Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
My question to neo-landmine detonation sites is how these true&honest women even walk afterwards, when there’s a plethora of muscle bands and tendons that got a tunnel drilled in. Even in old age the tendons and muscles loose elasticity, and I know for a fact none of these horsepiss heroes are athletic enough to salvage whatever muscle is left, for fear of a grand canyon splitting their crotch down their feminine taint. Are there any infos on non-wheelchair riding senior trannies?
 
she has a rotdog, two cysts underneath, and a micro dick at the very bottom!!! micro dick passes better than that rotdog, why surgery?
The sad little labia "balls" are always some of the funniest things about Pooners trying to show off their heccin' valid manly 'dogs.
The 'dogs are often too high or off center too, and the weird little crinkled up labia "balls" look like a drunk Chinese cook botched a batch of fortune cookies, dropped them on the floor so they got hairs stuck to them, then over cooked them in dirty grease and served them anyway.
As for the micro peen, it looks like she opted to refuse "burial" of the T mutated Hyena clit Pooners develop, so I guess at least she's not as crazy as some of these women, who have the thing "buried" at the base of their 'dog.
I don't have a clit but the thought of someone taking a scapel to one makes my balls hurt for some reason.
 
The best minds in "science" at the time where still trying to find the fucking Philosophers Stone to turn Lead into Gold ffs.
Trying to turn Lead into gold is way more sane than trying to turn dick into vag.

Our "science" isn't great either. It's still barbaric, nonsensical & downright evil. Children are getting chopped up because of an insane gender ideology.
 
Last edited:
GMKfFcBaAAAi2QT.jpg
 
Trying to turn Lead into gold is way more sane than trying to turn dick into vag.
This is so true.

I can only speak for myself, but trying to figure out what the fuck is going wrong with each one of these crotch destruction surgeries feels a lot like "Let's read the tea leaves to illuminate which scapulomancy interpretation we should follow".

There is a crazy amount of human experimentation going on in real time with no data to back up the efficacy or long term consequences and, as @Mellow Malevolent said, they don't even share or document their surgical techniques properly.

It's just medical depravity.
 
Agree with @Procrastinhater here. I am going to need to see a source for a successful stinkditch installation pre-anaesthesia and antibiotics. Castration sure, that’s been going on a long time. The kind of gnostic flesh Lego stuff we have now absolutely not.
It's being slippery with definitions and what is being described again. Cosmetic vaginal surgery (which is what they are talking about) does have a long history going back to Soranus of Ephesus in the first century AD.

Penile inversion vaginoplasty on the other hand, are much more recent (as in the 50s), and more and more wide development since then because of Christine Jorgensen (your prototypical frail, inadequately masculine gay boy who transitions because he doesn't feel manly enough) to popularizing the idea of sex reassignment surgery in the media at the time

Screenshot 2024-04-27 at 11-31-19 The History of Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty Technique.png

Things like Peritoneal pull-through and colonvags only have limited studies from the 2010s, with a small amount of surgeries performed before then (those being the surgeries the early studies on complications were done on). They've exploded in popularity since then, and again, no one is bothering with best practices or techniques so every back-alley butcher is free to do whatever they want under the premise that these operations are "safe" because a much more cautious surgeon also did them a couple of decades ago. It's a total perversion of how medical science and best practice is supposed to work.

This link (text above is taken from there) is from the journal of Urology and does a really good job of laying out the specifics of vaginoplasty as a practice, even if it is obviously framed in a very positive way.
 
Last edited:
being slippery with definitions and what is being described again. Cosmetic vaginal surgery (which is what they are talking about) does have a long history going back to Soranus of Ephesus in the first century AD.
I mean yeah if they want to include the shit Nero did to Sporus, (real "affirming" that was :story:) or that weird fuck Elagabalus, but thats still not "SRS" as is understood now.
Its disingenuous as fuck lol.
But then, Troons...
Shit while we're on we might as well throw in the Cult of Attis too, their priests used to cut off their own junk with pottery shards and smash it off the Statue of Attis at their festival.
 
Last edited:
I mean yeah if they want to include the shit Nero did to Sporus, (real "affirming that was :story:) or that weird fuck Elagabalus, but thats still not "SRS" as is understood now.
Its disingenuous as fuck lol.
But then, Troons...
Shit while we're on we might as well throw in the Cult of Attis too, their priests used to cut off their own junk with pottery shards and smash it off the Statue of Attis at their festival.
Yes, it's in keeping with how they understand all of history. Anything other than a strict gender binary being understood and enforced at any time in history is taken as proof that validating the absurd notion of physical transition via surgery or the equivalence of biological and trans women have always been around. Sporus and Elagabalus are both used as direct examples, despite the fact that the first one is just child abuse and the second one literally ended with the guy dying because he was, yes, fucking crazy.

