Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.5%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.4%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 47 15.5%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 104 34.3%
  • Total voters
    303
Dan of Steel said:
Nick is allegedly "coping" "attacking" saying that it's all bullshit and the person reported has "animus" against him.
COPE AND SNEED YOU CHILD ABUSING JUNKIE QUEER.
Click to expand...
Unless said people planted coke in his house, prevented his kids from eating, etc, its irrelevant. If someone did have animus against him then they struck gold. If he wasn't a bad dad then nothing would have happened as a result of the police visit and warrant search.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Young_Griff, Procrastinhater, parsnip and 5 others
Particle Bored said:
Total armaments:
-Sig Sauer .380 handgun
-Sig Sauer AR
-Remington 870 12ga shotgun
-Spingfield Armory .45 1911 (bigshot interweb law commentator could afford Dan Wessons and he got an SA? Lol)

That's it? Acres of land to play with, and this is all big shot libertarian has got? I've got way less money, way less space, way less "freedom" to use them, and way less "reputation" as a freedom-loving anti-government libertarian to maintain and I've got... Well I've got more than that.

Shamefu dispray.

(All for the best, I supposed)
Click to expand...
He doesn't even have a bolt action. No 308. No revolvers either, nice ones like I'd expect like a Colt Python. Fucking pussy.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: make_it_so, Procrastinhater, Justa Grata Honoria and 4 others
Onni Kalsarikännit said:
Doubling down, you say?

View attachment 6029560
link

View attachment 6029562
link

View attachment 6029566
link

View attachment 6029572
link

View attachment 6029579
View attachment 6029580
link / link

Can't get the archives to work atm. Please, anybody, feel free to archive.
Click to expand...
someone send this fucker a constitutionally valid medallion

he's only looking at each part by itself, the warrant was issued for probable cause with four or five different sources, any two of which would have been probable cause.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Haloperidol, Procrastinhater and Birdbonks
"Talkin bout probable cause? Y'all Constitutional experts? Y'all know about the law? Well I'd like to hear about it Kiwi prudes.

When the grift breaks down, we break down. And I ain't gonna allow that." - Sgt Robert Barnes, Esq.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Dan of Steel said:
Nick is allegedly "coping" "attacking" saying that it's all bullshit and the person reported has "animus" against him.
COPE AND SNEED YOU CHILD ABUSING JUNKIE QUEER.
Click to expand...
this might well be true, i don't doubt that there are people in his community who have a bone to pick with him
but again, this would only be a convincing argument if the cops had come out empty handed, with nothing to show but empty whiskey bottles and a dirty house.
however that's not what happened. he actually had large quantities of multiple hard drugs along with firearms. at this point it doesn't matter if the people who ratted on him were driven by malicious intent rather than genuine concern, because they turned out to be right either way.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Associate Rick, Scarface1, St. Alia of the Knife and 5 others
footballteam said:
It's simple - if you are to drunk or high to function - then you are not a responsible parent.
Click to expand...
It's interesting how normal people figure this out without knowing they figured it out. It's just a natural progression. I'll give you an example.

How many times have you had this exact conversation:

You're talking to a friend about your shared or parallel early adulthood debauchery, be it senior year of high school, your college or university years, or your first years out on your own, and one or both of you say "yeah, but then I had a kid/started having kids/got married and had kids/now I've got a kid/s and I just don't have time for any of that anymore."

I wouldn't have enough fingers and toes to count the number of times I've had this conversation even if I took my shoes and socks off, and that's because, on a core level, without even really thinking about it, every responsible adult out there knows that when you have a child to take care of, it's time to buckle down and get serious. There's simply no more time for getting blackout blasted out of your gourd on uppers and booze.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Magic Mirror, Sir Yarnsalot, Qonas and 9 others
Andrew today: "We're evidence based here, and I never apologize for being evidence based!"
Andrew yesterday: "Make a thread to defeat the 4th amendment arguments, Kiwi Farms!"

Ah yes, those evidence based 4th amendment arguments from yesterday. The grifts keep coming and they don't stop coming.

EDIT: "It's on the record that Aaron Imholte cannot make his wife orgasm!" Please die immediately.

Jose Cuervo said:
Funny how all the cope hardly mentions the kids.

These people don’t have any concept whatsoever of common sense or empathy.
Click to expand...
The cope that does mention them is blaming them for their millionaire parents neglecting them.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Not Even Twice, Associate Rick, mitro and 8 others
footballteam said:
I hate these fuckheads who whine about how the kids are perfectly safe when their parents are doing lines of coke out of each other's assholes.

It's simple - if you are to drunk or high to function - then you are not a responsible parent.

If there is a fire in the house - how is Drunkieta going to get his kids out of the house when he is to strung out that he cant barely function? This is the problem with the "coke doesn't hurt kids" argument. This is also why the government decided that having hard drugs around kids is a inherent danger to them regardless to the fact if they have access to them or not.

View attachment 6029675
Click to expand...
Dax really thinks cocaine powder just grows out of the ground? I suppose this is the same tard that supports pedophilia so what am I to think. Since he loves natural things I'm sure he wouldn't mind swallowing a whole load of cyanide, after all it's nice healthy apple seeds.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: makeup, AmateurComedicTaxidermist, indomitable snowman and 9 others
LiquidChrisRespecter said:
"Imagine not being self sufficient when you can walk and talk"
Click to expand...
its funny seeing them try to alog nicks kids instead of admitting the lord balldo messed up, because forbid boomers have to realize their lolbert fantasies arent real and that they ruined civilization with their self serving idealistic bullshit. the young must starve so one particular generation can have it all
Harm said:
Ah yes, those evidence based 4th amendment arguments from yesterday. The grifts keep coming and they don't stop coming.
Click to expand...
you forgot the old legal adage. evidence for thee but nay for me
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: makeup, Crinoids, Procrastinhater and 3 others
Harm said:
Andrew today: "We're evidence based here, and I never apologize for being evidence based!"
Andrew yesterday: "Make a thread to defeat the 4th amendment arguments, Kiwi Farms!"
Click to expand...
Which one's this? I can only think of Branca for that name and doesn't sound like him.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back