previous allegations and behaviors exist? Would his argument be that his statement is a reasonable extrapolation from previous events and comments?

I'm only a retard on the internet but I think there is a big difference between blanket statements and stating a specific crime. You need not have sodomized a child to be a pedophile and the act of simply being one isn't criminal. Nicki stating Monty likes to suck little boy cock is like a twofer in defamation per se as just insinuating he's a pedo causes ridicule, hatred, contempt and he accuses him of enjoying what would be an infamous criminal act.

If that matters in court or not, I'm about as much of legal expert as Nicki himself, so who knows.

 

[3MMA]

Spoiler: Off Topic

I could always start another religious holy war in this thread too.

Kay was apparently too hardcore for this thread, perhaps KayKay will become the new gold standard? Or the next gay slapfight? Only time will tell. Godspeed.

---

On the subject of Nick lying about the actual goddamn video footage of him saying the “Monty sucks baby’s dicks” line, I distinctly remember him being adamant about it. There was no “probably” involved. If anything, there was a “definitely” or a doubling down. The entire thing was a rage fueled comment, drunk, high on his ego, how dare you deny my opinion as fact, devil may care, clear defamation. Too late for sneaky words, no probably, no allegedly, no likely, no it’s quite possible. Balldo was fully committed to the bit, multiple times. He knows, too.