Can someone explain this movie franchise to me? I don't get it

Haven't found anything for 635.
Got ya covered!

706907-635pm-pst-0-1000-0-1500-crop.jpg

Watch it if you like:
 


Unfortunately that wouldn't work there would need to be some break between the 648 and 0 in the title. and the Auschwitz films full title is 65316 without any break between the 653 and 16

After doing a cursory glance on IMDB we might have trouble with the following on the way to 700.

653
657
659
661
662
670
673
675
676
683
687
689
691
692
693
694
696

Not to mention what we're already missing: 564,572, and 648

I think it's finally truly over.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately that wouldn't work there would need to be some break between the 648 and 0 in the title. and the Auschwitz films full title is 65316 without any break between the 653 and 16

After doing a cursory glance on IMDB we might have trouble with the following on the way to 700.

653
657
659
661
662
670
673
675
676
683
687
689
691
692
693
694
696

Not to mention what we're already missing: 564,572, and 648

I think it's finally truly over.
Does a trailer count for 648?
648.png

Found 564

1715216333756.png


and 572
572.png

 
Last edited:
Unfortunately that wouldn't work there would need to be some break between the 648 and 0 in the title. and the Auschwitz films full title is 65316 without any break between the 653 and 16

After doing a cursory glance on IMDB we might have trouble with the following on the way to 700.

653
657
659
661
662
670
673
675
676
683
687
689
691
692
693
694
696

Not to mention what we're already missing: 564,572, and 648

I think it's finally truly over.
Would this count for 661?
661.jpg
 
Good finds, my vote would be yes on 564, per the video description it was entered into and won in the fiction category film festival, the Mascarilla Film Festival, it's inclusion in a festival legitimizes it as a movie.

I would also say yes on 648, I was a bit hesitant at first, Googling showed '648' is the name of a short album, however when I checked out the artist's YouTube the video associated had this in the description.
648.png

This indicates that at some point there was indeed a movie titled "648" which had it's own independent soundtrack.

I'm a bit hesitant to say yes to 572 though as that is an ARG Youtube Series and not a stand alone film. I'm not sure we're counting Youtube Videos
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WhiteNight
Good finds, my vote would be yes on 564, per the video description it was entered into and won in the fiction category film festival, the Mascarilla Film Festival, it's inclusion in a festival legitimizes it as a movie.

I would also say yes on 648, I was a bit hesitant at first, Googling showed '648' is the name of a short album, however when I checked out the artist's YouTube the video associated had this in the description.
View attachment 5973658

This indicates that at some point there was indeed a movie titled "648" which had it's own independent soundtrack.

I'm a bit hesitant to say yes to 572 though as that is an ARG Youtube Series and not a stand alone film. I'm not sure we're counting Youtube Videos
What about this one for 572?
572(2).png
The description says "A short college documentary of my journey to college."

 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: WhiteNight
What about this one for 572?
View attachment 5973680
The description says "A short college documentary of my journey to college."

It's really tough but I think it does.

From what I understand from watching this thread in order for a film to pass the test of counting it has to have at least one of the following things to legitimize it as a film and not just a youtube video.

1. An IMDB thread
2. Have a wikipedia page
3. Have been submitted to a film festival
4. Have been screened or shown somewhere in a formal capacity
5. Have something uniquely film about it (such as it's own custom soundtrack)
6. Has been released on some format (DVD, VHS, Beta etc)
7. Been created by somebody known as a filmmaker who intended for this to be seen as a film.

the video you sent passes the seventh test. The creator ,Liam Urry, can be identified as a filmmaker because IMDB has a credit for him in a film. Additionally he has uploaded 572 onto his official film channel "Liam Urry Film" and identified the movie as a documentary, as you mentioned. Because of this I would agree and say that the film passes the test of being a short film and not just a YouTube video.

Obviously we need some distinction to separate a film from just a Youtube Video, otherwise I could upload a bunch of Youtube videos and titled them "572," "573" etc, I think the above test seems to give as fair but liberal definition of what a movie is.
 
There's so many shit 666, it's hard to pick
Shit peaked in June 6 2006, 1966 was too baked in cannabis and LSD to care, better luck in 2066 I guess.
Every movie with 666 in title was shit.

I hope kiwis pick a good one.
 
So at the present we're missing 661 and 662.

Once we get to 700 we'll have a little renascence of films based on checking IMDB
 
Back