Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Neg rate me into oblivion but I agree with the straight pooner with extra steps. If troons and poons are to continue to enjoy license to mutilate themselves they need to stick together. The fact that pooners view trannies as larping men, while hilarious, is indicative of their still having a foot in reality. One who still has a foot in reality exposes themselves to the possibility of deconversion and detransition. Troon/Poon logic is never consistent, but what she's spouting off about is pretty standard rhetoric, and if they can't hold the line on that they're completely fucked. The subtext of her post might as well be " Hey retards, you're gonna fuck this up for everybody."

Another funny takeaway from her observations is that the basic pooner line of thought is "fuck you I got mine", entirely selfish and conceited. If troons are a study in completely unbridled sexual paraphillia's, pooners are a study in unsupervised neurotic vanity.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Thomas Eugene Paris, Slideshow Bill, Muskcarpone and 29 others
15.png
How rude. People who behave this way should be banned from the local. Man's offering you a drink and enjoying the conversation, don't start drama like a teenage girl.
 
  • Like
  • Late
  • Lunacy
Reactions: a feel, The bearer of arms, Sneaky khajiit and 12 others
Law said:
Transgenderism uses deliberately obscure language to confuse people. I find that using frank, clear language and proper terms is a good way to combat its influence.
For example, the term "birth canal". It's not easily censorable, it's not porny or vulgar, and it centers birth, a bodily function that males don't get to have. Since the trans lobby and their pet butchers have insisted on calling amholes "vaginas", saying "birth canal" is one way to get around that. Using their terms (and genuflecting and groveling to make sure you get the ever-changing, increasingly absurd terms correct) is narcissistic supply nuggets for them. Using clear, simple language shows how absurd the con is.

Edit: Sweet tap-dancing Christ on a crutch, those woman in r/FTMMen are embarrassing. Where's Reviving Ophelia when you need it?
Click to expand...
I also use "cross-sex hormones" instead of HRT. I feel that HRT is playing into the trans narrative that what they get is hormones to replace the hormones their body should have produced. Calling it "cross-sex hormones" is more accurate and put it simply that what the individual is doing is taking hormones that are of the other sex (more precisely, the amount he/she takes are of the other sex, since we all have these sex hormones in our body, but the amounts/levels are different between males and females).
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: November Golf, Essay2414778, AI generated waifu and 57 others
Law said:
Transgenderism uses deliberately obscure language to confuse people. I find that using frank, clear language and proper terms is a good way to combat its influence.
For example, the term "birth canal". It's not easily censorable, it's not porny or vulgar, and it centers birth, a bodily function that males don't get to have. Since the trans lobby and their pet butchers have insisted on calling amholes "vaginas", saying "birth canal" is one way to get around that. Using their terms (and genuflecting and groveling to make sure you get the ever-changing, increasingly absurd terms correct) is narcissistic supply nuggets for them. Using clear, simple language shows how absurd the con is.

Edit: Sweet tap-dancing Christ on a crutch, those woman in r/FTMMen are embarrassing. Where's Reviving Ophelia when you need it?
Click to expand...
Very true, another clear example of their deception and manipulation lies in the hypocrisy surrounding the "sex and gender are TOTALLY different" slogan. Yet they categorically refuse to acknowledge that a tranny is male because it conflicts with their beliefs about identity. When discussing "sex reassignment surgery" and the butchery they inflict on their genitals, they resort to justify it by using extreme examples to muddy the waters, such as some random deep sea crustacean or the 0.1% intersex born people. This strategy is purely deceitful, using outlandish comparisons to support their agenda is a cult-like behaviour.

You have to understand their jargon & play pretend to actually notice the confusion they deeply love to project on people.

A little example;

>"Lia Thomas is male."
>"Lia Thomas identifies as a woman!"
>"Alright sure, that's about gender, not sex."
>"Exactly, sex and gender are separate concepts!"
>"Okay, so Lia Thomas is a woman which is her gender but her sex is male then."
>"...ehrrrrm..."
image_2024-03-30_122925315.png

Just wait and see how they stumble over their own contradictions. There are plenty of examples where their ideology falls apart when you look at it closely.

