gsv2w3erfe4
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2024
Do you think that it's easier for gruesome things to be the current thing if they're far away from home and therefore distant? Such as wars far away from home? Or is it easier when it could be used to guilt-trip the opposite political side or paint it as evil?
So the Dems could score a massive propaganda win by going after some cartoonishly evil Republican con artists... but instead they just fearmonger about "the far right"? Bizarre
I wonder if politicians like AOC might care about this. She complained about kids in ICE camps, even if she were to just do another photo op (while crying) it would help draw attention.Caged children covered in filth? Like ICE? LMAO
Some democrats are definitely in favor of these places, like the former MA state rep whose nephew was at the Judge Rotenberg Center, and blocked bills that tried to close it down. I don't know which dems have financial interest in the industry though.Dems are in on the grift because public money kids make up a lot of the current industry; they really pivoted away from a WWASPS like model and towards autistic kids, foster kids, and those court ordered in drug or violence diversions. So, yes, we can blame programs for fucked up autists now.
If the Dems were going to act on this they'd have done so in 2008 when the GAO blew the lid off of it and it was common knowledge among everyone the investigators spoke to that the Lichfields were dumping money into the GOP - congressman miller was a democrat, after all - and probably in 2012 when Mitt fucking Romney, owner of Bain Capital, that owns Aspen Education, that owns a ton of programs, had a good shot at the presidency. There's also Straight Incorporated being owned by Mel Sembler, GOP moneyman and penis pump enjoyer, who became ambassador because he literally paid for it.
There's also some who are against it. Like: https://web.archive.org/web/2024030...uro-schiff-hold-press-conference-paris-hilton
One of the things they wanted to do create a "youth bill of rights", but tthat portion apparently got scrapped in the later versions in order to gain bipartisan support.
The bill of rights was scrapped to gain bipartisan support, said Megan Stokes, executive director of the National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, a membership association dedicated to residential treatment centers.
“For some people, they’re going to look at a youth bill of rights as taking away from parental rights,” she said. “It is a very partisan time, and it’s one where the end result is focusing on the kids and their needs and making sure that they’re okay. And I think everyone can agree with the end result, but people have different ideas of what that would look like. And that’s tough to reconcile across party lines right now.”
These 2 quotes are from a news article which talks about the bill:Stokes, who said that NATSAP, the industry group, supports the fast passage of SICAA without amendment, is confident that the bill will be enacted this time around, thanks to both its bipartisan support and status as a study bill.
“There’s no mandate that goes into effect right away,” Stokes said. “That makes it a lot easier for people to want to say, ‘yeah, I can sign on to this.’”
Note that this is the same Megan Stokes who was telling these programs how to cover their ass in that leaked NATSAP call.
Interestingly, the Beau Biden foundation spoke in favor of the earlier version of the bill which still had the provisions about youth rights: https://web.archive.org/web/20230925083805/https://www.beaubidenfoundation.org/blog/acca/
Further back, some democrats actually did try to pass a bill in 2008 after the GAO report. The "Stop Child Abuse in Residential Programs for Teens Act" was first proposed in 2008.
I think this was the first version:
I took a look at it, and it seemed pretty comprehensive at a first glance. A few examples of it's sections
(B) PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN DISCIPLINARY TECHNIQUES.—Disciplinary techniques or other practices that involve the withholding of essential food, water, clothing, shelter, or medical care necessary to maintain physical health, mental health, and general safety, shall be prohibited.
(E) ACCESS TO COMMUNICATIONS.—Each child at such a program shall have reasonable access to a telephone, and be informed of their right to such access to maintain frequent contact, including making and receiving scheduled and unscheduled calls, unrestricted written correspondence, and electronic communications with as much privacy as possible, and shall have access to existing and appropriate national, State, and local child abuse reporting hotline numbers.