You see this in the way the totally distort and homogenize gender variance in Pre-columbian cultures in the Americas. It's all boiled down to "two-spirits" were trans "shamans" when in actuality the practices and social status varied wildly. The glaringly elephant in the room with all this historical revisionism is that basically all of the examples they point to are social structures to deal with effeminacy in men, That is the thing that cultures are always looping around, even modern day culture where the flamboyant fags are the most focused on group in gay men. That is the thing that everthing from shamans to Corinthians tries to metabolize in a society, the idea of a man being like a woman.

Masculinity in women is a very different thing, and the need to actively punish it is much more of a modern re-framing of history than people realize. It's 19th century conceptions of a feminine nature and pathologizing behavior outside of it. Before that women were mostly punished for not being sexually available to men, or fears of infidelity, and many cultures had specific niches where women occupying the roles of men could exist as sort of honorary men. And again, this tied to sexual availability, the most glaring and direct example of this being the Albanian sworn virgins who live as men specifically because they have taken a social role to avoid sexual contact with them. Albanian society evolved a social role to specifically allow women who did not want to be wives to exist as men, contingent on the notion that they would not allow any man at all to sleep with them.

Again, effeminacy in men, sexual availability (and with that, fatherhood fears) in women. These are the focus points of so much of culture generation across time and space. Different cultures have dealt with it very differently, in many ways that both align or don't with modern humanist notions, but the issues being dealt with go back to basic intersexual dynamics, and evolved traits relating to intrasexual competition and cooperation.

The actual picture of gender in human societies is a nuanced and variable thing in basically the opposite way troons and their enablers frame it. No one previously was obsessed with switching sex, even men like Christine Jorgensen that I mentioned above only go through with early SRS because it's given to then as a solution to not being adequately manly. It's a modern solution that presupposes rather than eliminates a gender binary. It tells people that yes, you suck as what you are, you are broken. And in so doing also enables a whole host of creppy obsessive behaviors in a bunch of porn-sick autistics.
 
Last edited:
There must be a correlation between neovagina’s and sepsis. An actual vagina is a self-cleaning orifice that will release discharge if there is an infection, and even then women will usually have to take antibiotics because it can’t always flush out all the bacteria. Since a neovagina is basically a pocket that isn’t a proper orifice, the amount of bacteria that festers in there must be incredibly high, not to imagine the necrosis that starts to set in from it being forced open all the time and never allowed to heal. It doesn’t really matter in the end of the owner of said neovagina is douching and dilating. The body is going to still do anything it can to close it up, including the discharging of pus, which is laden with bacteria.

So basically, lack of daily hygiene of the area can be dangerous because of bacterial accumulation, yet keeping the neovagina open only increases its chance of becoming infected (because it’s essentially an open wound). There’s not really a winning scenario with bottom surgery for trans women. There will eventually be complications. I feel since these surgeries are still pretty new we won’t be seeing studies about the severe negative effects of neovagina construction for a while, but I guarantee they’re gonna come. Soon.
And then these idiots are convinced that they don’t have to the douche because they believe it’s now magically a fully working vagina.
 
The SRS surgeons used to say it's just "aesthetically" a vagina, but non functional. Maybe 15-20 years ago trans were stating they just couldn't handle having a bulge so they wanted the aesthetics of the opposite genitals, but somewhere along the way it got passed off that the surgery gives you functioning genitalia of the opposite gender, like every piece is exactly the same and works the same, and troons believed it immediately.

But I distintcly remember seeing some tlc or bbc documentary about srs surgery and the surgeon on camera saying like this is JUST for a visual look of a vagina, it is NOT gonna act like a real one and the troon was like sign me up for it anyway.
 
Slight PL but I have a minor surgery in a few hours and I'm looking through this thread to ease my worries. At least this is necessary for my health and I won't wake up with an origami crane as genitals. To willing put yourself through this will never not shock me and all for a fetish or for immense self hatred. It's mind boggling.
You must update us. Did you wake up with a shredder pussy?

(Hope your surgery went well and you're recovering as planned.)
 
Can any medfags tell me what the FUCK we are looking at? It looked like a garlic clove, then some pizza dough, then just pure nightmare fuel. Some sort of infection…?? My brain cant comprehend this.
Looks like thick slough that formed over too fast and has bacteria under it/in it. The neolabias or whatever the fuck you want to call them are shiny and that might be biofilm from the bacteria.

Now obviously I'm not a neovagina surgeon so I have no idea what the fuck was done to the trauma tunnel and what could have been done to avoid this, but what I'm thinking happened is that the pissing canal was stuck with slough that was formed from the inflammation, the guy tried pissing through it, failed, pee got stuck and everything got infected.

They shouldn't be letting patients leave the hospital before they can pee in the first place to avoid shit like this so anything goes in answering "what the fuck happened?"
 
Sure, I believe that 16th century trans surgeries happened.
Just like I believe that Joan of Arc was a nonbinary two spirit, George Eliot was expressing her true masculine identity.....and all the other revisionist bullshit that the troons spout off at every opportunity to rationalize their delusions.
I was looking for new history podcast to listen to the other day and got really excited when I found one about the Middle Ages, only to find an episode called "Medieval Trans Saints and Sex Workers" when I was doing my perfuntory scan for exactly that kind of shit. *sigh*
 
Back