It's obvious they rely on extreme confusion & lies to keep themselves in control. And then they go circlejerk on twitter & reddit to mock the so called "troonsphobic bigots" when someone gets any shit wrong, as if the average person can tell what some mentally ill fucked up freak is supposed to pretend to be. "Haha, troonsphobes say they can always tell!!"
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: November Golf, Essay2414778, Adjustable Autism and 31 others
Chub Nigga Rat said:
Very true, another clear example of their deception and manipulation lies in the hypocrisy surrounding the "sex and gender are TOTALLY different" slogan. Yet they categorically refuse to acknowledge that a tranny is male because it conflicts with their beliefs about identity.
Click to expand...
100%.

Chub Nigga Rat said:
0.1% intersex born people
Click to expand...
I just have to interject here - the actual rate of intersex born people is actually less than 0.02%.

statsforgender.org puts it best:

It is not true that 1.7% of the population is ‘born between the sexes’. The proportion of people with DSDs (‘intersex’ conditions) is 0.018%.​

Conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female, occur in 0.018% of the population [1].

The claim that 1.7% of the population is ‘intersex’ [2] includes conditions which most clinicians do not recognize as intersex [1], and is often wrongly used to back up the ideological assertion that ‘sex is a spectrum’, or that biological sex is not dimorphic.

The philosopher Kathleen Stock points out that she would be considered as “intersex” under Fausto-Sterling’s “preposterously over-demanding conditions on sex category membership”, as she lost an ovary in early adulthood [3], which would count as “intersex” according to Fausto-Sterling.

REFERENCES

[1] Sax, L. (2002). How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 39 (3): 174-8. [Link]

[2] Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books. [Link]

[3] Stock, K. (2021). Material Girls. Little, Brown Book Group: p.56 [Link]
Click to expand...
For comparison, more than 0.08% of the population suffer from dwarfism; I guess we should now say that the height of an adult human male starts with 54.6 cm, and we should change all of our furniture, cars, etc. to fit this height.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Essay2414778, AI generated waifu, PetiteFeet and 32 others
and I must scream said:
I just have to interject here - the actual rate of intersex born people is actually less than 0.02%.

statsforgender.org puts it best:
Click to expand...
I guess it depends on the criteria they determine whether something is “true” intersex by? Klinefelter’s for example I think is generally agreed to be an intersex condition, and if Wikipedia is correct that it occurs in 1 out of 700 men, that would account for 0.07% of all people on its own. Quite a bit more than 0.02%, and it’s just one condition (if a relatively common one?). Obviously the example given, a woman missing a single ovary, isn’t meaningfully intersex, but a man with an extra X chromosome probably should count, that has a lot of impacts on pubertal development and adult hormone levels.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Bob Abooey, Howslans, Aunt Carol and 2 others
snov said:
I guess it depends on the criteria they determine whether something is “true” intersex by? Klinefelter’s for example I think is generally agreed to be an intersex condition, and if Wikipedia is correct that it occurs in 1 out of 700 men, that would account for 0.07% of all people on its own. Quite a bit more than 0.02%, and it’s just one condition (if a relatively common one?). Obviously the example given, a woman missing a single ovary, isn’t meaningfully intersex, but a man with an extra X chromosome probably should count, that has a lot of impacts on pubertal development and adult hormone levels.
Click to expand...
I think it really depends on the specific purpose the definition. The definition above specifies cases where a karyotyping test would produce an inconsistent result from an observed phenotype. Troons are being sneaky, but the issue comes out of the imprecision of language itself.

Klinefelter's sufferers are still visibly/phenotypically male, with some physiological abnormalities. The karyotype of a Klinefelter's male would still show that they are men, just with a supplemental X chromosome. Similarly, women who suffer from Turner Syndrome are not "half-women" because they lack part or all of the second X chromosome, they are just women with an abnormal karyotype and related physiological anomalies.

I think you can contrast that type of chromosomal anomaly compared to something like Swyer Syndrome or androgen insensitivity, where the karyotype would come back as male (XY), but the visible phenotype (sex) would be female (though even in this case there are usually developmental anomaliesm but I would say that phenotypically, we would define them as female/women). Those are truly examples of where the concept of sex breaks down a bit, because the two datapoints for determining sex are contradictory. This is a weakness of the language/conceptual model of sex we use.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Amelia Troonheart, November Golf, Essay2414778 and 28 others
I was going to post only this:
behindyourightnow said:
As a bisexual trans man in his mid-twenties who prefers to date T4T and additionally prefers relationships with women
Click to expand...
I can't help but to have my eyes glaze over and to space out when I try to follow along to some troon or genderspecial talk about their "identities" and whatnot. I don't even know what mtf bisexual trans woman means. Is it a man who thinks they are a woman? A woman who wants you to pretend she is a man? Are they gay or straight? It's like those puzzles that use double, tripple, quadruple negatives in a sentence and you end up needing to pull out a pen and paper to keep track of what the fuck the poet meant to say.

