Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I'd rather work with a pajeet than a troon, because the pajeet will most likely just ignore me, and I could still report pajeet moid behavior to HR without too much drama. Report troons for troon shit and you're going to be treated like an evil bigot.

And regarding Mr Poopybutthole, I just don't understand why a woman would even act like basic hygiene is some precarious topic. Fucking tell him to wash his stinking ass or give him the boot. There is no moid dick worth living with shit stink.
 
I'd rather work with a pajeet than a troon, because the pajeet will most likely just ignore me, and I could still report pajeet moid behavior to HR without too much drama. Report troons for troon shit and you're going to be treated like an evil bigot.

And regarding Mr Poopybutthole, I just don't understand why a woman would even act like basic hygiene is some precarious topic. Fucking tell him to wash his stinking ass or give him the boot. There is no moid dick worth living with shit stink.
If men and women should agree on at least one thing, hygiene is honestly at the top of the list.
Everyone, wash yo’ self.
 
Abolishing female colleges
That didn't happen. They're not abolished and they didn't die after WWII. The peak was supposedly around 1960, at 230 (I saw 261 somewhere, but close enough) or so.** Yes, there are fewer and fewer, but when I was in college (long after WWII, tyvm - by 45 years or so), there were many girls' schools still - Smith*, Wellesley*, Sweet Briar*, Mount Holyoke*, Hollins*, Barnard*, St. Catherine's (St. Kate's)*, Scripps*, Spelman*, Bryn Mawr*, Wesleyan (College, not University)*, Mary Baldwin (admitted residential men first in 2017), Radcliffe (until 1999) - I've seen ## today stated as 26-35, not sure why the range from recent data, but at least a couple dozen. As ever, they tend to be small, private, and pricey, many are selective, and there are many more on the East Coast then other parts of the country, but they exist.

* still women's colleges, though of course many are partnered/affiliated and many co-learn with men's schools.

** all-male college numbers peaked in the several hundreds (in the 19th c, iirc, though women couldn't even go until around 1835-37 (depending on your source)), and all-male colleges are down to just 3-5, depending on criteria

Btw, why did all-male schools go co-ed? Pure competition, as men were turning down single-sex opportunities in favor of coed:
In the United States, coeducation happened because it was in the strategic self-interest of all-male institutions like Princeton and Yale to admit women. By the late 1960s, these schools were beginning to see their applications decline, along with their yields. The high school students they called the “best boys” no longer wanted to go to all-male institutions, and the key issue was their ability to continue to attract those “best boys.” (Harvard had begun to pull away from Princeton and Yale in the competition for the best high school students.) Coedu- cation became the means for places like Princeton and Yale to shore up a first-rate applicant pool and enrolled student body. It was not the result of a high-minded moral commitment to opening educational opportunities to women, nor was it the result of deep thinking about how to educate women. Rather, it was about what women could do for previously all-male institutions—about how women would help these schools renew their hold on the “best boys.”
 
Moids who act like women are a monolith with hive-think are boring discussion killers. Troon topics are exemplary of this. 'Theyre (women) getting what they deserve!!' There are women who are happy with troons. There are women who are unhappy with troons. There are women who dont care. There are women who exist who are happily married to troons.
Either its bait or its autism: given that I see it the most on the farms, I'm betting on the latter.
The rhetoric is same old same old and it makes half the farms feel as dull and prototypical as reddit. You open a thread and you can already predict the comments before reading them. Parts of the site have just become Edgy Reddit and its incredibly boring.
Maybe its always been this way and the novelty has just worn off at this point, but barring certain threads (90% BP) I feel like a significant portion of KF has simply become a bastard child loaded with reddit/4chan moid castaways and teenagers
 
That's an extremely nice way to say girl scouts focuses on selling cookies and doing lame crafts in the leaders McMansion.
Yea, if you're a Daisy, Brownie, or Junior (aka elementary schoolers). I can't stand Girl Scout slander, especially from someone who doesn't know too much about it. Honestly you seem like you got burned by some mean girls in GS and now you're kinda malding about it and saying that it's inferior.
The GS experience depends on the troop leader tbh. I had two, one who was more of the domestic type and the other who was outdoorsy.
Girl Scouts has something called Bronze, Silver, and Gold Award. Its all about finding something you can fix in your community and solving it.
Bronze is started at about fourth grade and its pretty simple. Can't remember much about it.
When you hit middle school you start process on the Silver Award, which is given when you (or your troop) conduct a project that leaves impact on your community or the world. The scouts writes a proposal which is then approved by a board and then we all get together and do it. I think mine was sending cloth diapers to Haiti after the earthquake. Yea it aint much but it was ours.
Gold is a solo endeavor and is completed in high school. That also has to be approved by a board and put into action by you. Its much more work and your proposal has to be impactful. About the same percentage of GS get the Gold award as BS get Eagle Scout. It isn't something to scoff at. I didn't get it because I was lazy and focused on other things but friends who did it said it was hard doing it by themselves.
You don't see that many GS selling cooking in high school because they're focusing on their schoolwork and the Gold Award.
 
