Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 22.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 29.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 39 13.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 94 33.5%

  • Total voters
    281
"SWATTING IS A VIOLATION OF THE 4TH AMENDMENT" - BARNES. BRO THEY TOOK 1 WEEK TO INVESTIGATE THE CASE AND THEN THEY EXECUTED THE WARRANT. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? LMFAO
>The pastor swatted nick
:story:

If I didn't know that these people were dishonest grifting lawyers I would say they're just some legit 70 IQ retard. Their audience will eat it up though because they ARE the 70 IQ retards.
 
I think we need a Balldo subforum.

Legal mindset, Uncivil Law, and others are flailing. Barnes (who has served as @Null ’s lawyer) is trying to make this a second amendment case rather than realizing Nick curated his persona to sell to people.
Yeah, I had it all wrong. I thought Nick would never stream again after t his.

People in this thread and PPP were right. His social media activity and intent to stream plus the behavior of his remaining Balldoguards means this will continue to get more and more crazy for a long time to come.
 
I find it strange that this entire discussion is based on the premise that the mandatory report was the only reason for the search warrant. Yeah, if the mandatory report was the singular reason then that's fair, but why are they feverishly arguing under the assumption that there's nothing backing the warrant and that this is just a political hitjob against someone the local courts dislike?
It isn't particularly strange. They know as much as we do and they need to churn out videos for clout and shekels.
 
There's a lot we still don't know at this point but fact of the matter is Bro. Melin modt likely didn't know what would end up happening. He surely couldn't have predicted Nose would force his kids to experience a battering ram because of his coked up ODD. This might not have been the first time he's gone to the police with a report on the Rackets.
It's highly abnormal for a report like what we know of it so far to result in a "break the doors down" type warrant. They didn't request a warrant after pulling Balldo over, either, it was already in play.

Usually a report like what we see there would cause a CPS visit, premeditated and informed, so you get a chance to clean your act up. Something prevented that and instead resulted in a cops-out warrant being issued. So either they already knew something was fucky at the compound or there's more we don't know about.

Even most people who bitch about CPS haven't really had super bad experiences with them, it's like bitching about cops because you got a traffic ticket once. Annoying? Yes. Have they been involved in some serious shady shit at times? Also yes. Did it destroy you? No.

It's like bankruptcy - nobody expects to use it, nobody plans for it. These libertarian fucks assume they and theirs will never be in need and so the need doesn't exist. Some are out there no doubt saying the 16 year old should have just stepped up and taken over the family, in some kind of weird "I wish I was him" shit.

Everything is so fucked. Just don't let Nick take the easy way out and off himself, as that will destroy the kids; they'll never process it properly. Better he enjoy prison for 25 years than that.
 
My brother dared me to hit a 22 rifle round with a hammer in the garage. Age 10 maybe? it immediately went off, bounced off the wall and then whizzed back past us. Deafened and nearly fucking shot. Didn’t do it again.
Fucking identical and same age. Same ammo :biggrin: Just rock. Yeah you only need one time indeed to see your long hair be moved by a bullet not to do it another time.
 
why are they feverishly arguing under the assumption that there's nothing backing the warrant and that this is just a political hitjob against someone the local courts dislike?
Clout and money. Andrew clearly gets off on posturing as intelligent (by comparing himself to drama Youtubers and gossip forums; lol, lmao, lmfao) and he's raking in superchats.

It's virtually zero risk because even if the warrants come and invalidate everything he's saying, his faggy intellectual posturing will already write itself. "You guys were saying all of this without the warrant, but me, the smartest man alive, waited for the warrant before saying the same things you've all been saying for months! I am smarter than Acheeto!"
 
Summary of Legal Mindset's Judgment of Nick's Potential Defense (via Barnes)

>Barnes made a great argument but no one paid attention to it because it was streamed on Rumble.
>Barnes is so fast and smart no-one can understand his argument.

Barnes jumps around between amendments and arguments without organization. There was considerable overlap, I may have misplaced some comments.

