New Chairman and general secretary of the Finnish communist youth.
The girl on the right do be looking kinda fine but she should wear her hair short rather than not at all. Her baldness makes me think I'm looking at a baby doll half the time. Also, this faggot can go fuck himself:
You don't look
Nordic, you look like a FUCKING LESBIAN. I've seen other Finns, professors even, with this haircut too, and the first word that always comes to mind is "dyke". It's embarassing. Someone should tell them to "take a hint, hintti" and shave it off.
What it boils down to, is that communism is the politicization of envy, so no wonder ugly people are drawn to it. Have you ever seen a beautiful or handsome communist? I'm not talking about some half a century old picture of Che, but as in real life. Or hell, the Farms.
Largely you are correct. Those who become communist or socialist aren't always envious, but those who stay so often are. As an aside, I hope Satre is choking on shit in Hell. Neitzsche was also utterly pathetic but at least he had some neat observations and ideas. Satre has had nothing of the sort insofar as I've tolerated his words. Physiognomy is the Alex Jones of pseudosciences: it's right more often than you'd think.
Did they find the ugliest people in all of Scandinavia for these positions?
Yes. Yes they did. Even to a Finn, these people are
remarkably ugly.
Even if their leaders want to build a cool and hip fashy roman/sparta style empire, I don't like it, because what makes our species superior is the ability to love in a Christian sense, not merely behave like animals.
You are in your right to not like it. However, in my opinion, this "loving in a Christian sense" is a large part of what got us in the mess we are in today. We got so used to hugging, we forgot how to push. We got so used to peace, we forgot how to fight. We know how to shake hands more than throw them. I have my own problems with fascists and national socialists. But they are correct in that in the coming decades Europeans must confirm in parliament or in the streets, that this is their house; as, if they don't, it simply won't be anymore. There is a time for love. It is not now.
I don't think I have gotten any smarter or become convinced in the world revolution, but I have noticed a common theme in all of them: They depict fascists (or patriots in general) as retarded incompetent bumbling idiot inbred redneck boneheads...but also simultaneously just about to take over the world, or already controlling it, depending on the author. Schrödingers Fascist if you will. I wonder how antifascists live with this glaring ideological contradiction. Then again, that is why communist memes are always so full of text, while patriotism is simple to understand and almost instinctive, communism is so incoherent and full of contradictions you need complex ideological weltanschauung to not get short circuited. A bit like commies shill for brown nationalism and put the most backward people on pedestal.
Modern leftism has always been full of contradictions. One perspective I've heard, and agree with, is that this is intentional. The ideology is not meant to be correct or coherent, it is meant to humiliate its followers into subjugation, as a flex of power. Patriotism on the other hand is simple because it is instinctive. Just as one feels loyalty to their family, they feel loyalty to their nation and their people. Leftists also have the apparent contradiction that they must criticize rightists but never embed themselves in them and learn their ideology for fear of being tainted. If they did, they might actually have something to say.
Maybe they should. Maybe with less chauvinist undertones, I don't know. There are many gatherings, often religious, where naturally, almost exclusively whites are present, without needing to treat any outliers with suspicion or contempt.
You are right to worry but should keep in mind the chauvinism is expected and, to a degree, necessary. A sick society is like a sick body. To purge the sickness, a revolution will sweep over the society as a fever sweeps over the body. The chauvinism is the heat of that fever. It is right that it should be hot, to force the necessary change. But it can burn too hot, and irreversibly cripple the society it seeks to save. In this sense, there must be a balance.
Another thing to keep in mind with chauvinists is that they are always romantics. Their energy comes from an intense infatuation with what they propagate. Their affair is a deep love. It is nothing but vigor and emotion, desperately possessed by the beauty of a dream. If one is a patriot, this dream is of their nation's great future. Their love is of the fatherland. Their infatuation is with the culture around them. Their heart obligates a duty to their heritage and to their people.
This emotion is vital, but one should beware of where it goes. Such feelings are right for the artist, someone whose trade is in feeling and sensation, whose work gives the life and identity of the nation. But it is heinously perverse for those who make policy, who govern and rule. Ones desires and goals
can be the nation, the people and their betterment, just like the romantic, but to
actually deliver this requires a pragmatist. When the tribe and fatherland's future becomes a tactical question, realpolitik is the
only politik. Mannerheim knew this. Being romantic when one should be pragmatic is a common trap of this sort of thinking. Something strongly present in the errors Orwell points out in his "Notes on Nationalism" (his 'nationalism' is more accurately 'chauvinism').
This is also my main criticism of Nazism. The Nazis were romantics. Their suits. Their films. Their iconography. Their art and architecture. It is all a bonfire of passion for Germany and the German people - capturing the eyes, alluring the heart, grasping the soul. Hitler himself was an artist, deeply in love with Germany. But then the Nazi dream became state policy, and as a result of the expected dysfunction, what would've been Germany's finest hour became it's last. As an aside, another criticism of Nazism, specifically of Hitler, would be to not make your teenage dreams into your political ambition. If you read Kubizek's "The Young Hitler I Knew" you'd see that Hitler was more consistent than he was antisemitic.
I get that it's French, but whenever I hear this name I think of "git gud" à la Dark Souls lol. They should be yelling "git gud noob!" when they jump someone lmao.