Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
In a situation where authorities need to verify if a child had been exposed to a substance, do you really expect the lab technicians to be stupid and careless enough to mistake one hair sample for another? This isn't combing through the house for loose hairs that are presumed to be of the child. These were cut and sampled directly from her head. Further, for such a test to be performed there had to be reason. Nick has admitted in the past his child has violent outbursts and night terrors, antisocial behaviors. The police most certainly noticed more in examining the children directly and gave reason to test them for exposure.

Nick is a degenerate sex obsessed ghoul who has been making disgusting sexual remarks towards underaged characters and even his own children with increasing frequency over the last year and a half. His company consists of Dax 'Juju' Herrera, a self admitted pedophile drug pusher, Vito, a self admitted pedophile, Ralph, a pedophile sympathizer. It is not an outlandish conjecture to suggest that Nick's "favorite daughter" whom is in the ideal age range for the aforementioned freaks was being groomed with drugs. This has happened many times in the past in abusive households. Many victims of molestation report being plied with drugs and alcohol from an early age.

I highly doubt the cops just 'mixed up' hair samples and it just so happened the daughter exhibiting signs of psychological trauma tested positive.
He's not sweeping for Nick, you're so blangry that you're drawing unreasonable inferences against him. Labs fuck up pretty commonly, unfortunately. You probably watch too much TV and think the cops are way better at their jobs than they are.
 
Tell me how does this guy get an "unjust sentence"?
Nick is claiming some of the things are not true and correct procedures were not followed. If he’s right and gets slapped with the wrong sentence as a result it is unjust.

It’s why you don’t want court documents to leak and why you want them to be correct and not inflated or wrong

You don’t want fucked up individuals to be vindicated in saying you were lying and messing things up
 
Last edited:
About three months.
Is it possible it could have stayed since January? Does any cocaine test go back that far? There's speculation in this post that Nick's "worst day ever" where he had to sit with a child for multiple days while they recovered was an OD.


Nick's worst-day-ever has been a big question for half a year now.

cocaine on the other hand is a very different substance and is turned into very different waste products in the body.
yes, which is why i differentiate between the two and explicitly write the words "cocaine is not the same". My concern, which has already been dispelled by Dyn, was that there were similar relationships between Cocaine and legal Rx which could pose the same problem to a test.
 
The most plausible scenario where the kid wasn't using cocaine is that the lab techs just completely shat their pants and and mixed up her paperwork with a crackhead's somehow.
Maybe this is a stupid question but what about the scenario where their house is so filthy and Rekieta has so much cocaine lying around that the kid just got some coke in their hair by being surrounded by filth and not bathing?
 
A curse like the Sonichu curse only works if you give in. You CAN pull up. You don't HAVE to give your kids coke. But it certainly makes it easier.
It's more interesting if it's retrocausal: receiving the curse causes you to have always been the kind of person who would destroy their own life in the worst way possible. Amusingly this describes the life history of Ralph, Chris and Nick.
 
I really hope it's not the case. I pray it's not. The situation is already horrific enough as it is. I'm not gonna jump to conclusions yet till some sort of evidence comes out, because it's a pretty damning statement to make.
It's still to early to definitively say what was happening with his daughter, but the company Nick keeps coupled with his own wildly shifting sexual interests does not paint a pretty picture. There was a very good post some pages back speculating that Kayla became the pilled out living corpse she is now because she could not cope with her failure as a mother to protect her children. You and I would rationally see a situation like that and either fix it or at the very least kill ourselves out of shame, a narcissist cannot do that so she settled for a state of non-sentience, stuck in bed watching television with a Soma IV drip waiting for death.

We can be generous and assume Nick was totally oblivious to his "favorite daughter" getting lethally high on his drug stash. We can be generous in assuming that Nick intended no malice when he gave specifically only one of his children, his daughter specifically, drugs. Maybe it was FUNNY and WEIRD to get her high near a point of overdose.

Or we can be realistic. We know the company he keeps willingly and defends. Dax 'Juju' has a history of grooming and sex trafficking at least one woman that we know about with Mint Salad. A full grown woman, developmentally handicapped with the mind of a child. How is she placated? Her midget pig pimp Riley feeds her drugs and alcohol.

It is not a wild leap nor even unlikely scenario that Nick was preparing to or doing the same thing to his singled out favorite child that his pedophile drug pusher friends laude and praise as the apex of freedom and expression. This is the same sociopathic fuck that spent months and months waxing poetic about American Beauty and how he related to the main character.
 