Constitutional Defenses:
-Nick's defense should be based on the constitutionality of the search warrant and the arrest.

-1st amendment violation:
---Pastor's report should have only caused a wellness check, not a search warrant.
---Week delay in search is suspicious.
---Mandatory reporting is bad, because it removes pastor/therapist confidentiality.
---Barnes asserts that the raid was retaliation for Nick's criticism of Judge Fischer and the prosecutors.
---He also claims that Nick has previously exposed the local police for corruption.
---This was an opportunity to go after the county's biggest critic.

-2nd amendment violation:
---Why is there a gun charge? He should be allowed to own a gun, and it was in his bedroom not with the kids.
---Bail requirement of confiscating guns should be unconstitutional.
---Guns should only be taken if you use them while on drugs, not simply possessing them.
---The gun charge and the underlying law itself is unconstitutional.

-4th amendment violation:
---Drug testing violates the 4th amendment.
---Shouldn't be able to get a search warrant, remove the kids, remove guns, just because they found "something" in the search.
---A search based on an anonymous report, hearsay (the priest's report) should not be performed. It's the same thing as swatting.
---Search warrants should only be performed against drug dealers.

-5th amendment violation:
---The child neglect charges should be unconstitutional.
---Drugs should not be illegal, and parents should have the right to decide if drugs are around their kids.
---Having/using drugs around children is not harm by itself.
---No one witnessed anything bad happen to the kids except that the house was messy.

-6th amendment violation:
---The jail not allowing Nick to see his clients while he was under arrest is a violation of the right to an attorney.
---That Nick wasn't told immediately that April was released is a very bad look for the court.

-8th amendment violation:
---Confiscation of guns should not be a condition of bail, it's excessive and also violates 2nd amendment.
---Bail itself should be unconstitutional.

All of these arguments are essentially just cope. How libertarians wish the world was, how they wish the law was, and not how it actually is in reality. Essentially that the search and arrest was bad inherently because everything Nick is being charged with should be legal.
 
Yeah but Rekieta or whoever he hires as his lawyer could argue that.
"Did you get any other reports?"
"You battered this poor man's door based on ONE report by ONE person?"
"Have you ever heard of this great product for limp dicks called the bal-"
COUNTER: We don't have the full story. These lawtube fags are making arguments about the report being only the pastor when WE DON'T HAVE THE FULL CONTEXT OF THE REPORTING PROCESS. Child endangerment means CPS is getting involved and the kids might give testimony. Someone of the kids could have probably said something to the pastor. Making arguments without the full information is retarded.
 
Last edited:
I think we need a Balldo subforum.

Legal mindset, Uncivil Law, and others are flailing. Barnes (who has served as @Null ’s lawyer) is trying to make this a second amendment case rather than realizing Nick curated his persona to sell to people.
Worst idea ever. Subforums have proven almost always a bad decision because once the drama subsides you are left with a total mess of dead threads. This can all just stay in Da Sektur or Grift Wars

COUNTER: We don't have the full story. These lawtube fags are making arguments about the report being only the pastor when WE DON'T HAVE THE FULL CONTEXT OF THE REPORTING PROCESS. Child endangerment means CPS is getting involved and the kids might give testimony. Someone of the kids could have probably something to the pastor. Making arguments without the full information is retarded.
Yep - the pastor thing is based off literally one sentence from the incident report and that other document has almost no detail. They are just running with tiny bits of information and it's annoying as fuck


How the fuck is lawtube, specifically barnes and mindset, making legal determinations about how this has never happened to first time drug offenders.
Do they know more about this than anyone else? I wonder if they'll eat humble pie if it turns out it was a rekieta kid that went to the pastor.
They are just running with the assumption that it was just the word of the pastor - if that's true then what happened to Nick is irregular. But they don't know it's true and it's speculation with barely any foundation
 

"30% are like they were literally in the room" - Aaron talking about me. I have always been the one to spread truth in the sektor under various names and tip offs.