The GS experience depends on the troop leader tbh. I had two, one who was more of the domestic type and the other who was outdoorsy.
Then there are a lot of dogshit troop leaders and GS needs to get that shit under control ASAP, because my GS experience is hardly unique. It absolutely is inferior if so many troops don't do even basic scouting shit like camping in tents or learning knots.

What does it say that troop quality control is so bad specifically in the girls scouting org? What does it say so many troops aren't doing even basic scouting shit specifically in the female scouts?

Girls don't even get cool animal-named ranks, we just get lame shit like brownies and seniors.

I still maintain that gendering scouts is retarded and an outdated relic of a much shittier, even more misogynistic time period that most countries have already done away with.

Leave it to the US to still be doing something backassed and retarded long after every other developed country stopped.
 
Last edited:
Men are retarded and stinky.

Men will say women are idiots but when you try to make them do "women's work", they say it's too hard and difficult. And the funny thing is that they'll be detached from their children's lives and then will get upset why they get shitty father's day gifts.

You fucking dolt, you barely interact with your children. Of course there's no bond between you and your kids.

If you ever have to choose between sending your daughter or son to school, send your daughter because that's probably going to be the one raising your kids. Your son is just going to be detached from them anyway.
 
Then there are a lot of dogshit troop leaders and GS needs to get that shit under control ASAP, because my GS experience is hardly unique. It absolutely is inferior if so many troops don't do even basic scouting shit like camping in tents or learning knots.

What does it say that troop quality control is so bad specifically in the girls scouting org? What does it say so many troops aren't doing even basic scouting shit specifically in the female scouts?

Girls don't even get cool animal-named ranks, we just get lame shit like brownies and seniors.

I still maintain that gendering scouts is retarded and an outdated relic of a much shittier, even more misogynistic time period that most countries have already done away with.

Leave it to the US to still be doing something backassed and retarded long after every other developed country stopped.
I remember seeing tv ads for camp fire girls and never knew why they existed until I heard my peers' older sisters complain that all they did in girl scouts was make pot holders and visit old folks' homes.

image_2024-04-10_212847000.pngimage_2024-04-10_212936349.png
 
I remember seeing tv ads for camp fire girls and never knew why they existed until I heard my peers' older sisters complain that all they did in girl scouts was make pot holders and visit old folks' homes.

View attachment 5895851View attachment 5895852
Looks like they started as girls only, but have been unisex since the 70s.

Really is kind of amazing any gendered scouting has managed to persist as long as it has in the US and I'm sure money is the only reason (cookie money for GS and Mormon tugboat for BSA up until the past decade).

I feel like half the people I talk to that were in GS thought it was lame.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: I'm a Silly
No need. You could easily guess the first few comments based on the title.
And it’s usually the same old copy-paste shit for the entirety of the first page, exactly the kind of autism you’d see on Reddit but with a right-wing slant.

“Let’s play guess the race!”
“Women, you voted for this. Suffer from the consequences of your own actions.”
“Oh look! The thing that never happens, happened again!”

These were mainly the same assholes who bitched at Null about taking away their precious stickers, so yeah I’m sticking with my theory that they were post-2019 Reddit rejects who never got over the fact that repeating the same tired statements that coincided with the hive-mind meant it got the most updoots, therefore they believe they’re making good arguments. They get ass-blasted when somebody tries to express dissenting opinions, especially when it’s a female user who does it. No matter how logical you can come across, they’ll throw a bitch fit in a vein similar to the SJW’s they mock, hijack other threads, and go crying over to daddy Null and the Thunderdome mods. There’s a reason they bash Reddit so ardently.

Also much for being for free speech, eh? You fucking hypocritical retards.

I lurked for many years before creating an account on Kiwifarms so I’ve been here for quite a while. It really does feel like the culture here is declining because of these people. These past few weeks Null has been pretty upset with how the user base has been acting, and I can’t say I blame him. I am for free-speech but when you’re doing nothing but spewing the same bullshit hive-mind conservatoid opinions and getting butthurt at people who express different perspectives and bitching at the site owner for not taking their side all the time, I’m sorry but it’s your time to go. They were used to getting their way on other sites before coming here. These people are absolute poison to any community.

I’ll take my tophats now.
 
