A little input on rascism on college level, here in Europe.
I'd say rascism isn't really that present at a college level, mostly because it's just considered to be emotional and not rational, therefore not academic behaviour. Might be different in - let's say Russia - where openly gay scientists are discriminated against by the government interfering with law. I also heard some stories about some rascist professor, but that's a little bit OT.
What I do can say though is that there are some prejudices and expectations regarding some ethnicities and that's the closest thing you basically have regarding rascism. At my college we have something like a language school and I know some teachers pretty well to the point where they would tell me, which students perform well in language education and which don't. This is about people learning languages by some exchange program and not people picking it up at an early stage in life. I will say in advance, that this is sure as hell biased, since most of the languages taught are European languages.
Top tier, not too much trouble learning languages, usually not too much of an accent: Germanic roots (excluding Americans and English people, so German, Swedish, Danish, Dutch, etc.); Slavs (Polish, Czech, Russian, etc.);
Sometimes Top Tier, often below: Indians (although this one is a little bit controversial; they seem to pick it up easily, but most of them don't seem to be eager to learn languages. If they do, they usually excel, but they tend to have accents, which might lead to worse grading) and Chinese (probably attributed to their dictatorial politics, since only the best students are allowed to visit foreign countries. Even if you meet a competent Chinese it seems like they have to put a lot more effort into their education and their speaking level is usually worse than their level in writing. It's usually a hit or miss)
Problematic tier, usually sub-par skills, but many notable exceptions: Romance roots (French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, etc.), British people, maybe Australian, some Arabs, Turks. They do seem to grasp most language concepts, but then just stop learning. Pronounciation is usually off.
Shitty tier, usually feels like they don't want to learn languages: Americans, Canadians, Mexicans, South Americans, Japanese, Koreans, other East Asians, some Arabs, Africans (not too much data, collides with French due to colonialism and black people in Europe being generally French). These groups feature students, who study here in Europe and somehow think they can get away with not learning another language. And even if they do or if they're language students, they usually seem to be incredibily awful, whether it's incomprehensible pronounciation, unacceptable work ethic or just stupidity to the point, where they don't understand basic concepts like causality in languages.
So you have basically this food chain: Northern Europe + Russia -> Southern Europe + Britain + China and India -> North and South America + Rest of Asia + Arabs/Turks + Africa. This usually goes for all languages taught and it's also about work ethic. So why do I post this here in "race relations"? It also has to do a lot with perceived reliability. I study a natural science and I have the feeling that we also think of papers published with nearly the same ranking I just wrote: Northern European (including Brits) papers are yay, Southern European papers are nay. Asians are a mixed bag, Africans and South Americans are not present and Americans can be everything between "wow!" and "oh god no". So it's basically the same with Americans being considered to be random.
You get a different picture when it's about guiding students around the campus. I also have some experience with our international office and in general there is that same Northern and Southern European clash: Northern Europeans (includings Brits again) get all the things like flat, visa and enrollment done without much help needed, Southern Europeans tend to be really tedious, late and unreliable, same with South and North America.
Japanese are usually easy, but sometimes difficult to work with due to their shyness. Indians and Chinese are really clingy. Korean female students tend to be really obnoxious. Not too much data on African students.
Surprisingly positive image of Arabs though, even though interactions always seem distant due to completely different outlooks on the world. Appointments with Arabs suck though, since they don't seem to care about being on time.
What I do find interesting is the fact, that you rarely meet real Africans. Therefore there is little knowledge about how well they perform, but in reverse that also leads to us believing, that Africans just don't attend college. Same might be said about women from Muslim countries. With South and North Americans (and Australians) you just assume that they don't visit Europe though.
______________________________________________
tl;dr: Race relations seem to be not too present on a college level, but they are there!