Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a bear or a man? - aka Debate user doodoocaca on the validity of rape victims

Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a bear or a man?


  • Total voters
    199
Where you've gone wrong is thinking they don't. They do, they're almost certainly being intentionally obtuse because they've been socialized to lean into emotions put into them, or, socialized to cry victimhood in a politicized way, while also told to minimize criticisms of minorities.
Said the one who called a user a bitch and a cunt for disagreeing with you.
They clearly know men aren't dangerous or they would not go outside, full stop. Likewise, they would not antagonize half of humanity unless they knew this was performative.
I see you chose to ignore the sources I sent you that showed the assault statistics. Not all men are dangerous, many aren't, but again, there is always a risk that a woman, particularly when she is alone, of being targeted by a man. Women want to partake in society, too.
 
retards.png


We need a separate poll to see how many of these Farmers are legitimately retarded vs just trolling
 
Who the hell starts a conversation with that? Anyway, nature is fucking cruel there is no mercy and there is no reasoning. If I run into a man there is a good chance I can communicate and or reason with him. Not so with a bear, worse I won’t know what to do to calm him or her down. Also can’t outrun it or fight it so yeah I’m taking my chances with the man. Who knows, we could become friends in the end!
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: The Deep State
Just as most white liberals do know about black violence and the truth about the black undertow, as demonstrates by the choices they make in where they live, send children to school etc..The liberal hivemind is fraught with cognitive dissonance on a staggering scale.

Groupthink gonna group, to put it the way the kids would.

It's performative and mostly held as that, and only that, yes - but the problem is when anything is repeated enough people internalize it and see it as true because many if not most people are mentally on par with a moldy spongecake.
 
How the fuck do you retards manage to make everything about politics? Or race? Or liberals? Your all just as bad as leftists in terms of politicizing every fucking topic.
Because those are the things that matter, and it is what informs any intelligent analysis. The prospect of being in forest with a man depends on many different variables, as I explained. Race is one, high or low trust society is another. Where society is on the continuum of order vs chaos is another. Homogenety, rejecting democracy and overthrowing socalled democratic forms of government and embracing socalled "patriarchy" are the keys to restoring order and preventing a mad max, camp of the samps post-apocolyptic scenario.
 
Last edited:
Said the one who called a user a bitch and a cunt for disagreeing with you.

Why are you mad? This is a gossip site full of men.

I see you chose to ignore the sources I sent you that showed the assault statistics.

Because it is a waste of my time to explain to you how loaded and flawed it is, not because you couldn't understand it with some study and effort on your part, but because you would not ever admit it publicly even if you did privately.

Not all men are dangerous, many aren't, but again, there is always a risk that a woman, particularly when she is alone, of being targeted by a man. Women want to partake in society, too.

What risk? Are we talking about averaging everything up in a retarded manner, including your own risk, or respective to a man in question, the woman in question, and their demographics & ages?

You keep avoiding the fact that the lion's share of one's lifetime rape risk is as a child. None of these conversations ever even remotely brush against the welfare of children or child rape, ever. You use them as a prop to look like a victim around your enablers and other people who get off on this.

Can you even grasp the pareto principle (though it's likely far more lopsided than 80/20, more like 97/3) of who does the harming of others in society? Of course you can. Would you ever admit it?

Why waste time on you? This is clearly just attention seeking with no forethought put into how it affects others, or even yourself in the long term. Why not just call you whatever pisses you off, since you yourself seem so invested in antagonizing men you claim are dangerous while clearly treating them as able to tolerate your nonsense?

How the fuck do you retards manage to make everything about politics? Or race? Or liberals? Your all just as bad as leftists in terms of politicizing every fucking topic.

How are you so retarded you're engaging in extremely politicized actions and then try to pretend it isn't?

Stop acting like a fucking child and you'll be treated like an adult.
 
@doodoocaca And yet the studies you linked from the conservative website aren’t flawed??

I linked you three fucking websites with different sources and they all explicitly went into assault statistics, and yet you brush these off whilst completely buying into emotional anti-feminist fluff pieces.

