Spunt's helpful guide to Britain for fat Americans - Learn about Anglos so you can hate them better

What should I cover next?

  • The BBC

    Votes: 40 51.3%
  • Sportsball

    Votes: 10 12.8%
  • Education

    Votes: 23 29.5%
  • Culture

    Votes: 19 24.4%
  • Something else?

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Kys Anglo faggot retard nigger

    Votes: 13 16.7%

  • Total voters
    78
  • Poll closed .
In a parliamentary democracy, We, the People don't vote for the Prime Minister, but for the party. People didn't elect Blair; they elected their local MP, either because he was from the party they always voted for, or because he was someone they liked. The party elected Blair its leader. If you want to blame anyone for Blair, blame the people of Sedgefield. Bunch of tossers kept voting for him long after it was clear he was pure evil in a suit.
Also, people voted for Blair in 1997 not so much because they wanted him in power but because they wanted the Major administration and its assorted incompetents, perverts and petty criminals turfed out of office. People would have voted for a potato in a red rosette if it would have got rid of Norman Lamont or Neil Hamilton.

It's the same mechanism that will get Keir Starmer into Number 10 despite the fact that even his own party don't even seem to have any faith in him.
 
It's the same mechanism that will get Keir Starmer into Number 10 despite the fact that even his own party don't even seem to have any faith in him.
I agree, though I'm still predicting a hung parliament or a minority labour/snp/libdem government that will spend most of its term flailing around. I'm also pissing rainbows and predicting Badenoch leading a weak Tory government around 2030.
 
blame the people of Sedgefield. Bunch of tossers kept voting for him long after it was clear he was pure evil in a suit.
In fairness Sedgefield is tiny. Like less than 10,000 people tiny.

Probably why it was quite well known for the asylum that used to be there.

Pretty place, hope Blair is buried there. I'd like to do some sight seeing in between shitting on his grave.
 
One of the best threads I've ever seen on the net. I now hate the Anglos very much and I'm very much glad I live in Central European hellhole. Speaking of, I'm kind of surprised how much Spunt is fawning over Polacks - I talked with with some who lived in UK (not particularly hard to meet such person - it's estimated 2 million of Polacks emigrated after our country joined EU, and UK was most popular destination, chances are you had as many Polacks as Bangladeshi at the peak of our presence there, and there could be many more), they said Brits didn't seem to like us very much. Though maybe these were the tradesmen mentioned.
I am considering making my own version of this but for Texas. I moved overseas about 3 months ago and live the state but I do have plenty to say about it that can be taken as comical.
Yes please, make Alex Krycek's helpful guide to Texas for fat Europeans.
 
Last edited:
@Spunt He likened the current state of Britain today to that of the Soviet Union in the 1980s, just before it collapsed - not so much in the nuts and bolts of what was happening but in the psychology of the ruling elite and the people alike.

Great write-up Spunt I'm taking it in in parts. Just to comment on this one line in your section on why Britain is collapsing.

Yes and no. Yes in the sense that the Communist party encouraged the laziest and the most amoral members of society to seek out membership so they can get power and perks. Instead of providing leadership, the Party inspired nothing but disdain and jealousy from people who had to stand in long breadlines because of decades-long economic mismanagement by said party, whose members had access to special well-stocked shops. Economic reforms of the mid 80's came too little too late. Social reforms such as Glastnost encouraged things that were probably better left suppressed, such as nationalism and separatism on the periphery.

No, because there were many other problems of distinctly Russian and Soviet nature. For a society allegedly building a classless society, the Soviet system was very good at creating new classes of people that didn't exist anywhere else in the world.

The Communist party nomenclature. As mentioned above had a negative selection bias and produced a corrupt, parasitic class that was divorced from the day-to-day of the people it was supposed to be leading. It and the geriatric second-generation Communists at its helm were the butt of jokes. No joke, there was a samizdat compilation dong the rounds called "1001 Political anecdotes." That's like 1001 memes about how your country is a corrupt shithole, I don't think we see anything like it today.

Dissidents. The university-educated elites of the country that hate their own country. And still do, Putin is genuinely popular with the masses, it's the liberal elites that hate him. They are known as "liberasts" from the word "pederast" and Europe is often referred to as "Gayropa." It think you get the point here.

Crowned thieves. An elite class of criminals with an internal code that rejects all moral values of not just Soviet society but any society. Decades of penal colonies has nurtured this menace and it's not going anywhere in a hurry. Similar to hood niggers worshipping gangsta clowns such as TuPac, many modern Russian youths emulate the outward trappings of the criminal class and aspire to prison codes of conduct - "ponyatiya." These are the track-suited Gopniks you have all heard about.

