Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 22.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 29.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 39 13.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 94 33.5%

  • Total voters
    281
-4th amendment violation:
---Drug testing violates the 4th amendment.
Don't know much about this, so I won't comment.
---Shouldn't be able to get a search warrant, remove the kids, remove guns, just because they found "something" in the search.
The problem is they didn't just find "something". They found multiple illegal drugs and Balldo had guns along with them while his kids were around. It's perfectly valid to remove the guns and kids when this dude and his wife are cokeheads.
---A search based on an anonymous report, hearsay (the priest's report) should not be performed. It's the same thing as swatting.
It isn't the same thing as swatting. Swatting is when the police go to a person's house with a SWAT team WITHOUT a valid search warrant. This is different, the police had a search warrant and investigated the pastor's report a week before executing the warrant. Also, we don't have the full context of the reporting process (i.e. one of the kids talking to the pastor, a member of the church saying it to the pastor etc) this argument can't be made without knowing the full context of what happened.
---Search warrants should only be performed against drug dealers.
Lollibertarian argument not worth addressing.
-6th amendment violation:
---The jail not allowing Nick to see his clients while he was under arrest is a violation of the right to an attorney.
Of course they wouldn't allow him to see his clients, they are codefendants which has a MASSIVE conflict of interest.
---That Nick wasn't told immediately that April was released is a very bad look for the court.
That's a fair point by what does it have to do with the 6th amendment? The 6th amendment is about rights given to defendants during trials (right to a speedy trial, right to legal representation, right to be aware of the criminal charges, right to confront witnesses during the trial, right to have witnesses appear in the trial).
 
I think some pushback is needed on one aspect of the consensus of this thread: Why do you all expect the lawyers to moralfag about this? Analyzing the legal aspects of cases like this, including any potential defenses even if they are far fetched, is the entire reason lawtube came into existence. It is the only reason any of us should be paying attention to them. Wanting them to do kino casino style streams on this topic is retarded.
 
A true and honesty story telling man.



I believe Nick was fucking this faggots unsatisfied wife, and that he is very creepy and obsessed with risottos leathery slag, but fatty brings it up after this, all these stories are just how hes the hero and has good sex and his cock is 12ft long... none of these texts will ever appear, nothing will get proven, hes a lying little sad faggot and i kind of hope he gets montygraphed into silence and returns to obscurity
 
all the schizo rrats are true!!

schizorrats.png
 
Of course they wouldn't allow him to see his clients, they are codefendants which has a MASSIVE conflict of interest.
To play devil's advocate, doesn't the conflict of interest decision fall on the presiding judge? Prosecution would have no reason to tell Nick not to do this, nor would an impartial arbiter.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
A true and honesty story telling man.

View attachment 6026555

I believe Nick was fucking this faggots unsatisfied wife, and that he is very creepy and obsessed with risottos leathery slag, but fatty brings it up after this, all these stories are just how hes the hero and has good sex and his cock is 12ft long... none of these texts will ever appear, nothing will get proven, hes a lying little sad faggot and i kind of hope he gets montygraphed into silence and returns to obscurity
I brought this up in Aaron's thread, but a few weeks ago his crippled co-host was crying over bing made fun of by Mersh superchats, and instead of helping his friend- or just not reading the fucking superchat- he made a point to read every one and have his friend, some poor normie cocksucker just trying to help his pal with "his radio show", sit there and react to it.

Steel Toe is already a disgusting little weasel, but now he's publicly been cucked? You bet your life he's taking advantage of the headstart he has on any of the rest of them being able to talk and try to make himself look as good as possible. Old school radio shit!
 
All of these arguments are essentially just cope.
If Barnes legit tried to make some of these arguments I've lost a ton of respect for him.
The only ones I agree with are the 2A ones.
Fucking lolbertarians make me sick.
You're not "only affecting yourself" when you have five fucking kids you're responsible for.

When you have kids a decent person should make those kids their priority until they are 18.
If you can't do that don't have kids.
When you become a parent you are not only responsible for yourself anymore.
These fucking people make me sick.
 
"If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell."

If you're arguing at your arraignment that cash bail for unconditional release when facing felony charges is unconstitutional, you're pounding the table and yelling like hell.

If your cunning plan for a pre-trial hearing involves asking a rural county court judge (whose vagina you rant about at length) to overturn SCOTUS precedent on multiple BoR amendments, you've smashed the table to pieces and have screamed so much as to flay your vocal cords alive.

I really, REALLY hope Nick follows the incredible advice Barnes is offering here. Maybe he'll even tell the court about how it's all a big conspiracy to shut him up, masterminded by the most notorious, evil institution of all: the Kandiyohi County Sheriff's Office.
 
I think some pushback is needed on one aspect of the consensus of this thread: Why do you all expect the lawyers to moralfag about this?
Because too many of them are moralfagging about us laughing at a retard on the internet get smacked by a legal case instead of Nick - who made his living laughing at retards on the internet getting smacked by legal cases...
 
Back