By the way, I’m aware a large percentage of rapes happen when one is a minor. I still don’t know how that negates my point considering girls who have been raped have a likelihood of being raped when they’re adults. Also 90% of adult rape victims are female. You keep assuming women victimize themselves when there’s been a shit ton of advocacy for rape victims from women.
 
How are you so retarded you're engaging in extremely politicized actions and then try to pretend it isn't?

Stop acting like a fucking child and you'll be treated like an adult.
don't even bother
the supposed meaning behind their words changes depending on how much influence it'll give them in the conversation
they'll say they didn't mean it and then say they did just to make you look like an idiot but really it's the oldest trick in the book for mid and nitwits
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: The Deep State
are making a decision that is informed by their past traumas and abuse.
These brain-rotten zombies are making their decisions about the latest shallow TikTok trend, which is like all before them, about clout chasing, about their actual deeply felt emotions and not what they think will get them more engagement.

LOL, that is the most optimistic post I have read in a while.
 
@doodoocaca For someone that's seemingly so passionate about exposing child abuse you sure are insensitive to the fact that many of these women choosing "bear" are making a decision that is informed by their past traumas and abuse.

You use vague terminology for a reason. Most women say this because it's popular.

Indeed, as someone who has spent 20 years dealing with actually hurt people, I know how they communicate, and it isn't like this.

In any case it's just a dumb tiktok trend calm dowm

And here's the pivot. It's totally important until someone finally out argues this bullshit and calls it out then it's just dumb and just put up with it okay? You obviously aren't a danger or we wouldn't antagonize you!

@doodoocaca And yet the studies you linked from the conservative website aren’t flawed??

I linked you three fucking websites with different sources and they all explicitly went into assault statistics, and yet you brush these off whilst completely buying into emotional anti-feminist fluff pieces.

By the way, I’m aware a large percentage of rapes happen when one is a minor. I still don’t know how that negates my point considering girls who have been raped have a likelihood of being raped when they’re adults. Also 90% of adult rape victims are female. You keep assuming women victimize themselves when there’s been a shit ton of advocacy for rape victims from women.

You: OMG DON'T POLITICIZE

Also you: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POLITICS

You, yet again: I'm not even addressing the actual chance of being raped, but I'll talk about the breakdown of who WAS raped.

You, finally: Women don't rape women!

don't even bother
the supposed meaning behind their words changes depending on how much influence it'll give them in the conversation
they'll say they didn't mean it and then say they did just to make you look like an idiot but really it's the oldest trick in the book for mid and nitwits

You never argue with someone to change their opinion. You do it so someone else can learn from it watching on the sidelines. Shit sux.
 
Last edited:
You: OMG DON'T POLITICIZE

Also you: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POLITICS

You, yet again: I'm not even addressing the actual chance of being raped, but I'll talk about the breakdown of who WAS raped.

You, finally: Women don't rape women!
The websites I linked aren’t even political. What I’m talking about isn’t even politics. I’m talking about rates of assault.

Also I sincerely hope you’re not working with women if it’s true you’ve spent 2 decades “helping people”. If so, why do you hate women so much?
 
I hope you don't actually work with abused or traumatized people in real life because holy shit lol

You continue speaking from ignorance. Let me elucidate for you:

Us survivors are actually pretty good about not making blanket statements about even staff, and try to call out people who do that. Why is it these "I or my friend was totally (almost) raped!" types engage in it?

The websites I linked aren’t even political. What I’m talking about isn’t even politics. I’m talking about rates of assault.

With biases that lean the way you want them to, yes.

Also I sincerely hope you’re not working with women if it’s true you’ve spent 2 decades “helping people”. If so, why do you hate women so much?

>With women 🙄

I know I won't get through to you, at least not publicly, but do you not realize how you come across to everyone who isn't up the same asshole you are?

Survivors want to be believed and listened to, they don't blame every fucking person who was ever remotely like the person who hurt them. This has been my experience for a very long time.

You, on the other hand, are engaged in political theater and attention seeking and drama generation.
 
Back