LOGOS and Lolz
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2024
Once again that's complete nonsense. He's not defending Barnes he's simply reacting to/discussing his constitutional points right after Nick was arrested. Legal Mindset wasn't saying the warrant was unconstitutional at all, he was simply talking about things that could POTENTIALLY make it unconstitutional if those things were revealed when more information is available. As soon as more information became available he backed the warrant even more. You don't seem to understand lawtubers, especially Legal Mindset. He simply discusses the objective legal arguments both for and AGAINST a case. So any legal point he may bring up against Nick's case isn't him defending him, except in the most basic technical legal sense. But from the moment he talked about Nick's arrest he's hardly brought up any legal points against the case, as there are very few, and he's condemned both Nick and noseguards. You're being gung-ho about the truth, I'm just objectively pointing out facts. Anyone who watches Legal Mindset's first stream about Nick's arrest and think he's noseguarding is literally insane.He’s talking about the time early in Legal Mindset’s “Nick’s best defense” stream where he claimed PPP was using strawman arguments while talking to Potentially Criminal during the stream with Aaron and Sean.
In the discussion when the topic of Nick being arrested as part of a conspiracy, PPP retorts with “Is Nick OJ Simpson?!” To which Legal Mindset pauses and says that’s irrelevant, not realizing that PPP was making a point about how stupid it is to think that the government would bother trying to take down Nick Rekieta of all people.
Mindset has gone out of his way to avoid that mentioning stream because it was entirely him defending Barnes and backing up the “it’s unconstitutional” claims. I’m not sure why this guy is so gung-ho about it, but he’s a new user so I’m very skeptical of him