Oligarchs. In an unholy alliance with the above, they have degraded Soviet legacy to the ruinous state that the former republics are in now. I've heard somewhere that everything that still works, flies and functions in Russia and Ukraine was made in the 1970's. Pretty close to the truth, when you think about it. What we see happening in Ukraine and earlier in Armenia and Ajzerbajan, Georgia and earlier still the Chechen wars is a direct result of the redistribution of wealth and materiel that followed the collapse of the Soviet union.

In summary, there are parallels, but it sounds like the Brits are the agents of their own distinct misfortune. Another parallel BTW, more with the USA than with Britain the age of current politicians. 10 more years and half these people won't be with us. Who's coming to take their place? Interesting times ahead.
 
Last edited:
I talked with with some who lived in UK (not particularly hard to meet such person - it's estimated 2 million of Polacks emigrated after our country joined EU, and UK was most popular destination, chances are you had as many Polacks as Bangladeshi at the peak of our presence there, and there could be many more), they said Brits didn't seem to like us very much. Though maybe these were the tradesmen mentioned.
The Poles tended to disperse more evenly throughout the UK, compared to Pakis exclusively clumping together around areas that already had a considerable Muslim presence, and blacks being mostly concentrated in major cities. So in rural and semi-rural areas, Poles would be the main "immigrant" group you'd get, and would end up getting a considerable brunt of anti-immigrant attitudes regarding jobs and NHS places.
Those attitudes have definitely mellowed out more recently though, if only because the tidal flood of "refugees" (that aren't actually fleeing conflict) and the crime they bring make the Poles look a lot better.
 
The Poles tended to disperse more evenly throughout the UK, compared to Pakis exclusively clumping together around areas that already had a considerable Muslim presence, and blacks being mostly concentrated in major cities. So in rural and semi-rural areas, Poles would be the main "immigrant" group you'd get, and would end up getting a considerable brunt of anti-immigrant attitudes regarding jobs and NHS places.
Those attitudes have definitely mellowed out more recently though, if only because the tidal flood of "refugees" (that aren't actually fleeing conflict) and the crime they bring make the Poles look a lot better.
Makes sense. I also imagine the state was way more lenient with hate towards Central Europeans than towards blacks or muslims.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
So the show Little Brittan is a documentary then?
Right down to the sadistic, cross-dressing paedophile hiding in plain sight.

1710008794747.png
 
Tell me about Jimmy Savile. Did everyone (public and officials alike) completely bought into the lovable old eccentric angle and saw nothing wrong with granting him unrestricted to access to childrens' hospitals? Or were there obvious warning signs that were either completely ignored or covered up?
I know John Lydon (Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols) was really harshly critical of him and straight up called him a chomo, and the media lined up to defend Savile and act like Lydon was some kind of nut.
 
Tell me about Jimmy Savile. Did everyone (public and officials alike) completely bought into the lovable old eccentric angle and saw nothing wrong with granting him unrestricted to access to childrens' hospitals? Or were there obvious warning signs that were either completely ignored or covered up?
There were always rumours about him, but there were rumours about a lot of celebrities, many of which proved to be true, but some not*. I always found him very creepy and weird, even as a child. I think people in the media knew, but were intimidated into silence by his powerful friends and his ability to make money for those same media people - a lot like Harvey Weinstein.

* There were rumours for years about Cliff Richard being a nonce, for example. Then one day after the Savile story broke the Met raided his house. The BBC turned up with a helicopter full of journos 20 minutes before the Filth did - clearly Cressida Dick had tipped them off hoping to get a big win to try to salvage her reputation a bit - except they didn't find anything and Cliff sued the shit out of them.

There were also, for example, rumours I heard for years about DJ and children's presenter Timmy Mallet, but as far as I know nobody has ever looked into it seriously.

The problem always was that there were rumours about pretty much every children's presenter or prominent gay celebrity. Savile was one of them, but didn't stand out from any other name in the rumour mill in the 80s and 90s.
 
The problem always was that there were rumours about pretty much every children's presenter or prominent gay celebrity. Savile was one of them, but didn't stand out from any other name in the rumour mill in the 80s and 90s.
I'm sure there were people at the Beeb who flat out knew what he was up to, even if they didn't realize the sheer scope of his ghastly perversion, which went well beyond mere pedophilia into shit like necrophilia.
 