Especially since KF was never supposed to be a /pol/ echo chamber, being any kind of echo chamber goes directly against what this place is supposed to be. Fragile snowflake tradtard moids get hysterical when they're reminded that this site isn't one of their /pol/ reject telegram servers.
 
“Oh look! The thing that never happens, happened again!”
there was a subreddit called 'this never happens' that was so called due to TRA gaslighting which claimed that women and girls were never molested in restrooms, &c.; when it got inevitably banned, we'd post "that thing that never happens happened again" [usually on twitter] and that was over 5 years ago, so if the kissless virgins are using it, they're stealing from GCs/radfems
 
there was a subreddit called 'this never happens' that was so called due to TRA gaslighting which claimed that women and girls were never molested in restrooms, &c.; when it got inevitably banned, we'd post "that thing that never happens happened again" [usually on twitter] and that was over 5 years ago, so if the kissless virgins are using it, they're stealing from GCs/radfems
Moids, stealing shit from women and taking the credit for it??

Say it isn’t so!
 
Ladies, can you explain why this happens? We all know guys who dont even try and somehow get a long relationship like this. It is baffling. I've known women who put up with such awful shit that this isnt uncommon to me.
Some common ones:

1) Low expectations due to having gross men in her family and/or in relationships. Some may believe it's normal for a woman to have to nag her partner to wipe his ass, they're just frustrated because it's taking so long to sink in.

2) Terrified of putting her foot down in case this prize leaves her and she'll never find a man as sweet as him again. It really is just the hygiene issue, really.

3) Making the (wrong, stupid) assumption that if you partner up with a guy who is less desirable, then that man will be grateful and appreciative and faithful. Dismayed when this is not the case.
 
Then there are a lot of dogshit troop leaders and GS needs to get that shit under control ASAP, because my GS experience is hardly unique. It absolutely is inferior if so many troops don't do even basic scouting shit like camping in tents or learning knots.
I agree that not every troop is focused on doing outdoor activities all of the time but that is the fault of the troop leaders and this is also the same for Boy scouts too. Not every boy scout badge is focused on shooting and climbing and not every girl scout badge is collaging and makeup proficiency. The fact that there isn't a standardized curriculum is what makes each Girl Scout troop and Boy Scout troop unique. Its a very American way of doing it - big government isn't really liked. The quality control comes in when there are applications for the high level awards.
You also have to realize that the troop leaders are often the mothers/father's of one of the girls/boys in the troop. We all know that mothers have less free time than fathers as they are expected to do additional household work and child rearing. Therefore they would have less time to plan larger scale activities for their troop.
Girls don't even get cool animal-named ranks, we just get lame shit like brownies and seniors.
Stop acting like you know what you're talking about. There's seven tanks for Boy Scouts and only one is named after an animal (Scout, tenderfoot, second, first, star, life, eagle). The Girl Scout ranks are similarly named (daisies, brownies, juniors, cadettes, seniors, ambassadors).
Like we get it you didn't have a great girl scout experience and now you want to burn it all down
 
I agree that not every troop is focused on doing outdoor activities all of the time but that is the fault of the troop leaders and this is also the same for Boy scouts too. Not every boy scout badge is focused on shooting and climbing and not every girl scout badge is collaging and makeup proficiency. The fact that there isn't a standardized curriculum is what makes each Girl Scout troop and Boy Scout troop unique. Its a very American way of doing it - big government isn't really liked. The quality control comes in when there are applications for the high level awards.
You also have to realize that the troop leaders are often the mothers/father's of one of the girls/boys in the troop. We all know that mothers have less free time than fathers as they are expected to do additional household work and child rearing. Therefore they would have less time to plan larger scale activities for their troop.
I remember 0 badges in girl scouts for shooting and climbing, at least at the 9/10 year old level. Or anything else I liked (the only animal-related badges were horse-related, which kickstarted this weird phase of hating horses that as an adult i realize was kid me trying to rebel against gendered expectations and norms using horses as a symbol of that).

If you liked GS that's cool, plenty of girls thought it sucked and it gets criticized for a reason.

That said the issues with GS are minor in comparison to the worst issues with BSA (since afaik GS doesn't have sex abuse scandals going back almost a century).
 
Stop acting like you know what you're talking about. There's seven tanks for Boy Scouts and only one is named after an animal (Scout, tenderfoot, second, first, star, life, eagle). The Girl Scout ranks are similarly named (daisies, brownies, juniors, cadettes, seniors, ambassadors).
Like we get it you didn't have a great girl scout experience and now you want to burn it all down
is it possible that Cub Scouts have the animal ranks?
image_2024-04-10_233811256.pngimage_2024-04-10_234003869.png
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Android raptor
Back