I have Heterochromia. The blue eye sees past, present, and future. I can literally be there in the room watching. I am an aspect of God just like I told Cog and even the Casino laughed at it. Cog got doxxed because I willed it. I show mercy to the Casino because they are funny and it serves my purpose, for now...

Ask Ralph about Liminal Heaven. I have already told him how its going to end. He is desperately struggling like a flailing man in quicksand. The reason I was successful with the Lester Johnson meme was because I knew the exact time and moment he would accidentally show his screen. I also told Nick how it would all end for him. He has done his best to avoid his fate to spite me.
 
Andrew to Kiwi Farms: "Go make a thread that defeats the fourth amendment arguments!"

Nigga, we're a gossip forum. We get it, you're a super duper smart boy because you have a legal degree. We're not the obelisk through which you will process your intellectual insecurity complex.

No one is impressed that a lawyer can argue law better than non-lawyers.
I don't have to be a lawyer to see the flaws in his own assumptions. For example, he's saying it's a violation that April didn't get to talk to Nick (her attorney) before talking/release, but that's presuming she asked for him as an attorney. Usually the side-piece isn't as well trained as the bottom bitch.

All these hanger-on's are so boring and slow to get to the right questions even if they weren't noseguarding while pretending not to. It's easy to see why Nick is/was their pope. I wish there was an old-nick to cover new-nick.
 
How the fuck is lawtube, specifically barnes and mindset, making legal determinations about how this has never happened to first time drug offenders.
Do they know more about this than anyone else? I wonder if they'll eat humble pie if it turns out it was a rekieta kid that went to the pastor.
Please understand, Andrew is retarded and never went to practice criminal law, and the other one is retarded doing hypothesis constitution deprivation of an induvidual

they forgot that they should analyze a criminal case and they are doing nothing but sophistry
 
1716823970928.png
LEGAL MINDSET
LEGAL MINDSET
LEGAL MINDSET

LEGAL DICK SUCKER MORE LIKE
 
Last edited:
Yeah it matters for the criminal case, but all of them acting like it could be unconstitutional is literally based on nothing because none of them have seen the cause for the warrant. It's fucking retarded that they keep talking about it.
Yeah, they're basically hoping it's a bad warrant. They have no proof it is.

To me, it seems reasonable to presume the warrant is good until proven otherwise. The courts will sort it out if the warrant is bad.

I dunno why Andrew is on this shit. If it weren't for the fact he's distanced himself from Nick, I'd call him a balldoguard. Maybe he still is to some extent.

Andrew to Kiwi Farms: "Go make a thread that defeats the fourth amendment arguments!"
Did he really say that? What a fag!

What fourth amendment argument? How do you know Nick's fourth amendment was violated? The fourth amendment requires a warrant to search Nick's house. We get that. They had one. How do you know the warrant is bad?

WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO MAKE A THREAD ON ANDREW?!

"SWATTING IS A VIOLATION OF THE 4TH AMENDMENT" - BARNES. BRO THEY TOOK 1 WEEK TO INVESTIGATE THE CASE AND THEN THEY EXECUTED THE WARRANT. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? LMFAO
Is anybody else here thinking there might have been a good reason why Barnes was tossed off the Rittenhouse case?

Like maybe Kyle would be in prison right now if he weren't.
 
COUNTER: We don't have the full story. These lawtube fags are making arguments about the report being only the pastor when WE DON'T HAVE THE FULL CONTEXT OF THE REPORTING PROCESS. Child endangerment means CPS is getting involved and the kids might give testimony. Someone of the kids could have probably something to the pastor. Making arguments without the full information is retarded.
Oh but we do have the full story stalker child, are you forgetting that the evil government is TARGETTING this Christian family man?
That's why they greenlit the search warrant with ONLY the pastor's report and it also explains the 6 day delay.

>Police gets the report
>They immediately text Biden
>Mr. President we finally got him
>Biden being Biden takes a whole 6 days to respond cause he's sleepy
>Knock knock Rekieta


Why can't you loser KF prudes see the obvious illuminati conspiracy!? It's all there!
 
Back