And then the following posts just happened to point out exactly what I was going to go for:

Law said:
Transgenderism uses deliberately obscure language to confuse people. I find that using frank, clear language and proper terms is a good way to combat its influence.
Click to expand...
Chub Nigga Rat said:
It's obvious they rely on extreme confusion & lies to keep themselves in control.
Click to expand...

I know it's all by design but the joke is on them. I am not tricked, I am just disgusted and uninterested in trying to decypher their puzzles. I am not invested enough to attempt being friendly or curteous to those people. I just ignore their existance. The other day I got "corrected" for "misgendering" a character in a video game. I just said "I ain't into that." and kept the conversation going. Fuck all that.

And on topic of "wrongspeak" and mental gymnastics: Isn't it interesting how the worst fucking thing you can do to trannies is to "misgender" them? Isn't it funny how the actual crime is not misgendering, but gendering them correctly? Just thought that was funny, in a totally unfunny kinda way.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Essay2414778, AI generated waifu, PetiteFeet and 27 others
Chub Nigga Rat said:
It's obvious they rely on extreme confusion & lies to keep themselves in control.
Click to expand...
But also ... they rely on extreme confusion & lies to keep themselves in confusion.

The confusion is the psychological equivalent of releasing poison gas. Not just the target gets hit.

This is what peak gender euphoria looks like. 8)
Link Archive
5852626-f0b941462a37a6363cdf6a39927ab9d9.png

1.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: Essay2414778, The bearer of arms, PetiteFeet and 69 others
Law said:
I always figure the troons are delusional enough to think "Huh. Um, ok, whatever floats your boat. I don't think I can say anything else without it being unprofessional." means "ZOMG bestie!! No waaaay I totes thought you were a girl this whoooole time! You're sooooo much prettier than meee!"
Fun Powerlevel: for work I recently had to complete California law sexual harassment and discrimination training. One of the examples used in the training was a transwoman being told he couldn't join a group of female employees for lunch because they told him he wasn't "girly enough." According to the training, this could count as discrimination based on gender identity, a protected characteristic, and the hypothetical troon could file an EEOC complaint (if he could find the time between masturbating and yelling at women on Twitter - unlikely, but this is a fictional scenario).
Some workarounds for this scenario:
"You can't eat with us cause this is only for people in X department/only for employees of more than 5 years experience/we don't know you well enough/some other bullshit that doesn't use the trigger word "girly"."
This legislation means troons will still be excluded because they are creepy weirdoes who are insane, but we just can't tell them why they're being excluded using gendered terms.
Click to expand...

I would let him sit with me and my group, at least once 😊 then when he says something really fucked up, there are plenty of witnesses to report his behavior to HR for sexual harassment.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Essay2414778, socketmaster, PetiteFeet and 24 others
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Essay2414778, ApeBass, Not a bee and 13 others
Geraldine said:
But also ... they rely on extreme confusion & lies to keep themselves in confusion.

The confusion is the psychological equivalent of releasing poison gas. Not just the target gets hit.

This is what peak gender euphoria looks like. 8)
Link Archive
View attachment 5863024
View attachment 5863026
Click to expand...
If that's peak gender euphoria I want nothing to do with it, that's what I imagine Jason looks like under the hockey mask. Dudes eyes are so black i bet he has been smoking meth since he was 16, kids don't do drugs or you'll look like this DARE
Gondolindrim said:
"Some guy thought I was pretty and I'm very upset about it"

What a problem to have
Click to expand...
Some guy thought I was pretty even though I'm fat like all pooners and have a pube beard
Cringey Edgelord said:
LMAO. At the end of the day, spicy straight pooners are really just the most hardcore evolution of "not like other girls."
Click to expand...
Too bad they are not evolution of cash me outside girls, i think that'd be even funnier
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Essay2414778, The Holy Empress Theodora, Not a bee and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back