I'm sure there were people at the Beeb who flat out knew what he was up to, even if they didn't realize the sheer scope of his ghastly perversion, which went well beyond mere pedophilia into shit like necrophilia.
I've heard theories that Saville was friends with the Yorkshire ripper and that the tape that was sent to the cops was actually Saville
 
There were always rumours about him, but there were rumours about a lot of celebrities, many of which proved to be true, but some not...

Also, I think attitudes towards sex and sexuality have shifted. Saville was operating in the immediate aftermath of the swinging sixties. Also, some teenagers start fucking very early, everyone knows that. I think this contributed to a blasé attitude to "a bit of hanky panky."

What we're seeing now is the hangover: the outcome of the Sexual and Bi-sexual Revolutions was AIDS plus everyone's is now super-paranoid about pedos. Partly because they never found the "gay gene" and there now seems to be a strong connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse. Except, you can't talk about it because we're supposed to all be nice to gays. I think also that the generation that parented us were simply not equipped to talk about this stuff in earnest. It's partly a language barrier, because you need specialised jargon which until now was esoteric outside of the medical and law enforcement fields.

I'll give you an example. There was a serial killer around where I lived.. He was eventually caught several years later. But at the time, there were horrific rumours circulating and I remember a relative trying to warn me to be careful, because, and I'm paraphrasing, "This man will drag you down into a basement and attempt to shove broomsticks in your ass..." They were accidentally right, that's one of the things this man did to his victims, whose demographic I belonged to. I remember thinking to myself that that is a ridiculous thing to try to do. Broomsticks in ass? Why? It's almost comical. But this relative simply had no clue how to explain to a child what the danger was or how to protect myself from it, what homo is (this killer was gay), what sex is, for fuck's sake.

And that's partly the thing with Saville, I think, a general naivete about the depths of perversion some people allow themselves to enter and carry on like that for years, because they are well-connected, no-one's watching, et cetera.

The current generation is a lot more prudish about sex, one positive outcome of which has been that people like Saville were exposed. Too late, but you know, better late than never.
 
Also, I think attitudes towards sex and sexuality have shifted. Saville was operating in the immediate aftermath of the swinging sixties. Also, some teenagers start fucking very early, everyone knows that. I think this contributed to a blasé attitude to "a bit of hanky panky."
The usual "groupies fuck rock star" thing that was going on was pretty harmless compared to the stuff Savile got up to, or even the outright rape shit Jimmy Page did. That is probably why they let it slide because the depths of his perversion and sadism were not known, at least not to the general public.

I would not be at all surprised if the Yorkshire Ripper rumor is true.
 
Think of Scotland as looking a lot like Skyrim, except if instead of fighting dragons and raiding dungeons, the Nords lived in ugly Stalinist concrete tower blocks and drank Skooma all day, whilst being ruled over by Jarls who keep falsely accusing each other of sex crimes in order to climb the political ladder.
Alright, listen up, friend. Let me tell ya about the darker side of Scotland, particularly in places like Glasgow. It's like Riften, but without the Thieves Guild muckin' about. Nah, here you got real-life skeevers crawlin' through the streets, if ya catch my drift.

Crime? Oh, it's as common as a mudcrab on the shores of Lake Honrich. Pickpockets lurkin' in the shadows, thieves snatchin' whatever they can get their hands on. And don't even get me started on the gangs. They're like the Forsworn, but without the face paint. They run the streets, pushin' their skooma and makin' life miserable for everyone else.

And the drugs, oh by Talos, the drugs! It's like a plague, spreadin' through the veins of the city like a deadly poison. Heroin, cocaine, you name it. They're like potions brewed by some dark mage, turnin' good folk into mindless husks.

But ya know what? Just like in Skyrim, there are those fightin' back against the darkness. Community groups, outreach programs, tryin' to bring some light to the shadows. It's a tough battle, but they're holdin' their ground, just like the guards of Whiterun.

So, when ya walk through the streets of Glasgow, keep yer wits about ya. It's a rough place, but there's still hope, just like there's always a glimmer of light in the darkest of dungeons.
 
The usual "groupies fuck rock star" thing that was going on was pretty harmless compared to the stuff Savile got up to, or even the outright rape shit Jimmy Page did. That is probably why they let it slide because the depths of his perversion and sadism were not known, at least not to the general public.

I would not be at all surprised if the Yorkshire Ripper rumor is true.
nah they traced the yorkshire ripper letters and by extension the tape to a local guy by dna. maybe i don't get the Savile connection, but ther than him working with sound, what's the link there?
 
Back