Is it possible it could have stayed since January? Does any cocaine test go back that far? There's speculation in this post that Nick's "worst day ever" where he had to sit with a child for multiple days while they recovered was an OD.


Nick's worst-day-ever has been a big question for half a year now.
The 5 minutes of googling I did said the test goes back 90 days.
 
Yeah, if they were drugging her to molest her she'd pop for the ketamine. K holing somebody would actually be an effective date rape drug (for lack of a better term) as opposed to making them MORE alert and active.
Remember what Aaron said about how they would balance coke and ketamine to get out of the khole?
 
I agree with you, but also knowing addicts the way I do, I am 100% certain the children have witnessed the parents snorting.

For the normies: if your parents smoked cigarettes, how old were you the first time you put one in your mouth? If they drank beer, how old were you when you first tried to sip it? Probably younger than 9, right?
Nine, the summer before I started 5th grade. I stole cigarettes from one of my dad's packs and snuck out to the woods to try to smoke. I also remember sneaking to taste booze for the first time that summer, along with two friends the same age. My parents weren't drinkers, but had a bar in the house. Those bottles had been easily accessible to me my entire childhood and I never cared, but for some reason when I was nine I suddenly curious enough to want to sneak a taste of it.

A nine year old watching her parents life revolve around snorting coke would have been incredibly curious about the substance and wanted to at least try it to find out what all the fuss was about. It's possible she might have snorted it, but far more likely she just dipped her finger in it and licked it up.

I think the older kids, given the church participation and maturity level, would have been anti-drug and not been as tempted to try it. More likely they would have been angry about their parents using it. Usually kids 12 and up get angry about parental substance abuse and become very anti-drug at least for a few years, if not forever. The nine year old, and younger ones, would have been the most susceptible to trying it due to curiosity and still naively wanting to imitate her parents.

I'd also bet Nick has had "rational discussions" about "responsible drug" with his children because he would have been enraged at other adults implying Dad might be doing "bad stuff" by taking drugs.
 
Yes, easily.

About three months.
Thats within the time frame that Rekieta got noticeably more fucked up, the nanny was gone, it likely the house situation got extremely chaotic over the past 3 months leading up to the cops raiding Casa del Balldo.
If Aaron is telling the truth about how careless Nick could be with his "bullet" I'm wondering if the thing slipped out of his pocket and the 8 year old (the one he said they have the most problems with) sneaked some of his coke out of it and tried it.
With how fucked Nick has been I wouldn't be surprised if his kids had caught him getting high before. Kids aren't stupid.

I mean whether its a case of she snagged a load out of his stash once or she's repeatedly been getting high its still fucked up. I just hope for the kids sake it is just a case of a one time thing and she just took a load and thats why its such a high amount.
This is so fucked up. I like dark comedy but this is a bit much.
 
I guess it could be possible, hair tests vary massively from person to person in how much and how long they retain the metabolites.

I wouldn't think it's likely, though.
Is it in the hair itself or in the follicles near the scalp? Girls have pretty long hair, maybe the section with the coke in it never got trimmed off.
 
There was a very good post some pages back speculating that Kayla became the pilled out living corpse she is now because she could not cope with her failure as a mother to protect her children.
Ah now I feel bad about deleting it. I thought I was just way off in factless speculating the most horrid situation possible based on pretty circumstantial evidence.
But has anyone given a reason why Kayla seemed to go so hard so quick into drugs, resulting in a very quick collapse of a clean, stable healthy home life for all her children. Like Nick has been a deadbeat druggo for about a year now? Longer? But the home life of the dirty kids, cluttered home, kids not going to school or being fed is very recent and just a 6 months-3 months-ish development. Did Kayla just slide into full blown addiction then or did she find out about a molestation (if it even happended) and just give up mentally.
 
Again, you're a literal retard, you lack the ability to form an hypothetical theory of how someone else would act according to their past behaviour and character.
Nick’s past behaviour would suggest that he’d focus on his kids so much to the detriment of everything else. His job, his health etc and would in fact try to maintain the balance he had even if it was going to blow up in his face.

Which is why I’ve also said his last ounce of sense must have been gone by that point. Because that seems to be when he started neglecting his kids.
 
Is it possible it could have stayed since January?
This testing is about the presence of metabolites, so yes. The results presented indicate a continued substance presence, which means even if it was January that was the focal point (the worst day), that means it (likely) continued after that.

Schizo time: he started feeding her cocaine on purpose, so she doesn't get into withdrawals at an inopportune time.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back